Questions and Replies
14 October 2022 - NW2888
Cuthbert, Mr MJ to ask the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition
(1)What total amount has been invested in the foundry and/or mini-mill industry by the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) since 2010, (2) will he furnish Mr M J Cuthbert with an itemised list for each (a) year and (b) individual investment; (3) what is the debt to equity proportions for each investment; (2) what amount has been written off in the same period (a) for each investment and (b) in total?
Reply:
The IDC has approved R14,4 billion of funding in the Foundry and/or mini mill industry since FY 2010, in the following forms: industrial loans of R5,99 billion, equity of R8,44 billion and grants of R4m.
In addition, the IDC provided guarantees of R5,5 billion to companies in the sector.
A supplementary reply will be submitted shortly, with additional information.
-END-
14 October 2022 - NW2770
Masipa, Mr NP to ask the Minister of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development
What is the (a) total number of extension officers in each (i) farm and (ii) province, (b) ratio of extension officers in each (i) commercial, (ii) emerging commercial, (iii) smallholding and (iv) subsistence farm in each (aa) province and (bb) district?
Reply:
(a) (i) Extension Practitioners (officers) are allocated to districts and not placed per farm.
(ii) The number of Extension Practitioners (officers) per Province is as follows:
PROVINCE |
NUMBER OF EXTENSION PRACTITIONERS |
Eastern Cape |
496 |
Free State |
115 |
Gauteng |
119 |
KwaZulu-Natal |
522 |
Limpopo |
310 |
Mpumalanga |
146 |
Northern Cape |
43 |
North West |
181 |
Western Cape |
60 |
TOTAL |
|
(b)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv) The current Extension Practitioners are not allocated according to the specified producer categories; hence no ratio is available.
(b)(aa) Ratio per Province
The current ratio of Extension Practitioners to farmers is based on the July 2021 General Household Survey (GHS) by Statistics South Africa which measures the number of households practicing agriculture and is therefore not specific to categories of farmers. The Ratio of Extension Practitioners (officers) to farmers per province (as of September 2022) is outlined below:
PROVINCE |
Ratio |
Eastern Cape |
1:1162 |
Free State |
1:1672 |
Gauteng |
1:2896 |
KwaZulu -Natal |
1:1216 |
Limpopo |
1:2058 |
Mpumalanga |
1:3085 |
Northern Cape |
1:1097 |
Northwest |
1:809 |
Western Cape |
1:977 |
NATIONAL AVERAGE |
1:1 663 |
The estimated number of farmers as the GHS (July 2021) and the number of Extension Practitioners (officer) per province are shown on the table below:
PDAs |
Number of Extension officials |
Total number of Extension Officials |
Number of households per province |
% Of households involved in agriculture |
Estimated # farmers [GHS 2021, StatsSA] |
Extension to farmer ratio (current) |
|
Managers |
Extension Practitioners |
||||||
EC |
31 |
496 |
527 |
1 725 000 |
33% |
576 150 |
1 162 |
FS |
11 |
115 |
126 |
952 000 |
20% |
192 304 |
1 672 |
GP |
8 |
119 |
127 |
5 384 000 |
6% |
344 576 |
2 896 |
KZN |
60 |
522 |
582 |
3 111 000 |
20% |
634 644 |
1 216 |
LP |
11 |
310 |
321 |
1 684 000 |
38% |
638 236 |
2 058 |
MP |
41 |
146 |
187 |
1 399 000 |
32% |
450 478 |
3 085 |
NC |
8 |
43 |
51 |
363 000 |
13% |
47 190 |
1 097 |
NW |
31 |
181 |
212 |
1 308 000 |
11% |
146 496 |
809 |
WC |
8 |
60 |
68 |
2 021 000 |
3% |
58 609 |
977 |
TOTAL |
209 |
1 992 |
2 201 |
17 947 000 |
17% |
3 086 884 |
1 663 |
(b) (bb) The breakdown of Extension Practitioners (officers) per District excludes Managers.
