Questions and Replies

Reply:

The Department of Water and Sanitation has informed me that it has settled all commitments and liabilities relating to procured goods and services, including services provided in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Reply:

1. (a) ProgrammeFunding

Compensation of Employees (PERSAL allocation) R151 729 000

Direct Transfer (Subsidy) R 88 550 000

COVID 19 allocation R 3 233 000

Total Bursary allocation (20%) R 59 068 000

Capital Infrastructure Efficiency Grant R 11 872 784

(b) ProgrammeFunding

Compensation of Employees (PERSAL allocation) R151 729 000

Direct Transfer (Subsidy) R 88 550 000

COVID 19 allocation R 3 233 000

Total Bursary allocation (20%) R 59 068 000

Capital Infrastructure Efficiency Grant R 11 872 784

(c) Duetothecurrentaccountingsystem andstaffcomplimentinplace,EsayidiTVETCollege operatesonacentralizedbudget.Alloperationalcostsarebudgetedandpaidforcentrally.Each campus requests specific items based on their student enrolment figures, maintenance and individual campus needs.

(d) The budget breakdown and expenditure for each line item per campus based on the COVID-19 amended 2020 budget is attached.

2. EsaydiTVET College has not received anyfunds for laptops for any of its campuses.

3. Umzimkulu as a town has severe water issues and water is only pumped for a few hours a day.Thecampus has implemented a waterbackup storagesystemtoensurethatthereisbackupwateravailablespecificallyfortheresidences.Thecollegeisinthe processofaddressingthelack of toilets.Quotationshavebeenobtained,but sincethequotesexceeded theprocurementlimits,itwillgooutonpublictenderwithinthenext 2 weeks. Thecollegeisintheprocessofupgrading its infrastructureonallcampusesandplanstohave Wi-Fi available in 2021.

Reply:

Whenever the Minister for Small Business Development is not able to attend a Portfolio Committee meeting, there is always an apology that is tabled which provides a reason for the Minister’s absence from that particular meeting. The Secretariat of the Portfolio Committee can provide the Honourable member with copies of the Minister’s apologies for each meeting the Minister was not able to attend.

Reply:

1. Interns that participated in the Programme have been absorbed for employment by various sectors, as depicted in Figure 1 below. Data on the retention of interns for employment by their respective hosts has not been collected. The Department has commissioned an impact study that will provide more information on the retention of interns by their hosts and their career progression. The study will be completed in March 2022.

Figure 1: Sectors employing Interns on completion of the internship

2. Two months after the end of each internship, high-level data on the employment is collected, through exit surveys. Table 1 below provides statistics on interns’ employment and further studies. According to the annual exit surveys, of the 5 505 interns enrolled in the Programme since inception more than 2 100 were employed (a) The number reported is a cumulative number of interns employed while in the Programme and two months after exiting, as per annual exit survey’s findings. It should be noted that this number may have changed significantly with interns who exited the programme more than two years ago (b) Longer-term tracking of interns is currently not in place, and the impact study that has been commissioned is expected to gather data on the nature of their first employment after the internship.

Table 1: Interns’ status at the end of each internship

Internship Year	No. Placed	Employed	Further Study	Total
2005/06	49	38	4	42
2006/07	169	135	21	156
2008/09	92	46	34	80
2009/10	160	70	34	104
2010/11	280	124	54	178
2011/12	276	96	83	179
2012/13	517	220	149	369
2013/14	568	232	128	360
2014/15	710	249	246	495
2015/16	728	253	260	513
2016/17	733	284	277	561
2017/18	622	172	308	480
*2018/19	601	200	146	346
Total	5505	2119	1744	3863

3. As part of the intern performance management, mentors are expected to develop a detailed work plan for their respective interns for the internship period. This includes an agreement between the mentor and the mentee to identify training needs and courses for the intern to enhance their skills and competencies such as basic project management, report writing and Curriculum Vitae drafting. Training undertaken is reported on in the intern quarterly reports.

4. Interns are encouraged to enrol for postgraduate studies whilst participating in the Programme. It is required that mentors support interns on their further study activities so as to ensure that interns obtain the qualifications. The Programme makes provisions for interns to take study leaves when preparing for examinations and undertaking research activities. Progress on studies is also reported as part of the intern quarterly reports.

Reply:

Type	Total	Total amount
Below legal age of employment	53	224 677.43

(i) Applicants below the legal age of employment:

(ii) Applicants with the same identity number as Unemployment Insurance Fund

Type	Total	Total amount
Applicant's ID numbers same as UIF employee	1	4 027.45

(iii) Deceased individuals:

Type	Total	Total amount
Deceased	113	441 144.34

Type	Total	Total amount
Inmates	26	R 129 242.64

(iv) Individuals in prison:

(v) Individuals with invalid identity numbers:

Type	Total	Total amount
Invalid ID numbers	4 161	R 30 071 248.84

(vi) Applicants who received benefits from other state institutions, including remuneration:

Type	Total	Total amount
(SASSA) disability grant	20	69 419.36
(SASSA) Old age grant	22 611	88 814 684.36

(vii) Applicants with the same banking details as UIF employees:

(a) is the total quantum of payments in each category?

Type	Total	Total amount
Applicant's bank details same as UIF employee	4	613.89

(b) Is the total quantum of payments in each category?

Total amount: R 119 769 058.31

Reply:

(a) (i) In terms of information on PERSAL as at 31 May 2020, 62 581 employees have been appointed on temporary basis. Attached is a breakdown of temporary appointments per department (Annexure A).

(ii) The breakdown from PERSAL as at 31 May 2020 on the permanent organogram in terms of staff structures of each specified department is attached at (Annexure B).

(iii) and (iv) Budget and expenditure details for the relevant contracted positions can be obtained from the National Treasury.

(b) Persons may be employed to contracted positions additional to the establishment of a department based on a temporary need and such appointments are in terms of Regulation 57 (2) where;

• The incumbent of a post is expected to be absent for such a period that his/her duties cannot be performed by other employees;
• A temporary increase in work occurs or it is necessary for any other reason to temporarily increase the staff of the department;
• An employee’s post has been abolished and he or she cannot be transferred into another post; and
• An employee is part of a development programme as contemplated in regulation 58 (Development Programmes: Internship)

Appointments of this nature are for a period that must not exceed 12 consecutive calendar months.

2. The following 10 departments were merged on 01 April 2020 to coincide with budget appropriations for the 2020/21 financial year:

No.	Departments that Merged	New Merged Departments
1.	Agriculture	Rural Development and Land Reform	Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development
2.	Communications	Telecommunications and Postal Services	Communications and Digital Technologies
3.	Mineral Resources	Energy	Mineral Resources and Energy
4.	Sport and Recreation South Africa	Arts and Culture	Sports, Arts and Culture
5.	Trade and Industry	Economic Developments	Trade, Industry and Competition

3 (a) The process of placement has not yet been concluded. Consultations with organized labour are underway in the affected departments on the matching and placing of the staff of the merged departments. Public Service Coordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC) Resolution 1 of 2019 provides guidelines on the identification, transfer and placement of staff in a transparent, fair and inclusive process.

(b) The agreement provides that excess employees not matched and placed, be held additional to the post establishment. The employer must apply measures to enhance redeployment including training of employees additional to the establishment to meet the requirements of vacant posts.

A National Implementation Task Team comprising of the employer and organised labour under the auspices of the PSCBC will monitor implementation. Departmental Task Teams are established to facilitate the process of matching and placing.

End

Reply:

Response 

(1) and (2) Please see attached slides. 

Reply:

(a) Whales are fully protected in South African waters. Legal instruments are in place to ensure the long-term survival of whales, including the following:

The National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, 2004 (Act No. 10 of 2004). In the Threatened or Protected Marine Species Regulations, whales are listed as a threatened or protected species. In terms of these regulations, certain aMvitl99 are prohibited, such as hunting, catching, killing, capturing, importing or exporting of a listed species. Human activities around whales are also regulated.

The National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Amendment Act, 2014 (Act No. 21 of 2014) which enables the establishment of marine protected areas to provide sanctuaries for all marine species.

South Africa is also a signatory or party to various international treaties that promote the protection of whales, including Convention on Migratory Species (CMS), the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources(CCMALR) and the International Whaling Commission.

These legal instrument provide optimum conditions for all whale species to recover from past unsustainable whaling practices. In addition, South African re9earcheo play a leading role in international science forums aimed at determining the food requirements of top predators such as whales and setting measures to ensure adequate access to their prey.

(b) Whales eat a variety of prey within South African marine waters and at traditional feeding grounds in the Southern Ocean. In general, whales feed in the polar waters and breed in warmer waters. Feeding time is therefore typically spent away from South Africa in Antarctic and sub-Antarctic waters. The Southern Ocean is managed by agreement, including the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). South Africa is an active member and contributes to deliberations on conservation of the Southern Ocean.

