Questions and Replies

Reply:

The Minister of Finance has not been informed of any adjustment to the powers and functions of any (a) Local or (b) District municipality in terms of section 85(9A)(b) of the Local Government: Municipal Structures Act, Act 117 of 1998, as amended, before December 2015. (i) not applicable (ii) not applicable (iii) not applicable

Reply:

1) Yes.

2)  No, the MDDA staff members were not required to put in extra hours to cover hours lost due to staff shortages to ensure that the entity’s mandate was fulfilled. However, it is understood that due to the vacancy rate, some staff members were required to take on extra duties during normal working hours.

3) Staff members were given a choice to take leave or to take cash in lieu of leave to assist in compensating for the extra workload due to the vacancies.

  (a) A total of 17 staff members opted to not take leave and to receive cash in lieu of leave.

  (b) The professional designations were Programme Managers, Project Officers and Administration staff.

4) No, the MDDA did not re-allocate the lost leave days.

(a) The lost leave days were not reallocated as the staff had been given the option for cash in lieu for the lost leave days.

(b) The affected staff were given cash in lieu for the lost leave days. All affected staff received the cash in lieu for the lost leave days in April 2017.

5) The latest organogram is attached herewith as Annexure A

 

Reply:

South Africa is implementing the International Health Regulations (2005) [IHR 2005] since its enactment on 15 June 2007. In February 2017, the National Department of Health completed a self IHR assessment using the Joint External Evaluation tool, with the participation of all relevant Government departments and key stakeholders. The National Department of Health officials assessed all the action packages, namely: prevention, detection, response, and IHR-related hazards as well as Points of Entry. The Department of Health is using the findings to develop an action plan aimed at further strengthening of South Africa's IHR capacity.

END.

Reply:

No	Organisation	(a) Amount Outstanding	(b) Period	(c) Reason and payment dates
(i)	SAMRO (SA Music Rights Organisation)	R14,546,580-00	April 2017	This is based on March 2017 revenue. Payment of SAMRO is scheduled for the 3rd Quarter of the 2017/18 F/Y.
(ii)	SAMPRA (SA Music Performance Rights Association) and IMPRA (Independent Music Performance Rights Association)	R52,751,160-73	March 2014	Both societies have not agreed on the percentage split of the amount based on the play history reports SABC has generated. Then a decision was made that both societies must submit their repertoires lists to SABC for final verification which SABC agreed on the due date of the end of May 2017. Both societies have submitted the repetoires list for the verification process which is still ongoing. Once all is completed and agreed upon by all parties the payment will be made to the societies.
(iii)	AIRCO (Association of Independent Record Companies)	R2,800,000-00	October 2016 -  April 2017	TV division is awaiting invoices from AIRCO for October 2016 – March 2017. Payments are scheduled from May 2017 onwards.
(iv)	RISA (Recording Industry of South Africa)	R2,400,000-00	January 2017 – April 2017	A payment of R19.8m was made at the end of December 2016. Payment is scheduled for the 3rd Quarter of the 2017/18 F/Y.
(v)	CAPASSO (Composers, Authors and Publishers Association)	R3,000,000-00	February 2017 – April 2017	February and March payments have been submitted for payment and are dependent on funds availability. Payment is scheduled for the 3rd Quarter of the 2017/18 F/Y.

Reply:

(1) (a) In the current financial year the Department of Sport and Recreation SA (SRSA) will conduct a facility audit intended not only to quantify number of facilities available, their type and level of service they offer, but also to assess needs and shortfalls using various methods including municipal IDPs and the SRSA Facility Classification Framework, which provides guidelines in terms of type and category of facility, level of service it must offer and minimum distance/radius for accessibility. This, in line with the department’s annual performance plan, will ensure the prioritisation of building and maintenance of facilities in order to contribute to the objectives of National Sport and Recreation Plan and the National Development Plan.

(b) The Department has conducted and concluded a facility count and verification process in 2016. The process included count of all facilities irrespective of their ownership and this was done through our facility count project team in all nine (9) provinces in collaboration with municipalities. The national total sum of facilities as counted is 5022, and provincial breakdown is as follows:

 

PROVINCE	FACILITIES
Eastern Cape	214
Free State	259
Gauteng	989
KwaZulu-Natal	1341
Limpopo	947
Mpumalanga	791
Northern Cape	102
North West	134
Western Cape	245
NATIONAL	5022

(c) Our 2016 facility count took this matter into consideration and make a shocking revelation that of all facilities counted, irrespective of their conditions, only 20% are accessible to people with disabilities, and this is another matter that justifies a need to strengthen the role of SRSA in planning and monitoring implementation of sports and recreation infrastructure projects in order to enforce Norms and Standards, and Sports and Recreation Amendment Act both of which emphasize a need to ensure that sports facilities are user friendly to people with disability.

(2) (a) Since 2016/17 the department has been involved with identification of sports infrastructure projects in all provinces in order to guide allocation of the R300 million for MIG. The NDP dictates that all settlement in the country must have access to sport and recreation facilities, and it is in that spirit that while resources are limited and prioritisation is inevitable, allocations will be made in all provinces.

(b) Since sports infrastructure projects are implement in a context of MIG, therefore, with exception of multi-year projects, completion dates of projects will coincide with the end municipal financial year, and this effectively informs time frames.

**************************************

Reply:

The Department of Public works manages accommodation requirements of national departments through the Property Management Trading Entity (PMTE). Included in this mandate is the provision of accommodation through state owned and leased properties, construction of new accommodation, major refurbishment of existing properties and management of municipal services.

State-owned accommodation charges are billed quarterly in advance in line with the devolution framework principles developed at the time of establishment of the PMTE. The process that is followed to recover monies relating to private leases, municipal services, Client Infrastructure spending (Capital allocation) and other recoverable infrastructure projects (referred to as PACE and CA) is as follows:

 

• PMTE pays lessors, contractors and municipalities on behalf of user departments;
• At the end of the month, the recoverable costs are consolidated per client;
• Invoices are then issued to clients in arrears;
• User departments have 30 days to settle debts in terms of the PFMA;
• However, in practice this gives rise to 60 days delay in matching the expense with the revenue.

As at the end of March 2017, R2, 854 billion was outstanding from national departments (Annexure: A) and R195 billion from other organs of state (Annexure: B).

In line with established inter-governmental cooperation principles, the PMTE has regular interactions with user departments for the recovery of outstanding debts and is assisted by the National Treasury where additional funding is required.

 

Reply:

1. (a) Yes.

    (b) The Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of

Communication–related Information Act (RICA), 2002 (Act No. 70 of 2002) has been earmarked for revision and appropriate amendments. This is as a result of a number of requests for amendments that have been received from various quarters and also as a result of concerns regarding the implementation of the RICA which have been brought to the attention of the Department. These requests relate, among others, to the following:

1. the need to enhance governance, transparency and accountability mechanisms in order to oversee the interception of communications;
2. the need to give further consideration to the compulsory registration of SIM-cards and the regulation thereof; and
3. the broadening of RICA to cater for the combatting of cybercrime, making provision for other forms of electronic surveillance and regulating the use of remote access tools to investigate crime.

The Department is still in an investigative and initial drafting phase. A draft Bill is not yet available. Discussions with some of the law enforcement agencies regarding certain proposed amendments are under way. Public consultation will follow once the Department has processed the draft Bill through the required internal processes.

