Questions & Replies: Question & Replies No 1976 to 2000
2009-11-25
Search this file by selecting Ctrl + F on your keyboard
[PMG note: Replies are inserted as soon as they are provided by the Minister]
QUESTION NO: 2000
DATE SUBMITTED:
MS LD MAZIBUKO (DA) TO ASK THE MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
For each of the years of 2008/09 and 2009/10, up to the latest specified date:
(1) What total amount in respect of advertising has the department and all specified entities reporting to the department/minister (a) budgeted for and (b) actually spent?
(2) For the department and each entity reporting to the department, (a) what was the total number of advertisements that (i) appeared in the print media, and (ii) was broadcast on (a) radio and (bb) television, (b) how much did each advertisement cost and (c) what was the purpose of each advertisement?
REPLY
(a) BUDGET | (b) ACTUAL COSTS | |
2008/2009 | R6,925,000.00 | R2,968,306.16 |
2009/2010 | R4,230,000.00 | R1,228,602.21 |
(a)(i) The total number of advertisements in the print media
DATE ADVERTISED | (a)(i) NUMBER OF POSTS | (b) COST | (c) PURPOSE |
2008/06/08 | 177 | R1,262,324.28 | SMS, scarce skill and various posts |
2008/07/13 | 4 | R66,727.96 | Various posts for Custodian and Closed/Specialized Occupations |
2008/09/13 | 12 | R60,955.00 | Parole Board posts (Three [3] Regions: LMN, Gauteng and KZN) |
2008/11/09 | 8 | R136,466.21 | Various posts for Custodian and Closed/Specialized Occupations |
2009/01/11 | 1 | R24,987.60 | Audit Member Committee |
2009/01/18 | 352 | R381,327.26 | SMS, scarce skill and various posts |
2009/03/22 | 507 | R1,035,517.85 | Control Room Supervisor and Operator posts |
2009/05/29 | 3 | R90,898.00 | SMS posts |
2009/05/03 | 15 | R47,824.81 | Additional Community Member posts |
2009/06/09 | 270 | R924,296.68 | Scarce skill and various posts |
2009/09/13 | 20 | R165,582.72 | SMS and various posts (New Correctional Centre: Kimberley) |
TOTAL | 1369 | R4,196,909.00 |
In terms of (ii)(a) and (bb) a zero costing is reported.
Question 2
2008/2009
(i) Sixty (60) advertisements appeared in the print media. (For purpose of inviting prospective suppliers)
(ii) Four (4) advertisements appeared in the print media. (For purpose of bid invitations)
(iii) Three (3) advertisements appeared in the print media. (For purpose of advertising of national choir competition, advertising of national corrections week and article on corrections week at Rooigrond Management Area)
2009/2010
(i) Sixty (60) advertisements appeared in the print media. (For purpose of inviting prospective suppliers)
(ii) One (1) advertisement appeared in the print media. (For purpose of bid invitations)
(iii) One (1) advertisement appeared in the print media. (For purpose of report on national corrections week at Rooigrond Management Area)
(ii) was broadcast on
(ii) (a) radio and
2008/2009
None for Supply Chain Management.
2009/2010
None for Supply Chain Management.
(ii) (bb) television,
2008/2009
None for Supply Chain Management.
2009/2010
None for Supply Chain Management.
(b) 2008/2009
(i) R 84 033-37 for the total number of 60 advertisements. (For purpose of inviting prospective suppliers)
(ii) For purpose of inviting bid invitations:
- R 19 104-94: Outsourcing of the Chief Financial Officer function.
- R 24 283-00: Rendering of forensic audits.
- R 685-00: Collection of waste food at Potchefstroom Correctional Centre.
- R 2 205-00: Collection of waste food at Wolmaransstad Correctional Centre.
- R 17 000-00: Advertising of national choir competition at Rooigrond Management Area.
- R 9 000-00: Advertising of national corrections week at Rooigrond Management Area.
- R 6 838-29: Article on corrections week at Rooigrond Management Area.
2009/2010
(i) R 80 308-00 for the total number of 60 advertisements. (For purpose of inviting prospective suppliers)
(ii) For purpose of inviting bid invitations:
- R 834-00: Collection of waste food at Wolmaransstad Correctional Centre.
- R 11 500-00: Report on national corrections week at Rooigrond Management Area.
(c) For purpose of inviting prospective suppliers:
The purpose of these advertisements was to, in accordance with National Treasury's Practice Note number SCM 8 of 2007/2008, to invite prospective suppliers at least annually through local representative newspapers to apply for listing as prospective suppliers (for procurement by means of price quotations) at the individual Procurement Units within the Department of Correctional Services.
(i) For purpose of inviting bid invitations:
- To provide optimum exposure to the requirement of the Department for the outsourcing of the Chief Financial Officer function for a three-year period.
- To provide optimum exposure to the requirement of the Department for the establishment of a list of approved service providers for a two-year period for rendering of forensic audits.
- To provide optimum exposure to the requirement of the Department for Collection of waste food at Potchefstroom and Wolmaransstad Correctional Centres.
- To provide optimum exposure to the requirement of the Department for advertising of national choir competition at Rooigrond Management Area.
- To provide optimum exposure to the requirement of the Department for advertising of national corrections week at Rooigrond Management Area.
- To provide optimum exposure to the article on corrections week at Rooigrond Management Area.
- Report on national corrections week at Rooigrond Management Area.
Communications: The Communications' Chief Directorate does budget for adverts/advertorials as an integral part of key campaigns outlined in the corporate calendar. The objectives broadly are to enhance awareness, understanding and participation of stakeholders in the delivery of Correctional Services. It should be appreciated that the paid for media space and time is just one part of a broader media plan and most of the space secure is unpaid for. Taking into cognisance that communication is a support function the costs of advertising are in a number of respects borne by the core business branches, for an example: Operation Vala, Corrections Week and Corrections Excellence Awards. In total Communications had budgeted R1 995 000.00 (R515000 in 2008/9 and R1 480 000.00 in 2009/10) and spent R 3,283,608 over the years with the difference covered by core branches. The table hereunder gives a more detailed account of what happened.