1. (a) The South African policy and legal framework protects all whale species. The Department plays a meaningful role in International Conventions and Regional Fisheries Management Organisations to ensure that all fisheries are sustainable and that the environment is protected.

(b) The existing policy and legal framework to protect whales is currently being implemented and compliance and enforcement initiatives are in place to aid protection of our marine species.

Regards

MS B D CREECY, MP

MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT

DATE: 6/11/2020

Reply:

(1) (a) Despite being given a one and half months notice B apply for new permits, the majority of the industry operators submitted their applications for new permits on the eve of the expiration of the exemption given to them until the end of Alert Level 2 of the National Covid-19 Pandemic Lockdown. Furthermore, a number of fishing seasons also commence in the 9ummer months and right holders are therefore applying for new permits which have ‹exulted in the current backlog. The Department is currently working on clearing a backlog of Permit Applications that have been submitted by the industry.

(b) (i) The Electronic Application System is not down, it is currently operational. The Department is experiencing a slight backlog in processing permits for the reasons explained above.

(ii) The Electronic Application System is currently operational.

1. A large number of applications that have been submitted to the Department do not meet the minimum application requirements, and have been returned to applicants for resubmission with full and up-to-date documentation æ that the applications can be processed. This causes delays in the Department being able B issue new permits. The Department has also received a large number of new applications since the start of Alert Level 1 Lockdown and is working to clear the backlog.
2. The Department has engaged with Industry Associations as well as individual applicants to prioritise the processing and issuing of the outstanding permits and licences that meet the requirements and have been submitted to the Department timeously. Staff in the relevant permitting sections will also be working overtime to assist in clearing the backlog.
3. It is envisaged that the existing backlog should be cleared by mid November 2020.

Regards

MS B D CREECY, MP

MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Date: 6/11/2020

Reply:

(1)  The 2020 trophy hunting quota for elephants was set at 106 elephants. However, on average only 50 bulls are hunted annually. Globally, elephant as listed on the IUCN Red List as "Vulnerable“. In South Attica, the species is listed on the regional Red List as “Least Concern"

The national elephant population for South Africa is increasing, and estimated at approximately 30,000 individuals, of which an estimated 24,000 individuals occur within national and provincial reserves collectively, in seven of the nine provinces of South Africa.

The elephant population of South Africa is well managed and activities related to elephants are regulated through the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act 10 of 2004 (NEMBA), specifically the Threatened or Protected Species Regulations (TOPS Regulations), the National Norms and Standards for the Management of Elephants in South Africa (Government Gazette no. 30833), and respective provincial conservation legislation. In addition, local protocols managing elephant trophy hunting, taking into consideration the role of mature bulls, are in place in many areas were t trophy hunting of elephants take place in South Africa. South Africa has an annual national Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) trophy hunting quota of 150 elephants (300 tusks). In managing this quota, provinces are required to conduct calculations of their annual provincial level off-takes. These provincial off-takes are then collated to provide for a national quota.

On a provincial level, the quota is calculated by estimating the total elephant population within the province, multiplied by 19› to obtain the off-take quota for the specific province. Trophy hunting of elephants within South Africa is limited and the allocated annual quota is often not fully utilised. Therefore, trophy hunting is considered as having a negligible impact on elephant populations in South Africa. The 1% trophy hunting off-take is much lower than the average growth rate of the national elephant population.

(2) The study by Elephants for Africa and the University of Exeter, on "The Importance of Old Bulls: Leaders and Followers In Collective Movement of All-Male Groups In African Savannah Elephant", was recently published in September 2020, whereas the determination of the 2020 quota was made prior to the results of the said study. The department and the Provincial Scientific Authority will consider the key findings of the study in making determination of hunting quota for elephant in the future.

However, given the population numbers and the low number of elephant bulls' trophy hunted per annum the impact on populations is likely to be negligible. The Allen e/ at. (2020) study highlights that the off take (trophy hunting) of older mature bulls (considered bulls over 26 years of age) not only removes the prime breeders, but also removes individuals with a central ‹ale in the male society.

In South Africa the majority of bulls hunted are over the age of 50 years and nearing senescence, thus no longer bleeding. It is acknowledged that mature older bulls do play an important role in bull society. However, where low numbers of mature bulls and specifically those nearing senescence are hunted the impact on the population aa a whole and the bull society is likely to be negligible. In addition, elephant have evolved to cope with natural mortalities taking place, with the natural mortality rate of older mature bulls at approximately 1% per annum.

A study conducted by Burke et al, (2008) evaluating the risk and ethical concerns of hunting male elephant has indicated that all responses measured were minor and that the hunting of male elephant in South Africa is ethically acceptable when considering effects on the remaining elephant population. The authors recommended that bulls should be hunted when alone. This recommendation has been captured in the Norms and Standards for Management of Elephant in South Africa

(3) (a) The table below indicates the 2020 elephant trophy hunting quota for each province:
 

Province	Quota No.
Eastern Cape Province	3 Elephants (06 Tusks)
Free State Provinc	0
Gauteng Province	0
KwaZulu-Natal Provinc	15 Elephant(30 Tusks)
Limpopo Province	50 Elephant (100 Tusks)
Mpumalanga Province	40 Elephants (80 Tusks)
North West Province	0
Northern Cape Province	0
Western Cape Province	0
TOTAL	108 Elephants (216 Tusks)

b. See the response to question 1 above

Regards

MS B D CREECY, MP
MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
DATE: 6/11/2020

(#)

Reply:

The question has been referred to the KZNDOE; and the response will be provided as soon as it is received.

Reply:

(a) The Fisheries Offices are closed

The Fishing Sector was identified as an essential service in the provision of food during the National Covid-19 Lockdown. Office-based fisheries staff have been working on rotation since Alert 4 of the Lockdown, but have all returned to office with the commencement of Alert Level 1.

(b) Not applicable

Regards
MS B D CREECY, MP
MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT
DATE: 6/11/2020

Reply:

Type	Total exceptions	Total amount
Possible Double Dipping - PERSAL	9 494	R 41 009 737.70
Possible Double Dipping - SANDF	78	R 327 638.36
Total	9 572	41 337 376.06

Reply:

Yes, they were based on information in CompEasy.

A total of 38 946 invoices could not be migrated into CompEasy mainly due to the invoices not meeting the criteria for migration.

These invoices had already been rejected on uMehluko and the rejection reasons of those medical invoices were already communicated to medical service providers. Reasons for rejection included tariff code that did not match the published gazetted Compensation fund tariff codes.

These invoices were subsequently paid through the finance system of the Fund after medical service providers had provided the Fund with corrected information

Reply:

Eastern Cape: 

• Radio lesson schedules were developed and broadcasts included: 2 National Radio Stations;  14 Community Radio Stations; and 1 On-Line Radio Station
• Broadcast for e-School underway.  Access via the following link: rtmp://197.242.147.204/live/2e1 
• Grade 12 Tips for Success, Mind the Gap study guides and past exam papers all uploaded and available on ECDoE website.
• Access viawww.ecdoe.gov.za.  Click on Learners’ Support Menu or www.eccurriculum.co.za

Gauteng: 

• Provided autumn camp support material to all learners.
• Created an e-platform containing learning materials.
• Radio broadcast: using community radio stations.
• Created WhatsApp groups for learners/ teachers and subject advisors
• Weekly reports were provided to the provincial Command Centre on the readiness of the Special Schools to receive learners.
• The GDE COVID-19 steering committee had a representative from the disability sector. This enabled direct reporting and requesting progress on support required.
• National guideline documents were contextualised for Special Schools to facilitate effective and efficient implementation. 
• Special Schools were supported with the restructuring of timetables and transport routes.
• Youth Brigade members were deployed in Special Schools to assist with the activities regarding the containment of the COVID-19.
• Virtual or on-site school visits, monitoring and supporting school readiness were conducted from provincial level. 
• The Inclusion and Special Schools Directorate updated and added links to support Special Schools offering the Differentiated CAPS for learners with Severe Intellectual Disabilities, the Technical Occupational Curriculum and the Learning Programme for Learners with Profound Intellectual Disabilities.  This included curriculum content and lesson plans: 
• Technical Occupational Stream: https://education.gauteng.gov.za/Pages/Technical-Occupational-Curriculum-for-Special-Schools.aspx  
• NCS CAPS for SID: https://education.gauteng.gov.za/Pages/DCAPS-Gr-R-5-Severe-Intellectual-Disabilities.aspx
• Learning Programme for PID: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1QQgJUt1ZcqMqViyKmwdWa-dbjA2zLBau?usp=sharing

KwaZulu-Natal: 

• Distributed lesson plans, in video format, to all schools for the Deaf. The province has also secured slot for broadcasting lessons in the local radio stations, including Ukhozi FM. 
• Created the eFunda Portal with online resources;
• Print media utilised to support learning home;
• Radio broadcast programme/Comprehensive Schedule.