2. Yes. Section 15 of the RICA deals with the availability of other procedures for obtaining real-time or archived communication-related information. In terms of this section, the availability of the procedures in respect of the provision of real-time or archived communication-related information provided for in sections 17 and 19 of the RICA (applications to the interception judge for real-time communication-related and archived communication related-directions) does not preclude obtaining such information in respect of any person in accordance with a procedure prescribed in any other Act. However, in terms of section 15 of the RICA any real-time or archived communication-related information which is obtained in terms of such other Act may not be obtained on an ongoing basis.

In this regard, section 205 of the Criminal Procedure Act (CPA), 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977) is relevant. Section 205 of the CPA deals with the power of a judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate, upon the request of a Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) or a public prosecutor authorized thereto by the DPP, to require the attendance before a judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate, for examination by the DPP or the public prosecutor authorized thereto by the DPP, of any person who is likely to give material or relevant information as to any alleged offence, whether or not it is known by whom the offence was committed. If such person furnishes that information to the satisfaction of the DPP or the public prosecutor concerned prior to the date on which he or she is required to appear before a judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate, he or she is under no further obligation to appear before a judge, regional court magistrate or magistrate.

The Department is aware of concerns relating to the application of section 205 of the CPA in order to obtain real-time or archived communication-related information. Since section 205 of the CPA can be used to obtain material and relevant information regarding any alleged offence and not only information relating to communication as provided for in the RICA, the Department will consider amendments to section 15 of the RICA together with the amendments referred to in question 1 above.

Reply:

1. Yes, there are properties that are let out to non-governmental tenants.

  (a) As at 31March 2017, there were 1175 surplus properties let to non-governmental tenants;

  (b) These properties are leased to non-governmental tenants such as churches, private individuals, companies, not for profit organisations, etc.

  (c) These properties are spread across the country in all provinces and various municipalities (refer to attached annexure A).

2. Lease agreements were signed with these tenants. However, there are instances where the lease agreements have since expired and are in the process of being renewed.

The department embarked on Operation Bring Back (OBB) specifically to ensure all properties of state are accounted for and utilised appropriately. The department has a team which is visiting all properties to ensure they are secured, and any illegal occupants engaged and that all leases are regularised. For vacant properties, and expired leases, the department advertised these properties to ensure that we achieve legal occupation speedily, not all the expired leases have been renewed, as this is an ongoing process.

The rental amounts vary for each property as per the attached annexure.

(a) Further details with respect to the leased properties are as per the attached annexure.

Reply:

(a) In terms of the National Road Traffic Act (Act 93 of 1996), there is no provincial inspectorate of testing stations.

(b) No one has been appointed, however the Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC is in the process of appointing a service provider /s to conduct assessment and inspections of driver licensing testing centres and vehicle testing stations.

(c) An open tender, Reference No RTMC BID 05/2007/18 was issued on Friday 19 May 2017 and the closing date is 12 June 2017 at 11:00.

(d), and (e), for reasons stated in (a),(b) and (c) above, the Department only receives copies of the reports on inspections done by the SABS and is not privy to any provincial reports, findings and actions taken by the MEC of the province.

(f), (g), and (h) The Department has started with the process of developing the Anti-fraud and Corruption Strategy that is intended to root out fraud and corruption at the vehicle and driving testing stations; and in terms of the current Departmental Strategic Plan, it is anticipated that the strategy will be approved in March 2019.

Reply:

(a) In terms of the National Road Traffic Act (Act 93 of 1996), there is no provincial inspectorate of testing stations.

(b) No one has been appointed, however the Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC is in the process of appointing a service provider /s to conduct assessment and inspections of driver licensing testing centres and vehicle testing stations.

(c) An open tender, Reference No RTMC BID 05/2007/18 was issued on Friday 19 May 2017 and the closing date is 12 June 2017 at 11:00.

(d), and (e), for reasons stated in (a),(b) and (c) above, the Department only receives copies of the reports on inspections done by the SABS and is not privy to any provincial reports, findings and actions taken by the MEC of the province.

(f), (g), and (h) The Department has started with the process of developing the Anti-fraud and Corruption Strategy that is intended to root out fraud and corruption at the vehicle and driving testing stations; and in terms of the current Departmental Strategic Plan, it is anticipated that the strategy will be approved in March 2019.

Reply:

1. The National Treasury did provide the former Minister of Communications or the Department of Communication with the report into investigation into the set-top box procurement process.

2. (a) There was no additional request made to PWC to conduct any further investigation as the Department of Communication has not requested the National Treasury to facilitate such an investigation.

(b) No further aspects of the process are being investigated, currently.

(c) The final report will be completed subject to completion of criminal proceedings by law enforcement agencies.

Reply:

(a) GCIS had not procured any services or made any payment to the Decolonisation Foundation during the 2016/17 Financial Year.

Reply:

1. The Department has not undertaken and/or intends to undertake studies to determine the viability of allocating more money directly to the Unemployment Insurance Fund because the Fund has always been self-funding and as such it does not require any form of funding from the Department.

2. Yes, the monitoring mechanisms are based on the current performance management system.

3. The Department took into consideration amongst other things the human resources required for the monitoring; and successful implementation of the National Minimum Wage agreement.

Reply:

(a) Number of cases identified by the Auditor-General:	(i) Fruitless	(ii) Wasteful	(iii) Irregular
(aa) 2014-15	1	-	1
(bb) 2015-16	-	1	1
(cc) 2016-17	-	-	-
(b)(i) Total amount in each case:	(i) Fruitless	(ii) Wasteful	(iii) Irregular
(aa) 2014-15	R 67,000.00	-	R 750,865.50
(bb) 2015-16	-	R 50,050.00	R 520,000.00
(cc) 2016-17	-	-	-
(b)(ii) How much was recovered in each case:	(i) Fruitless	(ii) Wasteful	(iii) Irregular
(aa) 2014-15	R 67,000.00	-	-
(bb) 2015-16	-	-	-
(cc) 2016-17	-	-	-

Reply:

Firstly it is important to correct the statement/perception that the increase for 2017/18 financial year for Public Employment Services is by 54%. The actual increase for is a mere 2%.

 a) R4, 438.00

 b) R3, 875.00

Reply:

The impasse has been resolved. The Commonwealth Games Federation (CGF) awarded the bid to host the Commonwealth Games 2022 on 02 September 2015 at its general assembly in Auckland, New Zealand. At the time of awarding the bid, the finance guarantee by the South African Government was not signed, as certain conditions of the host city agreement were not favourable to South Africa and hence could not be signed. This further meant that the outstanding issues raised by the evaluation commission after their visit in April/May 2015 could not be attended to as it was dependent on the negotiations with the Commonwealth Games Federation around matters contained in the financial guarantee and the host city agreement.

Further to the negotiations, South Africa provided a response to the issues by 30 November 2016. The Commonwealth Games Federation completed its detailed review of the final information submitted by South Africa on 30 November 2016 to determine whether the requisite conditions precedent set by South Africa would be acceptable to the Commonwealth Games Federation. The latter however felt that this did not meet with their methodology of games delivery and considered South Africa's position as a departure from the conditions they had set in the proposed Host City Agreement. The Evaluation Commission of the Commonwealth Games Federation did not accept South Africa's conditions, budget proposals and delivery methodology. It was therefore resolved that the Commonwealth Games Federation should withdraw the rights awarded to Durban to host the 2022 edition of the games.

**************************************

Reply:

(a) The Department has not as yet received the legal fees from its legal team.

(b) Not applicable

(i) The Department has not yet received any taxed costs from the Applicants.

