FEDUSA SUBMISSION ON THE 2008

BUDGET

 

 

 

 

FEDUSA Submission to

 

The Portfolio Committee on Finance

 

Cape Town

 

 

 

 

Presented by:

FEDUSA Parliamentary Office

 29 February 2008

 

With specialist input by Dr Jurie van Tonder  

 

 

 

 

 

FEDUSA COMMENTS ON THE

2008 / 09  BUDGET

 

 

1.            INTRODUCTION

 

FEDUSA want to commend the Minister and Treasury on the concise policy statement used in this year’s Budget and estimates which very clearly reflects both economic policy and budget priorities.  The budget 2008 brings hope for the future, rather than immediate solutions to short term problems.

 

In the 2007 MTBPS and this year’s budget, Government faced serious challenges from abroad and domestically. The Minister is commended for the way he harnessed the budget to steer through these daunting challenges and came out with flying colours. The slower global economic development and the domestic electricity crisis resulted in pessimism and some economists even predicted an increase in the budget deficit. The Minister however proved that, given the sound and prudent footing on which Government finances is built, it is “business as usual” FEDUSA can almost agree with Hamlet that: “There is something in this more than natural, if philosophy could find it out.”(Hamlet: Act 2, scene 2)

 

2.            ECONOMIC OUTLOOK

 

South Africa with its relative small but open economy cannot be detached from the global economical trends. South Africa is facing many challenges. The budget delivered on 20 February draws one's attention to the set of policy proposals adopted at the ANC's conference in Polokwane in December 2007, many of which would have budgetary implications if they were to be implemented. The 2008 Budget is delivered against a backdrop of plunging equity markets, a power crisis, an oil price below $100 per barrel, inflation that is not yet under control and a looming recession in the US are some of the most challenging immediate factors challenging the sustainability of sub-saharan Africa.

 

Since Government started with multi-year budgeting, the annual budget holds fewer surprises. This is so because Government’s expenditure and revenue plans are spelled out for the next three fiscal years as well as its economic and fiscal policies.  There however always remains an element of surprise, as the actual economic outcome for a specific year may differ from what was expected in the MTBPS.

 

This poses the well-known policy choice faced by many countries in the past, including South Africa, of increasing growth and let inflation rise, or curbing inflation and suffer lower economic growth. FEDUSA agrees with the Minister that in such circumstances the budget focus should have a long-term focus and that price stability should be maintained. Although it is not spelled out explicitly, fiscal policy is to focus on longer term issues while monetary policy should be utilized to curb inflation. This does not mean that budget policy has no role to play against the fight against inflation. Estimates for the MTEF period show lower real non-interest expenditure than the previous years.

 

Although not referring to GEAR directly, the Minister expressed his conviction that the strategy adopted in 1996 (with later refinements thereof) contributed to our current position of strength. He rightfully pointes out that the macroeconomic framework contained in GEAR is of our own making and not dictated by multilateral institutions. FEDUSA fully supports the elements of this strategy, which includes prudent fiscal stance, building up our foreign exchange reserves, the system of inflation targeting and a floating exchange rate system.

 

As a measure of prudent fiscal stance, the Minister introduced the so-called cyclically adjusted or structural budget, which helps Government get an idea of temporary revenue gains. Estimates show that for the next MTEF period the structural budget will actually be a deficit. This really means that Government must maintain a surplus on its actual balance. Budgeting for an actual budget deficit would mean that the structural balance would be a large deficit, or that we use temporary or windfall revenue in such a way that it undermines sustainable growth.

 

Over the short term fiscal policy goals include containing inflation and increasing our electricity supply. Over the medium to longer-term goals include: increasing economic growth and development and employment; investing in productive capacity; raising exports to bring down the current account deficit; reducing poverty and inequality; and improving public service delivery.

