Questions and Replies

Filter by year

19 May 2016 - NW612

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)What was the cost incurred in employing the services of a certain company for the SA Revenue Services Transformation or Operating Model Review; (2) Was there an open tender process for the appointment of the specified company; if not, why not; if so, what were the terms of reference? NW725E

Reply:

The South African Revenue Service has submitted the following information.  Please note that the Minister is unable to verify the content.

1. The cost incurred for the mandated work was:

  • Bain Consulting:
        • Total Order: R155,125,728.00 (including contingency claims of 10% so far only R700 000 has been claimed).
        • Paid to date: R103, 609, 629.40

2. No, SARS used an already existing panel that was previously appointed through an open tender process in terms of paragraph 4.9 of the National Treasury Supply Chain Management – A guide for accounting officers/ authorities – February 2004. SARS further ran a close tender process within the panel which resulted in Bain being the successful bidder.

19 May 2016 - NW1150

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(a) What are the full relevant details of the Expenditure Reductions for the 2016 Medium-Term Expenditure Framework, as highlighted in Table 3.3 on page 31 of the 2016 Budget Review, in terms of the source of the specified reductions in the (i) 2017-18 and (ii) 2018-19 financial years in each (aa) national department, (bb) province and (cc) municipality and (b) what percentage do the specified amounts represent in each case in respect of the (i) reductions at each level, (ii) total reduction and (iii) total reduction in each specified financial year?

Reply:

The reductions of R10 billion in 2017/18 and R15 billion in 2018/19 were effected on compensation budgets at the national and provincial levels of government. These were allocated based on the proportion of non-occupational specific dispensation (OSD) positions in a department. This ensures that the impact on service delivery is minimised, as the bulk of the reductions will apply to managerial and administrative staff. Of these amounts, national departments carried 53 per cent of the cuts and provincial governments carried 47 per cent, based on the proportions on non-OSD staff at both levels. Provincial reductions were effected through the provincial equitable share (PES).

Table 1: Summary of expenditure cuts at the national level

Table 2: Summary of expenditure cuts at the provincial level

19 May 2016 - NW65

Profile picture: Atkinson, Mr P

Atkinson, Mr P to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)(a) How many persons attended the 2016 World Economic Forum conference in Davos, Switzerland, as part of the delegation of the National Treasury and (b) what are their (i) names and (ii) formal designations or positions in Government; (2) (a) how many of the specified persons in the delegation of the National Treasury paid the full £29 000 conference fee and (b) what was the total cost of the specified delegation’s visit to the specified conference in terms of amounts paid for (i) conference fees, (ii) accommodation, (iii) subsistence and (iv) travel costs; (3) whether any rebates were negotiated for additional members; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (4) whether any family members of delegates travelled with them to Switzerland at the state’s expense; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what are their names and (b) who did they accompany

Reply:

(1a) The Minister and four delegates from the National Treasury attended WEF Davos in 2016. National Treasury is the appointed coordinator of the government wide delegation to WEF Davos and so two of these officials attended in this capacity.

(1b) (i&ii) Ministerial delegation:

Minister Gordhan – Minister of Finance

Monale Ratsoma – Deputy Director-General: Economic Policy

Busi Sokhulu – Personal Assistant: Office of the Minister of Finance

WEF Coordinators:

Ofentse Lekwape – Assistant Director: International and Regional Economic Policy

Rebecca Murdoch – Deputy Director: International and Regional Economic Policy

(2a) None of the persons specified were required to pay fees to attend the conference, with the exception of a EUR50 fee for access badges for three of the delegates (see table 1).

(2b) The total cost of the five National Treasury delegates that travelled to WEF Davos was R549 383.72. A breakdown of these costs is in Table 1.

Table 1: Breakdown of costs for WEF

 

(i) conference fees1

(ii) accommodation

(iii) subsistence

(iv) travel costs2

Minister Gordhan

0

R40 145

R7 983

R66 217

Busi Sokhulu

R850

R73 900

R7 579

R29 963.72

Monale Ratsoma

0

R38 484

R10 428

R63 670

Ofentse Lekwape3

0

R74 680

R23 386

R26 786

Rebecca Murdoch3

R850

R74 680

R23 386

R26 786

TOTAL

R1 700

R301 889

R62 334

R183 459.72

1 Fee for access badges (EUR50).

2 Travel costs consist mainly of flights as National Treasury delegates used the complimentary WEF vehicles and shuttles to travel in and around Davos. VIP airport lounge services for Minister Gordhan, Ms Sokhulu; Mr Ratsoma are included in ‘travel costs’.

3 Mr Lekwape and Ms Murdoch were required to travel ahead of the conference as they were responsible for the coordination of the government delegation to WEF which accounts for their higher accommodation and subsistence costs.

(3) Not applicable: there were no additional members attending WEF from the National Treasury.

(4) No family members

19 May 2016 - NW1126

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)Whether, in light of his official statement on 1 April 2016, he is undertaking concrete actions to (a) map a path for higher economic growth and (b) preserve the country’s investment grade rating; if not, why not in each case; if so, in respect of each concrete action relating to (i) economic growth and (ii) the country’s investment rating, (aa) what is the objective, (bb) who is responsible for implementation, (cc) what is the deadline for implementation and (dd) when was it approved by Cabinet; (2) does a plan exist to monitor the implementation of the concrete actions relating to (a) economic growth and (b) the country’s investment rating; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

1.Yes, concrete actions are being undertaken.

South Africa needs to achieve higher levels of inclusive growth that raises employment, reduces inequality and eliminates poverty. Higher growth is also critical to help maintain South Africa’s investment grade rating.

The National Development Plan is the framework followed by all government departments to address structural constraints in the economy and achieve higher growth. The 2016 Budget Review outlines actions taken to promote private investment, address infrastructure bottlenecks, labour relations, improving policy certainty and coordination and on improving the ease of doing business (pg 25 – 27).

To further support efforts and implementation to foster higher economic growth, the president tasked the Ministry of Finance and Mr Jabu Mabuza to lead coordination with business, government and labour. Work from various work streams has focused on:

  1. preserving South Africa’s sovereign credit rating, which include joint roadshows to present a united front to rating agencies and international community, recommendations on reducing policy uncertainty and necessary fiscal and economic reforms.
  2. finding opportunities for co-investment, such as the launch of the SME Fund announced on 9 May, and
  3. resolving blockages in key sectors which can accelerate growth and investment, with ongoing task teams working within agriculture and tourism.

2. Monitoring progress is critical to ensure we are on the right path. Demonstrating concrete progress on our stated commitments to reform state owned companies, to catalyse growth and to maintain sound public finances is critical not only for ratings agencies, but for confidence in South Africa more broadly.

Government’s progress in implementing the NDP is monitored through the medium-term strategic framework (MTSF), which provides detailed reporting on individual programmes, including targets, timelines, and indicators to measure performance and the Minister/s responsible for each outcome. The process is managed and monitored by the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation.

19 May 2016 - NW991

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

Whether the Deputy Minister of Finance, Mr Mcebisi Jonas, has provided him with any further particulars concerning the allegation that he, as Deputy Minister of Finance, was offered the position of Minister of Finance by members of the Gupta family as set out in the Deputy Minister’s official media statement dated 16 March 2016; if not, why not; if so, (a) when were the particulars provided, (b) what particulars were provided and (c) why were the particulars provided?

Reply:

The details that the Deputy Minister made public is contained in the media statement released on the 16 March 2016. Please see the media statement attached. The Deputy Minister advises that he is obtaining further legal advice on the matter.

19 May 2016 - NW939

Profile picture: Brauteseth, Mr TJ

Brauteseth, Mr TJ to ask the Minister of Labour

Has (a) she and/or (b) her Deputy Minister ever (i) met with any (aa) member, (bb) employee and/or (cc) close associate of the Gupta family and/or (ii) attended any meeting with the specified persons (aa) at the Gupts’s Saxonwold Estate in Johannesburg or (bb) anywhere else since taking office; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, in each specified case, (aaa) what are the names of the persons who were present at each meeting, (bbb)(aaaa) when and (bbbb) where did each such meeting take place and (ccc) what was the purpose of each specified meeting?

Reply:

(aNo

(b) Not informed of

(i)(aa) No

(bb) No

(cc) No

(ii) (aa) No

(bb) No

(aaa) Irrelevant

(bbb)(aaaa) Irrelevant

(bbbb) Irrelevant

(ccc) Irrelevant

19 May 2016 - NW609

Profile picture: Shivambu, Mr F

Shivambu, Mr F to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)What was the cost incurred by the SA Revenue Services of paying the many lawyers in particular a certain law firm and a certain company, contracted to work on a certain person’s tax matter; (2) was an open tender process followed in appointing the specified lawyers; if not, why not; if so, what were the terms of reference?

Reply:

The South African Revenue Service has submitted the following information.  Please note that the Minister is unable to verify the content.

(1) Due to the secrecy provisions contained in Section 69 of the Tax Administration Act No. 28 of 2011, SARS is prohibited from disclosing any taxpayer information (Including whether or not a taxpayer is subject to an audit/ investigation) to any person other than a SARS official.

(2) In terms of Procurement processes SARS is guided by the PFMA and the Treasury Regulations. These requirements form the framework and basis of all practices and processes relating to procurement within the organisation.

19 May 2016 - NW1085

Profile picture: Rawula, Mr T

Rawula, Mr T to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises

(a) Has any of her senior officials met with certain persons (Atul Gupta, Ajay Gupta, Rajesh Gupta and Duduzane Zuma) during the period 1 January 2009 up to 31 December 2015 and (b) Has any of the entities reporting to her awarded any contracts to Sahara Holdings, Comair, Oakbay Investmnets, Islandsite Investments, Afripalm Horizons Stakes, The New Age Media, JIC Mining Services and Vusiwe Media in the specified period; if so, what (i) are the relevant details and (ii) is the amount of each specified contract?

Reply:

(a) Since my appointment to date as the Minister of Public Enterprises by the President, I have not officially tasked, directed or instructed directly or indirectly any of the officials in the Department of Public Enterprises to meet with any of the individuals mentioned in the question.

(b) The awarding of contracts between our State Owned Companies (SOCs) and different companies, the nature of these contracts, and the contractual relationships between SOCs and different companies are commercially sensitive.

 

19 May 2016 - NW465

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

(1) Whether consultants were employed to advise on the restructuring of the SA Revenue Service (SARS); if so, what was the (a) name of the consulting firm and (b)(i) total cost and (ii) breakdown of the cost of employing the specified firm; (2) what is the (a) estimated cost and (b) breakdown of the estimated cost of restructuring SARS?

Reply:

The South African Revenue Service has submitted the following information.  Please note that the Minister is unable to verify the content.

1. The South African Revenue Service did employ consulting firms to advise on the SARS restructuring. These were Bain Consulting and Gartner Ltd.

      (a) These were Bain Consulting and

           (i) Total order = R155,125,728.00 (including contingency claims of 10% so far only R700 000 has been claimed). Paid to date R = R103,609.629.40

      (b) Gartner Ltd.

           (ii) Total order = R157,442,590.00 (including contingencies of 10%). Paid to date = R60,555,640.00

2. The total contracted figure is R312,569,318.00

Contracts with service providers were concluded based on fixed amounts for services to be rendered. That being said, the overall cost of the restructuring of SARS cannot be estimated at this point in time as the process is still underway.

19 May 2016 - NW1171

Profile picture: Maynier, Mr D

Maynier, Mr D to ask the Minister of Finance

What effect did the decision of the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma, to remove the former Minister of Finance, Mr Nhlanhla Nene, on 9 December 2015 have on the value of assets under management of the (a) Government Employees Pension Fund, (b) Unemployment Insurance Fund, (c) Compensation Commissioners Fund, (d) Compensation Commissioners Pension Fund, (e) Associated Institutions Pension Fund and (f) Public Investment Corporation in (i) rands and (ii) percent in each case?

Reply:

The total decrease in Asset Under Management (AuM) over the period 08 December 2015 to 12 December 2015 amounted to R99 107 867 476, 76. Table 1 below provides detailed information as per requested institution.

