Questions and Replies

Reply:

The data for the 2019 academic year is currently not available. Preliminary (unaudited) student enrolment data and data required for calculating success rates is due from universities on 30 April 2020. Some universities have indicated that they may require an extension due to the lockdown period. The final submission date for data is 31 July 2020. A process of verifying this data will thereafter commence and the full set of audited data is normally available in October each year.  

Reply:

The total enrolment in public higher education institutions (universities) is just over one million students (1 085 568 students). There are 11 official spoken languages in South Africa. Universities need to ensure that language is not used as a barrier to access higher education. Language has been used to exclude the majority of South Africans from accessing some universities in the past. Government supports the initiatives taken by universities to remove barriers, linguistic or otherwise, to ensure that universities across the country remain truly national entities and are accessible to all South Africans. In the democratic South Africa, there are no exclusively IsiZulu, IsiXhosa or Afrikaans language universities, but rather, South African universities that uphold the values of the Constitution and are mindful of the legacies of the past, and play their part in creating a fully transformed united South Africa that is at peace with itself and the rest of the world. Students of all linguistic backgrounds can enter any university to study, and must be supported to succeed. Therefore, students whose home language is Afrikaans or any other South African language may choose to study at any university in the country. We certainly cannot go back to a past where some of universities were earmarked for exclusive cultural and linguistic communities. Moreover, while English is utilised as the main language of teaching and learning, there is no official South African language that is excluded by universities as all universities have multilingual language policies. Universities determine their language policies and plans in terms of the Higher Education Act (No. 101 of 1997 as amended). These policies and plans must be in line with the Higher Education Language Policy Framework determined by the Minister as well as the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa.

 

Reply:

a) On What date will the specified fund be launched?

The launch of the Tourism Equity Fund (TEF) pilot project to which the President of the Republic of South Africa, Mr M C Ramaphosa, referred in the State of the Nation Address on 13 February 2020, was initially planned to take place during the first Quarter of 2020/21 on a date that was yet to be determined. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic all plans were put on hold to focus on the response to the pandemic.

b) (i) How will it be funded?

In his address to the nation on 21 April 2020, the President announced that part of the social relief and economic support package of R500 billion to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic will come from the reprioritization of about R130 billion within government’s current budget. This means that the current budget allocations are all going to be revised. Once we have the revised budget we will communicate

(ii) What initial amount will go to the fund?

Refer to (i)

c) Who will administer the fund?

refer (i)

d) (i) To whom will the fund administrators report?

Refer to (i)

(ii) How regularly will they report?

Refer to (i)

e) What will be the objective of the fund?

Refer to (i)

f) (i) How will funds be disbursed?

Refer to (i)

(ii) How will such disbursement be monitored and evaluated?

Refer to (i)

Reply:

From historical records, the project received a total of R 15 000 000 in funding, R14 000 000 in phase one between 2004 and 2007 and R1 000 000 in 2009. This funding was provided by the then Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. The project was handed over to the Capricorn District Municipality pre 2010.

Reply:

 

 

Reply:

The President of the Republic of South Africa, His Excellency Mr Cyril Ramaphosa, launched the District Development Model (DDM) in OR Tambo (ORT), Ethekwini and Waterberg municipalities in 2019. The DDM is intended to enhance service delivery through collaboration of all government departments in all municipalities through a single plan called the One Plan.

The basic education sector is already steps ahead in the implementation of the DDM. Firstly, the Minister of Basic Education, Mrs Angie Motshekga MP, gazetted an amended Policy on the Organisation, Roles and Responsibilities of Education Districts in January 2018. The Policy, in addition to providing norms for the structure, size and resourcing of education districts, mandates that education districts should be aligned to municipal districts and metros. This is done in a manner that makes educational sense and takes into account other factors such as geographical orientation. For example, a municipal district/metro might have more than one education district in order to enhance manageability and support to schools. Subsequently, ORT municipality is comprised of two education districts - ORT Coastal and ORT Inland, Ethekwini metro is comprised of Umlazi and Pinetown education districts.

Education districts within a municipal district/metro, like all other government departments, should contribute to the development of the Integrated Development Plan (IDP). The education sector must identify catalytic projects/programmes, e.g., school nutrition, infrastructure and sanitation to enhance service delivery, and impact positively on the lives of the people; and to address their needs. The identified projects must be informed by research. For example, one of the immediate needs in ORT district municipality is that more than 60% of the youth have not passed the National Senior Certificate (NSC). To this necessity, the education sector is providing the Second Chance Matric Programme (SCMP), which provides learning materials and tuition to ensure that more youth can attain the NSC. Overall, all planning for capital projects in the basic education sector, will be done and coordinated through the One Plan of the District Development Model in each of the district municipality or metro.

Reply:

(a) A total of 4831 ordinary schools were provided with ICT equipment and Internet connectivity as part of the Universal Service and Access Obligation since 2015. The breakdown of schools that benefitted per Network Operators are follows:

Network operators	Phase 1: Ordinary schools
Vodacom	1501
MTN	1360
Cell C	1360
Neotel/Liquid Telcoms	610
	4831

(b) (i) (a)  Details of each school (Annexures A, B, C and D)  that benefitted from the rollouts.

(b) (ii) Each school was provided with the following ICT equipment:

• 24 x Learner tablets;
• 2 x Teacher laptops;
• 1 x Wireless Access Points;
• 1 x Server loaded with DBE electronic content;
• 1 x Data projector;
• 1 x Mobile charging trolley; and
• Connectivity (A SIM Card to support 26 devices) with 2GB of data.

(b) (iii) The date of installation per school are attached as Annexures A, B, C and D.

Reply:

The Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure:

The Department of Public Works and Infrastructure (DPWI) informed me an amount of R3 million was transferred from Programme 4 to Programme 1 for goods and services to assist the Chief Directorate: Legal Services. The Department usedthese funds to procure the services of the legal advisers to support the Department with its process of finalising the Expropriation Bill.

The Department received 50 000 public comments after the Expropriation Bill, 2019 was published in December 2018.

Senior Counsel assisted the Department by analysing substantive issues raised in comments submitted to the DPWI and assisted with the drafting of clause 12(3) of the Bill.

Reply:

(a),(b)(i) and (ii)(aa) and(bb). Information on un- and under-qualified Maths and Science educators is not available at the national level; as it is not routinely collected as part of the Department's monitoring frameworks.

Reply:

The National Strategy for the Prevention and Management of Alcohol and Drug Use amongst Learners in Schools, is the response to drug use/abuse by the Department of Basic Education.  This is in line with the National Drug Master Plan developed by the Department of Social Development.

a) All School Safety Provincial and District Coordinators have been trained.

b) The Provincial and District Coordinators have the primary responsibility to train the School Safety Committees.  

Further information regarding the roll-out in schools is obtainable from Provincial Education Departments

Reply:

Response from Mpumalanga Department of Education: The Department has no plans to build a school for learners with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Gert Sibande District Municipality. The establishment of a school is based on a wide range of criteria including the number of learners identified to attend the school. Currently; there are 42 learners with Autism that are admitted in Special Schools.  The Department has Units in the Special Schools for Severe Intellectual Disability (SID) to accommodate learners with Autism. Through the implementation of inclusive practices, learners with Autism are able to access required professional specialists appointed at SID schools because they are learners who require moderate to high levels of support. However; some learners referred and recommended for placement are not yet placed as the parents have a right to choose a school; unfortunately, in some instances preferred schools are full to capacity. It has to be noted that there is a plan in place to open a Unit for learners with Autism at the proposed school for hearing and visually impaired which is currently under planning and design in Barberton

Reply:

1. With regard to the Regulations Relating to Minimum Uniform Norms and Standards for Public School Infrastructure, the schools which are still NOT provided with facilities are as per Table 1 and Table 2 below.