 

In his MTBPS of October 2007 the Minister expected that economic growth will be 4.5 per cent in 2008, down from 4.9 per cent in 2007, while inflation will peak in 2007 and start to fall during 2008 and move within the target band of 3-6%. The actual outcome is quite different. Economic growth will be lower than 4 per cent, while CPIX inflation will be higher than the 5.4 per cent budgeted for. Economic growth was 5 percent in year 2007, averaging out to 4.3 percent over the period under review.

3.            INFLATION

 

After a few years of relative price stability, CPIX inflation broke through the 3-6 per cent target range in April 2007 largely driven by food and oil price increases. Policymakers expect that average CPIX inflation will average 7.1 per cent in 2008, where after it will decline to 4.9 per cent, in other words within the target range of 3-6 per cent, following interest rate hikes of 4 percentage points between June 2006 and December 2007 by the Reserve Bank. From the fiscal side, the budget surplus will contribute to a moderation of domestic demand and will therefore contribute to price stability. FEDUSA fully supports these steps by the monetary and fiscal authorities to curb inflation,

 

The challenge to economic policy over the next MTBPS is therefore to increase our economic growth rate and to lower our inflation rate. The basic reasons for these differences can be attributed to economic and financial problems in developed countries as well as large increases in the oil prices. Currently, the effect of these factors is exacerbated by the electricity crises.

 

Another reason for a possible different outcome of the budget for this year is the fact that Government committed itself to taking important steps to make progress with some of its most serious socio-economic problems. The President in his State of the Nation Address in no uncertain terms committed all spheres of Government to make progress with its goals over the short period.

 

More specifically, the President indicated Government’s seriousness with the implementation of its 24 Apex Priorities and mentions that steps have being taken to ensure that the necessary allocations will be made in the Annual Budget to implement the priorities. Provision has however already being made for some of the priorities in the MTEF. The programs include taking forward industrial policy for which R2.3 billion has been budgeted and a further R5 billion in tax incentives over three years, skills development, job-creation, fighting crime, improving service delivery and taking on social responsibility.

 

FEDUSA welcomes these important steps and is especially pleased with the fact that Government is not only paying lip-service to these matters, but that the necessary fiscal measures would be introduced to underpin Government’s plans.

 

The 2008 budget proposals are generally aimed at intensifying measures of implementation to address the challenges of underdevelopment, poverty and inequality. FEDUSA acknowledge the need for the national budget to be balanced but still be able to grow the economy and create more and better jobs. The economic surplus announced in the budget indicates that Government is making provision for risks in the economic environment largely because of the financial crises in developed markets, global imbalances, high food and oil prices internationally and slower growth in the US and other developed countries. FEDUSA believe that this the correct fiscal approach considering inflationary outlook.  

 

FEDUSA want to reiterate its concerns expressed in our comments in 2007 on the budget. The high consumption expenditure, together with the higher level of investment by both government and the private sector, result in a large current account deficit of our balance of payments. The level of the current account balance is such that it affects the exchange rate. This development does not only affect production price inflation but eventually also for consumer inflation. The relatively large current account is financed by capital inflows. Although this is normal and acceptable for developing countries, Government should always be mindful that the largest part of that capital inflow consists of short-term investments, sometimes also called “hot money. Although developing countries are today no longer being regarded for investment purposes to be all alike, the risk remains real that these funds nay be withdrawn on short notice. The only viable policy options to avoid this risk, is to increase our exports and to attract longer-term real investment. The Minister admits this and indicated that the large current account deficit poses a risk to the South African

4.            DEALING WITH OUR ELECTRICITY CRISIS

 

For the last few years FEDUSA in its presentations to Portfolio Committee on Finance pointed out that a low rate of infra-structural development by general government and the public corporations could affect economic growth negatively. This proved to be true.