(a) budgeted for:
(i) 2008/09:
R880 000
(ii) 2009/10:
R1 400 000
(b) spent
(i) 2008/09:
R878 205,84
(ii) 2009/10:
R1 323 483,00 (1 April 2009 to date)
(2)(a) Total number of advertisements for the department
(i) Print media: 17 (2008/09: 9 and 2009/10: 8)
(ii) broadcast on (aa) radio: 3 (2008/09: 1 and 2009/10: 2)
(bb) television: none
(b) Cost per advertisement
(i) Print media
2008/09 financial year | |
· Marketing departmental activities: | R129 995,00 [Izinkozi media publishers] |
· Female Farmer of the Year Awards: | R27 303,00 [New Africa Publication Magazine] |
· Ilima/Letsema winter campaign: | R177 274,33 [City Press, Sunday Times, Rapport] |
· Internship opportunities 2009/10: | R135 528,67[The Star, Daily Sun and Sunday Times] |
· 2009 academic year bursary awards: | R104 863,47[The Star, Daily Sun, Pretoria News, Isolezwe and Cape Argus] |
· Consultation for NAETF[1]: | R173 587,93 [City Press, Sunday Times, Rapport] |
· Mafisa[2] campaign I: | R18 662,12 |
· Mafisa campaign II: | R18 662,12 |
· Ilima/Letsema campaign: | R50 366,90 |
2009/10 financial year | |
· Female Farmer awareness campaign: · Sowetan, Beeld, Rapport, City Press] | R279 815,02 [The Star, |
· Showcasing Female Farmer winners: | R34 194,30 [Izinkozi media publishers] |
· Internship opportunities for 2010/11: | R112 337,89[Daily Sun and City Press] |
· 2010 academic year bursary awards: | R55 625,89[City Press] |
· Tribute to late Deputy Minister: Dirk Du Toit: | R95 935,07 [Cape Argus, Sat. Star, Sunday Independent] |
· World Food Day awareness campaign: | R67 499,66 [Capricorn Voice, Limpopo Informat, Daily Sun] |
· Agriculture Land Reform: | R148 174,92 |
· Ilima/Letsema campaign: | R381 120,37 |
(ii) Broadcast on
(aa) radio:
2008/09 financial year | |
· Call for nomination of candidates for OBP[i]: | R41 962,30 |
2009/10 financial year | |
· Female Farmer awareness campaign: | R119 025,92 [SABC radio stations] |
· World Food Day campaign: | R29 754,00 [community radio stations] |
(bb) television: none
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (ARC)
(1)The total amount used in respect of advertising of ARC products and services in print media and broadcast (radio and television) for the 2008/09 financial year was R 548 910.00 and from 01 April 2009 to date is R 220,590.00
Period | Budgeted for | Spent |
2008/09 | R 0 | R 548 910.00 |
01/04/2009 to date | R 0 | R 220,590.00 |
There was no budget allocated for advertising during the respective financial periods, however the organisation placed adverts in various publications of strategic importance to both the ARC and Stakeholders.
(2)(a)The total number of advertisements is nine (9) and two (2) for 2008/09 and 01 April 2009 respectively. Advertisements were in the print media only. No advertisements were placed in broadcast media (both radio and television). The purpose was to advertise the ARC Products & Services and create awareness about the ARC brand and corporate image.
2008/09 | |||
Company | Purpose | Amount Spent | |
Ekuseni Communications | Advertisement of the 2008/09 ARC Annual Report Tender in the Sunday Times. | R 17,258.40 | |
Government Printing Works | Advertisement of the 2008/09 ARC Annual Report Tender in Government Bulletin/Gazette | R 596.49 | |
VUNA Supplement 2008 | Advertising of ARC products & Services in VUNA Publication – Commissioned by the then Department of Agriculture and Land Affairs | R 177, 840.00 | |
TopCo Media (PTY) LTD | Placement of advertorial in the Top 300 performing companies' publication – ARC nominated as the top performing government agency. | R 33, 950.00 | |
Press Group Holdings | Placement of ARC advertorial in "the world bank perspective on development" publication. | R 146 127.07 | |
Media24 | Supplement insert of the vegetable growing supplement in FarmingSA – (The role of agricultural research in the economy and towards food security). | R 67,500.00 | |
Picasso Headlines | Placement of an advertorial in the New Agenda Publication. | R 30, 045.84 | |
Nexus Strategic Partnerships LTD | Placement of an advert profiling the ARC in the Commonwealth Education Partnerships publication. | R 73, 261.50 | |
Brabys (pty) Ltd | Placement of ARC listing in the SADC Directories Listing | R 2, 331.30 | |
Total | R 548 910.00 | ||
01 April 2009 to date | |||
VUNA Supplement 2009 | Advertising of ARC products & Services in VUNA Publication – Commissioned by the then Department of Agriculture and Land Affairs. | R 177, 840.00 | |
Proverto Publishers | Advertisement in Agricultural Career Guide – awareness of scarce skills in the agricultural sector and profiling of the ARC's professional development programme (PDP). | R 42, 750.00 | |
Total | R 220,590.00 | ||
NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL MARKETING COUNCIL (NAMC)
2008/09 | ||||
Description | Budget | Actual | Purpose | |
Print media - Fortune Magazine | 495,720.00 | 287,487.14 | To promote South Africa image's and to build upon our reputation in the global arena. To show investors that our economy offers a very stable and predictable environment from which to access large markets. | |
2009/10 | ||||
Description | Budget | Actual | Purpose | |
Print media - Mail & Guardian | 15,000.00 | 11,491.20 | To publicize that NAMC, WBHO and ComMark are working together on the Eastern Cape Red Meat Project (ECRMP) which focuses on linking rural and/or emerging farmers to formal markets. Also as a way of sourcing funding in order to leverage funds contributed by UK Department for International Development (DFID). |
PERISHABLE PRODUCTS EXPORT CONTROL BOARD (PPECB)
a) The PPECB had budgeted R380 000 in respect of advertising and promotion for the financial year 2008/09;
b) (i) The PPECB spent R279 919.16 In respect of advertising and promotion for the financial year 2008/09; (ii) during 2009/10 financial year, the PPECB has spent R142 915.70 in advertising & promotions.
Question 2:
(a)(i) 34 PPECB advertisement appeared on the print media; (ii) (a) no PPECB advertisements were on the radio; (b) no PPECB advertisements were on the television.
a) Each print advertisement costed an average of R7000 per advert.
b) The purposes of all PPECB advertisements is to bring awareness to Clients of the products and services of the PPECB
NCERA FARMS (PTY) LTD
Ncera Farms has not spent any money for advertising during the financial years 2008 - 2009 and during the period 1 April 2009 to date. No amount was budgeted for advertising during the aforementioned periods.
ONDERSTEPOORT BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (OBP)
(1)(a) OBP budgeted | R1 383 375.00 for advertising |
(b) Spent | R637 239.53 |
(i)(ii) during the period 1 April 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available budget (year-to-date) | |
(i) Budget: | R460 000.00 |
(i) Actual: | R345 628.00; |
(2)(a) (i) appeared in the print media 38 and (ii) were broadcast on | |
(aa) radio 0 and | |
(bb) television 0, | |
(b) adverts ranged between | R1640.00 and R52 387.00 |
(c) the purpose of each advertisement in essence they were encouraging users of our products to vaccinate against the various diseases catered for by our products |
[1] NAETF: National Agricultural Education and Training Forum
[2] Mafisa: Micro-Agricultural Financial Institutions of South Africa
[i] OBP: Onderstepoort Biological Products
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF PROVINCES
WRITTEN REPLY
QUESTION NO 1999
(Internal Question Paper No 29 - 2009)
Mrs M Wenger (DA) to ask the Minister for Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs:
(1) What total amount in respect of advertising has his department and all specified entities reporting to it (a) budgeted for and (b) spent (i) in the 2008-09 financial year and (Ii) during the period 1 April 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available;
(2) (a) what total number of advertisements for his department and each entity reporting to it (i) appeared in the print media and (ii) were broadcast on (aa) radio and (bb) television, (b) how much did each advertisement cost and (c) what was the purpose of each advertisement? NW2651E
Answer
-1 information on the amounts spent on advertising by the entities will be provided after the entities have all submitted. The department has for 2008/09 financial year budgeted R8, 592 million and the actual expenditure was R8, 238 million,
- For the financial year 2009/10, the department has budgeted R6. 989 million and to date R4, 869 million has been spent.
2. The information on entitles will be provided once an the entities have submitted, in terms of adverts by the department the following is the situation'
1)10 (excluding the recruitment adverts)
ii) Advert on 16 days of Activism and Advert on Vuna Awards
iii) The two broadcasted adverts costed the department R854, 844 and R699,372 respectively.