• Table 1: Breakdown by Province for Primary schools

PROVINCE	(a) Sanitation (Using Pit-latrines)	(b) No Laboratories	(c) No Libraries	(d) No Internet Access	(e) No Sport Facilities	(f) No Electricity
Eastern Cape	574	3 032	2 155	937	2 041	84
Free State	86	679	350	0	239	0
Gauteng	0	1130	538	0	296	0
KwaZulu -Natal	791	3 540	2 354	2 218	2 006	51
Limpopo	305	2 296	1 997	1 971	775	0
Mpumalanga	26	1 094	847	345	317	0
North West	38	908	662	103	246	0
Northern Cape	0	354	199	0	129	0
Western Cape	0	810	340	0	271	0
Total	1 820	13 843	9 442	5 574	6 320	135

Table 2: Breakdown by Province for Secondary schools

PROVINCE	(a) Sanitation (Using Pit-latrines)	(b) No Laboratories	(c) No Libraries	(d) No Internet Access	(e) No Sport Facilities	(f) No Electricity
Eastern Cape	923	1 802	1 739	526	1 313	14
Free State	14	70	81	0	79	0
Gauteng	0	181	157	0	138	0
KwaZulu-Natal	356	1 198	1 338	851	1 083	0
Limpopo	109	769	1 139	197	431	0
Mpumalanga	2	385	360	152	176	0
North West	15	212	221	57	108	0
Northern Cape	0	51	55	0	39	0
Western Cape	0	85	109	0	50	0
Total	1 419	4 753	5 199	1 783	3 417	14

 Water: There is no school without water supply, all schools have been provided with some form of infrastructure for water supply. It must be noted that there are instances where as a result of drought or lack of supply by municipalities, the supply of water to a school might be intermittent.

2. (a). As per the Regulations Relating to Minimum Uniform Norms and Standards for Public School Infrastructure, which are aligned to the National Development Plan, all schools should reached optimum functionality by 2030.
(b) The estimated total cost of meeting the minimum uniform norms and standards is R268 billion.
(c ) There are approximately 1 115 023 learners that are affected in schools that have yet to meet basic services and where schools still make use of inappropriate structures.

3. The Education Infrastructure Grant and equitable share allocation are not allocated per learner but are based on the equitable share formula. The Schools backlog grant is based on the backlogs in a specific province that needs intervention, and is also not calculated and allocated per learner.

Reply:

57 193 permanently appointed educators resigned between January 2012 and December 2019.  The unusually high numbers of resignations were recorded in 2014 and 2015.  This coincided with the period in which there was uncertainty relating to the changes in pension dispensation.  However, it should be noted that as at February 2020, about 17 800 of the educators who resigned, were back - appointed as educators in schools.
Number of permanently employed educator that resigned, 2012 to 2019
PROVINCE	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	Grand Total
EASTERN CAPE	464	830	1566	886	357	635	728	533	5999
FREE STATE	297	394	683	535	242	487	446	435	3519
GAUTENG	1477	1650	2678	2267	1083	1768	1611	1654	14188
KWAZULU/NATAL	1640	1589	2332	2299	1491	1379	1235	1376	13341
LIMPOPO PROVINCE	248	385	1098	1021	572	533	395	354	4606
MPUMALANGA	442	660	1026	633	383	364	286	393	4187
NORTH WEST	201	289	924	669	497	529	508	444	4061
NORTHERN CAPE	98	142	247	216	98	203	196	344	1544
WESTERN CAPE	365	544	821	784	450	896	916	972	5748
Grand Total	5232	6483	11375	9310	5173	6794	6321	6505	57193

Source: PERSAL 

Reply:

The information requested falls within the competence and purview of the Department of Higher Education and Training. The Honourable Member is urged to request the information through the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education, Science and Technology.

Reply:

The Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure:

As the Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure, I was not informed that the 5000 contracts, of participants in the Expanded Public Works Programme in Gauteng, were being terminated.

Each public body that implements an Expanded Public Works Programme is responsible for the recruitment and terminations of contracts of participants in a programme. However, in this particular case, I was subsequently informed by the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure (DPWI) that the matter was addressed by the Gauteng Department of Infrastructure Development and Property Management, as the coordinator of the EPWP in the Gauteng Province.

a) The participants were initially informed of the termination of their contracts by the Gauteng Department of Infrastructure Development and Property Management, via a text message. This was to be followed by letters from public bodies to the participants in their respective programmes.

b) The contracts of the affected participants had come to an end on 31 March 2020.

c) The following public bodies were affected by the termination of the EPWP participants:

Provincial Departments	Municipalities
Gauteng Department of Health	Sedibeng
Gauteng Department of Education	Merafong
Gauteng Department of Community Safety (SAPS)	Emfuleni
	Rand West
	West rand

d) The public bodies affected were informed in advance, by the Gauteng Department of Infrastructure Development and Property Management,of the contracts ending on 31 March 2020. The public bodies were advised to recruit new participants to avoid disruption of services.

Reply:

Currently the Gauteng Department of Education (GDE) is utilizing the services of patrollers through CPF (Community Policing Forum) to qualifying schools.  Nzamo Primary School did not constitute part of the services of patrollers.  As per the number of reported burglaries, the school will be put on the patroller programme.  The envisaged period of deployment will be linked to the re-opening of schools for the second term.

Reply:

Table 1 below indicates the number of learners enrolled in quintile 1 to 5 schools per province.It shows that the majority of learners are in quintile 3 with 3 218 301 followed by quintile 1 with 3 113 123.

Table 1: Number of learners in quintile 1 - 5 schools,by province, in 2019

Part 2 of the response refers to the attachment.

Province	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Q5	Grand Total
EC	555 913	335 572	744 697	53 600	80 385	1 770 167
FS	210 541	168 041	207 385	39 271	68 518	693 756
GT	310 456	319 183	385 513	464 180	671 763	2 151 095
KZN	562 445	703 099	832 338	362 525	320 254	2 780 661
LP	590 191	668 730	358 027	21 366	49 062	1 687 376
MP	476 069	391 077	98 192	52 136	49 801	1 067 275
NC	67 058	66 719	71 786	49 287	37 770	292 620
NW	231 983	165 320	326 956	87 844	16 138	828 241
WC	108 467	167 072	193 407	326 029	389 635	1 184 610
Grand Total	3 113 123	2 984 813	3 218 301	1 456 238	1 683 326	12 455 801

Source: LURITS 2019

Reply:

1) A total of 10 reservists were appointed, at the Actonville Police Station, in the past three financial years.

(2) Thee following criteria are used to determine where reservists should be appointed:

- The police station's needs challenges and skills required.
- The availability of trainers to train the reservists.
- The budget to train and equip the reservists.
 

