4^th Parliament Legacy Report

Portfolio Committee on Communications

Activities undertaken: May 2009 – March 2014,

dated 12 March 2014

Executive Summary

Over the last five years, the Portfolio Committee on Communications (PCC) has consistently carried out its legal mandate while responding to challenges that may have negatively impacted on the ICT and Postal sectors. More importantly, it has been important for the Committee to identify areas of focus to ensure that the departments and entities reporting to it align to the developmental state agenda[1] of the country. In the advent of a democratic dispensation in South Africa, the Committee has been able to respond effectively and transform the sector to respond to the needs of a democratic society despite some unprecedented challenges.

The Committee also had to respond to a global agenda as set out by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) which South Africa is a signatory and Member State. Being a global player comes with many benefits as much as challenges, and in the telecommunications and broadcasting sector, convergence and technological developments have had a major impact. Countries that adapt to this global change are able to reform the sector and witness unprecedented growth of the telecommunications and broadcasting which as a result, has favourably become more dynamic and competitive. The Committee continues to ensure that government harnesses technology in order to derive economic and social developments and can maximise benefits. The postal sector has also had to undergo unprecedented changes necessitated by technology while cyber security has become a global and fundamental challenge that accompanies technological innovation; in sum the Committee has ensured that all its activities align to global patterns in dealing with technology disruptions and is committed to seamless integration into RSA business and society for the benefit of the country at large.

Today South Africa enjoys a liberalised telecommunications market and an established and independent regulatory environment of the sector. Over the years, South Africa has been able to implement legislative, policy and regulatory transformation to ensure that it responds positively to globalisation. This is a process that continues to be a challenge because of an ever-changing environment bringing about new dynamics which inevitably put pressure on the government to adjust legislation and policies. However the pace at which the technology forces change is not always in tandem with how quickly government can effectively respond. For an example, during the last four years South Africa has witnessed major infrastructural developments in the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors including postal and yet the legislative environment has remained largely unchanged meaning that the ordinary citizens don’t always receive the benefits intended for them such as affordable access to services especially by under-serviced communities.

Any Parliament Committee responsible for such a pivotal and fast-paced sector therefore will always have a need to reinvent itself administratively and deploy systems and strategies that can support the work of Members of Parliament serving in the Committee.

This report provides a summary of the work conducted by the Portfolio Committee on Communications during the 4^th Parliament (2009-2014). The purpose of the report is to provide returning and new members a reference document in order to:

(i) ensure an effective carrying out of Parliament mandate in a manner that addresses issues impacting on the telecommunications, broadcasting, postal services, advertising industry and print media sectors;

(ii) ensure accountability of all departments and state owned entities reporting to the Committee;

(iii) identify areas of improvement and provide recommendations to the departments and state owned companies;

(iv) identify areas of improving efficiency of Members as well as Committee support staff and provide recommendations where the Committee must strengthen systems and processes for internal administration purposes; and

(v) provide a historical inventory of documentation related to the Committee and departments reporting to it.

The report also highlights the major activities the Committee dealt with during 4^th Parliament, namely (i) the high cost to communicate programme; (ii) digital migration programme; (iii) transformation of the print media programme; (iv) transformation of the advertising industry; (v) passing the amendments of the ICASA Amendment Act No. 3 of 2006, Electronic Communications Act (ECA), Post Bank Act, and South African Post Office Act; and (vi) improve local content development.

In closing, the report highlights specific areas for follow-up by the 5^th Parliament including outstanding recommendations to be responded to by departments. Lastly, it gives reference to the strategic plan of the Committee and general recommendations regarding Committee focus areas and budget requirements.

1. Foreword by the Chairperson

Firstly, let me thank the previous Committee of the 3^rd Parliament for the stunning and encouraging work they have done and to have paved the foundation for us to contribute positively and serve the country on the basis of their devoted attention and influence to the sector policy and legislative environment. I recognise that there are a number of deliverables based on our government’s programme of action that still require review and implementation.