(iv) The purpose of al1 adverts was to inform the public of the purpose of the events and activities that the department is involved in.
FOR WRITTEN REPLY
QUESTION NO 1990
DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 02 NOVEMBER 2009
(INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 26)
1990. Mrs A T Lovemore (DA) to ask the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs:
(1) What total amount in respect of advertising has her department and all specified entities reporting to it (a) budgeted for and (b) spent (i) in the 2008-09 financial year and (ii) during the period 1 April 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available;
(2) (a) what total number of advertisements for her department and each entity reporting to it (i) appeared in the print media and (ii) were broadcast on (aa) radio and (bb) television, (b) how much did each advertisement cost and (c) what was the purpose of each advertisement?
REPLY:
(1)(a) My Department had an advertising budget of R10, 000,000.00 for the 2008/09 financial year.
(1)(b)(i) The actual advertising spend for My Department during 2008/09 was R6, 110, 612.29.
(1)(b)(ii) The actual advertising spend My Department from 1 April 2009 to date is R7, 982,023.45.
(2)(a)(i) During 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 and the period covering 1 April 2009 to date, a total of 82 advertisements appeared in newspapers and magazines for purposes of raising awareness of water and forestry issues and the promotion of important events on the Department's calendar regarding water and forestry issues. Chief among these events are the National Water Week, Arbor Week and Sanitation Week.
(2)(a)(ii)(aa)During 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 and the period covering 1 April 2009 to date, five important events on the Department's calendar were advertised on radio broadcast. These were the National Water Week, Youth Summit, Weedbuster Week, Waste Discharge and Arbor Week.
(2)(a)(ii)(bb)During 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 and for the period covering 1 April 2009 to date, three important events on My Department's calendar were advertised on television. These were the National Water Week, Waste Discharge and the Arbor Week.
(2)(b) In 2008 the total cost of advertising in newspapers for the National Water Week, the Sanitation Week and Arbor Week was R 1,087,815.20. The Breakdown of costs between these three items is shown if Table 1 below. Total costs for magazine advertisements were R 1,071,698.80, bringing the overall costs of print media based advertisements to R 2,159,514.00
-2-
Table 1 (Advertising in Newspapers for the period 2008)
ADVERTISMENT ITEM | COST |
National Water Week | R 829,846.97 |
Sanitation Week | R 175,769.67 |
Arbor Week | R 82,198.56 |
TOTAL | R 1,087,815.20 |
In 2009 the total cost of advertising in newspapers for the National Water Week, the Weedbuster Week, Waste Discharge, Youth Summit and Arbor Week was R 1,448,192.75. The Breakdown of costs between these three items is shown if Table 1(a) below. Total costs for magazine advertisements were R 621,940.00 bringing the overall costs of print media based advertisements to R 2,070,133.75
Table 2 (Advertising in Newspaper for the period 2009)
ADVERTISMENT ITEM | COST |
Weedbuster Week | R 725,321.80 |
Youth Summit | R217,864.15 |
Arbor Week | R 384,606.80 |
Waste Discharge | R120,400.00 |
TOTAL | R 1,448,192.75 |
In 2008 the total cost of advertising in electronic media was R 3,951,098.29 and this amount of money was for the National Water Week, the Arbor Week and Sanitation Week. The breakdown of these costs is shown in table 2 below.
Table 3 (Advertising in electronic media for the period 2008)
ELECTRONIC MEDIA | NATIONAL WATER WEEK | ARBOR WEEK |
Radio Advertising | R 1,200, 00.00 | r 1,210,552.29 |
TV | R 1,000,344.00 | R 540,202.00 |
In 2009 the total cost of advertising in electronic media was R5,991,889.70 and this amount of money was for the National Water Week, the Arbor Week and Sanitation Week. The breakdown of these costs is shown in table 2(a) below.
Table 2(Advertising in electronic media for the period 2009)
ELECTRONIC MEDIA | weedbuster week | ARBOR WEEK | YOUTH SUMMIT | WAST E DISCHARGE | NATIONAL WATER WEEK |
Radio Advertising | r74,818.42 | r443,488.50 | R 496,706.05 | R 247,950.00 | R 1,486,238.01 |
TV | r660,000.00 | R 1,291,344,36 | r 1,291,344.36 |
(2)(c) All magazine advertisements were for raising the awareness about water and forestry issues in the South African public while newspaper and broadcast advertisements were for the National Water Week, the Arbor Week and Sanitation Week.
QUESTION NO. 1990 FOR WRITTEN REPLY: NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
A draft reply to Mrs A T Lovemore (DA) to the above-mentioned question is enclosed for your consideration
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
(For written reply)
QUESTION NO. 1990 INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 26 of 2009DATE OF PUBLICATION: 02 November 2009
Mrs A T Lovemore (DA) to ask the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs:
(1) What total amount in respect of advertising has the department and all specified entities reporting to it (a) budgeted for and (b) spent (i) in the 2008-2009 financial year and (ii) during the period
1 April 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available;
(2)(a) what total number of advertisements for the department and each entity reporting to it (i) appeared in the print media and (ii) were broadcast on (aa) radio and (bb) television, (b) how much did each advertisement cost and (c) what was the purpose of each advertisement?