 

Reply to question 487 recommended


GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE
KJ SITOLE (SOEG)
Date: 2020-04-02


Reply to question 487 approved

MINISTER OF POLICE
GENERAL BH CELE (MP)
Date: 07/04/2020

 

 

 

 

Reply:

1(a) Land Redistribution Programme.

1(b)

Year of Acquisition	Number of Farms
2005	16
2007	28
2008	108
2009	32
2010	2
2011	72
2012	46
2013	16
2014	19
2015	35
2016	14
2017	11
2018	11
Grand Total	410

2. 410.

3. (a) Yes. Please see the attached Excel spread sheet titled, NA – PQ No. 138.2020 (FS).

(b) and (c) No, since the Department has had no time to consult with the individual lessees on whether they consent to have their personal information publicly disclosed.

4. No, since the public disclosure of farms without leases could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

5. No, since the public disclosure of farms that are being reallocated could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

Reply:

1(a) Land Redistribution Programme (Proactive Land Acquisition Strategy);

1(b)

Year of Acquisition	Number of Farms
2006	13
2007	46
2008	117
2009	28
2010	34
2011	65
2012	20
2013	30
2014	6
2015	13
2017	10
2018	10
2019	5
Grand Total	397

2. 397.

3. (a) Yes. Please see the attached Excel spread sheet titled, NA – PQ No. 136.2020 (MP).

(b) and (c) No, since the Department has had no time to consult with the individual lessees on whether they consent to have their personal information publicly disclosed.

4. No, since the public disclosure of farms without leases could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

5. No, since the public disclosure of farms that are being reallocated could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

Reply:

The structures of police stations have lower and upper limits. A police station, at the level of Lieutenant Colonel, has between 91 and 179 staff. The grading of a police station does not only apply to the command structure but also to additional resources, without necessarily upgrading the post of the Station Commander.

Reply to question 466 recommended

GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE
KJ SITOLE (SOEG)
Date: 2020/04/03

Reply to question 466 approved

MINISTER OF POLICE
GENERAL BH CELE, (MP)
Date: 07/04/2020

Reply:

1(a) 457 of the 472 farms were bought under the Land Redistribution Programme, whilst the balance are pre-1994 government properties.

1(b)

Year of Acquisition	Number of Farms
2006	2
2007	10
2008	59
2009	16
2010	36
2011	106
2012	81
2013	30
2014	36
2015	53
2016	24
2017	2
2018	1
2019	1

2. 472.

3. (a) Yes. Please see the attached Excel spread sheet titled, NA – PQ No. 137.2020 (EC).

(b) and (c) No, since the Department has had no time to consult with the individual lessees on whether they consent to have their personal information publicly disclosed.

4. No, since the public disclosure of farms without leases could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

5. No, since the public disclosure of farms that are being reallocated could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

Reply:

1(a) 416 of the 467 farms were bought under the Land Redistribution Programme, whilst the balance are pre-1994 government properties.

1(b)

Year of Acquisition	Number of Farms
2006	16
2007	5
2008	57
2009	11
2010	11
2011	74
2012	41
2013	58
2014	49
2015	54
2016	18
2017	4
2018	18

2. 467.

3. (a) Yes. Please see the attached Excel spread sheet titled, NA – PQ No. 141.2020 (NW).

(b) and (c) No, since the Department has had no time to consult with the individual lessees on whether they consent to have their personal information publicly disclosed.

4. No, since the public disclosure of farms without leases could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

5. No, since the public disclosure of farms that are being reallocated could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

Reply:

THE MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE, LAND REFORM AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT:

1(a) 217 of the 218 farms were bought under the Land Redistribution Programme and the other farm is a pre-1994 government property.

1(b)

Year of Acquisition	Number of Farms
2002	1
2006	1
2007	12
2008	2
2009	16
2010	17
2011	60
2012	6
2013	23
2014	9
2015	20
2016	37
2017	11
2019	2
Grand Total	217

2. 218.

3. (a) Yes. Please see the attached Excel spread sheet titled, NA – PQ No. 140.2020 (LP).

(b) and (c) No, since the Department has had no time to consult with the individual lessees on whether they consent to have their personal information publicly disclosed.

4. No, since the public disclosure of farms without leases could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

5. No, since the public disclosure of farms that are being reallocated could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

Reply:

No housing allowance deductions are made for South African Police Service (SAPS) employees, who do not reside in official accommodation.

However, in forms of the Government Employee Housing Scheme (GEHS), .those employees who are renting and who ware employed, before 27 May 2015, receive R1 398,35 of which R498,35 is transferred to an interest bearing saving facility. For those employees who were appointed, after 27 May 2015, the whole amount. of R1 398,35 is transferred to an interest bearing saving facility.

The saving facility is administered by the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) and the National Treasury and funds can only be withdrawn when:

An employee becomes a homeowner.

In case of a contracted employee, his/her contract expires and the contract is. not renewed.

An employee passed on.

An employee retires or is medically boarded.

With effect, from 1 March 2017, all employees who currently rent official accommodation, pay R900,00 rental, per month, for state accommodation.

The deduction, in respect of state accommodation is paid into the National Revenue Fund. The deposit is made, in terms of Section 11(1)(a) of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No 1 of 1999).

Reply to question 357 recommended

GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE
KJ SITOLE (SOEG)|
Date; 2020/03/31

Reply to question 357 approved

MINISTER OF POLICE |
GENERAL BH CELE, MP
Date: 07/04/2020
 

Reply:

The total number of police stations that have received a thorough inspection by the National Inspectorate, since the 2014/2015 financial year, up to the latest date for which information is available, is reflected in the table below.

Financial Year	Number of Inspections conducted	Type of Inspections
2014/2015	1 020	Full inspections: 556 Focused inspections: 69 Follow-up inspections: 395
2015/2016	1 308	Full inspections: 714 Focused inspections: 418 Follow-up inspections: 176
2016/2017	270 high crime-weight police stations	The details of the inspections, are reflected in paragraph(b).
2017/2018
2018/2019
2019/2020

The relevant details of each inspection that was conducted, are reflected below.

Financial Year	Details of Inspections
2014/2015	Attached as per Annexure A.
2015/2016	Attached as per Annexure B.
2016/2017, 2017/2018, 2018/2019 and 2019/2020	The Division: Inspectorate functioned as Management Intervention. Management Intervention inculcated a culture of uncompromising compliance and performance management and implemented a multi- year programme at 270 high crime-weight police stations that gave impetus to the stabilisation of internal functioning, which lays the foundation for improved service delivery, capacity development and impact on crime

Financial Year

Diagnostic assessments were conducted; basic non-compliance rectified and root cause resolved that compromised service delivery and impact on crime. For this purpose, an intervention execution plan was developed and implemented at each of the 270 police stations, in consultation with the station commanders and members. The output of the programme was evaluated at the 270 police stations, using a compliance assessment tool, containing 361 indicators. The average result of the evaluation indicated a compliance rating above 80% threshold, in each of the following functional areas: - System utilization and date integrity - Administration and support - Community satisfaction - Service delivery complaints against the police - Visible policing - Crime and Management information - Concept of operations, command and control - Detective service The result standards for mitigation action, which were issued during previous inspections, were provided to the 270 police stations, for self-diagnoses and self-correction, in achieving the desired outputs and outcomes. The list of the 270high crime – weight police stations, is attached as Annexure C

Reply to question 465 recommended
 

GENERL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE
KJ SITOLE (SOEG)
Date: 2020/04/03

Reply to question 465 approved

MINISTER OF POLICE
GENEDRAL BH CELE, MP
Date: 07/04/2020

Reply:

The Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure:

The Department of Public Works and Infrastructure (DPWI) informed me an amount of R3 million was transferred from Programme 4 to Programme 1 for goods and services to assist the Chief Directorate: Legal Services. The Department usedthese funds to procure the services of the legal advisers to support the Department with its process of finalising the Expropriation Bill.