 

It is hinted in the Budget Review that there was a decline in investment by general government and public corporations from a peak in the mid-1970’s and that the present electricity supply shortfall is a timely reminder of the importance of long-term planning and decision-making for economic growth and development. In the Budget Review a graph is shown which illustrates that after a peak in the mid-1970, investment by both general government and public corporations declined. The Minister indicated that this has been a major contributing factor to the capacity constraints that the economy is experiencing today. The graph below based on data from the SA Reserve Bank which illustrates real increases instead of percentages of GDP gives a different picture. It shows that, whilst investment increased in real terms for the general government since 1994, investment by the public corporations for roads, bridges, dams, electricity and water supply decreased in 1990 and remained low up to 2006. This graph confirms the Minister’s remarks that timely planning is necessary to provide infrastructure to underpin economic development.

 

 

In the budget R60 billion is provided to support the financing of Eskom’s investment programme. Minister made it clear that this will not be a grant. As a demand-side measure to lower electricity shortages a new levy at a rate of 2 cents per KWh is proposed.

 

Source: SA Reserve Bank

 

FEDUSA welcomes the support for Eskom and also the levy. This levy is in line with Eskom’s principle that users should bear the cost of supply. As electricity tariffs are relatively low and the fact that households and businesses have the option of lowering their electricity usage to avoid paying more, FEDUSA would support the levy.

 

5.            INCREASING ECONOMIC GROWTH AND EMPLOYMENT

 

As a trade union federation, FEDUSA’s naturally focus on how the budget affects workers in the widest sense. Important issues are therefore the effects on economic growth and employment, how the budget contributes to empowering workers, and the material well being of workers still at work but also after retirement.

 

Economic growth and development is a many-faceted phenomenon and is affected by a diverse range of factors, including the level of demand, savings and investment, the rate of interest and price and social stability.

 

This year’s budget contains important measures that affect all of these elements. Overall demand will be lower because of lower private consumption and government expenditure, although the tax relief of R7.2 billion to especially the lower income groups will boost demand somewhat. Government will increase savings as it budgets for a small surplus. From the private sector’s side, the increases in the tax-free contributions to medical schemes will affect savings favourably.

 

FEDUSA want to iterate it concerns with the high marginal personal income tax rate on individuals, and is convinced that a lower rate would not only affect personal savings favourably, but would also be a stimulus for people’s propensity to work and save. A lower marginal tax rate would also bring it closer to the marginal rate of company taxes which have been reduced in this budget from 28% to 27%.

 

From a macroeconomic perspective FEDUSA applauds the supply-side measures to bolster growth and development, especially the reduction in the headline corporate income tax from 29 per cent to 28 per cent and the reform of the STC regime to switch this from a company-level tax to a shareholder’s tax. This would bring this element of our tax system in line with international best tax practice.

 

During the last few years FEDUSA has urged Government to play a more active role in the economy, without actually partaking in the production process but rather by initiating and supporting worthwhile projects. FEDUSA is therefore pleased with the high priority given to the Industrial Policy Plan. R2.3 billion is budgeted for the industrial programme and the Government planned for R5 billion in tax initiatives over three years to support this policy. Clearly, these measures should have favourable consequences for employment, also because labour-intensive projects will be favoured.

 

FEDUSA also welcomes the different steps taken in the 2008 budget to increase employment by taking micro policies further. This include budget support for labour-intensive projects under the umbrella of the expanded public work programme, social services initiatives such as early childhood education, and community- and home-based care. Funding is provided for labour centres, which are increasingly serving to bridge information gaps in the location of jobs and qualified people. Leanership and internship schemes are extended through spending and taxation measures, with special attention to technical areas. Small enterprises employ a large number of workers and measures to support small businesses, including tax measures, are proposed. The increased spending on education and skills development will contribute to more rapid economic growth and therefore higher levels of employment.

 

6.            REDUCING POVERTY AND INEQUALITY

 

The only viable long-tem solution to poverty remains high and stable labour-absorbing economic growth. Success with our policies of taking our potential growth rate to higher sustainable levels will go a long way to eradicate poverty and equality.