North West: 

• Parents were kept up to date on school contamination and provision of personal protective equipment upon return of learners.
• An audit of learners who would be or not returning to school was undertaken.
• Parents were encouraged to take learners to hospitals and clinics for their appointments.
• Parents were advised to contact schools for guidance and support on how to access therapeutic services.
• The Department collaborated with the Department of Health regarding the rendering of therapeutic services for learners while they were at home.
• A Facebook page was created to support learners by transversal itinerant outreach teams. 
• Google Classroom was used to support learners with co-morbidity. 
• Arrangements were made for parents to collect learning materials, assistive devices and instructions from schools. 
• Western Cape: 
• Made available revision programme for 12 subjects available in English and Afrikaans.
• Created a one-pager guideline for all subjects indicating what should be done, distributed to parents and teachers and learners.
• Telematics Broad Cast lessons: Register all grade 10- 12 learners in the country; Access through live streaming; Have all past recorded lessons (Grade 10-12)
• All subject advisers – created WhatsApp groups with teachers.
• WCED portal was loaded with comprehensive set of resources for each subject.
• Autism Western Cape have also made resources available for parents and caregivers and these were obtainable at https://www.autismwesterncape.org.za/services-resources/ . These were videos that explained the contents of the booster box/packs that they had developed. There was also a booklet for reference by parents and caregivers. Working with Autism South Africa, Autism Western Cape were able to send the available booster boxes to parents.
• Set up a Facebook page for “Real South African Sign Language”, and at  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePDwWPAwFXo&t=6s, containing free lessons for the lockdown period.
• Resources for children with autism spectrum disorder were made available to parents at  https://afirm.fpg.unc.edu/supporting-individuals-autism-through-uncertain-times.Teachers .
• With reference to the Schools of Skills, in which the Technical Occupational Stream is being piloted, a shared folder on Google Drive was shared with all principals of these schools.
• Sent video clips with activities via WhatsApp to parents and guardians. In addition, the PED created a WhatsApp resource bank, to which each of the members of the transversal outreach itinerant teams is linked. All available resources for this category of learners were shared with members in this group.

Reply:

There was no overall decrease of 3% on the Traditional Affairs budget allocation in February this year. However, as part of the 2020 Special Adjustment, in June an amount of R3 million was suspended from the allocation of the Department. This was for purposes of supporting the COVID-19 macro-economic stimulus response.

End.

Reply:

Type	Total exceptions	Total amount
Possible Double Dipping - PERSAL	9 494	R 41 009 737.70
Possible Double Dipping - SANDF	78	R 327 638.36
Total	9 572	41 337 376.06

2. The matter is under investigation by the UIF Fraud Unit as well as the SIU and based on the investigation recommendations, the recovery process will be initiated by UIF. In addition, possible criminal cases and internal disciplinary cases can be instituted

Reply:

(1),(2) and (3) The management of the environment and protection of natural resources is a concurrent function between the Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries and Provincial Departments responsible for matters related to the environment, Therefore, the issues raised in this question fall within the jurisdiction of the North West Provincial Department of Economic Development, Environment, Conservation and Tourism. In View of this it is recommended that the matter be referred to the relevant Member of Executive Council (MEC) responsible for environmental affairs in the North West Province.

Regards
MS B D CREECY, MP
MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND ENVIRONMENT
DATE: 6/11/2020
 

Reply:

1. 125

2. None

3. Note applicable

 

Reply:

a)

1. Mr Tebogo Maruping – Unemployment insurance Commissioner.
2. Ms Fezeka Puzi, UIF CFO.
3. Ms Judith Kumbi, Chief Director Operations.
4. Ms Maria Ramashaba, Director: Supply Chain Management.
5. Ms Nompumemlelo Mconywa: chief Director: Labour Activation Programme.

b)

1. Monthly gross salary is R107 863.90

2. Monthly gross salary is R101 118.31

3. Monthly gross salary is R94 252 .56.

4. Monthly gross salary is R800 89.44

5. Monthly gross salary is R97 227.18.

The date of return to work is dependant on completion and processing of the investigation report. The report is expected, according to norms, within 60 days from September 2020 or such extended period as may apply.

Reply:

None. There are no invoices that have not been paid as a result of migration into CompEasy.

Invoices were migrated into CompEasy from uMehluko so that they can continue to be paid in CompEasy when payable.

Reply:

The question has been referred to the Eastern Cape Department of Education; and the response will be provided as soon as it is received.

Reply:

Response from the Northern Cape Department of Education:

Ward 5, Phokwane Local Municipality is located in Hartswater Area, within this area there is a Primary School named CW KiesIntermediêreSkool. This school is classified as a Level 3 Primary School and accommodates learners from Grade R to Grade 8. Over the last 3 years the learner enrolment at this school that caters for Primary School learners were 752 (2018), 730 (2019) and 744 (2020) which on average indicates a decline in learners. This is also the case over a 5 year period. There is a total of 22 ordinary classrooms at the school and 1 single ECD Classroom, however according to the Norms and Standards there is only 18 ordinary classrooms required and 3 ECD Classrooms. The Department on the Infrastructure Plan have prioritized an additional Double ECD Classroom for this school, this is however still in outer years due to budget availability. The school within this academic year as well as the prior year’s however does not experience overcrowding.

The estimate population of Ward 5, Phokwane Local Municipality is 8 245, of the total population, about 14% is of primary school-going age; the existing primary school can serve up to 910 learners with the current infrastructure, however there are for this academic year only 744 learners.

Within the Infrastructure Plans there is a new English Medium Primary and Secondary School planned for Hartswater, however sites for these schools have not yet been acquired. According to the future planning as stated in the Spatial Development Framework of the Phokwane Local Municipality the open areas within Ward 5 are earmarked for upgrading of public space as well as settlement upgrades therefore there is no new settlements planned in this ward that will have an immediate effect on the population size. Within the Integrated Development Plan Review 2019/20 and Planning for 2020/21 the community members if ward 5 mentioned various priorities, the construction of a new primary school however was not one of the mentioned priorities.

The current school infrastructure caters for learners within the vicinity and therefore there are no plans for a new school for this specific area.

Reply:

 

1. The Department received over one thousand (1000) comments, with the majority (876) being submitted in the West Coast Rock Lobster Fishery. These comments are available for inspection at the premises of the Fisheries Branch.

   1. The comments were assessed and analysed by members of the Assessment Panel in each fishery.

   2. The details of how the provisional allocations changed as a result of the comments received can be determined by studying the difference between the Provisonal GPR and the Final GPR.

 

 

 

(2) and (3) a,b,c
It is common knowledge that the FRAP process 2015/16 has been the subject of lengthy litigation some of which continues to this day.

In our view one of the reasons for this was the decision to centralise decision-making in the hands of the Deputy Director-General of the Fisheries Branch, who was subsequently dismissed, by the then Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries.

In an effort to ensure a fair, transparent and accountable process of FRAP 2020/21 the Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries is doing the following:

appointing a number of Delegated Authorities, rather than just one;
augmenting the capacity of the Department via the appointment of external service providers to assist with the various phases of the FRAP process; appointing a Process Observer/Auditing Firm to oversee and audit the process;
the appointment of an independent Legal Team to advise and ensure a legally defensible process;
developing an online application process in order to reduce data-capturing errors.

 

MS B D CREECY, MP
MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT DATE: 05 NOVEMBER 2020

 

Reply:

(a) Yes, the Department of Public Service and administration has specified criteria in place regarding the number of officials who should attend the committee meetings in the Parliament of the Republic of South Africa.

(b)(i) The criteria for attending committee meetings in Parliament is included in the departmental Travel Policy which states the following “The number of employees attending official engagement on the same matter must be limited to 3 employees from the department. If the number exceeds 3, approval must be obtained from the Accounting Officer. The Accounting Officer, Deputy Directors-General or employees holding an equivalent rank, Ministerial advisors appointed in terms of section 12A of the Public Service Act and other EXCO members reporting directly to the Accounting Officer, people performing Parliamentary duty and the Chairperson and Secretary to the Public Service Remuneration Review Commission (PSSRS) do not contribute to the three (3) employees mentioned above.”

END

Reply:

(1)(a)(b), (2)(a)(b) and (3)(a)

Subsequent to the publication of the non-detriment finding for leopard in 2015, the Department, in liaison with the Scientific Authority, adopted an adaptive approach to determine the annual leopard hunting quota. Population trend data generated through the South African Leopard
Monitoring Project is used to inform decision making on the annual leopard hunting quota. South Africa ensures that leopard hunting is consistent with the sustainable use principles and that it does not have a detrimental impact on the survival of the leopard in the wild. Hunting of leopards in South Africa is therefore managed through:

Restrictions to designated hunting zones where trends in leopard density indicate that populations are stable or increasing, and

Limits to males older than 7 years, which is likely to have a minimal impact on population trends. This is used as an additional precautionary safeguard.