 

Table 1: AuM per institution

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE PENSION FUND

         

Start date

End date

End Market Value (Rands)

Change in Rands

Change in Percentage

2015/12/08

2015/12/09

1 578 842 958 575,68

   

2015/12/09

2015/12/10

1 533 030 433 903,16

-45 812 524 672,52

-0,03

2015/12/10

2015/12/11

1 492 840 656 310,47

-40 189 777 592,69

-0,03

2015/12/11

2015/12/12

1 492 952 420 399,11

111 764 088,64

0,00

2015/12/12

2015/12/13

1 492 954 477 051,57

2 056 652,46

0,00

         

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FUND

Start date

End date

End Market Value(Rands)

Change in Rands

Change in Percentage

2015/12/08

2015/12/09

118 539 328 931,11

   

2015/12/09

2015/12/10

113 622 850 706,82

-4 916 478 224,29

-0,04

2015/12/10

2015/12/11

110 538 549 728,88

-3 084 300 977,94

-0,03

2015/12/11

2015/12/12

110 553 868 800,92

15 319 072,04

0,00

2015/12/12

2015/12/13

110 555 818 779,42

1 949 978,50

0,00

         

COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER FUND

 

Start date

End date

End Market Value(Rands)

Change in Rands

Change in Percentage

2015/12/08

2015/12/09

34 722 690 994,32

   

2015/12/09

2015/12/10

32 550 500 181,82

-2 172 190 812,50

-0,06

2015/12/10

2015/12/11

31 615 296 174,48

-935 204 007,34

-0,03

2015/12/11

2015/12/12

31 627 883 140,02

12 586 965,54

0,00

2015/12/12

2015/12/13

31 628 048 616,55

165 476,53

0,00

         

COMPENSATION COMMISSIONERS PENSION FUND

Start date

End date

End Market Value(Rands)

Change in Rands

Change in Percentage

2015/12/08

2015/12/09

16 943 272 754,78

   

2015/12/09

2015/12/10

16 271 781 984,86

-671 490 769,92

-0,04

2015/12/10

2015/12/11

15 809 698 426,57

-462 083 558,29

-0,03

2015/12/11

2015/12/12

15 811 843 053,26

2 144 626,69

0,00

2015/12/12

2015/12/13

15 812 007 764,12

164 710,86

0,00

         

ASSOCIATED INSTITUTION PENSION FUND

Start date

End date

End Market Value(Rands)

Change in Rands

Change in Percentage

2015/12/08

2015/12/09

14 106 965 858,19

   

2015/12/09

2015/12/10

13 361 805 139,24

-745 160 718,95

-0,05

2015/12/10

2015/12/11

13 055 814 127,87

-305 991 011,37

-0,02

2015/12/11

2015/12/12

13 059 366 371,64

3 552 243,77

0,00

2015/12/12

2015/12/13

13 059 853 104,81

486 733,17

0,00

         

PIC FUNDS UNDER MANAGEMENT

Start date

End date

End Market Value(Rands)

Change in Rands

Change in Percentage

2015/12/08

2015/12/09

1 791 426 488 177,86

   

2015/12/09

2015/12/10

1 737 191 207 615,39

-54 235 280 562,47

-0,03

2015/12/10

2015/12/11

1 692 157 213 606,73

-45 033 994 008,66

-0,03

2015/12/11

2015/12/12

1 692 309 150 164,43

151 936 557,70

0,00

2015/12/12

2015/12/13

1 692 318 620 701,10

9 470 536,67

0,00

19 May 2016 - NW610

Profile picture: Ntlangwini, Ms EN

Ntlangwini, Ms EN to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)What is the cost incurred by the SA Revenue Services for employing the services of a certain company as at the latest specified date for which information is available; (2) was an open tender system followed in appointing the specified company; if not, why not in each specified case?

Reply:

The South African Revenue Service has submitted the following information.  Please note that the Minister is unable to verify the content.

1.The cost incurred for the mandated work was:

  • Gartner:
        • Total Order: R157,442,590.00 (including contingencies of 10%)
        • Paid to date: R60, 555, 640.00

2. No, an open tender was not followed for continuity, the Project was in two phases,

    (a) in phase 1(diagnostic) of the project, the Gartner services were procured on the basis of an agreement for IT Consultancy services between SITA and Gartner.

   (b) In phase 2 of the project, the services of Gartner were procured in terms of National Treasury regulation 16A6.4 read together with paragraph 10.5.2 of the Supply Chain Management practice note number 3/ 2003 for continuity purposes.

18 May 2016 - NW1240

Profile picture: Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP

Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP to ask the Minister in the Presidency

(1)With reference to his reply to question 2372 on 24 July 2015, (a) what are the names of the 18 learners from Stellenbosch who enrolled in the National Youth Development Agency’s (NYDA) Matric 2nd Chance Project and (b) how many of the specified learners (i) have since then qualified for a National Senior Certificate and (ii) are now able to access higher education opportunities; (2) Whether any of the specified learners are currently being assisted through the Solomon Mahlangu Scholarship Fund; if so, (a) who and (b) what are the further relevant details; (3) Whether the NYDA’s 2nd Chance Project will offer financial assistance to learners who have to travel long distances to attend the specified programme in the future; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

Names of Learners are available on request.

one of the above Learners from Stellenbosch were awarded the Solomon Mahlangu Scholarship. Only one Learner (Ms Sihle Mxosana) from NSC 2nd Chance in the Western Cape was awarded. She is currently studying ND: Sports Management at CPUT. Other 9 Learners who were awarded the Solomon Mahlangu Scholarship on the NSC 2nd Chance were from other Provinces.

The Matric Rewrite – NYDA NSC 2nd Chance model does not cover financial assistance given the limited financial resource of the organization. However, the programme offers young people the following at no cost:

  • Learners are registered with the Department of Basic Education to sit and rewrite their October/November examination;
  • Learners receive a minimum of 52 contact hours per subject registered;
  • Learners receive study guides per subject registered;
  • Learners receive examination preparation tool kits which includes past examination papers and memorandums; and
  • Learners receive career guidance and life skills training as NYDA value-add services.

 

Approved/Not approved

Mr J T Radebe, MP

Minister in The Presidency

Date:

18 May 2016 - NW1241

Profile picture: Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP

Van der Westhuizen, Mr AP to ask the Minister in the Presidency

(1)With reference to his reply to question 2381 on 24 July 2015, (a) how many of the eight indicated students of the first cohort of bursary holders supported by the National Youth Development Agency (NYDA) graduated or completed their studies at the end of 2015 as expected and (b) how many learners that enrolled for the first time in the 2013 academic year were supported with funding from the NYDA (2) Of the learners that enrolled in the second cohort of bursary holders supported by the NYDA, how many (a) graduated, (b) are still studying, (c) found other forms of financial support and/or (d) dropped out of their studies since enrolling in 2013 (3) Whether any plans have been put in place to ensure a higher success rate of learners benefitting from the specified funding; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details

Reply:

All eight students referred to graduated in 2015. The NYDA recruited 70 students in 2015 under the NYDA Bursary Scheme, and 10 more students under ‘Scholarship Funding’. Therefore, the combined number of students starting their studies in 2015 was 80.

Scholarship Funding was established in 2013 as a pilot study for the Solomon Mahlangu Scholarship Fund which started in 2014. The Scholarship Funding was therefore a precursor to the Solomon Mahlangu Scholarship Fund which currently covers for registration fees, tuition fees, accommodation, meals and books for 406 students.

Out of the 80 students recruited in 2013:

41 have graduated

25 are still in the programme (mainly in longer studies such as Medicine)

2 got other funding offers

12 dropped from the programme

Since the year 2013, NYDA’s Clinical Psychologist visited the universities at least twice a year to assist with mentoring, counselling and coaching of students to ensure a higher success rate. Since the NYDA restructuring process in 2015, the Clinical Psychologist position did no longer exist. In 2016, a Service Provider has been engaged who takes over the coaching and mentoring of the students with a focus on facilitating the transition from school to university.

18 May 2016 - NW966

Profile picture: Hadebe, Mr TZ

Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Finance

(1)What was the status of (a) cash-on-hand, (b) debtors book and age analysis, (c) collection ratio, (d) monthly operating (i) income and (ii) expenditure and (e) creditors book and age analysis of Makana Local Municipality Eastern Cape (i) for the 2014-15 financial year and (ii) since 1 April 2015; (2) (a) what capital grants have been awarded to the specified municipality in the 2015-16 financial year and (b) in each case, what amount was spent; (3) whether the funds for any capital grant have been utilised to finance operational expenditure; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what (a) are the details thereof and (b) steps have been taken in this regard?

Reply:

1. The Honourable Member should note that this question should be referred to the relevant municipality or sourced from their Budget documents or annual reports (including audited financial statements). Only a municipality can verify such information.

The National Treasury collects budget, financial and other information as a consolidated resource center for the public but cannot verify the information. The National Treasury publishes annually by November the Budgets of all municipalities in terms of Section 17 of MFMA. In addition, the National Treasury also publishes detailed quarterly reports submitted by all municipalities as per the Section 71 of the MFMA. The latest publication available for the 2015/16 municipal financial year can be found on our website. The accuracy of the reports can only be confirmed by the respective municipality. The quarterly reports have been available since 2006/07 on the National Treasury Website.

http://mfma.treasury.gov.za/Media_Releases/s71/Pages/default.aspx

I refer the Honourable Member to the page or table in the latest report published on 4 March 2016 as follows:

  (a) Cash-on-hand

See Part 3 of the 2-page summary per municipality

OR

Refer to the cash flow summary on C7 in the Municipal Budget and Reporting Regulation (MBRR) formats.

 (b) Debtor’s analysis

See Part 4 of the 2-page summary per municipality

(c) Collection rate

Refer to the high level summary on C1 in the Municipal Budget and Reporting Regulation (MBRR) formats.

(d) Operation revenue and expenditure

See Part 1 of the 2-page summary per municipality

OR

Refer to the Statement of financial performance on C4 in the Municipal Budget and Reporting Regulation (MBRR) formats.

(e) Creditor’s analysis

See Part 5 of the 2-page summary per municipality

2. In terms of the information required regarding Capital grants, refer to the conditional grant summaries per municipality as well as the Summary per program / grant.

AND

Part 2 of the 2-page summary per municipality.

3. The National Treasury is not in a position to confirm whether Makana municipality spent its capital grant for operational purposes, reason being our reporting system does not provide detail to that level. However, the national department responsible for administering of the capital grant would be in a better position to provide required detail. It should be noted however, that Makana Municipality is allowed by law (DoRA) to use a portion of capital grant allocation for operational purposes within the threshold prescribed by the national department responsible for the grant.

As noted in the 2015 Division of Revenue Act, Makana municipality received one capital grant being Municipal Infrastructure Grant (MIG) administered by the department of Corporative Governance. The MIG provides that municipalities can use a maximum of 5% of the grant allocation for operational purposes.

18 May 2016 - NW1414

Profile picture: Mokgalapa, Mr S

Mokgalapa, Mr S to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry

Whether (a) his department and (b) all entities reporting to him are running development programmes for (i) small businesses and (ii) co-operatives; if not, why not; if so, in each case, (aa) what are the relevant details, (bb) what amount has been budgeted and (cc) how many jobs will be created through the specified development programmes in the 2016-17 financial year?

Reply:

All programmes specifically targeting small enterprise development administered by the dti were transferred to the Department of Small Business Development in 2014. In carrying out its mandate to broaden economic participation, the dti encourages other businesses to do business with small business in the implementation of programmes such as the BBBEE codes of good practice, local procurement and export support.

Response from the Entities

Only the four entities listed here under provide support to small business.

Entity

b(i)

b(ii)

(aa)

(bb)

(cc)

Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC)

The CIPC does not run any development programmes for small business

The CIPC does not run any development programmes for co-operatives

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

Export Credit Insurance Corporation (ECIC)

The ECIC does run development programmes for small business

The ECIC does not run any development programmes for co-operatives

ECIC is runing an enterprise and supplier development programme for its suppliers since 2014. The development offered was that of SME related training.