Province |
Number of Extension Practitioners per district |
Province |
Number of Extension Practitioners per district |
1. Eastern Cape |
5. Western Cape |
||
Sarah-Baartman |
35 |
Cape Winelands |
12 |
Amathole |
153 |
Little Karoo |
6 |
Chris Hani |
74 |
Swartland |
5 |
Joe Gqabi |
31 |
Cape Metropole |
8 |
O.R. Tambo |
116 |
Garden Route |
9 |
Alfred Nzo |
87 |
Northwest |
6 |
Total |
496 |
Overberg |
7 |
Central Karoo |
5 |
||
Provincial office |
2 |
||
Total |
60 |
||
2. Free State |
6. North West |
||
Provincial office |
9 |
Bojanala |
55 |
Xhariep |
14 |
Dr Ruth S Mompati |
42 |
Mangaung |
23 |
NMM |
58 |
Thabo M |
32 |
Dr Kenneth Kaunda |
26 |
Lejwe L |
21 |
Total |
181 |
Fezile D |
16 |
||
Total |
115 |
||
3. Gauteng |
7. Northern Cape |
||
Germiston |
40 |
John Taolo Gaetsewe |
12 |
Pretoria |
41 |
Frances Baard |
7 |
Randfontein |
38 |
ZF Mgcawu |
8 |
Total |
119 |
Namakwa |
7 |
Pixley ka Seme |
9 |
||
Total |
43 |
||
4. KwaZulu-Natal |
8. Mpumalanga |
||
Amajuba |
46 |
Bohlabela |
34 |
Ugu |
50 |
Ehlanzeni |
29 |
Ethekwini |
33 |
Gert Sibande |
33 |
uThukela |
29 |
Nkangala |
50 |
uMkhanyakude |
52 |
Total |
146 |
King Cetshwayo |
73 |
9. Limpopo |
|
Zululand |
71 |
Capricorn |
72 |
Umzinyathi |
38 |
Mopani |
53 |
Ilembe |
45 |
Sekhukhune |
59 |
Harry Gwala |
41 |
Vhembe |
93 |
Umgungundlovu |
44 |
Waterberg |
33 |
Total |
522 |
Total |
310 |
GRAND TOTAL |
1 992 |
14 October 2022 - NW2846
Buthelezi, Ms SA to ask the Minister of Human Settlements
1) Whether, with reference to the perceived ambivalence of the Government towards Informal Settlements and poor development of implementation and capacity mechanisms, there has been any proactive programmes her Department initiated to tackle this, if not, why not, if so, what are the relevant details thereof; 2) Whether she has found that the specified programmes have been successful in dealing with the deficiencies that surround the construction of viable housing; if not, why not, if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
(1) The Informal Settlements Upgrading Programme was instituted in terms of section 3(4) (g) of the Housing Act, 1997 (Act No. 107 of 1997), (The Housing Act) and is reffered to as the National Housing Programme: Upgrading of Informal Settlements. The programme seeks to facilitate the structured in situ upgrading of informal settlements as opposed to relocation to achieve, tenure security, health & security and empowerment etc.
In 2019/2020, the National Department of Human Settlements in consultation with the National Treasury introduced the Informal Settlements Upgrading Partnership Grant (ISUPG), this was an attempt by the Department to ensure that there is a focus on the upgrading of informal settlements projects within the sector. The main objective of the Grant was to strengthen the policy in relation to the Informal Settlements Upgrading Programme, for both provinces and metropolitan municipalities. The Grant seeks to ensure the provision of basic services such as water, electricity, roads, stormwater, refuse removal and sanitation services to households.
To support the implementation of the Grant, a total budget of R14.7 billion was reprioritised from the Human settlements Development Grant (HSDG) and Urban Settlements Development Grant (USDG) in 2020/21 and 2021/2022. The funds were set aside to support the upgrading of 231 000 households in informal settlements over the medium-term.
2. In terms of finding out whether the identified programmes have been successful in dealing with the deficiencies that surround the construction of viable housing, it must be noted that the introduction of the dedicated Informal Settlements Upgrading Partnership Grant was in 2019/2020 and actual implementation started during the 2021/22 financial year, thus it is still too early for the Department to pronounce on the success or failure of the Grant in dealing with the deficiencies that surround the construction of viable housing. However, the non-financial performance of the programme in provinces and municipalities was provided and reported that 610 informal settlements were upgraded by provinces and 674 by metropolitan municipalities during the 2021/22 financial year. Furthermore, a total of 21 075 sites were provided with basic services such as electricity, water and sanitation by provinces and a total of 3 596 sites by metropolitan municipalities in 2021/22.
14 October 2022 - NW3086
Cuthbert, Mr MJ to ask the Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition
(1)Whether, he will furnish Mr M J Cuthbert with a list of legal service providers who have rendered legal services on a consultancy and/or other basis to the National Lotteries Commission (NLC) since the 2021-22 financial year; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details; (2) whether he will furnish Mr M J Cuthbert with a list of lawyers and/or law firms that are part of the NLC’s selection panel of legal practitioners that are regularly used for legal matters involving the NLC; if not, why not; if so, what are the relevant details?
Reply:
The National Lotteries Commission has furnished me with a response to the question.
It provides a list of law firms. I have requested that additional details be provided in respect of the specific matters covered in each of the specific briefs given to each law firm. Attention is also drawn to the reply to Parliamentary Question 606.
The reply of the NLC is attached hereto. A supplementary reply will be tabled if warranted, once the further information I have requested has been received.