It is again emphasised that only hunting zones where leopard populations are stable and increasing have been designated as eligible for hunting of leopard. Trends in leopard populations were determined by multi state models fitted to leopard density data that wee collected through the Leopard Monitoring Project at 17 monitoring sites between 2013 and 2019. Data from these sites were used to designate hunting zones. As a precautionary measure, only one leopard can be hunted per eligible hunting zone.

(b)(i)(ii)

The 2020 quote of eleven leopards is a country wide quota and not a quota per province. In other words, the total number of leopards that may be hunted in South Africa in 2020 is eleven (11) and not ninety-nine (99) as inferred by be question. The basis for the allocation of the quota is provided in question 3(a) above.

The table below indicates the allocation of the 2020 leopard hunting quota for each province:

Province	Allocated quota
Eastern Cape Province	0
Free State Province	O
Gauteng Province	0
KwaZulu-Natal Province	0
Limpopo Province	nine (9) male leopards of seven years or older
Mpumalanga Province	O
North West Province	No (2) male leopards of seven years or older
Northern Cape Province	0
Western Cape Province	0

(c)(ii)

The basis for the allocation of the quota is provided in question 1-3 above.

Regards

MS B D CREECY, MP

MINISTER OF FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT

DATE: 6/11/2020

Reply:

I am aware of the testimony given by Mr Sodi to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture, Corruption and Fraud in the Public Sector including Organs of State. No finding has been made by the Commission in this regard. I will apply my mind to any actions that need to be taken once findings and recommendations in this regard are made.

Reply:

The setting of prices falls within the ambit of the private sector. South African Tourism does engage the sector to consider special offers as part of the promotion activities they conduct i.e. Sho’t Left programme. The Minister of Tourism has commenced with a consultation process with the sector on the concept of dual pricing.

Reply:

There is a high demand for skilled medical professionals in South Africa, as there is in most countries globally.

To address this problem, Government has, among other interventions, ensured the expansion of the training platform in South African medical schools and has increased the number of doctors graduating from South African universities.

Additionally, Government also increased the intake of students studying medicine within the Nelson Mandela-Fidel Castro Programme (NMFC), through an agreement between the Republic of South Africa and the Republic of Cuba. The programme has since added a total of 2,498 medical doctors to our health workforce in the public health sector, and is expected to add a further 649 by January 2021.

With reference to the “South African foreign qualified medical doctors”referred to by the Honourable Member, I am advised thatthis concerns citizens who hold foreign qualifications, are not registered as medical practitioners under a foreign registering authority, have not completed training as interns and therefore are not meeting all requirements for registration.

In other words, these citizens are foreign-qualified medical graduates. They are not registered as medical practitioners or doctors in the countries where they have received their medical education.

To assist these medical graduates to get clinical exposure and to complete training as interns, the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) on 24 June 2020 approved the pathway that was referred to in the oral reply of the Minister of Health to Question 379 on 2 September 2020.

I am advised by the Minister of Health that the HPCSA Pathway is in line with the 2018 Policy Guidelines issued by the National Department of Health.

This will assist citizens who are qualified outside South Africa and are not, or were not, registered with a foreign registering authority and have not completed training as interns with a smooth integration into the South African healthcare system.

In view of the above, there is no need for my intervention.

Reply:

Consultations on a lifestyle audits framework are ongoing and being finalised.

In the meantime, all members of the Cabinet and Deputy Ministers have submitted the declarations of their financial interests to the Registrar of Executive Interests, the Secretary of the Cabinet, in line with the Executive Members’ Ethics Act and the Executive Ethics Code.

Reply:

The international trip undertaken by the Minister of Defence and Military Veterans was approved by me on 8 September 2020. As I was not in Gauteng at the time of the receipt of the request, the approval was verbal and the relevant documentation was signed as soon as possible thereafter.

While the request did not comply with the requirement in the Guide for Members of the Executive that requests should be made at least two weeks prior to departure, this is, unfortunately, not an uncommon occurrence due to the pressures of state work.

I do not intend to take any further action. I deem the reprimand given to the Minister, the directive that three months’ salary be donated to the Solidarity Fund, and the obligation to ensure that the costs of the trip are reimbursed by the political party (which has been done) sufficient sanction.

I was informed that the Minister would be travelling with 2 support staff as listed in her written request for permission to travel to Zimbabwe, submitted to me on 7 September 2020.

The information about the request for permission to travel by the Minister as well as my approval was made public on 1 October 2020, and can be accessed on the Presidency website.

Reply:

The Constitution provides that Ministers serve at the pleasure of the Head of the Executive. Section 91(2) of the Constitution empowers the President to appoint and dismiss them. Assignments to Ministers and decisions on their performance are within the President’s discretion.

I made clear that I disapproved of the Minister’s decision and actions, and therefore I applied the sanction in a manner that I deemed fit for her error in judgment.

As the President of the Republic I have no authority to sanction a political party for their actions. Decisions made within the political party are for the political party to communicate.

I understand that the Public Protector is investigating this matter.

The Department of Home Affairs is responsible for the entry and exit of persons to and from the Republic and for investigating if anything untoward occurred with respect to their responsibilities.

As the Honourable Member would be aware, not all international travel was prohibited during the period in question. Repatriation flights, travel by diplomats, travel by investors or business persons (after seeking due permission) was allowed.

The account of the costs involved was submitted to me, and to the Public Protector and made public, as was confirmation of payment by the political party in question, and I have no reason to doubt their accuracy.

Reply:

(1) (a) The Department and National Treasury have been tasked by Cabinet to consider alternative sources of funding for SAA to ensure that a restructured airline emerges from the Business Rescue process. Government will have to consider various sources of Funding including Strategic Equity Partnerships.

(2) Yes, a copy of the business rescue plan with proposals on the alternative transition process that he presented to the business rescue practitioners will be provided accordingly. (Kindly note the attached copy of the BR Plan for consideration).

Reply:

(1)(a) The tender for the Seraleng Housing Project was not awarded by my Department but by the North West Provincial Department of Human Settlements. With regards to the request for name of a contractor involved in the housing project referred to in this question, I am constrained and prohibited by the document titled “Guide to Parliamentary Questions in the National Assembly” from providing the Honourable Member with the name of the contractor. The document referred to states that:

“Questions are to be framed as concisely as possible. All unnecessary adjectives, references and quotations are omitted. Names of persons, bodies and, for example, newspapers are only used in questions if the facts surrounding the case have been proven. As the mere mention of such names could be construed as publicity for or against them, it should be clear that this practice is highly undesirable. If a question will be unintelligible without mentioning such names, the Departments concerned are notified of the name (-s) and this phrase is used: ".......a certain person (name furnished)”

(b) I am informed that the total number of houses to be built was 557.

(c) The total amount of the tender was R89 146 104.11

(2)(a) I am further advised that the building of houses commenced in October 2015 and

(b) the project was halted in 2018.

Reply:

Honourable Member, please be advised that my Department did not appoint the contractor for the Seraleng Housing Project and therefore did not pay any money towards the project.

Reply:

a) Various sources of funding are being considered including the strategic equity partner, application for funding from Government through the Medium-Term Expenditure Framework process, approaching Development Financial Institutions and Commercial Banks.

b|) The process has reached an advanced stage, which we will be able to announce in due course. Due to the sensitive nature of these negotiations we are unable to pronounce at this stage.

Reply:

According to the information received from Eskom

(1)(a)(b)(c) Since the question regarding financial payments is not specific, Eskom assumes it refers to payments received in line with the Government Appropriations.

Since January 2020, Eskom received the amounts set out in Table 1 below, as part of the Appropriations and Special Appropriations Act of 2019.

Table 1: Payments received by Eskom in line with Government Appropriations

Financial Year	(b) Date	(c) Amount paid, R'm
2020	03-Feb-20	4 000
2020	11-Feb-20	4 000
2020	28-Feb-20	5 000
2020	31-Mar-20	9 500
2021	29 May 20	1 000
2021	11 Aug 20	5 000
Total for the 2020 Calendar year	28 500

(2)(a) The cost of transport is included in the diesel price. Transport of diesel to Ankerlig and Port Rex is via truck, while transport is via pipeline for Gourikwa and Acacia.

(2)(b) The cost of diesel per litre in each month over the past 12 months for the gas turbine power plants is as set out in Table 2 below. Eskom received an average discount of 35c/l over this period.