R14m

At this current stage the number of sustained jobs is 133 as reported by the SMEs. ECIC have no indication of how many jobs will be created in 2016/17 FY. It is however anticipated that as the SMEs grow they will create more jobs.

National Empowerment Fund (NEF)

The NEF does run development programmes for small business

The NEF does run development programmes for co-operatives

The NEF provide financial and non-financial support through its two funds namely iMbewu Fund (iMbewu) and Rural and Community Development Fund (RCDF)

iMbewu – R346m

RCDF – R150m

iMbewu – 2 700

RCDF – 1200

National Metrology Institute of South Africa (NMISA)

The NMISA does run development programmes for small business

The NMISA does run development programmes for co-operatives

NMISA has a dedicated programme to assist SMEs to understand Technical Infrastructure issues in their organisations and to measure the level of impact quality infrastructure (QI) has on their specific business. A Measurement Toolkit is used to both train the SMEs in QI and to gauge the level of intervention needed. Focused intervention is then performed with specific SMEs (and Cooperatives).

R1,6m

NMISA has no mechanism to determine the number of jobs created through this activity. If internationally developed guidelines are used to convert investment in QI into job creation, the activity supports approximately 7 000 jobs.

South African Bureau of Standards (SABS)

The SABS does run development programmes for small business

The SABS does run development programmes for co-operatives

Certification and Testing - The SABS work with SME’s in the development and implementation of quality management system, testing of product and certification.

Funding is provided by the various provincial departments and agencies such as SEDA

Direct impact on jobs is estimated by funding agencies themselves

     

Design and Innovation interventions - The SABS Design Institute provides development and support to entrepreneurs and SMME using design thinking and methodologies to improve competitiveness.

Funding for these activities is also provided by various government agencies and departments.

Direct impact on jobs is estimated by funding agencies themselves

17 May 2016 - NW1341

Profile picture: Mhlongo, Mr TW

Mhlongo, Mr TW to ask the Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform

(a) How many applications for title deeds have been received for Lakeside in Orange Farm, Johannesburg, since 1 January 1996, (b) how many of the specified title deeds have been issued to date, (c) how many outstanding title deeds still need to be issued and (d) when will the outstanding title deeds be issued?

Reply:

a) The township Lakeside comprises of various extensions which are registered in the name of Merbuild Proprietary Limited and the Gauteng Provincial Government. The Gauteng Provincial Government is registered owner of only Lakeside Extension 4 Township. The total number of erven/stands in the township is 10977 of which 10363 have, since 1 January 1996, been transferred by the township owners to various parties.

b) The number of erven that have been transferred by the township owners, and held by means of separate title deeds, to date is 10363.

c) The number of erven still held by the township owners under various township title deeds is 614.

d) The Department of Rural Development and Land Reform is not in a position to know when the township owners will transfer the remaining erven, as it is the prerogative of the township owners to transfer erven still held under various township title deeds.

17 May 2016 - NW605

Profile picture: Madisha, Mr WM

Madisha, Mr WM to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

(1)Whether she has issued or was in the process of issuing any invitation to a parliamentary delegation, comprising Members of Parliament from the different political parties, to accompany her and the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs on an in loco inspection of townships in two or three of South Africa’s richest provinces to get a view of life and the living conditions in such townships 21 years after the advent of democracy; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether she will make a statement on the current physical environment of the apartheid-era established townships and to what extent these had remained the same or have substantially been transformed and improved to accord dignity to those who lived there?

Reply:

(1) I hope the Honourable member is not suggesting that he awaits my invitation for him (or his party) to undertake his oversight responsibility. The Honourable member should ensure that his party is represented, if that is not the case, in the Portfolio Committee on Human Settlements or the Select Committee on Social Services. Both Committees have undertaken oversight visits to various provinces and made valuable recommendations to the National and Provincial Departments of Human Settlements. I encourage the Honourable member to do the same and partner with us in ensuring that we provide the much needed sustainable human settlements.

I must emphasize that as political representatives it is incumbent upon us to remain connected with our constituencies, thus we must and should always be aware of the living conditions of our citizens. In my view the entire days, weeks, months and years of a political representative must and should in fact constitute inspection-in- loco oversight of the impact of our work and what still remains to be done.

As part of our Ministerial outreach programmes, the Deputy Minister and I had on a regular basis undertaken oversight visits to areas referred to by the Honourable Member.

Notwithstanding, one of the key development focus areas of government has been to ensure that the previous Black dormitory residential areas comprising African, Coloured, Indian households, are transformed by providing all the essential infrastructure and services to ensure households quality of life is improved but also integrated with the mainly White residential areas and other economic infrastructure and services including retail, industrial, commercial, educational, technological, innovation and transport. This is a task carried out as a multi-sectoral and spherical government area of development and includes private business and communities as partners.

Since the dawn of democracy, the National, Provincial and Municipal spheres of government have planned and implemented various programmes and projects in the Black residential townships established prior and post 1994. These include the various Special Presidential Programmes, Special Provincial and Municipal Programmes and projects, which have been implemented and include amongst others but not limited to the Kathorus and Alexandra Special Presidential Projects in Gauteng, the INK Programme in Ethekwini in KZN, the Special Presidential Projects implemented in Khayalitsha and Mitchells Plan, in the City Of Cape Town, the focused infrastructure programme implemented in Soweto, in the City of Johannesburg and more recently the focused programmes implemented in Botshabelo in the Free State and Umtata in the Eastern Cape.

It is also important that we are reminded of our continued infrastructure and services grants which include the Municipal Infrastructure Grant, the Urban Settlements Development Grant, the Integrated Energy Grant, the Neighbourhood Development Grant as well as the Regional and Bulk Infrastructure Grant for water bulk and link infrastructure, are also applied in the goal of achieving the sustainable development transformation of inherited dislocated and apartheid created dormitory residential areas.

(2) The Honourable member is referred to my reply to question 279 wherein I indicated that;

Indeed Honourable member, we have taken considerable strides in transforming apartheid established townships and we are determined to do more still in order to reverse the apartheid spatial planning and its legacy. For instance, in Soweto we have provided sports facilities, built malls, and paved roads. I invite the Honourable member to visit Cosmo City, which is one amongst our success stories. Evidence of our projects can be seen in many apartheid established townships nationally, places like Kwa-Mashu, Umlazi, Langa, Khayelitsha, Mamelodi and Atteridgeville are a few examples where our footprint can be seen.

We have managed to transform approximately 98% of all our projects to be representative of a human settlement, which includes access to amenities like schools, medical facilities, shopping centres, places of worship, points of transportation and access to roads.

The table below indicates the Human Settlements’ footprint.

Number of projects reflecting characteristics of a Human Settlements

 

Number of projects being implemented (2014/15)

Amenities:
Schools, Medical Facilities, Shopping Centres, Places of Worship, Transportation (Bus-, Taxi-, Railway Points)

Access to roads

Province

 

1 km
Radius

5km Radius

10km Radius

1km Radius

5km Radius

EC

977

829

941

942

904

942

FS

1538

1282

1507

1521

1476

1521

GP

1276

1156

1274

1274

1266

1274

KZN

942

735

924

925

877

925

LP

1251

882

1198

1224

1070

1224

MP

1666

1208

1563

1581

1499

1583

NC

573

354

433

448

430

467

NW

473

436

544

555

542

560

WC

1540

1438

1511

1516

1494

1516

Total

10236

8320

9895

9986

9558

10012

% of projects within specific distances from the project, with characteristics of a human settlement

 

81%

97%

98%

93%

98%

It is further important to note that out of a total of 10 236 projects, only 70 projects (0.68%), fall outside a designated town boundary. That is due to the fact that they are projects that focus on rural communities and self-help projects (PHP).

Additionally, we have referenced and profiled a few of the largest towns in the country in relation to the above analysis (Annexure A). From this list there are none of these large towns that cannot be classified as a human settlement based on the definition of a human settlement”.

17 May 2016 - NW370

Profile picture: Steenkamp, Ms J

Steenkamp, Ms J to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

With reference to President Jacob G Zuma’s undertaking in his State of the Nation Address delivered on 12 February 2015, that the Government will set aside 30% of appropriate categories of state procurement for purchasing from Small, Medium and Micro-sized Enterprises (SMMEs), co-operatives, as well as township and rural enterprises, what percentage of the total procurement of (a) her department and (b) every entity reporting to her went to (i) SMMEs and (ii) co-operatives from 1 April 2015 up to the latest specified date for which information is available?

Reply:

(a) The total percentage spent by the National Department of Human Settlements for procurement from Small, Medium and Micro-sized Enterprises (SMMEs) for the period 01 April 2015 to 31 March 2016 is 32%.

(b) (i) The information related to Entities on Small, Medium and Micro-sized Enterprises is as per the table below:

Entities

% Spent on SMME's

HDA

30.41%

NHBRC

45%

NHFC

45%

RHLF

35.35%

NURCHA

15.81%

EAAB

49%

CSOS

45%

Provinces

The Provinces are spending on average 66 % of the Human Settlements Development Grant on Small, Medium and Micro-sized Enterprises (SMME’s) of total procurement for the 2015/16 financial year ending 31 March 2016.Limpopo and Free State have spent more than 90% whilst Western Cape and Gauteng are spending the lowest at 46% and 32% respectively to their Small, Medium and Micro-sized Enterprises.

Provinces

% Spent on SMME's

Eastern Cape

 -

Free State

90%

Gauteng

32%

KwaZulu Natal

55%

Limpopo

97%

Mpumalanga

63%

Northern Cape

70%

North West

71%

Western Cape

46%

The percentages are 100% of the total procurement by provinces and it is as at 31/03/2016

(ii) Cooperatives

The Department is promoting and supporting the establishment of Cooperatives within the human settlements delivery chain. To this end, the Department (through People’s Housing Process Directorate) has partnered with the Department of Small Business Development (DSBD) and the following has been achieved:

  • Approximately 65 different Cooperatives have been established in six (6) Provinces, namely KZN, Gauteng, Free State, North West, Western Cape and the Eastern Cape
  • Housing or human settlements Cooperatives serves as a catalyst for the establishment of other Cooperatives. The housing Cooperatives ranges from Construction Cooperatives, brick-making, window/door frame making Cooperatives, carpentry, plumbing, transport, electricity, painting etc.
  • Other livelihood Cooperatives formed will focus on agriculture, sewing, catering, poultry, shoe-making etc.
  • Most of these Cooperatives are led by Women and Youth and there is one Cooperative established in the Free State led by Disabled people
  • A Military Veterans Cooperative called Matrosov was also established in the Eastern Cape for the Chatty 491 project in Port Elizabeth
  • Delivered pre-formation and Cooperatives workshops in the six (6) Provinces
  • Assessed the state of readiness for the Cooperatives Incentive Scheme (CIS) registration application for registered Cooperatives in KZN and Free State. The main objective of the CIS registration is to enable the Cooperatives to access grant funding from the DSBD as part of the start-up capital
  • In partnership with DSBD, delivered CIS workshop to the registered Cooperatives in the Free State who have now applied for the CIS Grant from DSBD
  • Through the partnership with DSBD, a project will be identified as a pilot under the new Cooperatives Incubator Programme led by DSBD
  • The Department will be sourcing Training and Skills development initiatives for the registered Cooperatives through NHBRC, SEDA and other similar institutions

17 May 2016 - NW973

Profile picture: James, Ms LV

James, Ms LV to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

(a) How many Breaking New Ground houses will be built in the Ekuphumleni housing development project in the Ndlambe Local Municipality in the Eastern Cape, (b) by what date will the specified houses be completed and (c) what is the total amount of funding allocated to the specified project?

Reply:

(a) A total of 564 houses are to be built in the Ekuphumleni housing project in the Ndlambe Local Municipality, Eastern Cape;

(b) The estimated completion date is 31st March 2017;

(c) The budget allocated for the project is R89m.