The Department received 50 000 public comments after the Expropriation Bill, 2019 was published in December 2018.

Senior Counsel assisted the Department by analysing substantive issues raised in comments submitted to the DPWI and assisted with the drafting of clause 12(3) of the Bill.

Reply:

1(a) Land Redistribution Programme.

1(b)

Year of Acquisition	Number of Farms
2003	1
2006	6
2007	64
2008	20
2009	14
2010	8
2011	22
2012	10
2013	25
2014	4
2015	12
2016	6
2017	9
2018	21
2019	1
Grand Total	223

2. 223.

3. (a) Yes. Please see the attached Excel spread sheet titled, NA – PQ No. 139.2020 (GP).

(b) and (c) No, since the Department has had no time to consult with the individual lessees on whether they consent to have their personal information publicly disclosed.

4. No, since the public disclosure of farms without leases could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

5. No, since the public disclosure of farms that are being reallocated could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

Reply:

(a)(i)(aa)(aaa)
 

THE NUMBER OF FIREARMS REPORTED AS LOST /STOLEN : 2010/2011 TO 2018/2019
Financial Year	2010/ 2011	2011/ 2012	2012/ 2013	2013/ 2014	2014/ 2015	2015/ 2016	2016/ 2017	2017/ 2018	2018/ 2019
Total	6 542	6 122	6 475	5 824	5 869	6 735	8 884	7 836	7 655

 

(a)(i)(aa)(bbb)
The total number of firearms, which was reported as lost/stolen, for the period 1 April 2019 to 17 February 2020, is 6 587

(a)(ii)(aa)(aaa)(bbb)
This information is not readily available on any South African Police Service (SAPS) System, in order to address the request, an extensive effort, from both administrative and operational personnel will need to be utilised over a long period of time. Case files will need to be recovered from archives and manually persued to identify any case that relate to this request. This will impede on current investigations and hamper service delivery.

(b) The relevant details, with regards to the lost and stolen firearms, including the type and calibre, per financial year, are reflected in the tables below:

 

LOST/STOLEN FIREARMS: 2010/2011
FIREARM TYPE	CALIBRE DESCRIPTION	TOTAL
COMBINATION	22 LR/.410BR		5
	.303/ 12GA		1
	12 BR/16 BR/9.3 MM COMBINATION		1
COMBINATION TOTAL			7
PISTOL	.22 LONG/ LR (PISTOL)		114
	.22 SHORT		2
	.25 ACP (6.35MM BROW)		4

 

 

RECOVERED FIREARMS: 1 APRIL 2019 TO 17 FEBRUARY 202
FIREARM TYPE	CALIBRE DESCRIPTION	TOTAL
	6.5X55MM SWED MAUS		1
	6MM		2
	6MM MUSGRAVE		3
	7.62 MM RIFLE		1
	7.62X39MM		1
	7.62X51MM		4
	7.9X57MM J OR JS		1
	7X57MM MAUS (7MM MAUS)		1
	7X64MM BRENNEKE		1
	8MM RIFLE		3
	9MM RIFLE		1
RIFLE TOTAL			335
S/L: PIST CAL – RIFLR/CAB	9MM PAR (9X19MM)		4
S/L: RIFLE CAL – RIFLE/CARBINE	.22 LONG RIFLE (LR)		1
	.223 REM		10
	5.56X45MM		1
	7.62X51MM		1
S/L: RIFLE CAL – RIFLE/CARBINE TOTAL			13
SHOTGUN	.410 B0RE		9
	12 GA		227
	20 GA		1
SHOTGUN TOTAL			237
GRAND TOTAL			5 531

Reply:

The Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure:

1. I have been informed the Department of Public Works and infrastructuredecided to let out the property through an open tender process.

2. Yes, measures were put in place to install security burglar bars and guards on the property to prevent vandalism and illegal occupation.

3. Yes, the structural engineer is to assess the property and identify any repair that needs to bedone.

Reply:

1(a) Land Redistribution Programme.

1(b)

Year of Acquisition	Number of Farms
2006	3
2007	22
2008	41
2009	20
2010	3
2011	44
2012	37
2013	17
2014	9
2015	27
2016	44
2017	2
2018	9
2019	4
Grand Total	282

2. 282.

3. (a) Yes. Please see the attached Excel spread sheet titled, NA – PQ No. 144.2020 (KZN).

(b) and (c) No, since the Department has had no time to consult with the individual lessees on whether they consent to have their personal information publicly disclosed.

4. No, since the public disclosure of farms without leases could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

5. No, since the public disclosure of farms that are being reallocated could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

Reply:

(1) Yes, the investigation into CAS 34/11/2015, opened at the Pretoria Central Police Statio, id ongoing. The date of finalisation of the investigation cannot be provided at this stage, due to the complex nature of the investigation.

(2) No, the South African Police Service (SAPS) has not obtained and/or executed any search and seizure warrants, while investigating the specified case. The acquiring of any search and/or seizure warrants will be determined as the investigation progresses.

(3) No. The interviewing of any persons of interest to the investigation will be conducted as the need arises, during the investigation process.

Reply to question 477 recommended

GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE
KJ SITOLE (SOEG)
Date: 2020/03/31

Reply to question 477 approved

MINISTER OF POLICE
GENERAL BH CELE, (MP)
Date: 07/04/2020

Reply:

1(a) Land Redistribution Programme.

1(b)

Year of Acquisition	Number of Farms
2007	9
2008	13
2009	1
2011	16
2012	99
2013	13
2014	11
2015	21
2016	5
2017	1
2018	2
2019	1
Grand Total	192

3. (a) Yes. Please see the attached Excel spread sheet titled, NA – PQ No. 143.2020 (WC).

(b) and (c) No, since the Department has had no time to consult with the individual lessees on whether they consent to have their personal information publicly disclosed.

4. No, since the public disclosure of farms without leases could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

5. No, since the public disclosure of farms that are being reallocated could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

Reply:

1(a) 220 of the 259 farms were bought under the Land Redistribution Programme, whilst the balance are pre-1994 government properties.

1(b)

Year of Acquisition	Number of Farms
2006	4
2007	23
2008	11
2009	8
2010	31
2011	34
2012	16
2013	20
2014	20
2015	22
2016	17
2017	8
2018	3
2019	3

2. 259.

3. (a) Yes. Please see the attached Excel spread sheet titled, NA – PQ No. 142.2020 (NC).

(b) and (c) No, since the Department has had no time to consult with the individual lessees on whether they consent to have their personal information publicly disclosed.

4. No, since the public disclosure of farms without leases could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

5. No, since the public disclosure of farms that are being reallocated could expose them to the possibility of land invasions.