 

However, in the meantime it is imperative that Government put in place measures to soften poverty. Government’s initiatives rest on three legs: broadening social assistance, creating jobs and enhancing the social wage. In this year’s budget the social wage, in other words, free or subsidized services such as education, health and public transport, housing, water, electricity and sanitation, is expanded through further investment in basic services, expanding the school nutrition programme and ensuring access to education for the poor. Rising public transport subsidies also add to the social wage. Early learning opportunities are being extended in poor communities, making success in later years in school more likely.

 

Work on significant reform of the social security system is under way with the focus on developing broad consensus on the design of a contributory retirement and risk benefit system. This could include a wage subsidy, which may have favourable consequences for employment, as this would enable small businesses to employ more workers. The Minister indicated that this year it would see an engagement within NEDLAC on implementation challenges.

 

FEDUSA welcomes the increase of the disability and old age grant in this year’s budget by R70 to R940. Also the extension of the child support grant to children up to their 15th birthday, given certain conditions such as school attendance.

 

The reduction of the qualifying age for men for old age pension is reduced from 65 to 63 this year and to 60 by 2010 is more problematic. This goes against international developments where it has become custom that workers, because of a better health environment live longer and also prefer to work up to an older age. However, our unique circumstances where older men are on average jobless and living in poverty, adds a totally different dimension to this problem. FEDUSA would therefore support this measure.

7.            RAISING NET EXPORTS

 

Over the last few year’s, exports remain a concern for Government, and is continuously too low to pay for our spiralling imports. The result is that we have to rely on capital inflows to finance our imports, which could be risky. Thus far we have succeeded in acquiring the necessary capital inflows. The ideal and more acceptable solution is to promote exports.

 

As export industries tend to be comparatively labour-intensive, trade promotion could also lead to broadening economic participation. FEDUSA welcomes the substantial spending allocations and tax measures directed at industry and trade development included in this year’s budge.

8.            INVESTING IN PRODUCTIVE CAPACITY

 

Electricity shortages which adversely affected our economy, pointed to the importance of long-term planning and decision making for economic growth and development. FEDUSA note that Eskom, Transnet, the Airports Company, water authorities and rail utilities are all increasing investment to expand their capacity. After many years of little or no investment and the awakening call of South Africa’s businesses and public, Eskom is embarking on a massive R343 billion expansion plan over the next 5 years.

 

9.            TAX POLICY  

 

Over the last decade, the Tax/GDP ratio has gradually increased to the current relatively high 27.5 per cent over the next MTBPS. There is no definite criterion to actually the determine the Tax/GDP ratio in a country as conditions differ between countries. The Katz commission proposed 25 per cent. It should however be remembered that taxes determine international competitiveness and that too high taxes have distorting effects on economic behaviour as they effects a person’s ability and propensity to work and save. Today taxes are an important factor for businesses considering his foreign investment.

 

FEDUSA would urge Government to consider the lowering of marginal tax rates over the next few years as a measure to increase foreign investment as well as domestic private investment.

 

 

10.        RETIREMENT SAVINGS

 

Taxation on retirement funds has finally received considerable mention in the Minister’s speech. The right of individuals to provide adequately for retirement is an important provision in public policy. However, the taxation on the retirement funds have a direct effect on the retirement capital of contributors and could add an additional burden on the state coffers if pensioners cannot live off secure pensions. When the tax on retirement funds was introduced in 1996, it was seen as a temporary measure pending the review of the retirement industry as a whole. Despite various suggestions from the Katz Commission, the review has been slow and very frustrating. The South African economy needs a robust inducement to boost domestic savings and the review and subsequent cut of the taxation on retirement funds would be a step in the right direction.  

 

FEDUSA believes that pension funds are finding it difficult to beat inflation in terms of performance and for the state to dip into workers benefits to the magnitude it is presently doing, adds insult to injury.