17 May 2016 - NW845

Profile picture: Ollis, Mr IM

Ollis, Mr IM to ask the Minister of Labour

(a) what action has she taken to re-open the Central Johannesburg Labour Centre since it was close 18 months ago, as the members of the public still arrive every hour to assisted at the specified office, (b) when will the specified office be re-opened , (c) what is delaying the re-opening of the specified office, (d) what is the closest office to the specified office where members of the public can get assistance and (e) why is this not publicised on (i) her department’s website and (ii) a notice on the door of the closed office?

Reply:

a) The current building has been condemned by the Johannesburg Emergency Services in July 2015, and all tenants had to vacate the building.

The Department of Labour is engaging with the Department of Public Works on procuring alternative accommodation. The Department of Public Works has identified land on which a building could be erected for the Johannesburg Labour Centre.

We are aware that this will take some time and we are engaging the Department of Public Works to identify suitable alternative premises that could be used in the interim. The request for alternative premises was sent to the Department of Public Works on 2 November 2015.

b) At this stage we do not have a date for re-opening of the office because alternative accommodation has not been identified. We will also first have to bring such accommodation up to standard and provide necessary infrastructure.

c) The office was due to re-open in June 2015, but unfortunately a fire broke out in the basement of the building which resulted in the closure and condemning of the entire building by the Johannesburg Emergency Services.

d) Closest offices are as following;

  1. Germiston Labour Centre situated at Number 141 Victoria Street.
  2. Alberton Labour Centre situated at Number 89 Voortrekker Street.
  3. Soweto Labour Centre situated at Number 2 Khumalo Stret
  4. Roodepoort Labour Centre situated at Number 125 Albertina Sisulu Road, Technikon .
  5. Randburg Labour Centre situated at corner Oak and Hill Streets.
  6. Sandton Labour Centre situated at Number 424 9th Street, Marlboro.

e) Notices were placed on the doors of the Johannesburg Labour Centre office, but normally removed by unknown persons. We have communicated through the media and also respond to all media enquires on the matter.

17 May 2016 - NW1055

Profile picture: Gqada, Ms T

Gqada, Ms T to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

Whether her department is still included in the Rural Household Infrastructure Grant budget; if not, why not; if so, how much funding was allocated to her department from the specified grant (a) in the (i) 2011-12, (ii) 2012-13, (iii) 2013-14 and (iv) 2014-15 financial years and (b) since 1 April 2016? W1188E

Reply:

No. The Rural Households Infrastructure Grant (RHIG) is no longer part of the Department of Human Settlements (DHS) allocation. This grant was transferred to the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) in 2014 when this new Department was established as part of the National Macro Organisation of the State (NMOS).

(a) The Rural Household Infrastructure Grant was allocated the following amounts while still managed by the Department:

(i) R231.5 million in the 2011/12 financial year

(ii) R479.5 million in the 2012/13 financial year

(iii) R106.7 million in the 2013/14 financial year

(iv) R113.1 million in the 2014/15 financial year. The whole allocation was transferred to the Department of Water & Sanitation during the mid-term budget process

(b) The Department of Human Settlement has not been allocated any RHIG funding in 2016/17 financial year and over the MTEF period.

16 May 2016 - NW1080

Profile picture: Ndlozi, Dr MQ

Ndlozi, Dr MQ to ask the Minister Communications

(a) Has any of her senior officials met with certain persons (names furnished) during the period 1 January 2009 up to 31 December 2015 and (b) has any of the entities reporting to her awarded any contracts to Sahara Holdings, Comair, Oakbay Investments, Islandsite Investments, Afripalm Horizons Stakes, The New Age Media, JIC Mining Services and Vusizwe Media in the specified period; if so, what (i) are the relevant details and (ii) is the amount of each specified contract?

Reply:

GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GCIS):

(a) To the knowledge of the Accounting Officers of both the Department of Communications and the GCIS, senior managers of the departments did not meet with the above-mentioned people on their official capacity, between 2009 and 2015.

(b) No contracts were entered into with Sahara Holdings, Comair, Oakbay Investment, Islandsite Investment, Afripalm Horizons Stakes, TNA Media, JIC Mining Services and Vusizwe Media between 2009 and 2015 outside of normal procurement transactions.

Yes, there has been transactions with TNA Media to procure advertising. Payments made from the budget appropriated to Government Communication and Information System (GCIS) to TNA Media are detailed below:

DEPARTMENT

FISCAL 2011-2012

INVOICE AMOUNT

GCIS

Protection of Information Bill

R132 526.37

 

SONA

R153 900.00

 

SONA

R1 700 000.00

 

Information Dissemination

R874 888.00

GCIS Total

 

R2 861 314.37

 

FISCAL 2012-2013

INVOICE AMOUNT

GCIS

National Orders

R450 000.00

 

Orders of Companions of OR Tambo

R77 319.00

 

SONA

R893 475.29

 

State Funeral

R92 836.93

GCIS Total

 

R1 513 631.12

 

FISCAL 2013-2014

INVOICE AMOUNT

 

Mandela Memorial Campaign: State Funeral

R62 928.00

 

Recruitment

R50 068.80

 

SONA

R821 128.32

GCIS Total

 

R934 125.12

 

FISCAL 2014-2015

INVOICE AMOUNT 

Government Communication and Information System (GCIS)

Database registration

R 14 945.40

 

Profiling Campaign

R 720 990.72

 

Recruitment

R 301 195.75

 

Recruitment Phase 3

R 57 078.43

 

SONA 2014

R 100 137.60

 

SONA 2015

R 101 888.64

GCIS Total

 

R 1 296 236.54

 

FISCAL 2015/2016

 

GCIS

SONA 2016

R 145 555.20

 

Voter Education

R 81 874.80

GCIS Total

 

R227 430.00

ENTITIES REPORTING TO DOC:

ICASA did not award any contracts to Sahara Holdings, Comair, Oakbay Investments, Islandsite Investments, Afripalm Horizons Stakes, The New Age Media, JIC Mining Services and Vusizwe Media during 1 January 2009 up to 31 December 2015.

Brand South Africa did not award any contracts to Sahara Holdings, Comair, Oakbay Investments, Islandsite Investments, Afripalm Horizons Stakes, The New Age Media, JIC Mining Services and Vusizwe Media during 1 January 2009 up to 31 December 2015.

Media Diversity and Development Agency did not award any contracts to Sahara Holdings, Comair, Oakbay Investments, Islandsite Investments, Afripalm Horizons Stakes, The New Age Media, JIC Mining Services and Vusizwe Media during 1 January 2009 up to 31 December 2015.

South African Broadcasting Corporation

    (a) N/A

     (b) Yes, The New Age Media.

      (i) 1. Newspaper subscriptions

           2. The SABC and The New Age (TNA) have an agreement that the SABC will cover live all the TNA Business Breakfasts. This agreement is for a period of three years. The agreement stipulates that the TNA will arrange and organise the Business Breakfasts by providing the venue (as well as catering) and secure the participants. The SABC in turn broadcasts the event. The advantage for the SABC is the acquisition of content.

       (ii) 1. R 733,930.

            2. Nil

Film and Publications Board did not award any contracts to Sahara Holdings, Comair, Oakbay Investments, Islandsite Investments, Afripalm Horizons Stakes, The New Age Media, JIC Mining Services and Vusizwe Media during 1 January 2009 up to 31 December 2015.

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MR D LIPHOKO

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEM

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

16 May 2016 - NW697

Profile picture: Van Damme, Ms PT

Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Communications

(1) Whether (a) her department and (b) any entities reporting to her sponsored any organisations in the (i) 2014-15 and (ii) 2015-16 financial years; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (aa) which organisations were sponsored, (bb) by what amount and (cc) what were the activities sponsored in each case in each of the specified financial years; (2) whether (a) her department and (b) any entities reporting to her intend to sponsor any organisations in the 2016-17 financial year; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (i) which organisations will be sponsored, (ii) by what amount and (iii) what activities will be sponsored in the specified financial year?

Reply:

(1)(a)The Department has not sponsored any organisations in the 2015-16 financial year, and was yet to be established in the 2014-15 financial year.

(1)(b) Brand SA has not sponsored any organisations in the 2014-15 and 2015-16 financial years.

FPB has not sponsored any organisations in the 2014-15 and 2015-16 financial years and will enter into partnerships with various institutions to save costs and for marketing benefits. The said partnerships are herein attached as Annexure A.

MDDA has sponsored the MTN Radio Awards 2015 to an amount of R 78 300 ex Vat. The sponsorship was for an Award category and was in support of the recognition given to the community radio stations by the Awards. As a partnership between the MDDA and MTN, the MDDA branding was incorporated in the promotion of the Awards.

ICASA has not sponsored any organisations in the 2014-15 and 2015-16 financial years.

SABC

1(b) (i) Yes.

(ii) Yes.

(aa) 2014/15 - Writers Guild of South Africa.

2015/16 - Writers Guild of South Africa (Muse Awards).

(bb) 2014/15 - Writers Guild of South Africa: R37 000.

2015/16 - Writers Guild of South Africa (Muse Awards): R50 000.

(cc) 2014/15 - 15 Previously disadvantaged youth with the creative writing flair got an opportunity to attend a two day workshop where they had an opportunity to have one-on-one sessions with Andrew Welsh who assisted them with turning their ideas into tangible concepts. They also received course materials which they could use for future idea development.

2015/16 – Support of the local independent production industry. The annual awards celebrate South African drama writers.

(2)(a) The Department does not intend to sponsor any organisations in the 2016- 17 financial year due to budgetary constraints.

(1)(b) Brand SA does not intend to sponsor any organisations in the 2016-17 financial year.

FPB does not intend to sponsor any organisations in the 2016-17 financial year.

MDDA does not intend to sponsor any organisations in the 2015-2016 financial year. Sponsorships are only considered where they will directly benefit community media and encourage media diversity and the MDDA does not anticipate that approaches for sponsorship that meet these criteria will materialise.

ICASA does not intend to sponsor any organisations in the 2016-17 financial year.

SABC intends to sponsor the Durban International Film Festival & Durban Film Mart in the 2016-17 financial year.

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

16 May 2016 - NW1045

Profile picture: Marais, Mr S

Marais, Mr S to ask the Minister of Communications

Whether she, her department and/or any entities reporting to her (a) awarded any tenders to and/or (b) concluded any contracts and/or financial transactions with (i) Sahara Holdings, (ii) Oakbay Investments, (iii) The New Age Media, (iv) Vusizwe Media, (v) Mabengela, (vi) Islandsite Investments 255, (vii) Afripalm Horizons Stakes, (viii) Dunrose Investments and/or (ix) JIC Mining Services since 1 May 2014; if so, (aa) which company or entity, (bb) what are the relevant details of the value of each specified tender, contract and/or financial transaction and (cc) what are the names of the companies who were unsuccessful for each specified tender, contract and/or financial transaction that was awarded?

Reply:

DoC and GCIS:

(a) Both the Department of Communications and GCIS - considering shared procurement systems in the initial year of the DoC’s operation - have not entered into contracts with the above mentioned companies since 1 May 2014, outside of normal procurement transactions.

(b) Yes, the Departments transacted with TNA Media to procure advertising. Payments made are detailed below:

DEPARTMENT

FISCAL 2011-2012

INVOICE AMOUNT

GCIS

Protection of Information Bill

R132 526.37

 

SONA

R153 900.00

 

SONA

R1 700 000.00

 

Information Dissemination

R874 888.00

GCIS Total

 

R2 861 314.37

 

FISCAL 2012-2013

INVOICE AMOUNT

GCIS

National Orders

R450 000.00

 

Orders of Companions of OR Tambo

R77 319.00

 

SONA

R893 475.29

 

State Funeral

R92 836.93

GCIS Total

 

R1 513 631.12

 

FISCAL 2013-2014

INVOICE AMOUNT

 

Mandela Memorial Campaign: State Funeral

R62 928.00

 

Recruitment

R50 068.80

 

SONA

R821 128.32

GCIS Total

 

R934 125.12

 

FISCAL 2014-2015

INVOICE AMOUNT 

Government Communication and Information System (GCIS)

Database registration

R 14 945.40

 

Profiling Campaign

R 720 990.72

 

Recruitment

R 301 195.75

 

Recruitment Phase 3

R 57 078.43

 

SONA 2014

R 100 137.60

 

SONA 2015

R 101 888.64

GCIS Total

 

R 1 296 236.54

 

FISCAL 2015/2016

 

GCIS

SONA 2016

R 145 555.20

 

Voter Education

R 81 874.80

GCIS Total

 

R227 430.00

ICASA has not (a) awarded any tenders to and/or (b) concluded any contracts and/or financial transactions with (i) Sahara Holdings, (ii) Oakbay Investments, (iii) The New Age Media, (iv) Vusizwe Media, (v) Mabengela, (vi) Islandsite Investments 255, (vii) Afripalm Horizons Stakes, (viii) Dunrose Investments and/or (ix) JIC Mining Services since 1 May 2014.