1990. THE MINISTER OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ANSWERS:
1) Tabulated below are the costs in respect of advertisements for the 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 (1 April – to 31 October 2009) Financial Year:
Name of Entity | (a)( i) Budgeted Cost 2008/2009 | (b)( i)Spent 2008/2009 | (a)( ii) Budgeted Cost 2009/2010 | (b)( ii) Spent 1 April – 31 October 2009 | ||
DEAT | R6 898 300 | R6 898 300.02 | R8 512 000 | R4 350 056.27 | ||
South African National Biodiversity Institute | R 200 000 | R 106 844 | R 100 000 | R 70 528 | ||
South African National Parks | R5 275 447 | R4 738 684 | R9 373 051 | R3 984 503 | ||
South African Weather Service | R3 100 000 | R1 613 885 | R 399 447 | R 366 628 | ||
iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority | R 166 200 | R 32 179 | R 200 000 | R 57 228 | ||
Marine Living Resources Fund | R1 368 350 | R774 000 | R3 199 740 | R1 344 826 |
2) Tabulated below are the costs in respect of total number of advertisements for the 2008/2009 Financial Year:
Name of Entity | (a)( i) Total Print Media Advertisements | (a)(ii)(aa) Total Broadcast Radio | (a)( ii) (bb) Total Broadcast Television | (b)(i) Cost of advertise- ment Print Media | (b)(aa) Cost of Advertisement Radio | (b)(bb) Cost of advertise-ment TV | (c) Purpose | |||
DEAT | 163 | N/A | N/A | R2 756 426.85 | N/A | N/A | The advertisements were for marketing, recruitment and tenders | |||
South African National Biodiversity Institute | 8 | N/A | N/A | R 106 844 | N/A | N/A | Various adverts in different media | |||
South African National Parks | 33 | 97 | N/A | R1 291 661 | R528 540 | N/A | Magazine & Press 45 second spots on radio | |||
South African Weather Service | 41 Advertisements | N/A | N/A | R1 613 855 | N/A | N/A | Other Advestise- ments Vacancies Advertised | |||
iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority | 9 Procurement tenders | N/A | N/A | R 32 719 | N/A | N/A | Procurement Tenders | |||
Marine Living Resources Fund | 82 | N/A | N/A | R 774 000 | N/A | N/A | Vacancies Advertisements |
Tabulated below are the costs in respect of total number of advertisements for the 2009/2010 Financial Year:
Name of Entity | (a)( i) Total Print Media Advertisements | (a)(ii)(aa) Total Broadcast Radio | (a)( ii) (bb) Total Broadcast Television | (b)(i) Cost of advertise- ment Print Media | (b)(aa) Cost of Advertisement Radio | (b)(bb) Cost of advertise- ment TV | (c) Purpose | |
DEAT | 289 | N/A | 2 | R 1 630 101.11 | N/A | R 296 828 | The advertisements were for marketing, recruitment and tenders | |
South African National Biodiversity Institute | 8 | N/A | N/A | R 70 528 | N/A | N/A | Various adverts in different media | |
South African National Parks | 21 | 39 | N/A | R 350 331 | R 150 200 | N/A | Magazine & Press 45 second spots on radio | |
South African Weather Service | 25 | N/A | N/A | R 324 058 | N/A | N/A | Other Advertise- ments Vacancies Advertised | |
iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority | 8 Tenders | N/A | N/A | R 57 228 | N/A | N/A | Procurement Tenders | |
Marine Living Resources Fund | 56 | 30 | N/A | R 364 809 | R 138 109.72 | N/A | The advertisements were for filling of vacancies and for events during 2009 National Marine Month |
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
(For written reply)
QUESTION NO. 1994
INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 26
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 2 November 2009
Ms M R Shinn (DA) to ask the Minister of Tourism:
(1) What total amount in respect of advertising has his department and all specified entities reporting to it (a) budgeted for and (b) spent (i) in the 2008-09 financial year and (ii) during the period 1 April 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available;
(2) (a) what total number of advertisements for his department and each entity reporting to it (i) appeared in the print media and (ii) were broadcast on (aa) radio and (bb) television, (b) how much did each advertisement cost and (c) what was the purpose of each advertisement? NW2646E
1994. THE MINISTER OF TOURISM ANSWERS:
DEPARTMENT:
1) (a) R534 000.00
(b) (i) not applicable – New Department
(ii) R 154 795.65 as at 12 November 2009
(2) (a) (i) Three adverts
(ii) None
(b) R 29 884.81, R 119 790.09 and R 5 120.75
(c) Two of them were to invite applications for vacant posts in the department and one was to invite proposals for research.
PUBLIC ENTITY: SOUTH AFRICAN TOURISM
(a) R 1 316 122
(b) (i) R194 449.19
(ii) 356 105.90 as at 31 October 2009.
2.
(SA Tourism is a marketing organisation. As per the audited 2008/09 financial statements approximately 75% of total expenses incurred were spent on marketing activities. The information provided below is from an operational perspective)
2008/2009 | 2009/2010 | |
(a) (i) | 11 | 7 |
(a (ii) | None | None |
(b) & (c) | See table here | See table here |
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
QUESTIION FOR WRITTEN REPLY
QUESTION NUMBER: 1993
DATE FOR PUBLICATION: 2 NOVEMBER 2009
DATE REPLY SUBMITTED: 30 NOVEMBER 2009
MR M J ELLIS (DA) TO ASK THE MINISTER IN THE PRESIDENCY: PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND EVALUATION AND ADMINISTRATION IN THE PRESIDENCY:
(1) What total amount in respect of advertising has the Presidency and all specified entities reporting to it (a) budgeted for and (b) spent (i) in the 2008-09 financial year and (ii) during the period 1 April 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available;
(2) (b) what total number of advertisements for the Presidency and each entity reporting to it (i) appeared in the print media and (ii) were broadcast on (aa) radio and (bb) television, (b) how much did each advertisement cost and (c) what was the purpose of each advertisement?
NW2645E
REPLY:
INTERNATIONAL MARKETING COUNCIL (IMC) International:
Spots | SA Rand Billed incl. 14% VAT | Messages | |
USA | |||
CNN (US) | 12 | R 686 170.93 | Investigate It, Invest in It |
Bloomberg USA Feed | 45 | R 371 773.67 | |
Bloomberg Digital Feed | 134 | R 528 540.65 | |
www.wsj.com Eyeblaster serving at no cost for trial | 160 x 600, 300 x 250 & Pre-roll video Impressions 1,063,361 | R 474 611.16 | Use of BMW advert - promotion of South African innovation and manufacturing sector |
Atlantic.com (Andrew Sullivan blog) including Eyeblaster serving costs | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 1,036,600 | R 532 909.48 | |
UK/Europe |
|
| |
London Cabs (Production) | 100 | R 954 910.96 | Messages related to tourism and investments i.e 3 of top 20 hotels, |
CNNI EMEA (Europe) | 156 | R 1 505 852.20 | |
Bloomberg European Feed | 200 | R 1 245 840.53 | Investigate It, Invest in It |
CNN Online | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 1,350,000 | R 553 081.14 | Promotion of South Africa infrastructure and innovation |
CNBC Online | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 300,000 | R - | |
www.skynews.com | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 2,142,858 | R 760 950.00 | |
India |
|
| |
CNN IBN Channel 18 | 458 | R 2 018 205.31 | Investigate It, Invest in It |
CNBC TV18 | 425 | R 2 300 775.61 | Promotion of South Africa infrastructures and innovation |
Indian Service Tax on Media | n/a | R 467 597.90 | |
www.IBNLive.com | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 2,000,000 | Added value | Surprising elements about South Africa. Advanced financial services |
www.moneycontrol.com | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 2,000,000 | Added value | |
www.timesofindia.com | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 10,850,000 | R 1 632 452.28 | |
www.economictimes.com | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 10,850,000 | R 1 632 452.28 | |
The Financial Express - SA Report | 1 | R 234 252.25 | |