Table 2 Cost of diesel per litre in each month for the gas turbine power plants

Month	Wholesale Price (R/l)	Average Discount	Nett Price (R/l)
04-09-19	14.05	0.35	13.70
02-10-19	14.30	0.35	13.95
06-11-19	14.14	0.35	13.79
04-12-19	13.99	0.35	13.64
01-01-20	14.08	0.35	13.73
05-02-20	14.03	0.35	13.68
03-03-20	13.49	0.35	13.14
01-04-20	12.09	0.35	11.74
06-05-20	10.48	0.35	10.13
03-06-20	10.70	0.35	10.35
01-07-20	12.43	0.35	12.08
05-08-20	12.88	0.35	12.53

(3) The report of the Medupi conveyor belt accident has been completed.

(4) The report is a product of an internal investigation that was commissioned in accordance with Eskom’s established integrated risk management processes. The report is therefore an internal report for consumption by the relevant Eskom senior executives and cannot be made public. However, Eskom endeavours to provide a summary of key findings from the report once internal governance processes are finalised.

Reply:

According to the information received from Eskom

(a)(b) and (c)

The request to disclose the prices and names of associated suppliers is commercially sensitive. The utility is currently progressing coal supply negotiations with existing and potentially new coal suppliers. By disclosing the requested information to parliament and to the public, suppliers could potentially use this information to erode Eskom’s bargaining power.

Reply:

According to the information received from Eskom

a) The total debt owed by municipalities as at 31 July 2020 is R46.1 billion, of which R31 billion is overdue debt. The details of the age analysis of the total debt owed by each municipality to Eskom, as at 31 July 2020 are set out in Annexure A.

b) Eskom has implemented several interventions to collect the outstanding debt owed as set out in Table 1 below:

Table 1: Interventions by Eskom to collect outstanding debt

Interventions by Eskom
Implemented concessions as agreed with SALGA	Eskom increased the payment days from 15 to 30 days for all non-metropolitan municipalities, reduced the interest rate on arrears, and applies payments to capital first before interest. Eskom offers payment plans as a means to make the payment of the arrear debt more affordable over a period of time.

Interventions by Eskom
Focus on enhancing and enforcing current revenue management processes	This includes direct engagement with defaulting municipalities, issuing contract breach notices with the intention of encouraging a remedy of the breach, interruption of supply, and also litigating by issuing summons for payment. Legal pursuance of debt owed also extends to the attachment of assets and bank accounts of certain municipalities.
Partnering with government	Eskom fully participates in intergovernmental structures such as the Eskom Political Task Team and the Multi-disciplinary Revenue Committee that is convened by the Office of the Deputy President. Eskom offers its services and expertise in the form of active partnering with stakeholders to improve revenue collection within municipalities. Eskom works closely with National Treasury, which provides municipal financial oversight, thereby ensuring municipal budgets are funded and payment obligations to Eskom are met.

ANNEXURE A - PQ2133
REPORTING MONTH : 2020/07/31
Name of Municipality	(a) Age	Total debt is made up of
	Current	16 - 30 days	31 - 60 days	61 - 90 days	90 days+	Total	(b)(i) Total Capital	Total VAT	(b)(ii) Total Interest
	EASTERN CAPE	1 045 309 406	2 530 451	82 838 040	54 125 462	1 094 964 881	2 279 768 239	1 795 121 602	268 812 797	215 833 839
1	ALFRED NZO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	-206 089	247 583	38 373	9 043	92 140	181 051	153 815	19 010	8 225
2	AMAHLATHI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	5 173 481	10 224	4 674 349	1 760 031	16 357 033	27 975 119	22 424 224	3 363 616	2 187 279
3	AMATHOLE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	1 274 342	1 087 143	1 210 463	981 709	1 092 622	5 646 278	4 836 768	727 414	82 097
4	BLUE CRANE ROUTE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	14 094 374	0	0	0	0	14 094 374	12 255 977	1 838 397	0
5	BUFFALO CITY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY	237 804 629	0	36 963	1	0	237 841 592	206 746 921	31 094 356	315
6	CHRIS HANI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	-723 145	101 341	4 198 860	221 205	432 114	4 230 375	3 786 403	389 371	54 601
7	DR BEYERS NAUDE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	12 712 692	69 099	8 824 386	7 206 803	85 385 606	114 198 585	87 592 369	13 119 997	13 486 219
8	ELUNDINI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	152 619	0	0	0	0	152 619	134 562	18 057	0
9	EMALAHLENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	2 019 976	0	5 877	0	0	2 025 852	1 756 485	263 473	5 895
10	ENGCOBO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0,05	0,01	0
11	ENOCH MGIJIMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	42 663 040	15 051	31 083 743	20 638 507	298 112 955	392 513 295	305 419 072	45 776 831	41 317 392
12	GREAT KEI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 562 521	0	484 587	10 368	3 802 232	5 859 708	4 665 931	699 858	493 919
13	INGQUZA HILL LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	250 676	34 647	257 909	0	0	543 232	469 595	70 439	3 198
14	INTSIKA YETHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	527 757	0	0	0	0	527 757	458 919	68 838	0
15	INXUBA YETHEMBA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	12 308 862	0	8 968 063	5 983 581	140 121 530	167 382 037	119 397 835	17 741 834	30 242 368
16	JOE GQABI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	11 361	134 482	109 492	1 496 472	0	1 751 808	1 500 303	225 045	26 459
17	KING SABATA DALINDYEBO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	101 419 957	31 501	424 314	1 441 991	112 009 461	215 327 225	180 089 083	27 617 009	7 621 133
18	KOUGA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	31 699 079	0	798	0	0	31 699 876	27 563 600	4 134 540	1 737
19	KOU-KAMMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	704 582	0	308 878	0	0	1 013 460	877 925	131 689	3 847
20	MAKANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	17 097 721	0	0	0	36 749 083	53 846 804	45 909 235	6 829 881	1 107 688
21	MATATIELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	6 988 990	0	0	0	0	6 988 990	6 077 383	911 607	0
22	MBASHE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 827	0	219	333	0	2 378	1 992	299	87
23	MBIZANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	93 301	0	0	0	1	93 302	80 413	12 067	822