MDDA has not (a) awarded any tenders to and/or (b) concluded any contracts and/or financial transactions with (i) Sahara Holdings, (ii) Oakbay Investments, (iii) The New Age Media, (iv) Vusizwe Media, (v) Mabengela, (vi) Islandsite Investments 255, (vii) Afripalm Horizons Stakes, (viii) Dunrose Investments and/or (ix) JIC Mining Services since 1 May 2014.

South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC):

(a) SABC has not awarded any tenders to (i) Sahara Holdings, (ii) Oakbay Investments, (iii) The New Age Media, (iv) Vusizwe Media, (v) Mabengela, (vi) Islandsite Investments 255, (vii) Afripalm Horizons Stakes, (viii) Dunrose Investments and/or (ix) JIC Mining Services since 1 May 2014.

(b) SABC concluded contracts with The New Age Media for Newspaper subscriptions at a cost of R733,930 since 1 May 2014.

Brand South Africa has not (a) awarded any tenders to and/or (b) concluded any contracts and/or financial transactions with (i) Sahara Holdings, (ii) Oakbay Investments, (iii) The New Age Media, (iv) Vusizwe Media, (v) Mabengela, (vi) Islandsite Investments 255, (vii) Afripalm Horizons Stakes, (viii) Dunrose Investments and/or (ix) JIC Mining Services since 1 May 2014.

Film and Publications Board has not (a) awarded any tenders to and/or (b) concluded any contracts and/or financial transactions with (i) Sahara Holdings, (ii) Oakbay Investments, (iii) The New Age Media, (iv) Vusizwe Media, (v) Mabengela, (vi) Islandsite Investments 255, (vii) Afripalm Horizons Stakes, (viii) Dunrose Investments and/or (ix) JIC Mining Services since 1 May 2014.

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MR D LIPHOKO

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEM

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

16 May 2016 - NW1038

Profile picture: Van Damme, Ms PT

Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Communications

(1) What is the full job description of the Chief Operations Officer (COO) of the SA Broadcasting Corporation (SABC); (2) whether the COO of the SABC has signed a performance agreement with her; if not; why not; if so, (a) when was the specified agreement signed and (b) what are the COO's key deliverables as per the specified agreement?

Reply:

(1) The COO’s job description is herein attached.

(2) No. The Executive Directors of the SABC sign performance agreements with the SABC Board, not the Minister.

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE

ANNEXURE A

Below is the job description of the SABC COO, as advertised on 15 February 2013, Ref.94358/2:

 

Key accountabilities: As a member of the Board and reporting to the Group Chief Executive Officer, with full day-to-day operating responsibility for the economic, content and platform performance of the SABC, the successful candidate will: ▪Ensure adherence to key performance areas, ie revenue, cost and quality ▪Ensure that the corporate strategy and the operational plans work in tandem and are geared towards positioning the SABC best in class public broadcaster ▪Work closely with the Group Chief Executive Officer and take direct corporate strategy for the operational growth of the corporation in order to improve profitability and quality of the service offering ▪Build the digital and new media capabilities of the organisation ▪Lead the various cross-functional teams across the organisation.

13 May 2016 - NW1079

Profile picture: Mokause, Ms MO

Mokause, Ms MO to ask the Minister of Mineral Resources

(1) Was he in Dubai at any time in December 2015; if so, (a) when and (b) what was the purpose of his visit;(2) whether he held any meetings while in Dubai; if so, (a) what was the purpose of the specified meetings and (b) was any of the specified meetings with the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma? (2) whether he held any meetings while in Dubai; if so, (a) what was the purpose of the specified meetings and (b) was any of the specified meetings with the President, Mr Jacob G Zuma?

Reply:

(1) Yes, Official trip to promote mining and investment opportunities in South Africa. The trip was also as opportunity to be apprised about the work done with African countries on matters pertaining to stemming the flow of illicit diamonds, and precious metals.

(2) Yes (a) To promote mining investment opportunities, as well as South Africa, as a preferred destination; (b) No.

 

Approved/not approved

Mr MJ Zwane, MP

Minister of Mineral Resources

Date Submitted: 11/05/2016

12 May 2016 - NW771

Profile picture: America, Mr D

America, Mr D to ask the Minister of Small Business Development

(1)(a) What is the current status of the plan to reduce red tape in the Moses Kotane Local Municipality in North West, (b) what is the total number unnecessary (i) policies, (ii) by-laws and (iii) regulations that were rescinded during the process to reduce red tape in the specified municipality and (c) what total amount of administration costs will the specified intervention save businesses in the specified municipality; (2) can she list three or more examples of the red tape that was cut because of the specified intervention in the specified municipality?

Reply:

(1) (a) The current plan of the Department of Small Business Development (DSBD) regarding the Red Tape Reduction Programme is to revisit the piloted municipalities to assess progress made in relation to the following: complaints notification system, 30 payment system, building plan approval processes, business registration permits, by-laws and communication of small business information to SMMEs and Cooperatives. Specifically for Moses Kotane Local Municipality in North West, the turnaround times for payment to small businesses have been reduced to the required 30 days period.

(b) There is no record of unnecessary (i) policies, (ii) by-laws and (iii) regulations rescinded in the specific municipality. The total number of policies, by-laws and regulations that impede the development and promotion of small businesses will only be outlined upon the conclusion of the proposed study on regulatory protocols affecting small businesses to be conducted by DSBD during the 2016/17 financial year. However, in terms of Moses Kotane Local Municipality the by-laws are reviewed every two years.

(c) The current assessment did not consider the administration costs. However, the improvement on turnaround times as well as communication on compliance will reduce Red Tape in each of the identified municipalities ultimately reducing costs experienced by SMMEs.

2. Some of the examples that can be referred to regarding how the red tape has been reduced include: improvement on turnaround times regarding complains on service delivery from 48 to 24 hours.

12 May 2016 - NW280

Profile picture: Lekota, Mr M

Lekota, Mr M to ask the President of the Republic

(1)Whether, in view of the rapidly diminishing fiscal space and poor state of the country’s economy, he has (a) ordered an analysis of the sustainability of having 37 Ministers, 34 Deputy Ministers and a government in each sphere and (b) requested Parliament to revisit section 46(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, with a view to reducing the cost of Parliament to the fiscus; if not, what is the position in each case; if so, what are the relevant details in each case; (2) whether he will make a statement on the affordability of Government in all three spheres as constituted currently?

Reply:

1. During the State of the Nation Address I announced a far reaching programme that is aimed at reigniting our economy and creating jobs for our people. The programme I announced, details of which were further announced in more detail in the Budget Speech by the Minister of Finance, includes measures government is taking to reduce wastage of resources in the state. I believe that if this turnaround and fiscal consolidation strategy is fully implemented, we will successfully address the matters you raise in your question.

One of the main contributors to cost is keeping two capitals, one in Pretoria and the other in Cape Town. I made a call to Members of Parliament to look into this matter and ensure that it is addressed with the urgency it deserves.

The State of the Nation Address as well as the Budget Speech contain details of our government’s plan to address wastage in the state.

12 May 2016 - NW603

Profile picture: Lekota, Mr M

Lekota, Mr M to ask the President of the Republic

Whether, in view of the fact that he, the Minister of Finance and the Statistician-General for Statistics South Africa, Mr Pali Lehohla, amongst others, are all pinning their hopes on the National Development Plan (NDP) to generate the economic growth our country needs, he would (a) take immediate and decisive steps to issue an invitation to every political party and organised interest groups which publicly, unreservedly and fully support the NDP to gather at an economic CODESA to agree to steps that would see the plan being fully implemented and (b) ensure that the mooted economic CODESA will set up an NDP Support Group that will  closely and continuously monitor progress and issue reports for government to act on; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; 2) whether he has established whether every member of the national Executive was willing to subscribe fully and unreservedly to the NDP and speak in open support of it at all times; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

1. The National Development Plan (NDP) was formulated through a thorough consultative process. Various stakeholders and members of the public were consulted in several road shows and extensive public engagement programmes by the National Planning Commission. The Plan was adopted by Parliament in 2013 with the objective to accelerate economic growth, eliminate poverty and reduce inequality by 2030. The Plan is already being implemented. The 2013 Budget was the first to be tabled within the framework of the National Development Plan (NDP). The NDP remains the cornerstone of all our budget allocation decisions. The Plan has been translated into a five year Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF), which is government’s five year programme of action. In this way, it forms part of the strategic plan of every government department.

The key priority for South Africa at the moment is to remove all possible impediments to implementation. The government cluster system ensures that there is alignment, facilitation and monitoring of implementation of priority programmes which feed from the NDP. Parliament is also able to monitor the implementation through the normal parliamentary oversight processes.

We have also introduced innovative programmes such as the Operation Phakisa Big Fast Results methodology. The programme is being implemented in a few sectors such as the ocean economy, information and communication technologies in schools, health and mining. Operation Phakisa is proving to be an effective implementation mechanism. Other programmes such as the Industrial Policy Action are also aimed at implementing the NDP, in order to promote inclusive growth and create jobs.

Every member of the Executive subscribes to the NDP. All government programmes are informed by the NDP.

12 May 2016 - NW811

Profile picture: Malatsi, Mr MS

Malatsi, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Sport and Recreation

(a) How many applicants applied for the vacancy of Boxing SA's Chief Executive Officer, (b) how many of the specified applicants were shortlisted and (c) what are the (i) names, (ii) qualifications and (iii) designated positions in (aa) his department and (bb) Boxing SA of the members of the interview panel who interviewed the shortlisted candidates for the vacant position?

Reply:

a) 18 applications were received by the Human Resource Unit of Boxing SA.

b) 3 candidates were shortlisted.

c) at this moment the names and other details required of the applicants cannot be revealed as the process of appointment is still in progress and the approval from Minister of Finance as per the Boxing Act is still awaited.

12 May 2016 - NW737

Profile picture: Madisha, Mr WM

Madisha, Mr WM to ask the President of the Republic

1. Whether the Government is implementing a policy across all spheres of government to actively and determinedly restrain the Government wage bill so that it does not (a) outpace inflation, (b) constrain the capital budget, (c) curtail service delivery (d) erode the contingency fund and (e) impact negatively on social spending on the poor; if not, why not; if so, what measure of success has the specified policy had in the period 1 January 2013 up until the latest specified period for which information is available; (2) Whether the Government is equally restraining government expenditure on the salaries of public representatives and office bearers in order to minimise the budget deficit; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

1. Government is committed to remaining within overall expenditure ceilings which were initially introduced in 2012. The main driver of growth in the past in the government wage bill has been the implementation of above inflation salary increases. However, careful reprioritisation of spending since 2012 has led to a reduction in the share of compensation of employees from 36.1 per cent in 2012/13 to a revised estimate of 34.5 per cent in 2015/16.

In the 2016 Budget Speech, the Minister of Finance announced measures to curtail growth in the wage bill, including reducing compensation budgets by R25 billion over the next three years. An additional R7.2 billion has been shifted out of compensation budgets over the medium term to other spending priorities. The National Treasury, the Department of Public Service and Administration, and the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation are working on proposals to reform wage negotiation processes. Appointments to non-critical posts will be blocked on the payroll system. However, to protect service delivery, teachers, nurses, doctors, police officers and other critical posts will be excluded from this process. To further restrain growth in wage bill, the 2016 Appropriation Bill proposes earmarking compensation budgets. The success of these interventions will be assessed during the next three-year period.