(ii) PRASA did not join legal proceedings, thus there were no legal fees to be paid

Reply:

1. The link below indicates the number of invoices issued and paid for each month since 1 April 2015 to 31 March 2017. The information for April 2017 is not yet available, but will be submitted once it is available.

https://pmg.org.za/files/RNW1328Table-170605.pdf  

2. SANRAL calculates the compliance rate in Rand value due to invoices varying in terms of tariff due to class of vehicle, time-of-day, frequent user discount, etc. Additionally, it should also be noted that once a vehicle reaches the monthly cap, invoices are still issued even though the value is zero.

a) The compliance rate for February 2017, based on Rand value was 29%.

b) Due to the year-end processes and audits still to be concluded, the value of outstanding debt can’t be disclosed. This will be available once the Auditor-General has concluded the audit on 31 July 2017. The audited results as at 31 March 2016, reflects the outstanding value (trade receivables), which would be for unregistered users, as R7 206 million.

Reply:

(1) The National Treasury reviewed coal contracts to established if Eskom complied with the SCM norms and standards when appointing the service provider.

(2) Yes.

(a) (1) Falcon Research and Consulting Services (Pty) Ltd and

(2) Israel Monnapula Dikgwatlhe.

(b) Both were appointed to assist the National Treasury to review and analyse the quality of coal delivered to Eskom by Tegeta Exploration and Resources.

(c) The total cost for Falcon Research and Consulting Services (Pty) Ltd

R 184 500.00,

The following is the breakdown of the cost for Falcon

Analysis of test coal results ...………………………………………………. R 13 500-00

Analysis of the Environmental Analysis report …………………………… R 4 500-00

Analysis of the technical aspects of the coal supply agreement ………. R 9 000-00

Analysis of the technical aspects in the draft report ……………………… R 18 000-00

Analysis of technical aspects in the minutes of the meetings …………… R 9 000-00

Extended reviews of documents………………………………………………. R103 500-00

Compilation of a technical report …………………………………………… R 27 000-00

TOTAL………………………………………………………………………….. R184 500.00

The following is the breakdown for Israel Monnapula Dikgwatlhe

Analysis of test coal results ...………………………………………………. R 24 800-00

Analysis of the Environmental Analysis report …………………………… R 18 600-00

Analysis of the technical aspects of the coal supply agreement ………. R 18600.00

Analysis of the technical aspects in the draft report ……………………… R 18 600-00

Analysis of technical aspects in the minutes of the meetings …………… R 9 920-00

Request additional data analysis………………………………. R12 400-00

Compilation of a technical report …………………………………………… R 49 600-00

Comparison of the quality of coal expected……………………………….. R5 425.00

Clear comparison of what was delivered………………………………….. R4 650.00

Clear comparison of results for Sibonisiwe and SABS in compliance of

Brakfontein mine with requirements for mining coal R4 030.00

NT findings with the response from Eskom………………………………. R5 425.00

TOTAL………………………………………………………………………… R178 250.00

(3) whether any draft and/or final report(s) on the review has/have been produced; if not, (a) why not and (b) by what date is a report expected; if so, (i) what is the title of each report and (ii) on what date was the report completed;

Response: A final draft report was sent to Eskom on 05 April 2017.

(4) whether the final report on the review will be made public; if not, why not; if so, by what date is it expected?

Response: Yes, as soon as the report is finalised.

Reply:

a) (i) Telkom cut voice services to NaTIS sites on 21 March 2017 because Tasima had not paid.

(ii) There were no adverse effects because the system remained operational as data services were not affected.

b) Voice services were restored on 19 April 2017 after the RTMC had taken over the NaTIS.

c) No owner of a motor vehicle was unable to licence a vehicle due to a planned interruption by Telkom. In the event of an unplanned interruption such as copper theft or other similar incidents, the licensing office logs a call with the provincial helpdesk to obtain a reference number. Through this process, the licensing office is authorised by the provincial helpdesk to backdate the effective date of licensing to prevent any penalties and arrears being payable.

Reply:

1. (a) (i) No.

(a) (ii) No.

(aa) Not Applicable

(bb) Not Applicable

(cc) Not Applicable

(dd) Not Applicable

(ee) Not Applicable

(ff) Not Applicable

Reply:

(a) and (b) (i) and (ii) The Department of Sport and Recreation South Africa and the entities reporting to its Executive Authority did not procure any services from and/or make any payments to the Decolonisation Foundation.

Thus (aa), (bb), (cc), (dd), (ee) and (ff) fall away.

************************************

Reply:

(1) Yes

(a) The law does not prohibit any person from serving on more than one Board of the entities reporting to the Minister of Communications.

(b) (i) Ms Khanyisile Kweyama

    (ii) Brand South Africa Board and the interim SABC Board.

    (iii) Serving a three-year term at Brand South Africa and six months at the SABC interim Board.      

    (iv) payment for services rendered were in line with the required prescript

(2) Yes.

Reply:

1. a) The National Department of Public Works is the custodian of the Jonkershoek Forest Reserve Farm 352 and the unregistered portion 4 also known as “Op-die-Bult Jonkershoek”

(b) The National Department of Public Works is currently negotiating with the Stellenbosch Municipality to assume responsibility for the human settlement of former forest workers by means of the disposal of the property to that municipality.

(2) No, currently there are no funds available for the maintenance of the general infrastructure and houses of the settlement, hence negotiations with the
Stellenbosch Municipality to assume responsibility for the settlement.

(3) (a) 18 formal structures have been confirmed at Op-die-Bult, with 123 households recorded in the broader Jonkerhoek Mixed Use Precinct. These
figures are from the time when the property was returned to Department by the South African Forestry Company Limited (SAFCOL) acting on behalf of
the then Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.

(b) (i) No funds have been spent on the infrastructure

(b) (ii) No funds have been spent on the houses

(4) (a) The Department is currently negotiating with the Stellenbosch municipalityto take over the properties together with their inhabitants as it is best-placed to provide appropriate standards of human settlement

(b) Yes, it is envisaged that the Department will hand over the properties to the Stellenbosch Municipality for management of the human settlement according to prescribed standards.

(5) The National Department of Public Works aims to transfer the land to the Stellenbosch Municipality. Other relevant Departments e.g. Department of
Human Settlements, COGTA, Department of Rural Development etc. will then be drawn in as an intergovernmental team to assist with housing and
infrastructure in formalising the settlement in terms of their core function.

Reply:

1. Yes, Erf 81 situated in Tamboerskloof, Cape Town, Western Cape falls under the care of National Public Works Department.

2. The property is being considered for transfer to the Department of Defence, which has requested that this property – as well as all other Endowment properties – be returned to the Department of Defence for their own use. The property is an Endowment property owned by Department of Defence and is under the custodianship of National Department of Public Works.

3. The property is intended to be used by the Department of Defence for their own needs.

Reply:

(1-2) The role of Prof. Chris Malikane is to advise Minister of Finance. The eight pages discussion documents, is not government position but was for his academic purposes.

(3) The government is doing all it can to improve the economic prospects of the country by ensuring that a conducive environment is created for public and private sector to invest in the economy and eventually create jobs.

(4) As government, we are clear and consistent in terms of Economic Policy and how to address current challenges. A lot of work is being done at the level of both local and abroad to avoid any further downgrade. We are working towards improving our current grading.