Reply:

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

FOR WRITTEN REPLY

QUESTIO’N 405

DATE OF PUBLICATION IN INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER: 13 MARCH 2020 (INTERNAL QUESTION PAPER NO 9-2020)

405. Mr C Brink (DA) to ask the Minister of Police:

(1) whether the investigation into CAS 816/11/2018 opened at the Brooklyn Police Station, and then transferred to CAS 1747/11/2018 at the Pretoria Central Police Station, is still open; if not, why not, if so, by what date is it expected that the investigation will be finalized;

(2) whether the SA Police Service (SAPS) obtained and /or executed any search –and seizure warrant while investigating the case; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, what are the relevant details;

(3) whether the SAPS interviewed or attempted to interview (a) certain persons (names and details furnished) an/or (b) any executives of a certain company (names furnished); in each case, why not; if so, what are the relevant details in each case?

REPLY

(1) The case is still open and due to the nature of complexity of the case and expected date of the finalization cannot be provided, at this stage.

(2) No search and./or seizure has been executed as yet. Any warrant for search /or seizure shall be determined as the investigation progresses.

(3)(a)(b) There has been no interviewing of certain persons or any executives of certain companies, are yet. The interviewing of any persons of interest shall be conducted as the need arises, during the investigation process.

Reply to question 405 recommended

GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE
KJ SITOLE (SOEG)
Date: 2020/03/31

Reply to question 405 approved

MINISTER OF POLICE
GENERAL BH CELE, (MP)
Date: 07/04/2020

Reply:

(1) The construction of the Wattville Police Station has been prioritised on the Gauteng Province User Asset Management Plan, for the 2021/2022 financial year.

(2)(b) The staff complement of Wattville Police Station, is projected at 1.05 members.

(2)(c)(i) The projected allocation of vehicles is 25.

(2)(c)(ii) The table below reflects the possible allocation and the type of vehicles:

Component	Vehicle Type	Number	Total
Visible Policing	Light Delivery Vehicle (LDV)	8	14
	Sedan	4
	Minibus	1
	Truck	1
Detective Service	Sedan	4	8
	LDV	4
Support Service	Sedan		3
	LDV	1

Reply to question 486 recommended

GENERAL NATIOAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE

KJ SITOLE (SOEG)

Date: 2020/04/03
 

Reply to question 486 approved

MINISTER OF POLICE
GENERAL BH CELE (MP)
Date: 07/04/2020

Reply:

I have been advised by the department as follows:

There is no amount that was spent by the Department in relation to attending the 2019 Rugby World Cup.

MS. STELLA NDABENI-ABRAHAMS, MP

MINISTER

Reply:

The ARC-OVR-Transboundary Animal Diseases (TAD) Facility includes a high security facility for Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) vaccine production, and Research and Diagnostics of FMD, African Swine Fever (ASF), and other exotic diseases. TAD houses an OIE Regional Reference Laboratory for ASF and FMD and is the FAO Reference Centre for both FMD and ASF for the entire African continent.

The TAD Diagnostic Laboratory applied for SANAS (South African National Accreditation System) accreditation of its FMD Serological methods to standard ISO/IEC 17025:2005, in December 2015. The SANAS assessment was conducted from 29-30 March 2016, and a certificate of accreditation was obtained on 20 June 2016, which is valid for five years. The 6 months follow up assessment tookplace on 24 January 2017and continued accreditation was granted. The twelve months’ follow-up assessment by SANAS took place on 31 January 2018 and continued accreditation was again granted.

TAD Diagnostic Laboratory facility further applied for accreditation according to the new ISO 17025:2017 standard, this was approved by the SANAS Approval Committee meeting on 21 August 2019. “Unconditional Accreditation” in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017, Accreditation number V0034 was granted. The ARC-OVR-TAD Laboratory was the first laboratory at ARC-OVR to be assessed to the new ISO standard.

Reply:

1) (a) Not all universities structure their faculties in the same way as some have colleges or schools. They determine within those faculties/colleges/schools their departments as deemed appropriate by each university. Data provided to the Department’s Higher Education Management Information System (HEMIS) is at a high-level according to qualification registrations and by CESM (Classification of Educational Subject Material), and not by faculty.

The Department is able to provide high-level enrolment and graduate data per CESM level. Enrolment data per university is provided in Table 1 (Annexure A) by qualification type and major field of study. In addition, data is provided per university by qualification type in Table 2 (Annexure A).

(b) HEMIS data only reflects a pass or fail result for the course completion at a full-time equivalent level to determine the overall success rate of the sector or by institution. Data on supplementary examinations are not collected. Table 3 (Annexure A) gives the success rates of students across all public universities by attendance mode (contact/distance) and by demographic population group.

(2) Marks are specific to a particular student and held by universities. This information would be subject to the universities’ confidentiality agreements with their students. The Department does not collect this level of detailed information per student, and is unable to provide it.

Reply:

The Compensation Fund has introduced the new CompEASY System in October 2019 and has progressively introduced new functionality and made improvements on some function based on feedback from users:

• User Registration was introduced on 1 October 2019
• Claims Registration was introduced on 14 October for internal users and 18 October 2019 for external users
• Electronic Medical Claims batch submission and internal medical claims capturing on 1 November 2019
• External Medical Claims and Pre Authorisation application released on 9 February 2020

Total amount paid since October 2019:

• to medical service providers on CompEASY is R103 million
• to medical service providers on SAP ECC R479 million
• to pensioners and beneficiaries R465 million

Reply:

1. CompEasy (S4i) information:

(a) R 143 million

(b) Claims processed in the system since introduction of the new claim system:

i.Medical invoices processed 170 955

ii. Claims Registered 15 428

iii. Claims Paid:

1. to medical service providers on CompEASY is R103 million
2. to medical service providers on SAP ECC R 479 million
3. to pensioners and beneficiaries R465 million

2. Adequate User Acceptance Testing and Quality Assurance was provided during the development of the new system prior to introducing the system. The gradual release of the functionalities in the system also assisted Users to test the system internally and give feedback before it is released to the public.

There is no legal or operational requirement to parallel test a system. Based on the control weaknesses in the old system, parallel testing would have continued to expose the Fund to fraudulent and invalid claims.

On the payment side the Fund continued to pay claims both on the new CompEasy system and on the old SAP ECC.

Reply:

In terms of the quarterly performance targets in the 2019/20 Annual Performance Plan (APP), 9 export protocols were implemented during Quarter 1, but were reported to be still in progress pending validation of reported data at the regional offices (WC, KZN, PE) by the unit responsible for Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E). As at to date, validation of the 9 export protocols by both M&E and the Directorate Inspection Services(DIS) has been concluded and all 9 export protocols have been implemented.

7 export protocols were implemented during Quarter 2 of 2019/20, but were also reported to be still in progress pending validation.M&E is allowed 90 days after each Quarter to validate reported performance.

The implementation of the protocols is seasonal and sometimes overlaps to the next quarter. The table below shows in which quarters each export control is expected.