The process of determining salaries of public representatives and office bearers is undertaken by the Independent Commission for the Remuneration of Office Bearers (“the Commission). The Commission is an independent statutory body mandated in terms of section 8 (4) and (5) of the Commission’s Act (Act No. 20 of 1998), to make annual recommendations relating to salaries, allowances, benefits and making submissions to the President for consideration. A number of factors are taken into consideration with the objective of restraining expenditure. Such factors include affordability, economic conditions, and inflation forecasts, amongst other. These factors are carefully considered by the President prior to taking a decision on the Commission’s recommendations. The process also involves consultation with various stakeholders including the Legislative Sector Forum (LSF) and the Minister of Finance. A case in point is the recently announced cost-of-living adjustments for public office bearers nationally and provincially. The Commission had recommended between 5% and 6% for main categories of public office bearers but the President, after due consideration, determined a below inflation increase, (i.e. Consumer Price Index minus 1% which translates to 4.4%) for the 2015/16 financial year.

12 May 2016 - NW700

Profile picture: Malatsi, Mr MS

Malatsi, Mr MS to ask the Minister of Sport and Recreation

Whether it is his position that the serious allegations of financial misappropriation made in a KPMG report against the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the SA Rugby Union (SARU), Mr Jurie Roux, during his tenure as financial director of the University of Stellenbosch, poses a conflict of interest in any way with his current appointment as SARU's CEO; if not, why not; if so, (a) what are the relevant details and (b) what steps will he take to deal with Mr Roux?

Reply:

The Minister sees no possible conflict of interest between allegations relating to employment in one role and the pursuance of employment in another.

(a) If the question is asking whether allegations against an employee in one role are compromising to his employment in a second, in this case that of the CEO of SA Rugby, the Minister is satisfied that the Federation has properly exercised its fiduciary responsibility and would point the questioner to the legal opinion provided by Fanie Cilliers, S.C. and Professor Michael Katz. They advised that it would be unfair labour practice to take action against an employee on perceptions of third parties or on the basis of a report of which the facts have not been tested in court.

(b) Based on the above advice, the Minister will not be taking any action against Mr Roux.

12 May 2016 - NW63

Profile picture: Atkinson, Mr P

Atkinson, Mr P to ask the President of the Republic

(1)(a) How many persons in his delegation attended the 2016 World Economic Forum conference in Davos, Switzerland and (b) what are their (i) names and (ii) formal designations or positions in Government; (2) (a) how many of the persons in his delegation paid the full £29 000 conference fee and (b) what was the total cost of his delegation’s visit to the specified conference in terms of amounts paid for (i) conference fees, (ii) accommodation, (iii) subsistence and (iv) travel costs; (3) whether any rebates were negotiated for additional members; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (4) whether any family members of delegates travelled with them to Switzerland at the State’s expense; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what are their names and (b) who did they accompany?

Reply:

The World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos is a premier global marketing opportunity, bringing together Heads of State and Government and global business executives and owners to discuss the state of the global economy.

WEF traditionally provides an excellent opportunity for South Africa to market itself as an investment destination. The January 2016 meeting was important, given the depressed global economic climate. We met global captains of commerce and industry to brief them on the various interventions that we have undertaken to reignite growth and create jobs, especially the Nine Point Plan that I introduced during the 2015 State of the Nation Address, within the framework of the National Development Plan. The engagements went well as Team South Africa, both government and business, was able to send out a common message that South Africa is open for business.

I was accompanied by my wife Ms Bongekile Zuma as well as the Ministers of Finance, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, Energy, Trade and Industry, Economic Development, Health, Water and Sanitation. Officials from the Presidency included Ms Lakela Kaunda, the Chief Operations Officer; Mr Silas Zimu; the Special Advisor to the President; Dr Bongani Ngqulunga, Deputy Director-General in the Private Office of the President. In addition, the support staff responsible for research, protocol, communication and general included Ms Grace Mason, Mr Bongani Majola; Ms Milka Bosoga; Mr Pride De Lange; Mr T Sekano; Mr K Sebata; Ms T Khambane; Ms N Dlamini and Mr G Moloisi. Ministers were also accompanied by a limited number of support staff. The cost of travel, accommodation and transport is still awaited and will be available after final reconciliation.

I am not aware of any family member of a delegate being on the visit as well. Other than my wife, no other delegate from the Presidency travelled with a family member.

None of the government delegates were required to pay the amount mentioned. Accommodation for participants and support teams in Davos is arranged through a WEF-appointed travel agency in Davos. There are no individual country arrangements.

The visit to Davos contributed immensely to the drive by government to assure investors and to promote the country as an investment destination.

12 May 2016 - NW718 - Amended

Profile picture: Carter, Ms D

Carter, Ms D to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

Whether Durban or any other city in the country is regarded as an environmental hotspot on account of (a) a lack of proper and adequate sanitation, (b) overexploitation and depletion of natural resources, (c) soil or beach erosion of one type or the other, (d) diminishing water availability and compromised water quality and (e) destruction of highly prized and unique eco-systems; if not, why not; if so, (i) which cities are regarded as environmental hotspots in respect of the aforementioned, (ii) what steps has the Government taken to address the specified problems proactively and aggressively in order to remedy the situation and (iii) what measure of success is being achieved in rectifying the specified problems?

Reply:

(a) This needs to be responded by the Department of Water and Sanitation

(b) The situation described below and under (a) is not applicable to Durban or any specific city but is in general applicable to most cities. Given their population density and sheer intensity of economic activity, cities are a major source of overexploitation and depletion of natural resources. As was noted in the recent OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050, the number of people living in cities will increase to around 6.4 billion by 2050, or approximately 70% of the total world population (OECD 2012).

Therefore all cities can be considered environmental hotspots– this shear density of humanity means that cities are huge sinks for food, water, energy and other natural resources as well as being significant sources of waste, effluent, heat and atmospheric emissions (often mostly vehicle emissions).

Loss of natural habitat is the biggest single cause of loss of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in the terrestrial environment. Outright loss of natural habitat takes place mainly as a result of conversion of natural vegetation for necessary infrastructure development and urban development, which means that patterns of land use have a great impact on the health and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, resulting in impacts on their ecological functioning and viability, particularly in the context of climate change.

Furthermore, waste generated by urban settlements generates water pollution, soil pollution and air pollution, impacting on ecosystems, species and ecological processes (National Biodiversity Assessment, 2011).

Nothwithstanding the above, Durban like any other city in South Africa is subject to environmental laws of the country. This city has a dedicated environmental and planning institutional arrangement that is meant to mitigate and manage potential environmental impacts. Part of their environmental vision, the eThekwini Metropolitan city, advocates for conserving biodiversity and the ecosystem goods and services.

Operation Phakisa led by the Department of Environmental Affairs has key focus areas on Marine Protection Services and Governance that include key initiatives addressing overexploitation and depletion of natural resources or marine living species. These include a network of Marine Protected Areas and Coordinated enforcement programs.

The monitoring and evaluation of local authorities’ performance is the mandate of COGTA.

(c) (i), (ii) and (iii)

The Department is in the process of conducting a National Coastal Assessment which will identify such hotspots.

(d) (i), (ii) and (iii)

Coastal cities by their nature are potential environmental hotspots with respect to water quality. As an example, some of recreational beaches in Durban had lost their Blue Flag status due to poor water quality but have since regained this Blue Flag Status.

The Department has tools that aim to assist municipalities to better manage water quality.

(e) (i), (ii) and (iii)

All cities contain highly prized ecosystems, but continue to face pressing needs of ever expanding need to provide for housing and other land uses. However, most of the more advanced metropolitan areas and bigger cities entertain these pressures through proper land use planning. Conservation plans and other tools are in place to indicate where the environmental hotspots are located. Planning of infrastructure takes these hotspots into consideration. Designing these cities consider environmental impacts and is dedicated to the minimization of the required inputs of energy, water and food, waste output and water pollution.

A number of conservation and legislative tools to ensure conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity have been developed.

---ooOoo---

12 May 2016 - NW868

Profile picture: Carter, Ms D

Carter, Ms D to ask the MINISTER OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND COOPERATION

Whether the Government is working with international partners to help end the siege of Gaza and push for a rapprochement between Gaza and Israel so that the conflict in the Middle East could find a resolution and come to an end in the region which is creating huge problems for neighbouring countries and the world; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

Government is not only working with international partners and stakeholders regarding the “siege of Gaza and push for a rapprochement between Gaza and Israel”, but to address the full spectrum of challenges between Palestine and Israel, including those in the occupied territories and Jerusalem.The South African Government interacts on this issue with the international community in many structures, including the United Nations, the African Union, the Southern African Development Community (SADC), the European Union (EU), the Commonwealth, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and BRICS.

In addition this issue also forms part of discussions in our bilateral relations.This process of engaging international partners and stakeholders is further facilitated through the appointment in 2014, of the Special Envoys for the Middle East Peace Process, former Minister Skweyiya and Former Deputy Minister Pahad. Since their appointment, the Special Envoys have visited Palestine, Israel and neighbouring countries to convey President Zuma’s grave concern over the then escalating violence, the civilian displacement and the deterioration of the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip.

More recently visits included high-level discussions to understand the impact of conflict in the broader Middle East region on the Middle East Peace Process and to assess a possible South African contribution. The Envoys intend briefing all structures of Parliament as soon as the necessary arrangements can be made.Similarly, DIRCO will also brief Parliamentary structures.

 

UNQUOTE

12 May 2016 - NW742

Profile picture: Lekota, Mr M

Lekota, Mr M to ask the President of the Republic

(1)    Whether, in view of the dire economic situation that the country finds itself and the extreme difficulty millions of persons are experiencing in finding jobs at a time when the mining sector, manufacturing and agriculture are all declining, the Government has succeeded in (a) achieving policy coherence, alignment and co-ordination across government, (b) creating a vibrant partnership between the Government and the business sector as a whole and (c) eliminating regulatory obstacles impeding investment in South Africa; if not, why not in each case; if so, what has the Government succeeded in doing in the first quarter of this year that has removed investor frustration and bolstered business confidence; (2) whether he will indicate in which way South Africa has succeeded in becoming a capable state and being accepted as such?

Reply:

The National Development Plan (NDP) is a coherent policy framework that is used to achieve alignment and co-ordination across government.

A number of implementation strategies are in place. They include addressing the growth path challenges to the creation of more jobs, and implementing industrial and agriculture policies. Our Medium-term Strategic Framework puts timeframes to specific actions in these strategies.

In order to ensure that our planning and our policies do in fact achieve what we want them to, we have, amongst other initiatives, strengthened the role of Parliament in the budget through the Money Bills Amendment Act, and established a Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation.

To improve the ease of doing business, we are now conducting socio-economic impact assessments on new legislation to enable the true costs and benefits to be known.

A large share of public sector spending, is aimed at establishing and maintaining conditions in which the private sector can invest. Public investment levels are robust and contributed to creation of jobs and opportunities for industrialisation.

As regards regulation, we have recently amended our visa regime to better balance the various policy objectives and to help the growth of tourism. Government departments are committed to helping municipalities cut red tape and provide a range of support measures for small businesses.

Many of our largest municipalities are participating in a programme intended to reduce red tape for business in areas such as getting construction permits, obtaining electricity connections and registering property.

To develop and strengthen a vibrant partnership with key economic stakeholders, we have engaged foreign and domestic investors, trade unions and community leaders. NEDLAC continues to remain an important body which facilitates consensus and cooperation between Government, Labour, Business and the Community in dealing with South Africa’s socio-economic challenges.

In the run up to this year’s State of the Nation, I met with business leaders to hear their concerns and exchange views on what each social partner can do to lift the rate of inclusive growth and job creation. We met again on the 9th of May and announced to the nation a package of interventions to unlock growth.

These measures that I have outlined are part of our efforts to build a capable, developmental state. While are stepping up efforts to improve the performance of the state, a number new investment commitments by the private sector, including foreign investors, point to examples of successful implementation of polices by the state. These include the automobile production sector as well as renewable energy plants.