Reply:

MINISTRY

PUBLIC WORKS

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Department of Public Works l Central Government Offices l 256 Madiba Street l Pretoria l Contact: +27 (0)12 406 2034 l +27 (0)12 406 1224

Private Bag X9155 l CAPE TOWN, 8001 l RSA 4th Floor Parliament Building l 120 Plain Street l CAPE TOWN l Tel: +27 21 468 6900 Fax: +27 21 462 4592

www.publicworks.gov.za

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

(ORAL)

1. We requested information from Mr Edward Nkuna in Head Office, we are awaiting his feedback.
2. See below:

Item No	Project Name	WCS numbers	Status	2015/16	2016/17	2017/18
1	Bryntirion No. 19	053319	Completed	R 158 301.19	R 2 107 035.90	R 0.00
2	331 Olivier, Brooklyn	053347	Completed		R 1 835 818.72
3	375 Lawley	053574	Completed		R 1 319 303.55
4	321 Rigel	054033 & 048576	Completed	R 2 398 350.77	R 89 124.35	R 0.00
5	313 Edward, Waterkloof	054031	Completed	R 0.00	R 2 597 583.51	R 0.00
6	273 Eridunus, Waterkloof	053575	Completed	R 0.00	R 2 828 604.88	R 0.00
7	286 Albertus, Waterkloof	053584	Completed	R 0.00	R 2 784 102.34	R 0.00
8	13, 1st Avenue Houghton*	050773 & 054581	Completed	R 3 133 499.05	R 333 263.99	R 0.00
9	21A Killarney Road, Sandhurst	052038	Completed	R 197 826.19	R 2 501 531.73	R 0.00
10	79 Bogey	052425	Completed	R 920 961.98	R 1 200 680.99	R 0.00
11	205 Sterlitzia Street	054730	Completed	R 0.00	R 2 658 529.98	R 0.00
			TOTAL	R 6 808 939.18	R 20 255 579.94

Reply:

(a) The increase in the remuneration of the CEO of Umalusi from 2013-14 to 2014-15 financial years was not as a result of a long service award as previously reported. The spur of the moment response given in the meeting of the Portfolio Committee on 3 May 2017 was informed by the fact that such an award was given to the CEO in recognition of his 30 years’ service in the public service albeit a year earlier. The decision for the long service award was guided by the long service policies of the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) and Umalusi.

The table below outlines the remuneration components of the total package reported in the annual reports of the abovementioned financial years:

	Remuneration component	13/14	14/15	%
		R'000	R'000	increase
1	Basic remuneration	1 618	1 729	6.9%
2	Pension contribution	149	160	7.1%
3	Medical contributions	–	12	100.0%
4	Cost to company package	1,767	1,901	7.6%
5	Bonus & Performance payment	99	114	14.9%
6	Leave pay-out	–	220	100.0%
7	Long service award	–	–	–
8	Total package	1 867	2 235	19.7%

In the 2013-14 to 2014-15 financial years the leave pay-out was the remuneration component that led to the high increase. In 2014 the Remuneration and Human Resources Committee of Council (REMCO) noted that 12 employees had accumulated more than 50 leave days. In May 2014, REMCO recommended to Council to pay out a maximum of 30 days to employees. The recommendation was subsequently approved by Council in June 2014 and the pay-out was actioned in July 2014. Ultimately, only 7 employees were reimbursed, and one of them was the CEO.

(i) The long service award was given to the CEO in January 2013 i.e. the 2012/13 financial year, as stipulated in the policies of the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) and Umalusi.

(ii) The amount of the award was R15 000. The employee also encashed 30 days’ annual leave as per the Umalusi policy. The total amount of leave paid out was R188 270.

(iii) The CEO is employed at salary level 16 of the DPSA levels.

(iv) The table below summarises the employment history of Dr Rakometsi from 1 January 1983 to date.

Years	Position held	Institution	Date appointed	Date resigned / promoted
Total to date: 34 years 5 months
8 years 5 months	Chief Executive Officer	Umalusi, Pretoria	Jan 2009	To date
3 years 4 months	Superintendent General (Head of Department)	Free State Department of Education, Bloemfontein	Sep 2005	Dec 2008
4 years 5 months	Chief Director: Curriculum and Professional Development and Support	Free State Department of Education, Bloemfontein	Apr 2001	Aug 2005
2 years 3 months	Director: Education Institute	Free State Department of Education, Bloemfontein	Jan 1999	Mar 2001
3 years	Chief Education Specialist (Deputy Director Professional) - Examinations	Department of Education, Arts and Culture, Sport and Recreation, Mmabatho North-West Province	Jan 1996	Dec 1998
3 years	Deputy Chief Education Specialist (History)	Free State Department of Education and Culture, Welkom	Jan 1993	Dec 1995
3 years	Head of Department Professional Subjects and Student Affairs	Tshiya College of Education, Qwa Qwa	Jan 1990	Dec 1992
1 year	Senior Lecturer (Student Affairs)	Tshiya College of Education, Qwa Qwa	Jan 1989	Dec 1989
1 year 7 months	Lecturer	Tshiya College of Education, Qwa Qwa	Apr 1987	Dec 1988
3 year 3 months	Teacher	Thokoana-Makaota Senior Secondary School, Qwa Qwa	Jan 1984	Mar 1987
1 year	Teacher	Rearabetswe Senior Secondary School, Odendaalrsrus	Jan 1983	Dec 1983

(v) A submission regarding the long service award for the CEO is recommended internally, but ultimately submitted to the Chairperson of Council for approval.

All remuneration aspects of the CEO as the Accounting Officer are recommended to Council as the Accounting Authority and only paid out with Council’s approval. The cost to company is paid in line with the rates as determined by DPSA. To this end, Council is requested annually to approve all annual cost of living adjustments.

Bonus and performance payments are made on an annual basis in line with the performance management and development policy. The award ranges from 2% to 8% of cost to company, limited by the 1.5% of the total remuneration budget. The scores are moderated by members of the Executive Committee of Council (EXCO) and signed off by the Chairperson of Council.

(vi) Legislation informing the long service award is the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) and Umalusi policies.

Reply:

(1) Yes, since from 17 March 2017.

(2) (a)(b) the FPB conducts benchmarking studies in different jurisdictions and the work on the Online Regulation Policy was a culmination of such studies.

Reply:

The information required is being collected from various Divisions and stake holders which in turn must still be collated and verified so as to provide an accurate information. Therefore a consolidate response will be provided soon.

Reply:

1.  The 6% increase to Inspection and Enforcement Services was granted by National Treasury and not by the Department.

(2) No; the 6% increase for 2017/18 financial year is not sufficient to ensure that the labour inspectors are properly resourced and capacitated to ensure all labour market policies are complied with.

Reply:

1. In terms of the National Road Traffic Act (Act 93 of 1996), there is no provincial inspectorate of testing stations.

1. No one has been appointed, however the Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC is in the process of appointing a service provider /s to conduct assessment and inspections of driver licensing testing centres and vehicle testing stations.

1. An open tender, Reference No RTMC BID 05/2007/18 was issued on Friday 19 May 2017 and the closing date is 12 June 2017 at 11:00.

(d), and (e), for reasons stated in (a),(b) and (c) above, the Department only receives copies of the reports on inspections done by the SABS and is not privy to any provincial reports, findings and actions taken by the MEC of the province.

(f), (g), and (h) The Department has started with the process of developing the Anti-fraud and Corruption Strategy that is intended to root out fraud and corruption at the vehicle and driving testing stations; and in terms of the current Departmental Strategic Plan, it is anticipated that the strategy will be approved in March 2019.