Export protocol	Quarter 1	Quarter 2	Quarter 3	Quarter 4
Apples to China	X	X	X	X
Apples to Mexico	X
Apples to Taiwan	X
Citrus to China	X	X
Citrus to Japan	X	X
Citrus to S. Korea	X	X
Citrus to Thailand	X	X
Citrus to USA	X	X
Pears to USA	X	X	X	X
Table grapes to China			X	X
Table grapes to Israel			X	X
Table grapes to Thailand			X	X
Table grapes to USA			X	X

Reply:

The Department and the National Student Financial Aid Scheme (NSFAS) will not be able to provide the information in the requested format, as this level of detail is only available at an institutional level, and would take considerable time to collate. There would also be limits to the level of detail that could practically be provided per institution.

In terms of the data exchange between NSFAS and institutions, institutions provide information to NSFAS on whether students meet the criteria for continuation. The level of detail requested in terms of examinations, supplementary examinations, subjects passed and failed, marks, etc. is not provided to NSFAS.

The Department's Higher Education Management Information System (HEMIS) collects information on enrolments and completion of qualifications. This enables cohort reporting to be done according to a breakdown of qualification types, i.e. 3-year degrees, 3-year diplomas and 4-year degrees. Specific cohort information is also collected on the MBChB programme, engineering programmes, life and physical sciences and teacher education. In addition, data is broken down according to population group and gender. This is in line with the requirement to focus on specific Medium Term Strategic Framework targets. It is possible to provide an overview of the breakdown according to fields of study, i.e. Science, Engineering and Technology; Business and Commerce; Education and the Humanities.

NSFAS recipient data is also brought into the cohort study to show the overall performance of NSFAS recipients, and the study is also able to look at students enrolled for foundation programmes. The attached cohort study was based on data up to the 2017 academic year and provides the throughput and dropout rates of NSFAS funded students.

It is only possible to provide a global picture of throughput rates for particular cohorts. Data provided to HEMIS is at a high level according to qualification registrations and by CESM (Classification of Educational Subject Material), and not by faculty. The names of qualifications reported from different institutions are not consistent, as they are reported according to their accredited names. HEMIS only reflects pass or fail results for the course completion at a full-time equivalent level to determine the overall success rates of the sector or by institution. This data is required at a high level for funding and planning purposes.

Reply:

Yes, members of the South African Police Service (SAPS) do enforce compliance to provincial liquor legislation, in support of Provincial Liquor Board Inspectors, appointed in terms of the applicable provincial liquor legislation. The following number of liquor law enforcement actions were executed at licensed liquor premises, in 2018/2019:

Province	Number of liquor compliance inspections conducted	Number of J534's issued for liquor compliance contraventions by licensed liquor premises	Number of of J534’s Issued for drinking in public places	Number of J534’s issued for being drunk in public places
Eastern Cape	85 113	21 395	827	9 696
Free State	01432	33 453	2 098	8 265
Gauteng	136 200	22 624	6 787	2 441
KwaZulu-Natal	80 531	10 308	2 162	2 728
Limpopo	113 114	31 313	10 346	8 161
Mpumalanga	37 723	2 249	1 437	140
North West	31 289	9 169	12 933	1 373
Northern Cape	33 367	5 153	351	14 138
Western Cape	58 812	9 998	1 645	44 761
Total	677 581	145 002	39 516	87 733

2. No, the SAPS does not have the mandate to close an establishment that transgresses its liquor licence conditions. Only the respective Provincial Liquor Boards have the mandate to close an establishment that transgresses its liquor licence conditions.

Reply to question 347 recommended/

GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE KJ SITOLE (SOEG)
Date: 2020/03/23

Reply to question 347 approved

GENERAL BH CELE (MP)
MINISTER OF POLCE
Date: 01/04/2020

Reply:

1. The number of K78 roadblocks, which were conducted in each municipality in the Western Cape, from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2019, is reflected in If\e table below:

Municipality	Number of roadblocks
Bergrivier	22
8reede Rivier	44
Cape Agulhas	47
City of Cape Town (Metropole)	202
Drakenstein	5
George	30
Hessequa	20
Kannaland	2
Knysna	14
Laingsburg	13
Langeberq	41
IVlatzikama	23
Mossel Bay	20
Oudtshoorn	4
Overstrand	68
Prins Albert	37
Saldanha	27
Swartland	21
Swetlendam	4
Theewaterskloof	54
Witzenberg	33

1. The dates on which the roadblocks were conducted, are reflected in the table

below:

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
Berqrivier	2019-01-25
	2019-02-22
	2019-03-29
	2019-04-18
	2019-08-17

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
	2019-12-10
	2019-04-22
	2019-12-23
	2019-12-24
	2019-01-04
	2019-01-18
	2019-02-08
	2019-02-15
	2019-03-01
	2019-03-20
	2019-04-06
	” 2019-04-22
	20J 9-05-18
	2019-08-10
	2019-08-24
	2019-10-05
	2019-10-19
Breede Rivier	2019-02-04
	2019-04-20
	2019-05-11
	2019-06-01
	2019-08-10
	2019-08-24
	2019-09-07
	2019-09-28
	2019-10-12
	2019-10-26
	2019-11-02
	2019- J 1-23
	2019-12-07
	2019-12-14
	2019-12-21
	2019-12-28
	2019-04-18
	2019-10-15
	2019-12-13
	2019-12-20
	2019-01-07
	2019-01-14
	2019-01-21
	2019-04-09
	2019-04-IN
	2019-04-18 "
	2019-05-16
	2019-05-28
	2019-11-06
	2019-06-J 2
	2019-07-03
	2019-07-16
	2019-08-01
	2019-08-08
	2019-08-15
	2019-J 0-17
	2019-10-31
	2019-1 J -01
	2019-11-15
	2019-11-08

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
	2019-12-12
	2019-12-22
	2019-12-24
	2019-12-30
Cape Agulhas	2019-01-02
	2019-01-24
	2019-02-21
	2019-02-10
	2019-02-16
	2019-02-17
	2019-02-15
	2019-03-22
	2019-02-10
	2019-02-06
	2019-OF-03
	2019-08-20
	2019-12-02
	2019-12-21
	2019-04-18
	2019-08-22
	2019-10-15
	2019-11-08
	2019-11-29
	2019-12-13
	201902-22
	2019-06-21
	2019-06-28
	2019-11-29
	2019-01-11
	2019-01-24
	2019-02-13
	2019-02-26
	2019-03-01
	2019-04-18
	2019-05-14
	2019-05-24
	2019-06-20
	2019-07-10
	2019-07-26
	2019-08-16
	2019-08-22
	2019-09-10
	2019-09-17
	2019-10-17
	2019-10-24
	2019-11-08
	2019-12-04
	2019-12-06
	2019-12-12
	2019-12-13
	2019-12-23
City of Cape Town (Metropole)	2019-02-24
	2019-04-21
	2019-06-16
	2019-01-25
	2019-01-31
	” 2019-07-16

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
	2019-11-04
	2019-01-18
	2019-07-11
	2019-08- J 6
	2019-10-23
	2019-11-22
	2019-11-23
	2019-12-14
	2019-12-30
	2019-01-0 1
	2019-08-08
	2019-01-04
	2019-01-11
	2019-01-18
	2019-01-18
	2019-01-25
	2019-02-01
	2019-02-08
	2019-02-15
	2019-02-22
	2019-03-0 1
	2019-03-08
	2019-03-15
	2019-03-29
	2019-03-22
	2019-04-05
	2019-04-12
	20J 9-04-18
	2019-04-25
	2019-04-26
	2019-05-03
	2019-05-10
	2019-05-17
	2019-05-24
	2019-05-3 1
	2019-06-07
	2019-06-12
	2019-06-14
	2019-06-21
	2019-06-28
	2019-07-05
	2019-07-12
	2019-07-19
	2019-07-26
	2019-08-02
	2019-08-16
	2019-08-23
	2019-08-30
	2019-09-13
	2019-09-20
	2019-09-27
	2019-10-04
	2019-10-11
	2019-10-11
	2019-10- J 8
	2019-10-25
	2019-11-08