11 May 2016 - NW996

Profile picture: Macpherson, Mr DW

Macpherson, Mr DW to ask the Minister of International Relations and Cooperation

How much does her department charge government departments every time the respective Ministers make use of the (a) protocol lounges and (b) chauffeur services at each airport under the management of the Airports Company of SA?NW1128

Reply:

(a) The Department (DIRCO) does not charge other Government Departments for the usage of the State Protocol Lounges by Ministers.

The Department (DIRCO) does not pay for any chauffeur services at the Airport for Ministers.

11 May 2016 - NW1204

Profile picture: Mazzone, Ms NW

Mazzone, Ms NW to ask the Minister of Public Enterprises

(1)  What amount is the subcontract for cutting steel for 238 Badger vehicles awarded by Denel to a certain company (VR Lazer) worth; 2) did she approve the subcontract; if not, (a) why not and (b) who approved the subcontract; if so, why was it approved?

Reply:

(1) The orders placed on VR Laser as of 29 April 2016 on the Badger vehicle programme amount to R236 646 034.

(2) I do not approve sub-contracts

 (a) Awarding of contracts is a business operational matter within the mandate of Management and the Board of Directors, depending on Delegations of Authority.

(b) Management awarded the contract in line with Denel’s procurement prescripts. The contract was awarded to VR Lazer as it presented the best value proposition to Denel for the services required.

 

11 May 2016 - NW1357

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry

(1)(a) To what extent the Legal Metrology Act, Act 9 of 2014, is an improvement on the Trade Metrology Act, Act 77 of 1973, and (b) what is the legal effect of any metrology instruments for which it is obligatory to develop standards in terms of the specified Acts, but for which no standards have yet been developed; (2) whether the specified metrology instruments may be used in the absence of the specified standards; if not, what is the legal effect of any (a) business conducted and (b) accounts generated by the use of the specified metrology instruments in terms of each specified Act; if so, on which legal grounds in respect of each specified Act; (3) what is the legal effect of any metrology instruments for which it is obligatory to comply with standards already developed, but which do not comply with these; (4) whether the specified metrology instruments may be used in the absence of such compliance; if not, what is the legal effect of any (a) business conducted and (b) accounts generated by the use of the specified metrology instruments in terms of each specified Act; if so, on which legal grounds in terms of each specified Act? NW1506E

Reply:

1. (a) The Legal Metrology Act, Act 9 of 2014 is an improvement on the Trade Metrology Act, Act 77 of 1973. The Act expands trade metrology to the legal metrology domain for trade, health care and the environment amongst others, which were previously excluded from appropriate administrative control.

(b) In circumstances where standards have not been developed yet, for any metrology instrument, the CEO of the NRCS, in consultation with the user, may set interim requirements and conditions for the use of such an instrument until such time that relevant standards are developed.

2. (a) The Act makes provision for specified metrology instruments to be used in the absence of specified standards according to the stipulated process outlined above.

(b) The interpretation of the Department of Trade and Industry is that revenue generated in circumstances where there is not yet a standard, is legally permissible.

3. Section 18(1) of the Legal Metrology Act 9 of 2014 confers powers to the NRCS to take appropriate action against a defaulting party who has utilized an instrument, product or service that does not conform to legal metrology technical regulations (standards). The Act allows the NRCS to direct in writing any non-compliant instrument, product or service to be brought into compliance with the relevant standards, failing which the instrument or product may be confiscated, destroyed or returned to the country of origin.

4. Section 17(1) of the Legal Metrology Act, 9 of 2014 states that no person may import, manufacture, sell or supply a measuring instrument or product, or render a service, to which a legal metrology technical regulation applies. Costs incurred by the National Regulator for the confiscation, destruction of non-compliant measuring instrument, product or service may be recovered from the person using such measuring instrument or product, or rendering such service.

11 May 2016 - NW1094

Profile picture: Robertson, Mr K

Robertson, Mr K to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

(1) What are the reasons why 49 non-operational tractors at his departments’s Umzinti training facility in Mpumalanga have not been repaired for more than 12 months; (2) Is his department ring-fencing finances for the continued maintenance of the specified tractors; (3) What is the impact on emerging farmers when the land of beneficiaries cannot be properly prepared due to a lack of operational tractors?

Reply:

DAFF has engaged Mpumalanga Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Land and Environmental Affairs (DARDLE). They provided the following answers:-

1.The DARDLE has collected all the tractors that used to be allocated to cooperatives into one central place after realizing that there were challenges in this method when it comes to servicing farmers on the ground who were not members of the cooperatives. Furthermore, the maintenance of the tractors was also a challenge. Mzinti Training Centre was then selected for the safekeeping of the collected tractors. This move assisted the department to be able to evaluate the current status of all the tractors that were collected.

The centre currently has 58 tractors, of which 16 are in good working condition, which comprises of 4 new tractors bought in 2015 and 12 tractors that were repaired.

DARDLE acknowledges that 42 tractors are not functioning. This fleet was bought in 2006/07 financial year and has not been properly serviced all these years as they were with the cooperatives. The assessment conducted by the department revealed that 14 have serious mechanical challenges like engine replacements, gearboxes etc and this will require huge sums of money to repair. The DARDLE has therefore requested the Mpumalanga Department of Public works Roads and Transport to auction them so that they can be cleared in our asset register. The department is awaiting the auction date.

2. Yes, the DARDLE has set aside budget to continue servicing the operational tractors and also to repair the 28 tractors that could not be repaired during the last financial year.

3. The impact is minimal due to the fact that the department has in the centre 16 operational tractors. DARDLE has in the past financial year 2015/16 appointed 14 private service providers to complement the existing fleet, to ensure that farmers receive the expected services from the department.

11 May 2016 - NW517

Profile picture: Hadebe, Mr TZ

Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Communications

Whether the progress report of the allegations made against the Media Development and Diversity Agency about processes and procedures around (a) supply chain management, (b) organisational structures and (c) human resources processes in its 2012-13 Annual Report will be included in its 2014-15 Annual Report; if not, (i) why not and (ii)(aa) how and (bb) when will such a report be made available; if so, (aaa) why was the progress report not published in the 2013-14 Annual Report and (bbb) what are the further relevant details?

Reply:

The 2014/15 annual report has already been published in September 2015, and all audit findings were addressed accordingly as remedial actions which will be included in the 2015/16 annual report currently being drafted.

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE

11 May 2016 - NW429

Profile picture: Van Dyk, Ms V

Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Communications

(1)  Whether the SA Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) has an audio bouquet; if not, why not; if so, (2)  whether the specified audio bouquet will carry all of the SABC’s radio stations; if not, why not; if so, (3)  whether any provisions have been made for community radio stations to be included in the specified bouquet; if not, (a) why not, and (b) how will advertisers be convinced to still advertise on community radio stations if the community radio stations are not broadcast nationally; if so, what are the relevant details?

Reply:

(1) Yes, the SABC has an audio bouquet, it currently sits on the DSTV bouquet

(2) Yes, all 19 SABC radio stations will be carried, this includes 15 PBS Radio stations, 3 PCS Radio stations as well as Channel Africa.

(3) Not yet, Community Broadcast Services will decide on how many TV and Radio services there will be on their portion of MUX1. All TV and Radio Services on DTT (SABC and Community) will also be available on the Direct to Home (DTH) Satellite platform that has a 100% National footprint.

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

11 May 2016 - NW1221

Profile picture: Hadebe, Mr TZ

Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesQUESTION

Whether, with reference to the takeover by his department of the function of monitoring the conservation and usage of marine resources from Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, his department has enough resources to fulfill this important role; if so, what are the relevant details in respect of the human resources that his department has allocated for the specified monitoring?

Reply:

The Protocol Agreement between the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife is in force until 31 July 2016. In preparation for the termination of this agreement, the Department has already entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with an organisation called Amagagasoshintsho for the implementation of the Small-scale Fisheries programme in the province as well as for the deployment and management of the Catch Data Monitors for the Small-scale fishery. In addition, the Department will redirect the financial resources currently spent on the Ezemvelo KZN contract to ensure that there will be monitoring, control and surveillance capacity in KZN post July 2016.

11 May 2016 - NW803

Profile picture: Van Damme, Ms PT

Van Damme, Ms PT to ask the Minister of Communications

Whether the executive directors of all the entities reporting to her signed performance agreements with her; if not, (a) which executive directors did not sign, (b) for what reasons and (c) when will each executive director sign a performance agreement; if so, (i) on which date did each executive director sign a performance agreement and (ii) what are the key deliverables listed in each performance agreement?

Reply:

No, the Executive Directors of all the entities reporting to the Ministry of Communications do not sign performance agreements with the Minister. The legal framework for Brand South Africa; South African Broadcasting Corporate Services SoC Ltd; Films and Publications Board; and Media Development and Diversity Agency (MDDA) requires them to report to the Boards which are the Accounting Authorities for the entities.

Only ICASA’s Chairperson and the other Councillors are required - in terms of section 6A of the ICASA Act, No 13 of 2000, as amended - to sign a performance agreement with the Minister. In this regard, the 2016/17 performance agreements between the Chairperson, other Councillors and the Minister have been developed and are ready for signature.

 

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE

11 May 2016 - NW1216

Profile picture: Hadebe, Mr TZ

Hadebe, Mr TZ to ask the Minister of Environmental Affairs

With reference to the takeover by the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of the function of monitoring the usage of marine resources from Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, what measures and plans has her department put in place to ensure the conservation and monitoring of the marine resources on the KwaZulu-Natal provincial coastline?

Reply:

The Department of Environmental Affairs continues to have a contract with Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife and iSimangaliso Wetland Park Authority. The Department of Environmental Affairs has structured monitoring plans and arrangements with Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife. These include monitoring the KwaZulu-Natal Marine Protected Areas and the New Proposed Marine Protected Areas included in the recently gazetted 22 Network of Marine Protected Areas (for public comments) under Operation Phakisa: Ocean Economy.

The plan in this financial year 2016/2017 from 15 to 19 August 2016 is for the Department of Environmental Affairs to host another training programme for officials of Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal on the management of the Marine Protected Areas.

---ooOoo---

11 May 2016 - NW752

Profile picture: McLoughlin, Mr AR

McLoughlin, Mr AR to ask the Minister of Water and Sanitation

(1)With reference to her department’s Third Quarter Expenditure Report for the 2015-16 financial year, what capital assets were purchased from the R5,9 billion that was spent from her department’s operational budget between 1 April 2015 and 31 December 2015, in each case detailing (a) how much each item cost, (b) the (i) nature and (ii) location of each item and (c) the purpose of the specified acquisitions; (2) with reference to her department’s underspending of R3,275 billion with regard to Transfers and Subsidies and Operational Expenditure by the end of the third quarter of the 2015-16 financial year, what are the full details of the plans that have been put in place to ensure that her department achieves its targets by the end of the 2015-16 financial year without resorting to fiscal dumping; (3) (a) how many employees are (i) employed by her department and (ii) compensated through transfers from her department and (b) how much is spent on the compensation of employees at each different (i) salary scale and (ii) level of employment; (4) how does she reconcile the apparent contradiction between the statement in the report that read respectively that the slow spending is expected to be resolved as the implementation of projects gets accelerated towards the end of the financial year and that it is projected that the department will underspend towards the end of the financial year on the second to last page of the report; (5) (a) how did her department fund the 419.7% overspend on the Water Trading Entity: Operations and Maintenance budget line and (b) what was the reason for such a high overspend?

Reply:

(1) As at 31 December 2015, an amount of R47.864 million was spent on the adjusted allocation of R132.717 million for capital assets in the normal voted funds (operational budget) of the Department. The details of each item cost, and the location thereof are outlined in Annexure A.

  • Machinery and Equipment: These assets which can be used continuously or repeatedly in production for at least one year. Examples of Machinery and Equipment are Water laboratory equipment, construction and maintenance equipment, auto visual equipment, photographic equipment, office furniture, computer hardware, printing equipment, etc
  • Software and Intangible Assets are the identifiable non-monetary asset without any physical substance. Examples of intangible fixed assets are mineral exploration rights; computer software; literary and artistic originals; and miscellaneous other intangible fixed assets. To qualify as a fixed asset, the item must be intended for use in production for more than one year and its use must be restricted to the units that have established ownership rights over it or to units licensed by the owner. (The units that have established ownership rights refer to the entity that created the software for example “Microsoft” and units licensed by the owner refers to the unit buying a license to use or the right to use the software, but will not be able to change the software).