Reply:

a) 30;

b) All 30 relate to allegations of fraud;

c) 89

Reply:

Since the inception of e-tolls on 3 December 2013, the payments to date amounted to R2.22 billion for full toll operations. It must be noted that this amount cannot be regarded as compensation directly to the toll operator since it includes amounts that are paid via the e-toll operator to other service providers that provide direct services in terms of the project. Most notably are the following services:

Safety and Security Services	R 19.02m
Insurance of buildings	R 11.72m
Utilities (water, power, property taxes, telecoms), kiosk rental	R 138.49m
e-tags procurement from 3rd parties	R 130.56m
Invoice printing and posting	R 225.30m
SMS's	R 3.72m
	R 528.81m

Excluding the above payments to other service providers (e.g. municipalities, telco’s, e-tags, Post Office, security and insurance companies), the payments made to the toll operator amount to R1.69 billion over a period of 42 months (Dec 2013 to May 2017). From these payments the operator:

• pays salaries (approximately 1000 people);
• performs system maintenance (toll gantries and all other hardware and software), electrical and building maintenance;
• pays software licenses;
• processes toll transactions;
• generates invoices; and
• operates customer service centres, the call centre, violator processing centre etc.

Reply:

(a) The Huguenot Tunnel is not a concession contract, but a state-owned toll road, as it is funded and maintained by SANRAL. The toll operations and tunnel management are outsourced to Tolcon Group, the Operator. SMEC Consulting Engineers are the appointed professional service providers; and are responsible for overseeing the operations and maintenance of the Huguenot Toll Plaza and Tunnel.

(b) Tolcon was appointed on 27 November 2014 and the Operations and Maintenance contract officially commenced on 01 February 2015.

(c) Tolcon and SMEC Consulting Engineers were appointed after an open tender process.

(d) The tender provided for a functionality requirement to be met as a minimum. This was calculated on the following basis:

THE QUALITY CRITERIA AND MAXIMUM SCORE IN RESPECT OF EACH OF THE CRITERIA ARE AS FOLLOWS: FORM	DESCRIPTION OF QUALITY CRITERIA AND SUB-CRITERIA	MAXIMUM NUMBER OF TENDER EVALUATION POINTS
B1	Schedule of Work Experience in comparable projects	20
B3	Proposed Personnel for Key staff	15
B4	Continuing professional development of the Key staff	5
B5 (Items 1,4,5, & 6)	Organisational structure, Logistics, support structures and managerial ability appropriate to the size and nature of the work	10
B5 (Item 2)	Financial control structures	10
B5 (Item 3)	Financial information	5
B5 (Item 7)	Maintenance proficiency	15
B7	Toll Systems Replacement: Methodology, Approach & Technical Compliance	15
B8	Toll Manning Configuration	5
Total evaluation points for quality (MS)	100

The minimum number of evaluation points for quality (WQ) was 75.

All compliant tenders who met the threshold moved on to the second stage of the tender evaluation which was Price and Preference (90/10).

Scoring preference:

Up to 100 minus W1 tender evaluation points will be awarded to tenderers who submit responsive tenders and who are found to be eligible for the preference claimed. Points are based on a tenderer’s scorecard measured in terms of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act (B-BBEE, Act 53 of 2003) and the Regulations (2009) to the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act (PPPFA, Act 5 of 2000).

Points awarded were allocated according to a tenderer’s B-BBEE status level of contributor and summarised in the table below:

The score for price was calculated out of the 90 points using the formula:

A = (1 – (P – Pm)/Pm)

Pm is the comparative offer of the most favourable comparative offer

P is the comparative offer of the tender offer under consideration

The points for Price was then added to the Preference Point for a total point out of 100. The tender is awarded to the highest point scorer.

(e) It should be noted that this is not a concession contract, but the current Operations and Maintenance contract started on 01 February 2015.

(f) The contract was awarded for a 3 year period, with an option to extend for a further 2 years.

(g) Not applicable

(h) The Huguenot Toll Plaza and Tunnel is part of the SANRAL Toll Portfolio. Details of bonds issued in the capital markets to fund the Portfolio with each bonds corresponding coupon rate is disclosed in the SANRAL financial statements.

Reply:

Department

Department did not procure any services or made any payments to (i) the certain company (name furnished) or (ii) any other public relations firms. The reason is because the department did not have a need to obtain the services of a public relations firm.

(aa) Not applicable

(bb) Not applicable

(cc) Not applicable

(dd) Not applicable

(ee) Not applicable

(ff) Not applicable

Airports Company South Africa SOC Limited (ACSA)

Airports Company South Africa has not procured any services from the company whose name was furnished. Airports Company South Africa utilises the services of FTI Consulting for its public relations.

Air Traffic Navigation and Services (ATNS)

1. According to ATNS records, no services where procured or payments made to Bell Pottinger
2. No service or payments were made to any public relations firms. There has not been any reason to procure services or make payments to public relations firms

(aa) Not applicable

(bb) Not applicable

(cc) Not applicable

(dd) Not applicable

(ee) Not applicable

(ff) Not applicable

South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA)

(a) N/A (b)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb)(cc)(dd)(ee)(ff)The South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA) procured services from and made payments to a public relations agency called PR Powerhouse. The agency was hired to provide the SACAA with a variety of marketing communications aimed at creating awareness about the organisation, its mandate, and services offered to the public. Examples of outputs include drafting of media statements, setting up media interviews, and related public relations activities. The contract agreement was for a period of six months, ending 31 March 2016. During the contract period, the agency was paid a monthly retainer fee of R54 150, 00 (fifty-four thousand one hundred and fifty rand); amounting to R324 900, 00 (three hundred and twenty-four thousand nine hundred rand). NW1652E

(b) Cross-Border Road Transport Agency (CBRT) has not procured services from nor has it made any payments to (i) Bell Pottinger nor (ii) has it engaged any other public relations firm. The Agency has not established the need to do so.

(aa) – (ff) Not applicable

(b) Road Accident Fund (RAF) did not procure any services from and/or make any payments to (i) Bell Pottinger, but (ii) did procure services from The Brand Leadership Group (Pty) Ltd (“Brand Leadership”), a brand strategy, brand valuation and intellectual property management company, to (aa) provide the RAF with communications, media and public relations services, (bb) at a total contracted cost of R3 102 624, including VAT, over the three year period commencing on 13 January 2014, (cc) the detailed breakdown of such cost is:

Description	Total Cost
Management fee	R2 721 600
Percentage of markup fee for events	Billing principles and terms and conditions
Addition cost	Billing principles and terms and conditions
Total	R2 721 600
Total VAT	R381 024
Total VAT inclusive	R3 102 624

, (dd) of which R 2 879 044.31 has been paid to date, (ee) the purpose of the payment was to compensate Brand Leadership for the contracted services rendered to the RAF, (ff) the detailed breakdown of the payments are set out below:

Date of Payment	Amount	Particulars:
07 April 2014	R7,524.00	Advertisement
09 May 2014	R13 167.00	Brand Management
11 June 2014	R86 184.00	Retainer
19 June 2014	R86 184.00	Retainer
04 September 2014	R86 184.00	Retainer
05 November 2014	R86 184.00	Retainer
12 November 2014	R86 184.00	Retainer
26 February 2015	R86 184.00	Retainer
13 March 2015	R86 184.00	Retainer
17 April 2015	R86 184.00	Retainer
30 April 2015	R86 184.00	Retainer
11 June 2015	R86 184.00	Retainer
01 July 2015	R86 184.00	Retainer
08 September 2015	R86 184.00	Retainer
11 September 2015	R96 159.00	Retainer of R86 184.00 and R9 975.00 for design and artwork
18 November 2015	R99 581.81	Retainer of R86 184.00 and R13 397.81 for road show
20 January 2016	R105 606.75	Retainer of R86 184.00 and design and layout R11 172.75
20 April 2016	R114 114.00	Retainer of R86 184.00, R16 758.00 and R11 172.00 for branding.
22 April 2016	R135 560.25	Retainer of R86 184.00 and design and placement of advert R49 376.25
25 April 2016	R172 368.00	2 X Retainer of R86 184.00
18 May 2016	R172 368.00	2 X Retainer of R86 184.00
20 June 2016	R172 368.00	2 X Retainer of R86 184.00
14 September 2016	R172 368.00	2 X Retainer of R86 184.00
19 September 2016	R182 286.00	Retainer of R86 184.00, advertorial for R87 210.00 and R8892.00 for design and layout for an advert.
19 January 2017	R401 365.50	4 X Retainer of R86 184.00, campaign of R53 437.50 and R3 192.00 for design.
Total	R2 879 044.31

(b) Road Traffic Management Corporations (RTMC) has not procured services from nor has it made any payments to (i) Bell Pottinger nor (ii) has it engaged any other public relations firm. The Agency has not established the need to do so.

(aa) – (ff) Not applicable

(b) Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTI) has not procured services from nor has it made any payments to (i) Bell Pottinger nor (ii) has it engaged any other public relations firm. The Agency has not established the need to do so.

(aa) – (ff) Not applicable

(b) South African Road Agency Limited (SANRAL) has not procured services from nor has it made any payments to (i) Bell Pottinger nor (ii) has it engaged any other public relations firm. The Agency has not established the need to do so.

(aa) – (ff) Not applicable

South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA)

The South African Maritime Authority (SAMSA) has never done any business nor procured any goods or services from Bell Pottinger or any other public relations firm.

The Authority has its own internal Corporate Affairs department which, among other things, is responsible for stakeholder management and communication.

Ports Regulator of South Africa (PRSA)

(b) The Ports Regulator did not procure any services from and/or made any payments to (i) Bell Pottinger or (ii) any other public relations firm. The reason for not using such services is because the activities of the Ports Regulator so far have not necessitated the use of a public relations firm.

National Railway Safety Regulator (NRSR)

(b)(i) The RSR has not procured any services from and/or made any payments to the company in question, Bell Pottinger.

(b)(ii) The RSR utilised the public relations services of Media Equity South Africa

(aa) The services procured related to the provision of reputation management services for the Regulator

(bb) The total cost of the services is contracted for an amount of R295 000.

(cc) Breakdown for cost relate to the assisting the Regulator to strengthen its relationship with the media and increase awareness of its newsworthy initiatives:

(dd) The Regulator has paid Media Equity SA R95 000 to date.

(ee) For services rendered as per the contract awarded to date

(ff) Detailed breakdown:

• Facilitation of the State of Safety report Launch – R35 000
• Interviews with senior management and staff
• Desktop research and social media analysis
• Securing participation from media houses and ongoing relationship building - R60 000

Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (PRASA)

          (b) (i) PRASA has never procured services from Bell Pottinger

               (ii) No other PR Agency has been used by PRASA

               (aa) there was no requirement for those services

               (bb) Not applicable

               (cc) Not applicable

               (dd) Not applicable

               (ee) Not applicable

               (ff) Not applicable           

 

Reply:

Yes, the official has been suspended.

a) The official was suspended on 17 March 2017.

b) The official is facing various charges of alleged misconduct, details of which are still confidential pending finalisation of the disciplinary processes. The suspension was to enable the Board to conduct an investigation on allegations of misconduct.

c) Mr Mmberegeni Dzebu.

d) The Council requested the then Minister of Communications to second an official to act as the CEO. Mr Dzebu was found to be a suitable person.

Reply:

It is difficult to report on the statistics relating to convictions of examiners due to the prolonged period it takes to finalise a case; and due to the fact that once a case has been opened with the South African Police Service (SAPS), they must conduct investigations and ultimately prepare the docket for the Department of Justice to prosecute. Therefore a case may take much longer than expected to be finalised. This involves arms of government other than the Department of Transport.

a) The Limpopo province reported that there were no examiners convicted of issuing fraudulent certificates of road worthiness in the 2016 / 17 financial year.

b) See above (a)

c) See above (b)

Reply:

(i) There are three ongoing investigations at PRASA.

1. The investigations into the irregular and fruitless and wasteful expenditure found by the Auditor-General in the 2014/2015 annual financial statements. This was commissioned by the Board of PRASA in terms of its fiduciary duties flowing from the Public Finance Management Act and led by Werksmans Attorneys.
2. The investigations into contracts of more than R10 million concluded between 2012 and 2015 as per the remedial steps recommended by the Public Protector’s Report in August 2015 that are associated with the entities and transactions that were under investigation in (1) above. These investigations were, by agreement between PRASA, the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer of the National Treasury and the Department of Transport, led by Werksmans Attorneys.
3. The investigations into contracts of more than R10 million concluded between 2012 and 2015 as per the remedial steps recommended by the Public Protector in August 2015. These relate to entities and transactions that were not viewed as related to the entities and transaction under investigation in (1) above. These investigations are led by National Treasury and National Treasury has appointed about 20 entities with forensic investigation capacity to conduct the investigation of these transactions and entities.

(ii) There is no new investigation commissioned by the Board of PRASA.

(iii) For the Financial Years 15/16 and 16/17, R148 million was paid for the investigations, and for the 17/18 Financial Year R14 million has been budgeted.

(iv) The timeframes for the conclusion of the investigations is end of July. The Milestones are that reports are submitted to the Board as they are completed. To date the Board has instituted seven court actions and has also forwarded 41 reports to the Directorate of Priority crimes investigations for further criminal investigations and 4 internal disciplinary actions have been instituted against affected employees.

(v) Please see response under (ii).

Reply:

(a)(b)(i)(ii)(aa)(bb)(cc)(dd)(ee)(ff)

The Department and the Entities reporting to the Minister did not procure any services from and/or made any payments to the Decolonisation Foundation.

Reply:

The Department has refurbished and equipped the West End Psychiatric Hospital state patients unit in the 2016/17 financial year.

(a) A vacated 36 bed ward at West End Hospital has been completely upgraded to make it suitable for involuntary male health patients. The male involuntary patients were transferred from the secure ward adjacent to the existing State Patient Ward. This vacated ward is also suitable for State Patients which allowed rapid transfer in early May of 21 State Patients from Kimberley Correctional Services.

(b) The ward is fully and appropriately equipped for State Patients.

END.

Reply:

No, neither the National Department of Health nor any of the public entities reporting to the Ministry of Health procured any services from the Decolonisation Foundation.

END.

Reply:

Public funds are intended to be spent for public purposes. Accordingly, no payments were made to the named entity.

-END-

Reply:

(1) The person has resigned from the FPB.

(a) The person resigned on 8 April 2017 and is currently handing over and concluding projects relating to the Annual Report.

(b) The resignation was due to professional reasons.

(2) No.

(3) No. (a) She used to serve on the MDDA Board. (b) Yes. (c) payment for serves rendered are made in terms of the revenant prescript.

(4) Yes, the person has been shortlisted to serve on the Council of ICASA and recommended by the National Assembly.