Name of Municipality	(a) Age	Total debt is made up of
	Current	16 - 30 days	Current	16 - 30 days	Current	16 - 30 days	(b)(i) Total Capital	Total VAT	(b)(ii) Total Interest
24	MHLONTLO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	199 361	45 970	34 821	0	0	280 152	242 800	36 420	932
25	MNQUMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
26	NDLAMBE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	7 573 353	0	0	0	0	7 573 353	6 518 988	1 054 365	0
27	NELSON MANDELA BAY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY	513 455 879	527 935	0	0	0	513 983 814	446 942 072	67 041 372	370
28	NGQUSHWA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
29	NTHABANKULU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	30 151	0	276	0	0	30 427	26 458	3 969	0
30	NYANDENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY FBE	107 342	0	0	0	0	107 342	93 341	14 001	0
31	O R TAMBO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	-468 490	225 060	222 275	174 269	193 240	346 355	263 672	64 209	18 474
32	PORT ST JOHNS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	303 262	0	0	0	0	303 262	263 706	39 556	0
33	RAYMOND MHLABA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	9 715 887	0	7 687 542	4 832 117	166 402 968	188 638 514	122 480 855	17 928 459	48 229 201
34	SAKHISIZWE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 995 628	12	0	0	0	1 995 640	1 720 822	258 121	16 698
35	SENQU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	5 340 493	0	0	0	0	5 340 493	4 643 910	696 582	0
36	SUNDAYS RIVER VALLEY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	3 538 619	0	2 510 673	1 583 566	0	7 632 858	6 176 658	926 499	529 701
37	UMZIMVUBU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	44 043	403	0	0	0	44 446	38 649	5 797	0
38	WALTER SISULU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	15 841 324	0	11 755 177	7 785 466	234 213 897	269 595 865	173 510 863	25 689 820	70 395 182
	FREE STATE	558 515 003	247 880 311	275 222 401	206 877 352	11 474 620 510	12 763 115 577	8 663 638 405	1 258 736 678	2 840 740 494
39	CENTLEC MUNICIPALITY	3 430 414	0	0	0	0	3 430 414	2 971 169	445 675	13 570
40	DIHLABENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	26 792 920	0	18 576 125	13 342 424	347 465 405	406 176 873	296 860 680	43 919 008	65 397 185
41	KOPANONG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	5 331 508	0	10 065	15 155	1 226 544	6 583 272	5 556 785	825 596	200 892
42	LETSEMENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	4 981 926	0	4 272 604	2 347 114	46 973 170	58 574 813	45 544 488	6 840 068	6 190 257
43	MAFUBE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	13 032 629	0	12 416 681	15 357 066	98 532 534	139 338 910	101 708 119	14 920 993	22 709 798
44	MALUTI A PHOFUNG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	103 018 183	662 361	89 820 631	72 908 612	5 140 907 401	5 407 317 188	3 416 686 863	493 591 612	1 497 038 713
45	MANGAUNG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY	4 952 986	247 171 599	12 040 567	0	13 886 892	278 052 045	241 698 211	36 254 997	98 836
46	MANTSOPA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	8 029 084	0	14 084 839	7 374 869	192 387 328	221 876 119	144 565 922	21 065 830	56 244 367
47	MASILONYANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	6 792 694	0	5 811 351	2 434 505	60 087 494	75 126 044	60 368 482	8 906 425	5 851 137
48	MATJHABENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	178 222 967	7 893	49 033 516	44 390 457	3 129 712 117	3 401 366 950	2 277 416 556	329 785 275	794 165 118
49	METSIMAHOLO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	44 243 387	0	0	0	13 500 000	57 743 387	49 953 693	7 493 054	296 640
Name of Municipality	(a) Age	Total debt is made up of
	Current	16 - 30 days	Current	16 - 30 days	Current	16 - 30 days	(b)(i) Total Capital	Total VAT	(b)(ii) Total Interest
50	MOHOKARE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	67 803	0	66 300	65 412	192 350	391 865	334 842	50 226	6 796
51	MOQHAKA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	40 234 333	0	15 742 628	0	298 357 452	354 334 414	274 732 913	40 968 278	38 633 222
52	NALA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	25 440 184	0	2 973 884	17 704 568	346 273 371	392 392 006	298 390 489	43 565 352	50 436 165
53	NGWATHE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	37 416 763	0	31 989 813	18 228 528	1 221 468 050	1 309 103 154	986 444 975	142 542 453	180 115 726
54	NKETOANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	20 562 888	0	5 750 543	5 557 075	321 984 368	353 854 874	239 246 224	34 691 455	79 917 195
55	PHUMELELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	8 037 971	26 578	2 314 024	2 213 297	124 528 836	137 120 705	99 794 356	14 859 853	22 466 496
56	SETSOTO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	11 717 024	11 879	210 852	0	0	11 939 755	10 275 707	1 541 356	122 692
57	TOKOLOGO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	5 006 543	0	4 049 180	2 839 483	93 121 829	105 017 035	78 046 722	11 542 190	15 428 123
58	TSWELOPELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	11 202 797	0	6 058 799	2 098 788	24 015 370	43 375 754	33 041 210	4 926 979	5 407 565
	GAUTENG	6 262 789 360	707 633 991	259 734 441	182 966 557	2 405 224 960	9 818 349 309	7 967 389 189	1 194 170 609	656 789 511
59	CITY OF EKURHULENI METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY	1 841 503 839	703 358 185	14 068 423	331 637	0	2 559 262 084	2 226 904 328	334 200 566	-1 842 810
60	CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY	1 670 743 142	85 603	3 778 616	0	2 275	1 674 609 637	1 456 122 030	218 418 546	69 062
61	CITY OF TSHWANE METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY	1 508 561 807	724 170	384 906	0	0	1 509 670 884	1 312 835 323	196 828 012	7 548
62	EMFULENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	626 500 695	3 386 573	158 757 750	110 805 767	1 833 220 909	2 732 671 694	1 968 807 647	294 487 852	469 376 196
63	LESEDI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	39 965 438	0	0	0	0	39 965 438	34 753 416	5 212 022	0
64	MERAFONG CITY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	106 995 000	79 460	30 161 686	26 536 973	363 916 132	527 689 250	382 220 081	57 162 147	88 307 021
65	MIDVAAL LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	43 316 862	0	0	0	0	43 316 862	37 666 837	5 650 026	0
66	MOGALE CITY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	226 714 381	0	168 198	0	0	226 882 579	170 075 997	25 511 623	31 294 960
67	RAND WEST CITY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	198 488 196	0	52 414 862	45 292 180	208 006 073	504 201 310	377 934 338	56 689 438	69 577 534
68	SEDIBENG DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	79 570	79 570	69 192	10 379	0
	KWAZULU NATAL	2 640 303 110	5 626 740	38 055 628	32 493 098	482 404 486	3 198 883 061	2 686 612 419	403 032 475	109 238 166
69	ABAQULUSI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	52 536 257	12 584	0	0	17 281 243	69 830 084	56 131 678	8 421 628	5 276 778
70	ALFRED DUMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	42 465 418	0	0	0	0	42 465 418	36 926 450	5 538 968	0
71	AMAJUBA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	365 343	0	243 797	16 239	41 156	666 535	577 233	86 800	2 502
72	BIG 5 HLABISA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	-2	0	0	0	0	-2	-2	0	0
73	CITY OF UMHLATHUZE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	135 633 196	1 230 235	153 317	148 200	0	137 164 948	119 267 789	17 893 124	4 036
74	DANNHAUSER LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Name of Municipality	(a) Age	Total debt is made up of
	Current	16 - 30 days	Current	16 - 30 days	Current	16 - 30 days	(b)(i) Total Capital	Total VAT	(b)(ii) Total Interest
75	DR NKOSAZANA DLAMINI ZUMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	18 415	0	2 545	0	0	20 960	18 208	2 731	21
76	EDUMBE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	5 118 208	0	0	0	0	5 118 208	4 450 616	667 592	0
77	EMADLANGENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	2 020 573	0	0	0	0	2 020 573	1 757 020	263 553	0
78	ENDUMENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	18 996 139	0	0	0	0	18 996 139	16 519 983	2 476 156	0
79	ETHEKWINI METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY	1 512 335 557	0	5 185	0	0	1 512 340 742	1 315 078 890	197 261 841	11
80	GREATER KOKSTAD LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	-1 633	0	0	0	0	-1 633	-1 633	0	0
81	HARRY GWALA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	-584 999	161 024	0	0	0	-423 975	-427 098	1 947	1 175
82	ILEMBE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	819 821	780 852	1 013	0	0	1 601 686	1 392 771	208 916	0
83	IMPENDLE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
84	INKOSI LANGALIBALELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	51 163 261	0	0	0	25 207 105	76 370 366	59 246 542	8 886 539	8 237 286
85	JOZINI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	32 710	0	0	0	0	32 710	28 443	4 266	0
86	KING CETSHWAYO DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	156 948	166 379	0	0	0	323 328	279 853	43 474	0
87	KWADUKUZA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	104 639 975	0	0	0	0	104 639 975	90 991 283	13 648 692	0
88	MANDENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
89	MAPHUMULO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 839	0	0	0	0	1 839	1 599	240	0
90	MKHAMBATHINI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
91	MPOFANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	7 921 418	0	5 957 353	3 952 182	168 480 033	186 310 986	137 797 506	20 384 739	28 128 740
92	MSINGA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	-3 304	0	0	0	0	-3 304	-2 782	-522	0
93	MSUNDUZI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	480 468 091	0	45 104	24 039	1 592 529	482 129 763	415 304 937	62 535 103	4 289 724
94	MTHONJANENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	2 547 629	0	0	0	3 571 696	6 119 325	5 203 446	781 578	134 301
95	MTUBATUBA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	11 550	9 548	0	0	0	21 098	17 917	2 688	493
96	NDWEDWE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
97	NEWCASTLE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	125 363 929	0	30 242 547	21 597 294	166 566 605	343 770 375	262 288 394	39 461 437	42 020 544
98	NKANDLA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	4 021 175	0	0	0	0	4 021 175	3 484 208	522 631	14 336
99	NONGOMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	25 992	0	26 194	0	0	52 186	45 379	6 807	0
100	NQUTHU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	3 574 987	0	0	0	0	3 574 987	3 108 684	466 303	0
101	OKHAHLAMBA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 455	0	0	0	0	1 455	1 265	190	0