5

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
	2019-11-15
	2019-11-15
	2019-11-22
	2o1e-11-22
	2019-11-23
	2019-11-24
	2019-11-29 2019-11-01
	2019-12-06
	2019-12-06
	2019-12-11
	2019-12-13
	2019-12-20
	2019-12-27
	2019-12-27
	2019-12-31
	2019-01-31
	2019-03-16
	2019-04-19
	2019-05-24
	2019-06-25
	2019-07-12
	2019-07-26
	2019-08-02
	2019-08-10
	2019-08-24
		2019-08-31
		2019-09-07
		2019-09-14
		2019-09-20
	2019-09-27
	2019-09-28
	2019-10-05
	2019-10-19
	2019-10-26
	2019-11-01
	2019-11-15
	2019-11-25
	2018-12-10
	2019-12-22
	2019-12-26
	2019-12-31
	2019-11-28
	2019-12-04
	2019-02-10
	2019-02-16
	2019-03-01
	2019-03-10
	2019-03-11
	2019-03-14
	2019-03-22
	2019-04-04
	2019-04-07
	2019-04-11
	2019-04-12
	2019-04-13
	2019-04-19

Municipality		Date of roadblocks
	2019-04-21
	2019-04-27
	2019-05-13
	2019-05-14
	2019-05-24
	2019-05-31
	2019-06-0 1
	2019-06-14
	201g-06-z4
	2019-06-29
	2019-07-05
	2019-07-12
	2019-07-19
	2019-07-26
	2019-08-04
	2019-08-16
	2019-09-13
	20J 9-09-20
	2019-10-04
	20J 9-10-05
	2019-10-11
	2019-10-18
	20J 9-10-25
	2019-11-15
	2019-12-20
	2019-09-22
	2019-02-22
	2019-04-01
	2019-06-26
	2019-07-17
	2019-08-02
	2019-08-07
	2019-11-01
	2019-01-20
	20J 9-05-19
	2019-06-16
	20J 9-10-05
	20J 9-10-13
	2019-11-03
	2019-03-09
	2019-03-25
	20J 9-06-13
	2019-08-02
	2019-08-02
	2019-12-27
	2019-04-30
	2019-04-21
	2019-04-21
	2019-05-26
	2019-06-16
	2019-01-05
	2019-01-12
	2019-01-26
	2019-02-02
	2019-02-09
	2019-02-16
	2019-02-23

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
	2019-07-20
	2019-08-03
	2019-08-10
	2019-08-17
	2019-08-24
	2019-08-31
	2019-10-05
	2019-10-12
	2019-10-19
	2019-10-26
	2019-11-23
	2019-11-30
	2019-12-16
	2019-09-02
	2019-01-25
	2019-02-22
	2019-03-29
	2019-04-18
	2019-04-27
	2019-11-20
	2019-11-26
	2019-07-27
	2019-08-31
	2019-10-11
	2019-12-31
Drakenstein	2019-01-27
	2019-06-13
	2019-06-22
	2019-11-18
	2019-12-04
Geor9e	2019-03-16
	2019-04-18
	2019-06-14
	2019-08-21
	2019-01-01
	2019-01-04
	2019-01-05
	2019-02-23
	2019-03-30
	2019-04-10
	” 2019-04-13
	2019-04-22
	2019-06-28
	2019-06-30
	2019-08-28
	2019-00-29
	2019-09-03
	2019-11-29
	2019-12-20
	2019-12-26
	2019-12-31
	2019-06-24
	2019-09-25
	2019-09-26
	2019-12-05
	2019-12-06
	2019-02-06

	Date of roadblocks
	2019-12-07
	2019-12-07
	2019-12-07
Hessequa	2019-02-19
	2019-03-15
	2019-04-19
	2016-05-10
	2019-05-18
	2019-05-31
	2019-06-14
	2019-08-10
	2019-09-21
	2019-10-04
	2019-12-07
	2019-02-28
	2019-07-08
	2019-12-03
	2019-01-24
	2019-05-25
	2019-06-24
	2019-09-11
	2019-11-0 1
	2019-12-20
Kannaland	2019- 1-01
	2019-12-20
Knysna	2019-01-18
	2019-02-15
	2019-03-23
	2019-04-20
	2019-04-26
	2019-06-15
	2019-06-21
	2019-07-27
	2019-08-24
	2019-09-21
	2019-10-25
	2019-11-27
	2019-12-09
	2019-12-19
Laingsburg	2019-01-10
	2019-01-29
	2019-02-28
	2019-03-20
	20J 9-04-18
	2019-04-20
	2019-07-12
	2019-09-13
	2019-10-18
	2019-11-23
	2019-11-29
	2019-12-21
	2019-12-27
Langeberg	2019-02-03
	2019-03-17
	2019-04-13
	2019-05-25
	2019-06-08

9

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
	2019-07-09
	2019-07-21
	2019-08-03
	2019-09-22
	2019-10-04
	2019-11-09
	2019-12-21
	2019-01-02
	2019-01-01
	2019-01-02
	” 2019-01-01
	2019-01-12
	2019-01-30
	2019-02-01
	2019-02-16
	2019-03-23
	2019-04-13
	2019-05-04
	2019-07-20
	2019-07-27
	2019-08-31
	2019-09-05
	2016-11-08
	2019-11-16
	2019-11-22
	2010-12-07
	2019-01-09
	2019-01-25
	2019-03-22
	2019-04-24
	2019-06-12
	2019-08-02
	2019-08-13
	2019-12-24
	2019-12-30
	2019-12-31
Matzikama	2019-01-01
	2019-01-02
	2019-02-02
	20J 9-02-04
	2019-03-01
	2019-03-03
	2019-04-04
	2019-05-06
	2019-02-07
	2019-06-02
	2019-06-03
	2019-07-02
	2019-07-03
	2019-08-01
	2019-08-03
	2019-08-06
	2019-09-01
	2019-09-04
	2019-10-01
	2019-10-04
	2019-11-01

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
	2019-12-D1
	2019-12-04
Mossel Bay	2019-03-02
	2019-05-11
	2019-05-24
	2019-05-25
	2019-07-05
	2019-08-02
	2019-09-14
	2010-09-27
	2019-09-28
	2019-10- J 1
	2019-10-12
	2019-10-25
	2019-10-26
	2019-11-08
	2019-11-22
	2019-11-23
	2019-12-06
	2019-12-07
	2019-12-20
	2019-12-21
Oudtshoorn	2019-03-18
	2019-09-06
	2019-12-21
	2019-12-27 ”
Overstrand	2019-01-24
	2019-02-22
	2019-03-09
	2019-04-18
	2019-04-29
	2019-06-28
	2019-09-23
	2019-10-18
	2019-01-19
	2019-01-25
	2019-01-30
	2019-01-31
	2019-02-02
	2019-02-07
	2019-02-16
	2019-02-28
	2019-03-02
	2019-03-15
	2019-03-15
	2019-03-16
	2019-03-22
	2019-03-27
	2019-03-29
	2019-03-30
	2019-04-12
	2019-04-18
	2019-04-21
	2019-04-25
	2019-05-04
	2019-05-11
	2019-05-18