The Economic Times - SA Report | 1 | R 373 779.86 | |
Mainland China & Hong Kong |
|
| |
TVB Pearl | 180 | R 1 504 535.12 | |
Beijing BTV5 | 10 | R 477 654.56 | |
Shanghai CBN | 56 | R 1 158 478.67 | |
Scmp.com | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 173,000 | R 82 459.71 | Investigate It, Invest in It |
Capital-HK.com | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 21,100 | R 41 122.61 | Promotion of South Africa infrastructure and innovation |
www.sina.com.cn | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 73,000,000 | R 1 166 512.77 | |
Smart Media | Video MPU 300 x 250 Impressions 12,730,000 | R 836 975.41 | Surprising elements about South Africa. Advanced financial services |
Time Magazine WEF Feature | 1 | R 459 852.10 | |
Adhoc/Contingency |
|
| |
The Economic Observer | 1 | R 248 375.30 | Investigate It, Invest in It |
Financial Times SA Report | 1 | R 459 852.10 | Promotion of South Africa infrastructure and innovation |
CNBC Magazine African/SA Report | 1 | R 91 927.90 | |
Time (Davos Package) | 4 | R 3 265 796.66 | |
Davos Outdoor (Airports) | 7 x Digital boards Zurich Airport | R 377 932.05 | Showcasing of 2010 as a catalyst for economic growth |
Davos Outdoor (Airports) | 15 Digital Screens Zurich Airport | R 111 453.26 | * Infrastructure |
Davos Outdoor (Train stations) | 2x F12 Posters Zurich Train Station 2 x F200 Posters Zurich Trian Station 21 x F4 Posters Davos | R 113 673.16 | Showcase of sectors |
London Cabs for Davos | 4 cabs | R 239 626.40 | wine industry |
Eyeblaster Serving costs (Online) | R 1 780 689.96 | ||
Total Investment | R 28 691 073.94 |
INTERNATIONAL MARKETING COUNCIL (IMC) Domestic:
Medium | Duration | No Spots | Total Value | IMC Payable | Messages | ||||
Television | |||||||||
Domestic Television (27-30 Apr - 10-22 May) | Freedom Day Campaign - 27-30 Apr | ||||||||
SABC 1 (50% discount) | 60" | 10 | R 620 000 | R 310 000 | * Flighting 'We've done it before' in | ||||
SABC 2 (50% discount) | 60" | 9 | R 361 000 | R 180 500 | line with Freedom Day | ||||
SABC 3 (50% discount) | 60" | 9 | R 646 000 | R 323 000 | 10 -22 May - launch of the 'It starts with you Campaign - Asking South Africans to chare the kind of SA they want to live in | ||||
Etv (50% discount) | 60" | 17 | R 930 000 | R 465 000 | |||||
M-Net (50% AV off peak) | 60" | 11 | R 355 000 | R 268 000 | |||||
Domestic Television (12-30 June) | |||||||||
SABC 1 (50% discount) | 20" | 31 | R 887 600 | R 443 800 | |||||
SABC 2 (50% discount) | 20" | 34 | R 862 400 | R 431 200 | Feedback of the responses collated from public - key responses and themes i.e Safety and Security, Education, Health, Unemployment | ||||
SABC 3 (50% discount) | 20" | 26 | R 606 800 | R 303 400 | |||||
Etv (50% discount) | 20" | 24 | R 479 200 | R 239 600 | |||||
M-Net (50% AV off peak) | 20" | 30 | R 455 700 | R 227 850 | |||||
Domestic Television Phase 2 (1-26 October) | |||||||||
SABC 1 (50% discount) | 60" x 3 Avs | 22 | R 1 652 000 | R 826 000 | |||||
SABC 2 (50% discount) | 60" x 3 Avs | 21 | R 1 416 000 | R 708 000 | |||||
SABC 3 (50% discount) | 60" x 3 Avs | 18 | R 1 161 000 | R 580 500 | Response to public and proof points in partnership with education, police as well as health departments | ||||
Etv (50% discount) | 60" x 3 Avs | 17 | R 744 000 | R 372 000 | |||||
M-Net (50% AV off peak) | 60" x 3 Avs | 34 | R 1 309 000 | R 766 000 | |||||
Domestic Television Phase 2 (1-12 November) | |||||||||
SABC 1 (50% discount) | 60" x 3 Avs | 7 | R 244 000 | R 121 500 | |||||
SABC 2 (50% discount) | 60" x 3 Avs | 14 | R 512 000 | R 256 000 | |||||
SABC 3 (50% discount) | 60" x 3 Avs | 8 | R 553 000 | R 276 500 | Continuation of response to public and proof points in partnership with education, police as well as health departments | ||||
Etv (50% discount) | 60" x 3 Avs | 6 | R 288 000 | R 144 000 | |||||
M-Net (100% AV for every program bought in peak time) | 60" x 3 Avs | 12 | R 413 000 | R 149 000 | |||||
DSTV (100% AV for every program bought in peak time) | 60" x 3 Avs | 8 | R 110 000 | R 0 | |||||
Domestic Television Phase 3 (22 Dec - 4 Jan) | |||||||||
SABC 1 (50% discount) | 90" Start Small | 14 | R 967 500 | R 483 750 | |||||
SABC 2 (50% discount) | 90" Start Small | 13 | R 586 500 | R 293 250 | |||||
SABC 3 (50% discount) | 90" Start Small | 14 | R 568 500 | R 284 250 | It starts with you phase 3: Proof points and ideas on what each and every person can do in their own can do to make SA a better place | ||||
Etv (50% discount) | 90" Start Small | 14 | R 969 000 | R 484 500 | |||||
M-Net (100% AV for every program bought in peak time) | 90" Start Small | 12 | R 807 000 | R 442 500 | * Crime line | ||||
Domestic Television Phase 3 (12 - 25 Jan 2009) | * Donation of books to hospitals | ||||||||
SABC 1 (50% discount) | 60" & 5 x 20" | 29 | R 487 800 | R 243 900 | * Turn off dripping taps | ||||
SABC 2 (50% discount) | 60" & 5 x 20" | 40 | R 741 400 | R 370 700 | |||||
SABC 3 (50% discount) | 60" & 5 x 20" | 29 | R 422 600 | R 211 300 | |||||
Etv (50% discount) | 60" & 5 x 20" | 24 | R 554 000 | R 277 000 | |||||
M-Net (100% AV for every program bought in peak time) | 60" & 5 x 20" | 21 | R 414 100 | R 414 100 | |||||
Total Domestic Television (incl vat) | 578 | R 24 081 474 | R 12 422 694 | ||||||
Radio | |||||||||
Domestic Radio (12-30 June) | |||||||||
702 Talk Radio | 15" & 30" Live Reads | 163 | R 337 170 | R 337 170 | Continuation of response to public and proof points in partnership with education, police as well as health departments | ||||
Capetalk | 15" & 30" Live Reads | 159 | R 171 370 | R 171 370 | |||||
Ikwekwezi FM | 15", 45" Live Reads & Interviews | 66 | R 102 408 | R 51 204 | |||||
Lesedi FM | 15", 45" Live Reads & Interviews | 123 | R 631 620 | R 315 810 | |||||
Ligwalagwala FM | 15", 45" Live Reads & Interviews | 72 | R 140 298 | R 70 149 | |||||
Motsweding FM | 15", 45" Live Reads & Interviews | 77 | R 312 960 | R 156 480 | |||||
Munghana Lonene FM | 15", 45" Live Reads & Interviews | 65 | R 135 720 | R 67 860 | |||||
Phalaphala FM | 15", 45" Live Reads & Interviews | 74 | R 96 710 | R 48 355 | |||||
SAFM | 15", 45" Live Reads & Interviews | 110 | R 133 998 | R 66 999 | |||||
Thobela FM | 15", 45" Live Reads & Interviews | 78 | R 313 084 | R 156 542 | |||||
Tru FM/CKI | 15", 45" Live Reads & Interviews | 67 | R 48 924 | R 24 462 | |||||
Ukhozi FM | 15", 45" Live Reads & Interviews | 117 | R 950 300 | R 475 150 | |||||
Umhlobo Wenene FM | 15", 45" Live Reads & Interviews | 115 | R 623 944 | R 311 972 | |||||
Domestic Radio Phase 2 PR (6-12 October) | |||||||||
702 Talk Radio | 90" Live Reads | 20 | R 137 723 | R 137 723 | Continuation of response to public and proof points in partnership with education, police as well as health departments | ||||
Capetalk | 90" Live Reads | 20 | R 71 338 | R 71 338 | |||||
Ikwekwezi FM | 90" Live Reads | 18 | R 56 880 | R 28 440 | |||||
Lesedi FM | 90" Live Reads | 17 | R 255 060 | R 127 530 | |||||
Ligwalagwala FM | 90" Live Reads | 18 | R 73 440 | R 36 720 | |||||
Motsweding FM | 90" Live Reads | 18 | R 157 500 | R 78 750 | |||||
Munghana Lonene FM | 90" Live Reads | 18 | R 74 700 | R 37 350 | |||||
Phalaphala FM | 90" Live Reads | 18 | R 52 680 | R 26 340 | |||||
SAFM | 90" Live Reads | 16 | R 99 360 | R 49 680 | |||||
Thobela FM | 90" Live Reads | 18 | R 161 880 | R 80 940 | |||||
Ukhozi FM | 90" Live Reads | 18 | R 403 140 | R 201 570 | |||||
Umhlobo Wenene FM | 90" Live Reads | 18 | R 261 000 | R 130 500 | |||||
Total Domestic Radio (incl vat) | 1503 | R 6 615 656 | R 3 716 861 | ||||||
THE NATIONAL YOUTH DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(1) (a)
(i) The National Youth Development Agency was formally launched in 2009 from the merger between the National Youth
Commission and Umsobomvu Youth Fund. Therefore there was no budget for the NYDA in the 2008-09 financial years.