 

FEDUSA needs to caution Government and specifically the National Treasury on any proposals that could be to the detriment of individuals making provision for old age. Any proposals pertaining to the legislative environment on withdrawals from retirement funds should be subjected to consultation at NEDLAC where the social security reform is currently being revised. Specifically the issue pertaining to the taxation of retirement funds upon employee termination of service, even if that employee fails to withdraw funds from the retirement system.[1]

 

11.        SPECIFIC FOCUS AREAS IN THE BUDGET ALLOCATIONS THAT ARE WELCOMED BY FEDUSA ARE AS FOLLOWS:

 

11.1      Crime

 

Crime fighting will be strengthened by additional allocations of R10-billion over three years, including expansion of police numbers to reach 200 000 in 2010/11. Also on the cards are more prosecutors, judges and magistrates, further investment in forensic science laboratories, 40 new police stations and accommodation for 18 000 prisoners. The Safety and Security Department's budget will increase to R49,3-billion by 2010/11, from R40-billion in 2008/09 and R36-billion in 2007/08.

 

The government intends reducing contact crimes by 7% to 10% a year, including crimes against women and children. The Correctional Services Department was building six new-generation prisons by 2010/11, five of them through public-private partnerships. They will accommodate 3 000 prisoners each. The department is also making efforts to improve its rehabilitation of prisoners, to reduce the numbers of repeat offenders. R15-billion will be allocated to correctional services in 2010/11, from R10,7-billion in 2007/08.

 

FEDUSA is of the opinion that social stability is just as important as price stability as a pre-requisite for economic growth and development. As the country is still facing unacceptable high levels of crime, Government is urged to make the fight against crime a priority issue. This is especially, given the coming 2010 FIFA world soccer game.

 

FEDUSA is pleased to note that this year’s Budget again include some steps to combat crime. This includes additional allocations of R250 million for upgrading of equipment in police forensic service laboratories, and R530 for the appointment of about 850 police officials. This would bring the projected police numbers to by 201 000 by 2011. Other measures include increasing prison space. Other measures include enhancing court efficiency over the medium period.

 

11.2      Housing

 

About R2,2-billion will be spent on upgrading informal settlements. According to the he Budget Review about 762 000 homes in these settlements will be upgraded over the next three years. The Housing Department will receive a total of R10,5-billion[2] in the coming 2008/09 financial year, increasing to R15,3-billion in 2010/11. Alternative and cheaper building technologies will be used to complement the bricks and mortar used in low-income housing.

 

The Budget Review indicates that a further 2,4-million homes are needed to overcome the housing shortage. A total of R35,8-billion has been allocated to housing needs over the medium term. Efforts are being made to ensure closer scrutiny of housing delivery, and to evaluate progress.

 

FEDUSA welcome the housing subsidy programme will now allow households earning between R3 501 and R7 000 a month to qualify for subsidies on mortgages from private-sector banks.[3]

 

11.3      Health

 

Additional funding over the next three years could double the number of people on treatment for Aids, according to the budget. The fight against multi- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) will also be given priority.

 

The Budget Review states that spending on dedicated HIV/Aids programmes by health, education and social development departments will top R6,5-billion a year by 2010/11. Current spending is just more than R2,2-billion.

 

An extra R2,1-billion had been committed over the next three years to the provincial conditional grant for fighting Aids. This will be used to expand the comprehensive treatment programme already being offered at 316 sites.

 

According to the Budget Review additional funding should allow 500 000 more people access to treatment in addition to the 418 000 already on treatment, as well as increasing the numbers of people tested, and expanding a range of prevention programmes. TB funding support will be extended to hospitalisation and treatment.

 

The hospital revitalisation programme will receive an additional R2,1-billion over the next three years to help provinces equip and modernise hospitals. Spending on this programme will rise to R9,6-billion over the next three years. In addition, provinces are expected to step up their own hospital maintenance budgets. A total of 33 hospitals are currently under construction.

 

Improved remuneration and training had contributed to an increase in health personnel of 39 600 over the past four years. A further 25 000 posts will be filled by 2010. Spending on health services, which now stands at R75,5-billion, will grow by over 10% a year over the next three years.