Name of Municipality	(a) Age	Total debt is made up of
	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	(b)(i) Total Capital	Total VAT	(b)(ii) Total Interest
102	RAY NKONYENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	14 348 518	0	0	0	0	14 348 518	12 476 972	1 871 546	0
103	RICHMOND LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
104	UBUHLEBEZWE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	35 627	42 770	33 220	0	0	111 617	96 508	14 569	540
105	UGU DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	305 961	1 673 529	0	0	0	1 979 491	1 721 959	257 037	494
106	ULUNDI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	22 836 934	0	8 111	6 586 606	99 612 854	129 044 505	93 943 656	13 991 774	21 109 076
107	UMDONI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	-57 247	70 103	0	0	0	12 856	10 655	2 201	0
108	UMFOLOZI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	99 443	19 360	0	0	0	118 803	103 307	15 496	0
109	UMGUNGUNDLOVU DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	8 567	0	0	0	0	8 567	7 449	1 117	0
110	UMHLABUYALINGANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	-1 000	0	0	0	0	-1 000	-870	-130	0
111	UMKHANYAKUDE DISTRICT MUNIC	3 832 673	0	79 841	0	0	3 912 513	3 409 374	502 361	779
112	UMLALAZI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	7 920 573	0	0	0	0	7 920 573	6 887 455	1 033 118	0
113	UMNGENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	20 381 396	0	0	0	0	20 381 396	17 722 952	2 658 443	0
114	UMSHWATHI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	-2	0	0	0	0	-2	-2	0	0
115	UMUZIWABANTU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
116	UMVOTI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	10 353 066	0	0	0	0	10 353 066	9 002 666	1 350 400	0
117	UMZIMKULU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
118	UMZINYATHI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	897 411	221 356	710 537	148 451	51 264	2 029 019	1 758 677	267 133	3 209
119	UMZUMBE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	171 762	0	0	0	0	171 762	148 285	22 243	1 234
120	UPHONGOLA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	3 736 084	0	0	0	0	3 736 084	3 248 768	487 315	0
121	UTHUKELA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	4 311 747	199 515	181 736	16 056	0	4 709 054	4 094 838	614 217	0
122	ZULULAND DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	1 471 651	1 039 484	365 126	4 032	0	2 880 292	2 491 189	376 216	12 887
	LIMPOPO	365 644 212	83 934	36 521 267	19 461 882	799 096 597	1 220 807 892	917 389 531	136 409 206	167 009 155
123	BA-PHALABORWA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	10 296 929	0	0	0	0	10 296 929	8 953 852	1 343 078	0
124	BELA-BELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	12 529 223	0	16 264 129	6 505 124	534 614	35 833 091	22 204 295	3 349 128	10 279 668
125	BLOUBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	5 796 357	0	68 663	0	0	5 865 021	5 100 018	765 003	0
126	CAPRICORN DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	231 179	0	108 572	0	0	339 751	293 593	44 456	1 701
127	COLLINS CHABANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	442 394	0	0	0	0	442 394	344 466	97 928	0
128	ELIAS MOTSOALEDI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	10 791 749	0	0	0	0	10 791 749	9 366 960	1 405 044	19 744

Name of Municipality	(a) Age	Total debt is made up of
	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	(b)(i) Total Capital	Total VAT	(b)(ii) Total Interest
129	EPHRAIM MOGALE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	5 984 035	0	0	0	0	5 984 035	5 203 508	780 526	0
130	FETAKGOMO - GREATER TUBATSE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	695 238	0	0	0	0	695 238	604 571	90 668	0
131	GREATER GIYANI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	94 137	0	0	0	0	94 137	81 859	12 279	0
132	GREATER LETABA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	2 276 535	0	0	0	0	2 276 535	1 979 595	296 939	0
133	GREATER TZANEEN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	62 478 617	0	0	0	0	62 478 617	54 097 570	8 114 634	266 412
134	LEPELLE NKUMPI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	333 195	0	0	0	0	333 195	289 735	43 460	0
135	LEPHALALE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	12 968 872	0	83 097	0	0	13 051 969	11 340 038	1 702 157	9 774
136	MAKHADO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	40 837 585	0	0	0	0	40 837 585	35 510 944	5 326 642	0
137	MAKHUDUTHAMAGA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	36 690	0	0	0	0	36 690	31 904	4 786	0
138	MARULENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	27 376	0	0	0	0	27 376	23 805	3 571	0
139	MODIMOLLE-MOOKGOPHONG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	24 901 644	0	19 975 470	12 956 758	541 353 824	599 187 696	430 035 176	63 881 053	105 271 466
140	MOGALAKWENA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	28 617 694	68 719	21 335	0	0	28 707 749	24 643 089	3 696 463	368 196
141	MOLEMOLE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	369 567	0	0	0	0	369 567	321 362	48 204	0
142	MOPANI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	2 782 672	0	0	0	0	2 782 672	2 342 185	440 487	0
143	MUSINA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	14 281 246	0	0	0	62 547 185	76 828 431	52 507 211	7 863 053	16 458 168
145	POLOKWANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	110 045 238	0	0	0	0	110 045 238	95 690 601	14 354 637	0
146	SEKHUKHUNE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	2 727 234	0	0	0	0	2 727 234	2 424 021	303 213	0
147	THABAZIMBI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	9 035 505	0	0	0	194 660 974	203 696 479	147 869 991	21 522 136	34 304 352
148	THULAMELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	941 719	0	0	0	0	941 719	818 886	122 833	0
149	VHEMBE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	6 121 581	15 215	1	0	0	6 136 796	5 310 296	796 827	29 673
	MPUMALANGA	907 660 119	7 516 615	437 595 269	295 614 172	8 067 142 378	9 715 528 552	6 871 695 575	1 013 313 981	1 830 518 996
150	BUSHBUCKRIDGE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	8 592 270	9 556	41 218	47 295	2 795 848	11 486 187	9 591 898	1 438 956	455 332
151	CHIEF ALBERT LUTHULI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	11 152 692	0	12 654 701	44 644	3 064 943	26 916 980	18 370 903	2 755 567	5 790 510
152	CITY OF MBOMBELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	233 332 697	7 506 989	59 540 611	50 613 658	119 353 057	470 347 013	347 286 841	52 077 008	70 983 163
153	DIPALESENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	10 767 510	0	3 135 474	28 792	40 966 490	54 898 267	36 562 627	5 480 622	12 855 018
154	DR J S MOROKA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	45 430	0	46 800	0	0	92 230	149 401	-58 126	955
155	DR PIXLEY KA ISAKA SEME LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	11 194 699	0	0	0	0	11 194 699	9 734 521	1 460 178	0
Name of Municipality	(a) Age	Total debt is made up of
	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	(b)(i) Total Capital	Total VAT	(b)(ii) Total Interest
156	EMAKHAZENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	9 110 334	0	7 624 258	4 727 831	14 106 323	35 568 745	19 644 348	2 945 752	12 978 645
157	EMALAHLENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	202 206 778	0	184 122 466	105 468 608	3 765 940 297	4 257 738 149	2 980 551 539	438 233 357	838 953 253
158	GOVAN MBEKI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	118 537 253	70	75 977 923	56 430 543	1 845 400 427	2 096 346 216	1 491 685 244	220 881 471	383 779 501
159	LEKWA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	51 751 210	0	35 985 637	27 920 218	1 061 620 169	1 177 277 234	771 943 754	113 585 356	291 748 124
160	MKHONDO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	23 505 497	0	19 843 787	10 989 345	140 688 284	195 026 912	143 033 710	21 658 341	30 334 861
161	MSUKALIGWA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	40 017 013	0	25 819 186	16 502 497	98 578 799	180 917 495	129 653 393	19 441 736	31 822 366
162	NKANGALA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	38 741	0	0	0	0	38 741	33 549	5 032	159
163	NKOMAZI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	18 159 927	0	19 840	0	0	18 179 768	15 801 662	2 370 249	7 857
164	STEVE TSHWETE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	79 812 695	0	38 668	0	10 023	79 861 386	69 443 904	10 416 429	1 053
165	THABA CHWEU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	53 638 796	0	9 123 742	8 066 497	731 152 976	801 982 010	607 390 361	87 677 266	106 914 383
166	THEMBISILE HANI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	273 419	0	0	0	0	273 419	237 756	35 663	0
167	VICTOR KHANYE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	35 523 158	0	3 620 958	14 774 245	243 464 742	297 383 103	220 580 164	32 909 122	43 893 817
	NORTH WEST	841 754 173	2 233 012	257 373 301	114 059 427	1 616 955 797	2 832 375 711	2 045 584 616	303 446 819	483 344 276
168	CITY OF MATLOSANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	245 873 306	686 256	57 731 377	49 476 792	295 308 522	649 076 254	498 853 779	74 629 652	75 592 823
169	DITSOBOTLA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	19 888 630	9 034	15 811 342	10 967 219	580 419 857	627 096 083	403 251 980	58 948 453	164 895 650
170	DR RUTH SEGOMOTSI MOMPATI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	76 928	0	43 745	0	0	120 673	104 973	15 700	0
171	GREATER TAUNG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 736 478	0	0	0	0	1 736 478	1 510 345	226 133	0
172	JB MARKS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	127 779 494	0	22 790 470	0	0	150 569 964	130 832 609	19 624 891	112 464
173	KAGISANO-MOLOPO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	338 156	0	218 868	0	0	557 024	484 492	72 532	0
174	KGETLENGRIVIER LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	8 221 795	22 347	3 127 140	2 967 531	128 124 786	142 463 600	102 472 991	15 057 349	24 933 259
175	LEKWA-TEEMANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	16 374 286	11 979	5 295 415	4 105 005	28 438 977	54 225 662	45 013 631	6 752 309	2 459 722
176	MADIBENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	61 889 822	112 129	46 638 872	27 191 585	49 111 665	184 944 072	146 411 142	21 880 992	16 651 938
177	MAHIKENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	434 909	46 888	82 618	99 498	4 887 425	5 551 338	4 299 862	616 684	634 793
179	MAMUSA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	5 765 300	230 076	4 542 741	2 651 415	84 228 354	97 417 888	64 355 570	9 487 426	23 574 891
180	MAQUASSI HILLS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	17 729 506	1 037 353	4 969 338	5 017 932	10 719 534	39 473 662	29 198 825	4 354 983	5 919 854
181	MORETELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	822 572	0	0	0	0	822 572	705 339	105 799	11 434
182	MOSES KOTANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	548 174	0	0	0	0	548 174	476 087	72 087	0
183	NALEDI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	28 783 257	0	7 755 111	7 018 725	325 325 325	368 882 419	248 644 382	36 372 825	83 865 212
Name of Municipality	(a) Age	Total debt is made up of
	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	(b)(i) Total Capital	(b)(i) Total Capital	(b)(i) Total Capital
184	NGAKA MODIRI MOLEMA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	-295 536	0	0	0	0	-295 536	-215 388	-80 148	0
185	RAMOTSHERE MOILOA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	9 014 105	76 950	6 463 760	4 232 882	45 036 315	64 824 013	49 482 277	7 418 730	7 923 006
186	RATLOU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	946 515	0	0	0	0	946 515	823 499	123 015	0
187	RUSTENBURG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	281 951 757	0	81 890 831	318 076	470 551	364 631 215	270 476 067	40 580 472	53 574 676
	NORTHERN CAPE	344 185 847	491 368	72 340 140	33 725 145	1 657 186 468	2 107 928 968	1 459 764 851	215 637 494	432 526 623
188	!KHEIS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	48 605	69 735	0	0	0	118 339	101 008	15 151	2 181
189	DAWID KRUIPER LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	28 287 216	0	0	0	0	28 287 216	23 958 504	3 593 776	734 936
190	DIKGATLONG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	4 921 723	0	11 199 072	2 405 857	114 259 861	132 786 514	89 544 028	13 103 909	30 138 577
191	EMTHANJENI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	11 133 067	0	8 300 662	4 886 344	71 524 133	95 844 205	70 079 616	10 497 178	15 267 411
192	GAMAGARA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	40 057 404	0	10 154 304	10 199	229 882 298	280 104 206	204 883 347	30 542 311	44 678 547
193	GA-SEGONYANA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	16 881 579	0	0	0	0	16 881 579	11 686 218	1 752 933	3 442 428
194	HANTAM LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	2 883 373	0	0	0	0	2 883 373	2 507 281	376 092	0
195	JOE MOROLONG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 412 277	0	707 836	0	0	2 120 114	1 740 990	261 101	118 023
196	KAI !GARIB LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	9 161 264	0	6 550 145	4 832 837	318 372 016	338 916 262	233 828 207	34 086 755	71 001 300
197	KAMIESBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	823 637	353 168	1 213 979	997 020	19 450 858	22 838 661	17 337 681	2 589 369	2 911 612
198	KAREEBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	-270	0	0	0	0	-270	-512	242	0
199	KAROO HOOGLAND LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	30 511	0	0	0	0	30 511	26 531	3 980	0
200	KGATELOPELE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	3 289 068	0	0	0	0	3 289 068	2 211 400	331 710	745 958
201	KHAI-MA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 231 326	64 307	906 888	633 133	17 567 862	20 403 516	13 323 309	1 977 493	5 102 715
202	MAGARENG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	2 931 296	0	2 357 735	1 645 332	58 243 830	65 178 194	42 469 756	6 244 447	16 463 991
203	NAMA KHOI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	10 417 488	0	8 818 618	6 424 048	110 568 882	136 229 036	90 015 279	13 537 080	32 676 677
204	PHOKWANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	19 782 404	0	5 952 228	5 309 723	116 395 538	147 439 893	105 562 316	15 735 134	26 142 443
205	RENOSTERBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 477 358	0	1 185 868	989 069	88 517 636	92 169 930	55 603 383	8 014 615	28 551 933
206	RICHTERSVELD LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 962 553	4 158	1 434 466	1 146 780	8 269 265	12 817 222	9 932 841	1 489 888	1 394 493
207	SIYANCUMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	12 218 530	0	3 488 128	0	150 826 726	166 533 384	104 722 521	15 334 349	46 476 514
208	SIYATHEMBA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	3 388 979	0	2 709 253	1 774 437	63 576 385	71 449 053	50 090 782	7 391 879	13 966 392
209	SOL PLAATJE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	145 089 302	0	9 043	7 744	0	145 106 089	120 503 185	18 075 478	6 527 427
210	THEMBELIHLE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 990 003	0	1 654 177	1 227 199	77 900 543	82 771 921	49 523 127	7 197 184	26 051 609