The National Youth Commission (NYC) budgeted R400 000-00 for advertising in the 2008-09 financial year.
(ii) There was no budget for the NYDA in the 1 April to October 2009. The National Youth Commission (NYC)
budgeted R1 million for advertising in the 2009/2010 financial year.
(1) (b)
(i) There was no money spent by the NYDA in the 2008-09 financial year. The NYC spent R R186 687-31 on advertising during
the 2008-09 financial year.
(ii) There was no money spent by the NYC on advertising from 1 April to 5 November 2009. The NYDA spent R636 403-36
on advertising during the period 1 April to 5 November 2009. The NYDA adverts were paid for by Umsobomvu Youth Fund out of its 2009-10 allocation.
.
(2) (a)
(i) There were no print adverts for the NYDA in the 2008-9 financial year. There were two (2) NYC print adverts for the NYC
in the same period.
There were 19 print adverts for the NYDA from 1 April to 5 November 2009 while the NYC did not place any print adverts.
(ii) (aa) The NYC and NYDA did not place any radio adverts in the 2008-9 financial year.
The NYC and NYDA did not place any radio adverts during the period 1 April to 5 November 2009.
(bb) The NYC and NYDA did not place any television adverts in the 2008-9 financial year.
The NYC and NYDA did not place any television adverts during the period 1 April to 5 November 2009.
(2)(b)
Please see tables below for explanation on cost of each advertisement.
(2)(c)
Please see tables below for explanation on purpose of each advertisement?
2008-09 Financial Year
Advertising costs for the NYC
2B & 2C ADVERTISING COSTS AND PURPOSE FOR ADVERTISING | |
(2C) PURPOSE FOR ADVERTISING | (2B) TOTAL SPENT IN RANDS |
Recruitment for four (4) vacant position | 72 037 - 55 |
To encourage youth to go and register for election. | 114 649 - 76 |
TOTAL | (2B) 186 687 - 31 |
Period 1 April up to 5 November 2009
Advertising costs for the NYDA
ADVERTISING COSTS AND PURPOSE FOR ADVERTISING | |||
(2C) PURPOSE FOR ADVERTISING | PUBLICATIONS USED | COST PER PUBLICATION IN RANDS | (2B) TOTAL SPENT IN RANDS |
Call for logo designs from youth | 1. Beeld | 20 039 - 70 | 225 540 - 66 |
2. City Press | 28 476 - 00 | ||
3. City Press | 48 454 - 56 | ||
4. Daily Sun | 21 067 - 20 | ||
5. Rapport | 47 964 - 00 | ||
6. Sunday World | 14 028 - 00 | ||
7. Sunday Sun | 28 812 - 00 | ||
Call for Tips for the NYDA Chairperson | 8. City Press | 35 595 - 00 | 176 107 - 23 |
9. Rapport | 59 955 - 00 | ||
10. Sunday World | 17 535 - 00 | ||
11. Sunday Sun | 18 375 - 00 | ||
12. Sunday Independent | 23 020 - 00 | ||
Launch of NYDA invitation to youth | 13. Sunday World | 139 741 - 20 | |
14. Sunday Sun | |||
15. Sowetan | |||
Call for applications: Audit Committee | 16. Rapport | 36 720 - 37 | 79 213 - 87 |
17. Business Day | 15 800 - 40 | ||
18. Sowetan | 26 693 - 10 | ||
Call for applications: Chief Executive Officer position | 19. Business Day | 15 800 - 40 | 15 800 - 40 |
TOTAL | (2B) 636 403 - 36 |
Question 1992
Mr S J F Marais (DA) to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry:
(1) What total amount in respect of advertising has his department and all specified entities reporting to it (a) budgeted for and (b) spent (i) in the 2008-09 financial year and (ii) during the period 1 April 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available;
(2) (a) what total number of advertisements for his department and each entity reporting to it (i) appeared in the print media and (ii) were broadcast on (aa) radio and (bb) television, (b) how much did each advertisement cost and (c) what was the purpose of each advertisement?NW2644E
REPLY:
Advertisements for the department:
2008/09 Financial Year
(1)(a)(i) Budget: R20 808 000
(1)(b)(i) Expenditure: R19 075 855
(2)(a)(i) Total number of advertisements: 582
(2)(a)(ii)(aa) Radio: 11
(2)(a)(ii)(bb) Television: 3
(2)(b)The cost of each advertisement varies substantially, however the cost breakdown per media utilised is as follows:
Radio: R 1 219 754
Television: R 4 086 644
Print Media: R13 769 457
(2)(c) The advertisements relate to staff recruitment, campaigns relating to departmental activities, public invitations to attend specific workshops, dissemination of general information and public awareness of the dti and its products.
Advertisements for the department:
1 April 2009 to 30 September 2009
(1)(a)(i) Budget: R17 268 000
(1)(b)(i) Expenditure: R 5 254 423
(2)(a)(i) Total number of advertisements: 138
(2)(a)(ii)(aa) Radio: None
(2)(a)(ii)(bb) Television: 3
(2)(b) The cost of each advertisement varies substantially, however the cost breakdown per media utilised is as follows:
Radio: None
Television R 5 060 196
Print Media R13 769 457
(2)(c)The advertisements relate to staff recruitment, campaigns relating to departmental activities, public invitations to attend specific workshops, dissemination of general information and public awareness of the dti and its products.
Advertisements for entities reporting to the department:
The information with respect to the entities reporting to the department is still being compiled and will be submitted in due course.
FOR WRITTEN REPLY
QUESTION NO 1990
DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 02 NOVEMBER 2009
(INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 26)
1990. Mrs A T Lovemore (DA) to ask the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs:
(1) What total amount in respect of advertising has her department and all specified entities reporting to it (a) budgeted for and (b) spent (i) in the 2008-09 financial year and (ii) during the period 1 April 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available;
(2) (a) what total number of advertisements for her department and each entity reporting to it (i) appeared in the print media and (ii) were broadcast on (aa) radio and (bb) television, (b) how much did each advertisement cost and (c) what was the purpose of each advertisement? NW2642E
---00O00---
REPLY:
(1)(a) My Department had an advertising budget of R10, 000,000.00 for the 2008/09 financial year.
(1)(b)(i) The actual advertising spend for My Department during 2008/09 was R6, 110, 612.29.
(1)(b)(ii) The actual advertising spend My Department from 1 April 2009 to date is R7, 982,023.45.