Reply:

(1) Listed below are municipalities with payment arrangements, however these municipalities have defaulted at some point. These key defaulting municipalities’ combined contribution to overdue municipal debt is 87%.

Table 1: Municipalities with valid payment arrangements, as at 31 January 2017

See the link: http://pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/RNW87Table-170605.pdf

(2)(a) Section 139(5) states that if a municipality, in financial crisis, breaches its obligation to provide basic services or admits that it is unable to meet its financial commitments, the relevant provincial executive authority must impose a financial recovery plan. The Minister can only intervene in terms of Section 139(7) if the provincial executive authority cannot adequately exercise its power to perform the functions referred to in sub-sections 4 or 5. The national executive authority must then intervene.

National and provincial government is obligated, in terms of Section 154 of the Constitution, to support and strengthen the capacity of municipalities in managing their own affairs and exercising their own power to carry out functions. In holding municipalities accountable, CoGTA as part of the Inter-Ministerial Task Team on Eskom debt, has been in discussion with Premiers, MECs and Mayors. The Department has had engagements with various stakeholders to resolve the issue of Eskom debt. The following agreements were reached:

• Eskom proposed to reduce the current interest rate charged to municipalities that are in arrears from 5% to prime plus 2,5%.
• Eskom will review charging interest after 15 days as opposed to 30 days, in terms of the PFMA.
• Eskom has agreed to allocate the payments by municipalities first toward the principal debt before the interest.
• The majority of municipalities have been assisted to enter into payment agreements. In August 2016, only 24 municipalities had agreements in place. However, as at January 2017, it has increased to 54.
• The Inter-Ministerial Task Team is in the process of resolving the legislative matters on electricity reticulation between Eskom and municipalities.

(3) Based on Eskom’s interaction with municipalities and the Inter-Ministerial Task team (DPE/CoGTA/NT) during 2016, the following common challenges were identified as contributing to the municipalities not honouring their financial obligations with Eskom:

i) Financial

• Cross-subsidisation of electricity revenue for other municipal services.
• Electricity tariff setting is not cost-reflective.
• Some municipalities are grant-dependent.
• Notified Maximum Demand (NMD) penalties and interest on arrears makes it difficult to decrease the principal debt.

ii) Technical

• Eskom charges a high penalty when municipalities exceed the NMD.
• Theft and losses of electricity equates to as much as 50% of purchases in some municipalities.
• A maintenance backlog in infrastructure results in high technical losses.

iii) Legislative Framework

• Municipalities are unable to effect credit control measures in Eskom-supplied areas of electricity supply.

Reply:

(a) (i) Please refer to Annexure A.

(ii) Only 1 (one) borehole was refurbished at a cost of R 58 129.98. All other boreholes were drilled and equipped, as per annexure A.

(iii) Please refer to Annexure A.

(b) (i),(ii) Please refer to the Annexure A.

(c) (i) There were no service providers appointed for maintenance of boreholes. Boreholes were on completion handed over to the farmers (beneficiaries or communities).

(ii) No maintenance costs were incurred by the Department.