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
	2019-05-25
	2019-06-06
	2019-06-08
	2019-06-11
	2019-06-29
	2019-07-04
	2019-07-13
	2019-07-17
	2019-07-20
	2019-07-27
	2019-08-03
	2019-08-08
	2019-08-17
	2019-08-24
	2019-08-31
	2019-09-14
	2019-09-17
	2019-09-28
	2019-09-28
	2019-10-11
	2019-10-12
	2019-11-02
	2019-11-15
	2019-11-22
	2019-11-29
	2019-12-07
	2019-12-14
	2019-12-19
	2019-12-21
	2019-12-31
	2019-04-10
	2019-04-18
	2019-04-21
	2019-12-27
	2019-02-04
	2019-07-17
	2019-12-13
Prins Albert	2019-12-05
	2019-12-08
	2019-01-08
	2019-01-05
	2019-03-22
	2019-03-18
	2019-03-07
	2019-03-22
	2019-03-18
	2019-05-29
	2019-05-22
	2019-05-29
	2019-05-22
	2019-06-10
	2019-06-24
	2019-06-25
	2019-06-26
	2019-06-26
	2019-06-27
	2019-06-28

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
	2019-06-29
	2019-07-15
	2019-07-11
	2019-0B-20
	2019-09-26
	2019-09-26
	20J 9-10-18
	2019-12-05
	2019-12-05
	2019-12-06
	2019-12-07
	2019-12-07
	2019-12-08
	2019-01-05
	2019-01-06
	2019-02-02
	2019-03-02 "
Saldanha	20 9-12-Z0
	2019-01-25
	2019-02-21
	2019-03-03
	2019-04-19
	2019-01-18
	2019-02-18
	2019-03-10
	2019-04-11
	2019-06-12
	2019-07-27
	2019-08-30
	2019-09-06
	20J 9-09-21
	2019-10-19
	2019-11-23
	20J 9-12-06
	2019- J2-28
	2019-02-01
	2019-03-08
	2019-03-30
	2019-04-21
	204 9-04-27
	2019-11-15
	2019-12-13
	2019-12-17
	2019-12-27
Swartland	2o1g-o4-18
	2019-12-06
	2019-12-13
	2019-01-10
	2019-01-17
	2019-01-24
	2019-02-12
	2019-02-14
	2019-03-08
	2019-03-21
	2019-04-1 J
	2019-04-22
	2019-06-29

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
	2019-07-16
	2019-08-22
	2019-08-29
	2o‹e-o9-22
	2019-10-10 2019-12-11 “
	2019-12-26
	2019-12-29
Swellendam	2019-02-08
	2019-04-28
	2019-07-12
	2019-11-15
Theewaterskloof	2019-01-01
	2019-01-04
	2019-01-07
	2019-01-23
	2019-01-23
	2019-02-09
	2019-02-12
	2019-02-22
	2019-03-02
	2019-03-26
	2019-03-02
	2019-03-26
	2019-03-02
	2019-03-26
	2019-04-05
	2019-04-20
	2019-04-26
	2019-05-04
	2010-05-18
	2019-05-31
	2019-06-08
	2019-06-16
	2010-06-08
	2019-06-16
	2019-07-15
	2016-07-28
	2019-08-10
	2019-08-31
	2019-09-01
	2019-09-27
	2019-12-01
	2019-12-13
	2019-12-26
	2019-01-26
	2019-03-03
	2019-09-22
	2019-04-21
	2019-05-03
	2019-05-10
	2019-05-24
	2019-05-31
	2019-06-07
	2019-06-21
	2019-07-05
	2019-07-26

Municipality	Date of roadblocks
	2019-08-23
	2019-09-20
	2019-10-04
	2019-09-25
	20J 9-11-01
	20J 9-12-01
	2019-12-12
	2019-12-20
	2019-12-29
Witzenberg	2019-01-05
	2019-01-16
	2019-01-11
	2019-01-11
	2019-01-11
	2019-01-25
	2019-02-15
	2019-03-09
	2019-04-07
	2019-04-18
	2019-05-27
	2019 06-22
	2019-06-23
	2019-08-06
	2019-10-29
	2019-11-17
	2019-12•29
	2019-02-02
	2019-02-15
	2o1g-o3 19
	2019-03-29
	2019-04-12
	2019-09-23
	2019-09-25
	2019-09-26
	20 9-10-08
	2019-10-15
	2019-10-22
	2019-11-05
	2019-11-25	"
	2019- 2-03
	2019-12-17
	2019-12-24

Reply to question 276 recommended/not recommended

GENERAL NATIONAL COMMISSIONER: SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICE
KJ SITOLE (SOEG)
Date:

Reply to question 276 approved

MINISTER OF POLICE
GENERAL BH CELE
DATE: 4/04/2020

Reply:

I think that this is a personal question, I therefore suggest that the Honourable Member ask Netball South Africa directly.

Reply:

(1).     Currently the Oude Stadshuisis closed to the public.

(a)(i). It was closed to the public on 31 December 2015.

(ii). Two serious electrical-related incidents – a fire in the wall and burning in the ceiling – transpired at the Oude Stadshuis. Assessment of the incident by The Department of Public Works and Occupational Health and Safety team determined that the impact of the incidence made it unsafe for the public, staff and irreplaceable artworks housed therein.

(b). The reopening of the Oude Stadshuis is dependent on a series of factors. Some of the processes of upgrading and maintaining the museum are beyond the locus of Iziko’s control. Iziko is engaging with all stakeholders at national, provincial and local levels, and have followed all required processes. Iziko is committed to ensuring the protection and safety of the building, the collection formerly housed therein, and the public – whom our museums serve.  The impact of the recent occupation by the refugees of the veranda of the Oude Stadshuisand the surrounding building, has further impacted the implementation timelines. Currently, a project manager has been appointed to manage the implementation. Procurement of goods and services are planned for the upcoming fiscal and Supply Chain has been engaged in the processes. Project implementation that is both outside of the scope and control of Iziko Museums of South Africa, include approvals by provincial heritage authority committees.

Reply:

I think that this is a personal question, I therefore suggest that the Honourable Member ask Netball South Africa directly.

Reply:

I think that this is a personal question, I therefore suggest that the Honourable Member ask Netball South Africa directly.

Reply:

1. The second asset verification is completed, the report on the asset verification is currently going through the internal review processes and will also be reviewed the external auditors during the interim audit. As I indicated in my response to question 107 in February, I will furnish the Honourable Member with details when the process is done.

2(a). The Director: Ms ShanduNontutuko Constance

(b)(i).Details includes: Appointment of service provider to operate retail spaces (restaurant, coffee shop & canteen) in //hapo building and catering (as and when required) at Freedom Park for 3 years period.

(ii). Tender was awarded to bidder DANDOZEST including lists of food as per specifications.

(c). Tender was advertised on the tender bulletin No. 2993 dated 01 December 2017

(d). Number of bidders received were 14