(2)(a)(i) During 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 and the period covering 1 April 2009 to date, a total of 82 advertisements appeared in newspapers and magazines for purposes of raising awareness of water and forestry issues and the promotion of important events on the Department's calendar regarding water and forestry issues. Chief among these events are the National Water Week, Arbor Week and Sanitation Week.
(2)(a)(ii)(aa)During 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 and the period covering 1 April 2009 to date, five important events on the Department's calendar were advertised on radio broadcast. These were the National Water Week, Youth Summit, Weedbuster Week, Waste Discharge and Arbor Week.
(2)(a)(ii)(bb)During 2008/2009 and 2009/2010 and for the period covering 1 April 2009 to date, three important events on My Department's calendar were advertised on television. These were the National Water Week, Waste Discharge and the Arbor Week.
(2)(b) In 2008 the total cost of advertising in newspapers for the National Water Week, the Sanitation Week and Arbor Week was R 1,087,815.20. The Breakdown of costs between these three items is shown if Table 1 below. Total costs for magazine advertisements were R 1,071,698.80, bringing the overall costs of print media based advertisements to R 2,159,514.00
-2-
Table 1 (Advertising in Newspapers for the period 2008)
ADVERTISMENT ITEM | COST |
National Water Week | R 829,846.97 |
Sanitation Week | R 175,769.67 |
Arbor Week | R 82,198.56 |
TOTAL | R 1,087,815.20 |
In 2009 the total cost of advertising in newspapers for the National Water Week, the Weedbuster Week, Waste Discharge, Youth Summit and Arbor Week was R 1,448,192.75. The Breakdown of costs between these three items is shown if Table 1(a) below. Total costs for magazine advertisements were R 621,940.00 bringing the overall costs of print media based advertisements to R 2,070,133.75
Table 2 (Advertising in Newspaper for the period 2009)
ADVERTISMENT ITEM | COST |
Weedbuster Week | R 725,321.80 |
Youth Summit | R217,864.15 |
Arbor Week | R 384,606.80 |
Waste Discharge | R120,400.00 |
TOTAL | R 1,448,192.75 |
In 2008 the total cost of advertising in electronic media was R 3,951,098.29 and this amount of money was for the National Water Week, the Arbor Week and Sanitation Week. The breakdown of these costs is shown in table 2 below.
Table 3 (Advertising in electronic media for the period 2008)
ELECTRONIC MEDIA | NATIONAL WATER WEEK | ARBOR WEEK |
Radio Advertising | R 1,200, 00.00 | r 1,210,552.29 |
TV | R 1,000,344.00 | R 540,202.00 |
In 2009 the total cost of advertising in electronic media was R5,991,889.70 and this amount of money was for the National Water Week, the Arbor Week and Sanitation Week. The breakdown of these costs is shown in table 2(a) below.
Table 2(Advertising in electronic media for the period 2009)
ELECTRONIC MEDIA | weedbuster week | ARBOR WEEK | YOUTH SUMMIT | WAST E DISCHARGE | NATIONAL WATER WEEK |
Radio Advertising | r74,818.42 | r443,488.50 | R 496,706.05 | R 247,950.00 | R 1,486,238.01 |
TV | r660,000.00 | R 1,291,344,36 | r 1,291,344.36 |
(2)(c) All magazine advertisements were for raising the awareness about water and forestry issues in the South African public while newspaper and broadcast advertisements were for the National Water Week, the Arbor Week and Sanitation Week.
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
FOR WRITTEN REPLY
QUESTION NO 1988
DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 2 NOVEMBER 2009
(INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 26 - 2009)
Date reply submitted : 15 December 2009
Mr P J Groenewald(FF Plus) to ask the Minister of Police:
(1) What is the total amount in legal fees that the State has paid for a certain person (name furnished) (a) up to and (b) since the expiry of his contract of service;
(2) whether he will make a statement on the matter?
NW2615E
REPLY:
a) What was the final cost of the Department's new accommodation:
b) Whether any Government officials have declared an interest in the companies that provided services to build and refurbishment the offices:
c) Whether any investigation has revealed evidence of any government official having an undisclosed interest in any of these companies or having been paid any sum of money in relation to the building and furbishment of the office, and
d) If yes, to any of the above, what steps have been taken in this regard, and if none, why not?
REPLY
a) The total cost of the building amounts to R1.4 billion
b) No official from the Department of International Relations and Cooperation declared any interest in the companies that provided the services.
c) The Department conducted its own investigation which has not revealed any undisclosed interest by any official in any of these companies.
d) Not applicable.
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
FOR WRITTEN REPLY
QUESTION NO 1987
DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 2 NOVEMBER 2009
(INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 26 - 2009)
Date reply submitted : 15 December 2009
Mr P J Groenewald(FF Plus) to ask the Minister of Police:
(1) How many crimes were committed (a) in (i) 2007 and (ii) 2008 and (b) during the period 1 January 2009 up to the latest specified date for which information is available (aa) by owners of licensed firearms, (bb) with stolen licensed firearms and (cc) with illegal firearms;
(2) whether he will make a statement on the matter?
NW2614E
REPLY:
(1) (a) The Authority is enjoined by the ICASA Amendment Act, the Electronic Communications Act and the Broadcasting Act to monitor compliance by SABC with its licence terms and conditions, regulations and applicable legislation. In order to ensure efficient and effective monitoring, ICASA requires the following:
- Broadcast Monitoring Equipment or infrastructure that will enable it to record and keep, on a daily basis, broadcasting content (including South African Content quotas) of each licensee throughout the country. In so doing the Authority will rely less on the recording submitted by the licensee, which are at times faulty. Secondly, there is a need to capacitate the Authority's Compliance Department to enable it to deal with the increasing number of licensees and regulations that must be closely monitored.
- · With respect to Human Resources capacity, the Authority is currently reviewing its structure to ensure that it operates effectively and efficiently. However, from a short-term point of view, the Authority will implement an internship programme to deal with lack of capacity.
(b) The Authority has budgeted R19 million for the acquisition of the Broadcast Monitoring Equipment or infrastructure. The Interns will be given a stipend, as per ICASA policy.
(2) ICASA will use its internal staff to monitor compliance by all its licensees but will be assisted by interns.
(3) The Authority intends to procure the Broadcast Monitoring equipment during the 2009/10 financial year. Compliance reports are produced on an annual basis.
QUESTION NUMBER 1980
DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 30 OCTOBER 2009
(INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NUMBER 26)
Mr M Waters (DA to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources:
(1) Whether, with reference to a reply to Question 588 on 26 May 2008, any inspectors have visited the Witfontein R/33/151R mining site; if not, (a) why not and (b) when will this be done; if so, (i) when, (ii) who were the inspectors and (iii) what were their findings;
(2) whether any inspection has been conducted to determine whether regulation 17(6) of the Mine Health and Safety Act, Act 29 of 1996, is being adhered to; if not, (a) why not and (b) when will this be done; if so, when;
(3) whether there are any laws or regulations that stipulate the number of inspections that should be carried out by her department at mining sites per year; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details;
(4) whether such obligations have been met with regard to the abovementioned mining site; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details? NW2463E
REPLY
(1) Yes, Inspections were conducted on 20th and 31st October 2008 by Senior Inspector FJ Nkuna of the Gauteng Region Office as well as on 18th November 2008 by Senior Inspector F Barradas and Inspector J Kearney of the Directorate: Mine Surveying, Head Office, Pretoria.