(2) Refer below for full details of the plans that have been put in place to ensure that her department achieves its targets by the end of the 2015-16 financial year without resorting to fiscal dumping:

  • Reallocation of budget within projects for improved level of expenditure between the slow and fast moving projects;
  • This will assist to expedite service delivery and improve expenditure. Over and above this, the following actions were to be taken;
  • Dedicated efforts to collect outstanding invoices from all suppliers (Including municipalities) for work completed;
  • Drive and expedite the recruitment and selection processes for the recently advertised positions;
  • Improve working relations between line function, finance and municipalities to improve supply chain management processes;
  • Perform an internal expenditure review and provide more realistic cash flow projections and practical measures (recovery plans) to put in place to ensure adherence to the cash flow projections (At project level, for all programmes).

(3) As at 31 December 2015, an amount of R1.021 billion was spent on the adjusted allocation of R1.428 billion for Compensation of Employees, refer to Annexure B.

(4) The Water Trading Entity spent the allocated funds in line with Treasury Regulations and Departmental Policy regarding the Budget.

(5) The Department’s operation and maintenance expenditure is reflected under operational clusters in the third quarter report. According to the report, there is no overspending reflected therein. The Audited financial statement for the 2014/15 financial year as reflected on the comprehensive income does not show any over expenditure on operation and maintenance.

---00O00---

Annexure A

The details of each item cost, and the location thereof are outlined in the table below:

OFFICE

MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT

SOFTWARE & INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Adjusted Budget

Spent

31 Dec 15

%

Spent

 

Adjusted Budget

Spent

31 Dec 15

%

Spent

Adjusted Budget

Spent

31 Dec 15

%

Spent

     

EASTERN CAPE

8,019

2,082

26%

-

-

0%

 

8,019

2,082

26%

FREE STATE

5,684

1,089

19%

 

-

0%

 

5,684

1,089

19%

 

 

               

GAUTENG

2,742

1,372

50%

 

-

0%

2,742

1,372

50%

KWAZULU-NATAL

1,865

985

53%

 

-

0%

 

1,905

985

52%

LIMPOPO

18,216

3,644

20%

 

-

0%

 

18,216

3,644

20%

                   

MPUMALANGA

3,874

1,164

30%

 

-

0%

3,874

1,164

30%

HEAD OFFICE

 

40,838

24,354

60%

40, 370

10,306

33%

 

81,168

34,661

43%

NORTH WEST

1,229

327

27%

 

-

0%

 

1,229

327

27%

NORTHERN CAPE

2,758

829

30%

 

-

0%

 

2,758

829

30%

WESTERN CAPE

7,122

 

1,706

24%

 

-

0%

7,122

1,706

24%

GRAND TOTAL

92,347

7,557

41%

40,370

10,306

33%

132,717

47,864

36%

Annexure B

The details for Compensation of Employees are outlined in the table below:

Classification Item

Programme

Adjusted Budget

Spent

31 Dec 15

%

Spent

COMPENSATION OF EMPLOYEES

ADMINISTRATION

645,589

481,719

75%

 

WATER PLANNING & INFORMATION MAN

350,644

244,837

70%

 

WATER INFRASTRUCTURE DEV

114,679

60,237

53%

 

WATER & SANITATION SERVICES

148,102

96,939

65%

 

WATER SECTOR REGULATION

169,383

137,694

81%

Grand Total

 

1,428,397

1,021,427

72%

The funds allocated to the department for each salary scale and) level of employment are as follows:

Salary Level

Number of officials

Original Budget per Salary Level

1

1

98

2

305

22,750

3

381

56,326

4

165

23,912

5

744

169,567

6

423

126,911

7

524

143,440

8

450

146,085

9

299

109,661

10

371

149,050

11

290

145,574

12

287

216,925

13

116

115,818

14

35

45,546

15

9

14,582

16

3

5,888

Total

4,404

1,492,133

11 May 2016 - NW279

Profile picture: Lekota, Mr M

Lekota, Mr M to ask the Minister of Human Settlements

Whether her department has transformed any of the apartheid established townships in order to ensure that the specified townships conform to the full definition of a human settlement in keeping with its own designation as the Department of Human Settlements; if not, why not; if so, which townships are now fully functional human settlements?

Reply:

Indeed Honourable member, we have taken considerable strides in transforming apartheid established townships and we are determined to do more still in order to reverse the apartheid spatial planning and its legacy. For instance, in Soweto we have provided sports facilities, built malls, and paved roads. I invite the Honourable member to visit Cosmo City, which is one amongst our success stories. Evidence of our projects can be seen in many apartheid established townships nationally, places like Kwa-Mashu, Umlazi, Langa, Khayelitsha, Mamelodi and Atteridgeville are a few examples where our footprint can be seen.

We have managed to transform approximately 98% of all our projects to be representative of a human settlement, which includes access to amenities like schools, medical facilities, shopping centres, places of worship, points of transportation and access to roads.

The table below indicates the Human Settlements’ footprint.

Number of projects reflecting characteristics of a Human Settlements

 

Number of projects being implemented (2014/15)

Amenities:
Schools, Medical Facilities, Shopping Centres, Places of Worship, Transportation (Bus-, Taxi-, Railway Points)

Access to roads

Province

 

1 km
Radius

5km Radius

10km Radius

1km Radius

5km Radius

EC

977

829

941

942

904

942

FS

1538

1282

1507

1521

1476

1521

GP

1276

1156

1274

1274

1266

1274

KZN

942

735

924

925

877

925

LP

1251

882

1198

1224

1070

1224

MP

1666

1208

1563

1581

1499

1583

NC

573

354

433

448

430

467

NW

473

436

544

555

542

560

WC

1540

1438

1511

1516

1494

1516

Total

10236

8320

9895

9986

9558

10012

% of projects within specific distances from the project, with characteristics of a human settlement

 

81%

97%

98%

93%

98%

It is further important to note that out of a total of 10 236 projects, only 70 projects (0.68%), fall outside a designated town boundary. That is due to the fact that they are projects that focus on rural communities and self-help projects (PHP).

Additionally, we have referenced and profiled a few of the largest towns in the country in relation to the above analysis (Annexure A). From this list there are none of these large towns that cannot be classified as a human settlement based on the definition of a human settlement.

11 May 2016 - NW917

Profile picture: Mkhaliphi, Ms HO

Mkhaliphi, Ms HO to ask the Minister of International Relations and Cooperation

(1)Has she earned any additional income from businesses, in particular businesses doing work for the Government, since her appointment as Minister; if so, (a) when, (b) how much did she earn, (c) from which businesses and (d) for what work; (2) whether her (a) spouse, (b) children and (c) close family earned income from businesses, in particular businesses doing work for the Government, through her appointment as Minister; if so, in respect of each case, (i) when, (ii) how much did each earn, (iii) from which businesses and (iv) for what work?

Reply:

 

Minister

(1)

No

(a)

Not applicable

(b)

Not applicable

(c)

Not applicable

(d)

Not applicable

 

(a)spouse

(b)children

(c)close family

(2)

No

No

No

(i)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

(ii)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

(iii)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

(iv)

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

11 May 2016 - NW1257

Profile picture: Bagraim, Mr M

Bagraim, Mr M to ask the Minister of Trade and Industry

(a) How many (i) international and (ii) domestic trips has a certain person (name and details furnished) undertaken since her appointment, (b) what class of travel did she use in each case and (c) what was the cost per financial year for these trips in terms of (i) accommodation costs, (ii) car rental costs and (iii) subsistence allowances?

Reply:

The requested information relates to a period that spans 11 years, which exceeds the period that the NEF stores records of the nature requested once audited. In terms of National Treasury Regulations, the NEF is required to keep records containing the requested information for a maximum period of 5 years.

It is therefore not possible at this point in time to respond comprehensively to the question as this is an onerous task by virtue of the considerable time that has lapsed since appointment of the CEO in 2005. Over the last few years the NEF has responded to similar questions relating to its CEO from the DA and has provided all necessary information as that related to information which was within its possession. We would also like to bring the Hon. Bagraim’s attention to the fact that the Hon. McPherson asked a similar question about the CEO of the NEF on 15 April 2016 and the NEF has provided responses thereto.

It is therefore regrettable that the NEF has had to contend with this volume and frequency of questions that relate to the same matter as this distracts valuable care and attention from the core business of the NEF. The latest request might necessitate the appointment of an external service provider to review NEF records and compile the report required by Hon. Bagraim.

11 May 2016 - NW701

Profile picture: Van Dyk, Ms V

Van Dyk, Ms V to ask the Minister of Communications

(1)(a) How many projects have been funded by the Media Development and Diversity Agency (MDDA) in terms of community printing and (b) how many of the specified projects are still running since the entity was established in 2004; (2)(a) how many projects have been funded by the MDDA in terms of community radio and (b) how many of the specified projects are still running since her reply to question 2876 on 26 August 2015; (3)(a) how many of the specified projects have been funded more than once, (b) which companies have been funded more than once and (c) what was the reason for allocating additional funding in each case?

Reply:

(1) (a) The MDDA has, since inception, funded 68 Small Commercial Media Print Projects

(b) 45 Small Commercial Media Print projects are currently receiving both financial (disbursement) and non-financial support (fully disbursed)

(2) (a) The MDDA has funded 103 Community Radio Stations since 2004

(b) 99 stations are fully operational

(3) 36 Small Commercial Media publications and 27 community radio stations as follows:

Small Commercial Print

  1. Genuine Magazine
  2. Isibane News
  3. Maputaland Mirror
  4. Phumelela Express
  5. Seipone/Xivoni/Tshivhoni
  6. Taxi Talk
  7. Uxhumano/Ziwaphi
  8. Bravo,
  9. Free State News
  10. Winelands Echo
  11. Rainbow News
  12. Hope Community
  13. Coal City
  14. Chalkline
  15. Northwest on Sunday
  16. Masilonyana
  17. Ngoho News
  18. Dizindaba News
  19. Eastern Cape Women Magazine
  20. Ezakwazulu News
  21. Lema Printing and Media house
  22. Die Horison
  23. Religious News
  24. Nkomazi Observer
  25. Mmaiseng News
  26. Metro News
  27. Multi – Purpose Magazine
  28. North Western Times
  29. Langa Media
  30. Ikhwezi
  31. Mmega Dikgang
  32. Zithethele
  33. Treasure Magazine
  34. Gulova Magazine
  35. Alex Pioneer
  36. Nthavela

Community Radio

  1. Barberton Community Radio
  2. Vukani Community Radio
  3. Eastern Cape Community Radio Hub (NCRF)
  4. Indonsakusa Community Radio
  5. Maputaland Community Radio
  6. Mokopane Community Radio
  7. Moutse Community Radio
  8. Moletjie Community Radio
  9. Radio Teemaneng
  10. eKhepheni community Radio
  11. Ermerlo Community Radio
  12. Makhado radio station
  13. Greater Giyani community radio
  14. Umgungundlovu community radio
  15. Inanda FM,
  16. Vibe FM,
  17. Mohodi CR,
  18. Sekhukhune CR,
  19. Radio Riverside
  20. Bushbuckridge CR
  21. Voice of Tembisa
  22. Alex FM
  23. Alfred Nzo CR
  24. Bush Radio
  25. NFM
  26. Koepel FM
  27. Motheo CR

(c) Additional funding is recommended taking consideration of the escalating printing and distribution costs, providing opportunity to the publication to increase market share such moving from publishing monthly to fortnightly and increasing the distribution footprint, funding allocated for 12 months is not sufficient for the businesses to break even and establish themselves in the market. (including Cities) in South Africa.

MR NN MUNZHELELE

DIRECTOR GENERAL [ACTING]

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE:

MS AF MUTHAMBI (MP)

MINISTER OF COMMUNICATIONS

DATE