ANNEXURE A OF NA QUES 1049 OF 2017

No	Province	Local Municipality	Name	Total Cost per borehole	(a)(i) Drilling cost per metre	(a)(iii) Equipping cost per metre	(b)(i) Type of pump	(b)(ii) Type of equipment installed
1	Free State	Dihlabeng/Maluti a phofung	Bethlehem Camp 1	R 475 218.35	R 320.00	R 3 052.00	Mono	1x5000lt tank on 350mm thick concrete base & 4 drinking troughs and 1 windmill
2	Free State	Dihlabeng/Maluti a phofung	Bethlehem Camp 2	R 475 218.35	R 320.00	R 3 052.00	Mono	1x5000lt tank on 350mm thick concrete base & 4 drinking troughs and 1 windmill
3	Free State	Dihlabeng/Maluti a phofung	Gedachtenis	R 475 218.35	R 320.00	R 3 052.00	Mono	1x5000lt tank on 350mm thick concrete base & 2 drinking troughs and 1 windmill
4	Free State	Dihlabeng/Maluti a phofung	Mahlake 305	R 475 218.35	R 320.00	R 3 052.00	Mono	1x5000lt tank on 350mm thick concrete base & 4 drinking troughs and 1 windmill
5	Free State	Dihlabeng/Maluti a phofung	Mahlake 310	R 475 218.35	R 320.00	R 3 052.00	Mono	1x5000lt tank on 350mm thick concrete base & 4 drinking troughs and 1 windmill
6	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mcakwini 1	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
7	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Ndombeni	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
8	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Bethangwe	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
9	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mansiya	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
10	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Manaba	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
11	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Imanzibomvu (Mbazwana)	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
12	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Kwageorge dip	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
13	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mabandleni dip	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
14	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mkhumbikazane	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
15	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Thengane dip	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
16	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Bomvini Dip	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
17	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Genuka dip	R 265 354.15	R 3 960.51	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
18	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mfanela	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
19	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mthaleni	R 265 354.15	R 3 960.51	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
20	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Mthaleni 2	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
21	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Masakeni	R 265 354.15	R 3 960.51	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
22	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Masakeni 2 (Giba)	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
23	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Nqutshini	R 265 354.15	R 3 960.51	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
24	KZN	Umkhanyakude	Nqutshini 2 (Esimphondweni)	R 526 184.52	R 3 960.51	R 3 892.99	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
25	KZN	Zululand	Ntweni	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
26	KZN	Zululand	Nkweme	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
27	KZN	Zululand	Ndololwane	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
28	KZN	Zululand	Emfemfeni	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
29	KZN	Zululand	Dabhazi	R 87 246.73	R 736.60	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
30	KZN	Zululand	Dabhazi	R 87 246.73	R 736.60	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
31	KZN	Zululand	Dabhazi	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
32	KZN	Zululand	KwaMphothi	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
33	KZN	Zululand	Qanqathu Trust	R 420 891.75	R 736.60	R 2 816.89	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
34	KZN	Uthungulu	Thelumoyaphansi	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
35	KZN	Uthungulu	Matina	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
36	KZN	Uthungulu	Matina	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
37	KZN	Uthungulu	Siyangokuya	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
38	KZN	Uthungulu	Mpongose	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
39	KZN	Uthungulu	Dubeni Dip tank	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
40	KZN	Uthungulu	Ntshiweni Dip Tank	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
41	KZN	Uthungulu	Patane (Gcobashe)	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
42	KZN	Uthungulu	Mfanisa	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
43	KZN	Uthungulu	Ntuthunga	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
44	KZN	Uthungulu	eDayini	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
45	KZN	Uthungulu	Sabhuza	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
46	KZN	Uthungulu	Sabhuza	R 145 193.84	R 1 214.29	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
47	KZN	Uthungulu	Gegethe	R 483 218.87	R 1 214.29	R 2 826.97	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
48	KZN	Amajuba	Inkululeko Yomphakathi	R 407 185.65	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
49	KZN	Amajuba	Ndwakazane	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
50	KZN	Amajuba	Vaalbank-Esidakeni	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
51	KZN	Amajuba	Vaalbank-Esidakeni	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
52	KZN	Amajuba	Slagveld	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
53	KZN	Amajuba	AMAJUBA - OSIZWENI	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
54	KZN	Amajuba	Jiyane	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
55	KZN	Amajuba	Waaihoek	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
56	KZN	Amajuba	Esikhaleni	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
57	KZN	Amajuba	Reserve Farm	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
58	KZN	Amajuba	Bloodriver -Nzimane	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
59	KZN	Amajuba	Bloodriver -Nzimane	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
60	KZN	Amajuba	AMAJUBA BUFFALO RIVER	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
61	KZN	Amajuba	Steeling	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
62	KZN	Amajuba	Malonjane	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
63	KZN	Amajuba	GROOTHOEK	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
64	KZN	Amajuba	MANCAMANE	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
65	KZN	Amajuba	WAAIHOEK FARM 2 TRUST	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
66	KZN	Amajuba	GROOTVLEI	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
67	KZN	Amajuba	BEROUW	R 292 295.64	R 716.48	R 3 210.10	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
68	KZN	Umzinyathi	Ward 9	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
69	KZN	Umzinyathi	Ward 7	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
70	KZN	Umzinyathi	Ward 7 Replacement	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
71	KZN	Umzinyathi	Nquthu Ward 12 Jabuvu	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
72	KZN	Umzinyathi	Jabavu - alternate	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
73	KZN	Umzinyathi	Nquthu Ward 13 Hluleni	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
74	KZN	Umzinyathi	HLAZAKAZI	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
75	KZN	Uthukela	Emnambithi piggery	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
76	KZN	Uthukela	Mdlatswele -Cornfields	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
77	KZN	Uthukela	Mkholombe -Weenen	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
78	KZN	Uthukela	Khanjana (Nhlambamsoka)	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
79	KZN	Uthukela	Rosboom ( Goodhope)	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
80	KZN	Uthukela	RIETKUIL FARM	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
81	KZN	Uthukela	KLIP PORT FARM	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
82	KZN	Uthukela	MANGQATENI	R 322 772.55	R 657.26	R 3 199.74	Mono	3x5000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
83	Limpopo	Greater Giyani	Thomo	R 346 225.00	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
84	Limpopo	Thulamela	Tshifudi	R 415 663.38	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
85	Limpopo	Lephalale	Kgobagodimo	R 482 582.50	R 657.26	No information provided	No information provided	No information provided
86	Mpumalanga	Thembisile Hani	Gemsbokfontein	R 150 000.00	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	1x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 1 troughs on slab
87	Mpumalanga	Bushbuckridge	Welverdiend A	R 315 680.00	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	1x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
88	Mpumalanga	Chief Albert Luthuli	Lekkerloop (section 2)	R 58 129.98	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	4x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 8 troughs on slab
89	Mpumalanga	Thaba Cheu	Pilgrimrest	R 160 000.00	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	4 x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 16 troughs on slab
90	Mpumalanga	Nkomazi	Strydomblok/Dludluma	R 202 000.00	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	1x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
91	Mpumalanga	Nkomazi	Goba	R 189 720.00	R 657.26	R 3 200.00	Mono	1x10 000lt tanks on 3m stands & 2 troughs on slab
92	North West	Moses Kotane	DRIEFONTEIN FARM-MMEKWA	R 190 000.00	R 657.26	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
93	North West	Moses Kotane	DRIEFONTEIN FARM-MONAGENG	R 190 000.00	R 657.26	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
94	North West	Mahikeng	FARM LUCYDALE-STONE	R 190 000.00	R 657.26	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
95	North West	Mahikeng	FARM LUCYDALE-MATSHEKA	R 190 000.00	R 657.26	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
96	North West	Mahikeng	SUNNYSIDE-MOJIWA	R 220 000.00	R 657.26	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
97	North West	Moses Kotane	VLAKFONTEIN FARM	R 220 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
98	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm-Mabiletsa	R 220 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
99	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm- ntshabele PJ	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
100	North West	Moses Kotane	driefontein farm -Monageng	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
101	North West	Moses Kotane	Donkerhoek farm-Ramokgadi	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
102	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm-Pitse	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
103	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm-Lekgotla PN	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
104	North West	Moses Kotane	Donkerhoek farm- Maragel BJ	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
105	North West	Moses Kotane	Donkerhoek farm - Matlapeng	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
106	North West	Moses Kotane	Donkerhoek farm Moraka	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
107	North West	Moses Kotane	Donkerhoek farm- Maragele TM	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
108	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm-Molefe ES	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
109	North West	Moses Kotane	Driefontein farm-Ntshabele NS	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
110	North West	Rustenburg	Palmietfontein -Mokgatle	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
111	North West	Rustenburg	Potgieters fontein-Motlhabane	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
112	North West	Rustenburg	Palmietfontein -Rammutla	R 190 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill
113	North West	Mahikeng	Lucydale farm	R 220 000.00	R 0.00	R 300.00	windmill	water tank, elevated stand & windmill

Reply:

It is difficult to report on the statistics relating to convictions of examiners due to the prolonged period it takes to finalise a case; and due to the fact that once a case has been opened with the South African Police Service (SAPS), they must conduct investigations and ultimately prepare the docket for the Department of Justice to prosecute. Therefore a case may take much longer than expected to be finalised. This involves arms of government other than the Department of Transport.

a) According to information provided by the Free State province, no examiners were arrested or convicted in the 2016 / 17 financial year for fraudulent certification of roadworthiness.

b) See above (a)

c) See above (b)

Reply:

(1) FIFA was authorized by the South African Football Association (SAFA) to make the necessary payment to the Confederation of North, Central and Caribbean Football Associations (CONCACAF) and was authorized to do so as the funds were destined for the Host Association being SAFA itself.

(2) There was no inquiry into this matter as the payment was not unlawful and SAFA was well within its right to make the payment in furtherance of a standing government programme of making the World Cup an African World Cup, and a FIFA approved programme of ‘Win in Africa for Africa and One Goal’. No South African law was broken in the transactions that ensured to effect the payment of $10 million by FIFA to CONCACAF.

(3) SAFA does not intend to recover this money as it was paid for a legitimate purpose and there is no verdict of wrongdoing on the part of CONCACAF. SAFA has noted the allegations contained in the indictment by the US Attorney General and will follow the developments closely.

**************************************

Reply:

1. South Africa continues to support MONUSCO (United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo) through a deployment of uniformed and other personnel in a multi-dimensional peacekeeping which involves the military, police and the civilian components. MONUSCO’s strategic priorities are to protect civilians, stemming out of violence against women and children perpetuated by armed groups. The current mandate of MONUSCO will expire on 31 March 2017. The UN will provide guidance in terms of the extension of the mandate based on a situational analysis on the ground, particularly in the Eastern DRC and the political developments as the country prepares for the elections by end of 2017.

 

UNQUOTE

Reply:

(1) The South African Government, through the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO), employs country nationals, third country nationals and/or South African nationals at the various Diplomatic and Consular Missions abroad, as support staff to the South African diplomats stationed in these missions abroad. Such employees are referred to as Locally Recruited Personnel (LRP).

(2) (a) 2049 LRP

(b)(i) The LRP are employed in the following positions:

• Cleaner
• Domestic Worker
• Gardener
• Watchman/Security
• Chauffeur
• Messager/Driver
• Receptionist
• Registry Clerk
• Accountant/Assistant Accounts Clerk
• Consular Clerk
• Maintenance Officer
• Secretary
• Administrative Clerk/Officer
• Information Clerk
• Translator
• Trade and Information Assistant
• Marketing Officer

(ii) (aa) Each post has minimum requirements in terms of qualifications.

(bb) Post requirements and skills are determined by the level of the post

(3) (a) Yes

(b) As part of recruitment and selection, all applicants are required to submit a police clearance certificate from the local authorities of the host country.