During these inspections it was found that regulation 17(6) was not applicable as the mine was established in 1983 whilst the township, according to the deeds office, was only proclaimed in 2003. There was also no evidence found that the developer of the township of Glen Erasmia Extensions 4 & 5, which has been established within a horizontal distance of 100 metres from the boundary of the quarry, had submitted an application for comment to my Department, nor had the developer complied with Regulations 17(7)(b) or 17(8)(b) of the Mine Health and Safety Act, Act 29 of 1996, which stipulate that no structures may be erected within a horizontal distance of 100 metres from a mine without prior submission of a risk assessment to, and approval from, the Chief Inspector of Mines.
(2) Yes, the aforementioned inspections were carried out, inter-alia, to investigate compliance of regulation 17(6) as well as compliance with regulations 17(7)(b) and 17(8)(b).
(3) No, there are no laws or regulations that stipulate the number of inspections to be carried out per year. The Annual Business Plan of the Mine Safety Inspectorate, however, determines the risk value of underground and surface mining operations, which in turn, determines the frequency of visits to individual mining sites.
(4) Yes, the obligations were met on 31st October and 14th November 2008 which were routine inspections. All relevant details regarding the legal standing between the mine and the adjacent township have been addressed in my reply of question 1 above.
QUESTION NO.: 1976
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 23 October 2009
1976. Mr L W Greyling (ID) to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises:
Whether there were any costs payable to a certain company (name furnished) as a result of the Alcan aluminium smelter contract being terminated; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what amount was payable according to the stipulations of the contract? NW2546E
REPLY
In terms of the Electricity Supply Agreement between Eskom and the company referred to, Eskom is obliged to pay the connection fee less costs incurred by Eskom.
No penalties are payable by either party in terms of the contract termination.
The amounts in question have not yet been finalised.
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
QUESTION FOR WRITTEN REPLY
QUESTION NO.:1985
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 30 October 2009
1985. Mr P J Groenewald (FF Plus) to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises:†
(1)Whether all of Eskom's transformers are actively operational and delivering at full capacity; if not, (a) how many (i) are and (ii) are not delivering at full capacity and (b) why not;
(2)(a) what effect do transformers that are not delivering at full capacity have on the total electricity output and (b) what would be the total electricity output if all transformers were delivering at full capacity;
(3)whether she will make a statement on the matter? NW2609E
REPLY
(1)(a)(i-ii)(b): All of Eskom's installed transformers are operational given that it runs an interconnected grid. Transformers that are kept as spares are not operational until installed. The level of utilisation of each transformer can vary from minute to minute as it is dependent upon the level of electricity demand in the area that it supplies. It is not desirable that a transformer is run at its maximum rating for extended periods of time as that would have a detrimental effect on its lifespan and would also not allow for growth in electricity demand. Planning is therefore done to ensure that transformer and network upgrades are undertaken timeously to ensure that overloading does not occur.
(2)(a-b) The total electricity output of the national electricity grid is not purely dependent on the load carrying capacity of transformers installed; it is a function of the generation capacity (Power Stations) that is available as well as the network capacity (includes power lines and transformers) to carry the power generated
(3) No, the Minister will not make a statement on the matter.
QUESTION NO.:1983
DATE OF PUBLICATION: 30 October 2009
1983. Mr L Ramatlakane (Cope) to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises:
(1)Whether Transnet's payment to a certain consortium (name furnished) was made in terms of a valid contract; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details;
(2)whether Transnet's attorneys and senior counsel advised them to make the financial settlement as the only possible course of action; if not, (a) what course of action did they recommend and (b) what is the position in this regard; if so,
(3)whether the Transnet Board resolved at a legally constituted meeting that the matter should be concluded with payment; if so, (a) on what basis did the board make such a decision, (b) why was the payment decided on after two years had elapsed, (c) why was the decision made after the former chief executive officer had left and (d) how did she resolve the matter;
(4)whether she approved the payout; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) why was the amount paid as a settlement and (b) what amount was in the budget;
(5)whether she will provide a copy of the signed agreement between the parties; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details of the contract? NW2553E
REPLY
(1) Transnet Limited's ("Transnet") settlement payment to the referred to company in full and final settlement of the legal dispute between Transnet and the company was made in terms of a settlement agreement between the two parties. The terms of such settlement agreement are confidential. The settlement arose from litigation regarding the disposal of the shares held by the Transnet Second Defined Benefit Fund ("TSDBF") and in this regard a contract was not executed. The sale of those shares for about R5.3 billion contributed to the turning around of the TSDBF's billions of Rand's deficit position to the current billions of Rand's surplus position.
(2) (a-b) I am advised by Transnet that no guarantee could be given that, distinct from other litigation matters which Transnet has been previously a party to, its litigation with the referred to company would be free from any risk. In the circumstances, the officers of Transnet charged with the power to decide whether or not to settle such matters considered it prudent to mitigate any legal, commercial and reputational risk that could potentially actualise by settling the matter through the payment of an agreed settlement amount.
(3) The decision to enter into a settlement agreement with the company was made on behalf of Transnet by the Acting Group Chief Executive of Transnet and with the concurrence of the Group Executive: Office of the Group Chief Executive of Transnet, in accordance with the authority delegated to the Group Chief Executive of Transnet in terms of the Board of Directors' Written Resolution 2004/P4: Amended Delegation of Authority read with the Transnet Limited Delegation of Authority Framework. Accordingly, the Board of Directors' approval for such a settlement was not a requirement and was therefore neither sought nor obtained.
(a) I am advised by Transnet that the authorised functionaries considered that, if for any reason the matter was decided by the Court in a manner that was adverse to the interests of Transnet or Transnet suffered severe commercial and/or reputational harm arising from such litigation, it would be difficult to explain why Transnet spurned the opportunity that had since presented itself to mitigate such risks by settling at a figure it considered reasonable, affordable and a mere fraction of the claim brought against Transnet. Given that the sale of the shares significantly contributed to the turning around of the TSDBF's deficit position to the current surplus position, it was considered prudent and advisable that, to the extent possible, the risk of a sustained attack of the transaction that resulted in such benefit be effectively eliminated.
(b) The opportunity to negotiate a settlement of the dispute between Transnet and the company availed itself in pre-trail consultations from about July 2009.
(c) As indicated in paragraph (3)(b) above, the opportunity to negotiate a settlement presented itself months after the former Group Chief Executive of Transnet had terminated her employment with Transnet.
(d) As the matter could only be resolved by either the Court making a determination on the claim, or the company withdrawing or abandoning its claim, or the matter being settled out of Court (as has now happened), the matter remained unresolved at the time of the departure of the former Group Chief Executive.
(4) The significance and materiality framework in terms of the Public Finance Management Act, Act of 19 does not require shareholder to approval for settlements of the amount involved. My approval was neither sought nor obtained.
(4)(a- b) As the opportunity to settle had not been foreseen by Transnet and the disclosure of a budgetary figure for a potential settlement would, I am advised by Transnet, have inappropriately exposed the hand of Transnet and potentially weakened the negotiating position of Transnet, the amount for the settlement was not budgeted for. As matters happen, however, Transnet could with ease afford to pay the settlement amount from its cash resources without, in any way, adversely impacting on the financial position and performance of the Company.
(5) As indicated in paragraph (1) above, the settlement agreement is the confidential property of Transnet and the referred to company and therefore the signed agreement and its contents are restricted from public disclosure. Transnet has previously sought the public disclosure of its content and been advised by the company's lawyers that the company is not prepared to waive such confidentiality.