 

FEDUSA would like to raise the concern that there appears to be no evident link between health planning a budgets. The budget process determines what health needs are met, rather than health needs determining the budget. [4]

 

11.4      Transport

 

The price of petrol and diesel is to increase by 11 cents a litre from April 2.  This includes an increase of six cents a litre in the general fuel levy, and an increase of five cents a litre in the Road Accident Fund levy. [5]

 

The biodiesel fuel-tax concession is raised from 40% to 50%. Bio-ethanol will remain outside the fuel-tax net, but will still be subject to VAT at the standard rate.

 

The government's bio-fuel industrial strategy -- approved by the Cabinet in December 2007 - aims to see bio-fuel make up 2% (or 400-million litres a year) of the national liquid fuel supply over the next five years.

 

11.5      Education: the largest single category of spending in the budget.

 

Provinces are to spend more than R18-billion on school infrastructure and equipment over the next three years. FEDUSA and our education trade union Suid-Afrikaanse Onderwysers Unie (SAOU) welcomes the expansion of early childhood education and the school nutrition programme. However we would like to raise our concern as to whether the Department has the capacity and the ability to utilise these allocations efficiently and effectively. Underspending of budget allocations remain a major concern.

 

Education in the coming year will account for R121,1-billion. Early childhood education will be expanded to about 700 000 more children, which will put basic pre-school education within reach of even the poorest of households. FEDUSA and the SAOU welcomes the school nutrition programme which will grow by more than 30% next year

 

According to the Budget Review, the nutrition programme is to get an extra R1,8-billion. Currently the programme provided meals to six million learners in 18 000 schools targeting 7 million learners in 19000 schools by 2009 is a reasonable target.[6]

 

FEDUSA and the South African Parastatal and Tertiary Trade Union  (SAPTU) welcome the additional allocations this year for higher education and the National Student Financial Aid Scheme, and further education and training (FET) colleges.

 

Revenue from the skills development levy is projected to rise to more than R9-billion by 2010/11. The government is exploring ways in which these funds can be used to support FET colleges.

 

11.6      Provinces and Government

 

Allocations to provinces will total R238-billion in 2008/09, increasing by R46-billion over the next three years. Most of this will go to improvements in education, health, welfare and housing.

 

According to Budget documents tabled, KwaZulu-Natal will receive the lion's share of the R238-billion budget -an amount of R49-billion. A total of R17-billion was added to the budgets of the departments of housing, provincial and local government, water affairs, sport and recreation, and transport over the next three years, mainly for infrastructure.

 

Over the next three years, non-interest public spending is projected to grow by 6,1% in real terms.

 

 

CONCLUDING REMARKS

 

FEDUSA want to commend the Minister on the many positive steps take in this year’s Budget to improve the quality of life of South African workers. FEDUSA is convinced that the measures will play a crucial role to lift our economy to a higher level of sustainable growth and development over the years to come.

 





[1] Budget Tax proposals 2008/9 p.20

Streamlining retirement fund registration and changing pre-retirement withdrawal defaults

[2] Estimates of National Expenditure 2008 Vote 26: Housing, p525

[3] Estimates of National Expenditure 2008 Vote 26: Housing, p528

[4] TAC, Brief TAC analysis of the budget with respect to HIV and Health: 21 February 2008

An example of needs-based budgeting is the National strategic plan for HIV/Aids and STI’s 2007-11. This plan was developed fist and then costed at R45bn on the basis of the achievement of 80% of its targets. Yet the current medium-term expenditure framework has allocated only R14bn to HIV/Aids.  The problem is that if the health budget is out of sync with the health needs of our population, then there is no prospect of progressively realizing the right to health.

 

 

[5] UASA Mail No 2 21/02/2008 : Some more bad news, which is deplored by UASA, is an increase in the fuel and RAF levies which will lead to an additional  increase of 11c per litre in the fuel price from 1st April. As it is , South African fuel is exceptionally heavily taxed. Aren’t South Africans partly to blame for the RAF increase because of their poor driving habits and the consequential alarmingly high accident and death rate on our roads.

[6] Estimates of National Expenditure 2008 Vote 13: Education ,p 231