Name of Municipality	(a) Age	Total debt is made up of
	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	(b)(i) Total Capital	(b)(i) Total Capital	(b)(i) Total Capital
211	TSANTSABANE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	13 003 441	0	3 368 820	60 023	147 252 789	163 685 073	106 538 739	15 626 285	41 520 049
212	UBUNTU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	2 621 811	0	2 131 961	1 375 400	64 577 847	70 707 019	45 485 525	6 645 686	18 575 807
213	UMSOBOMVU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	9 141 904	0	196 956	0	0	9 338 860	8 089 790	1 213 469	35 601
	WESTERN CAPE	2 128 610 643	468 097	13 559 252	8 907 022	4 955 170	2 156 500 183	1 871 098 781	280 628 568	4 772 834
214	BEAUFORT WEST LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	16 618 073	2	1 350 357	0	0	17 968 433	15 290 788	2 293 692	383 953
215	BERGRIVIER LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	13 025 659	0	0	0	0	13 025 659	11 326 660	1 698 999	0
216	BITOU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	14 779 187	367	0	0	0	14 779 554	12 851 778	1 927 776	0
217	BREEDE VALLEY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	46 785 107	0	0	0	0	46 785 107	40 682 700	6 102 407	0
218	CAPE AGULHAS LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	12 318 050	0	0	0	0	12 318 050	10 711 347	1 606 702	0
219	CEDERBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	11 422 826	129 097	9 243 198	6 468 139	3 421 849	30 685 109	25 517 245	3 827 587	1 340 277
220	CITY OF CAPE TOWN METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY	1 344 766 378	203 828	52 964	13 250	89 301	1 345 125 721	1 169 720 089	175 397 831	7 801
221	DRAKENSTEIN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	209 005 120	0	0	0	0	209 005 120	181 253 161	27 210 855	541 104
222	EDEN DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	66 031	0	0	0	0	66 031	57 192	8 579	260
223	GEORGE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	71 141 484	0	0	0	0	71 141 484	61 862 160	9 279 324	0
224	HESSEQUA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	4 483 848	0	0	0	0	4 483 848	3 898 092	585 757	0
225	KANNALAND LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	4 738 693	0	2 901 594	2 425 633	1 444 020	11 509 940	8 530 103	1 279 516	1 700 321
226	KNYSNA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	27 494 603	15	1 431	0	0	27 496 048	23 908 113	3 586 217	1 718
227	LAINGSBURG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	469 439	0	0	0	0	469 439	407 232	60 963	1 244
228	LANGEBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	42 248 052	0	0	0	0	42 248 052	36 737 436	5 510 615	0
229	MATZIKAMA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	14 285 691	0	0	0	0	14 285 691	11 833 676	1 775 051	676 964
230	MOSSEL BAY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	50 700 673	0	0	0	0	50 700 673	43 985 167	6 597 775	117 731
231	OUDTSHOORN LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	23 009 623	0	0	0	0	23 009 623	20 008 367	3 001 255	0
232	OVERSTRAND LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	40 485 198	0	0	0	0	40 485 198	35 204 520	5 280 678	0
233	PRINS ALBERT LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	1 646 075	0	52	0	0	1 646 126	1 431 369	214 705	52
234	SALDANHA BAY LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	40 339 866	96 939	0	0	0	40 436 804	35 161 624	5 274 246	935
235	STELLENBOSCH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	52 626 589	37 845	9 337	0	0	52 673 770	45 803 178	6 870 478	115
236	SWARTLAND LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	33 945 087	0	320	0	0	33 945 407	29 517 468	4 427 614	325
237	SWELLENDAM LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	9 975 014	0	0	0	0	9 975 014	8 673 880	1 301 134	0
Name of Municipality	(a) Age	Total debt is made up of
	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	Current	(b)(i) Total Capital	(b)(i) Total Capital	(b)(i) Total Capital
238	THEEWATERSKLOOF LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	9 787 132	0	0	0	0	9 787 132	8 510 552	1 276 579	0
239	WEST COAST DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY	1 194 027	0	0	0	0	1 194 027	1 038 255	155 738	34
240	WITZENBERG LOCAL MUNICIPALITY	31 253 122	3	0	0	0	31 253 124	27 176 630	4 076 494	0