In this report, I would like to highlight key issues that kept the Committee busy, not alone but in partnership with internal government structures, private sector, civil society at large and the international community. In carrying out our work, the Committee operated on an outward-looking and all-inclusive model that factored in all stakeholders that make up this concept of a rainbow nation.

Recognising the role of ICTstowards the attainment of a developmental state agenda, the Committee was charged with identifying key elements that contribute towards the attainment of the latter.

Addressing the inequalities of communities: this was amongst the first of challenges in order to continue to redress the imbalances of the past. For an example when the Committee conducted its first oversight in the Northern Cape, communities had little or no access to SABC broadcasting services but as the 4^th Parliament comes to a close, majority of communities in that province enjoy broadcasting services from the public broadcaster as well as others.

Alignment of the policy environment: so that it responds to the broader mandate of government and respond to the government imperatives.

Addressing cost to communicate: realising the fact that in order to attract among others, local and international investment, cost to conduct business remains a key incentive for economic growth and sustainability. To that effect we have broadly engaged to solicit input from various sectors as means to remove policy bottlenecks.

Universal access and services: while we may have had challenges in the area of achieving universal service in telecommunications through the use of the universal service fund, we have made some inroads in influencing both the policy maker and the regulator to accelerate infrastructure rollout relating to availing broadcasting signal to under-serviced areas.

Outreach and oversight: in attaining an equitable, fair and transformed print media sector, we have hosted a number of outreach programmes which sought to define the meaning of community media that culminated into an agreed definition of community media in terms of the MDDA Act as well the development of a Charter to address Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) in the sector. I am pleased to reveal that ultimately, the Print and Digital Media Transformation Task Team which was borne out of the latter process has already published its findings and recommendations into the print media sector.

While we have had an outreach programme focusing specifically on the advertising and marketing industry, there is still a need to pay more attention into the factors that hamper the transformation of the sector.

Transformation of the Postal sector: there is recognition for sustenance of this strategic structure for the purposes of sustaining traditional services and introducing new services. The interventions by the 4^th Parliament was to ensure that there are sustained jobs for citizens, ensure new business models for an industry overwhelmed by technological advances as well as finding a revised sustainable funding model.

Information security: while we recognise that convergence will require integration of different contents, it was the Committees’ desire to ensure that information relating to stakeholders (citizens, business and civil society at large) must not be compromised. It remained a policy priority to ensure that in any of our revised policy frameworks that privacy and protection of information becomes a fundamental pillar of our democracy.

Promotion of local content development: I am encouraged that the decision by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) of ensuring that migration happens. This will in turn provide a business opportunity for innovators (content developers and producers) to take advantage of available platforms created as a result of this migration to empower themselves while contributing to economic growth and job creation.

Amongst many other opportunities stemming from this migration, an opportunity exists for the local manufacturing industry which could also be realised in collaboration with the international community thereby strengthening our international links with global players in order to further cross-border trade and partnerships.

In noting, let us not forget those who have passed on and who have contributed immensely to the work of the Committee; the death of Ms Nontsikelelo Magazi was a huge loss to the Committee. She was a member who served for many years in Parliament and sat on the Portfolio Committee on Communications.

I would also like to thank my predecessor, Honourable Ismail Vadi, who served the Committee between 2009 and 2010 for the sterling work that paved the way for my Chairmanship.

Lastly, I wish the new Committee success in carrying out its legislative mandate. In my opinion the Legacy Report in its entirety should form the basis for a five year strategic plan of 5^th Parliament.

2. Introduction

In terms of Chapter 4 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996 (the Constitution) gives a mandate to the Portfolio Committee to legislate, conduct oversight over the Executive and also facilitate public participation. The Committee is a sector-specific “engine room” of Parliament’s oversight and legislative work.

2.1 Functions of the Committee:

The National Assembly (NA) appoints members to a number of Portfolio Committees to exercise oversight over the various national government departments. The roles of the Portfolio Committees, amongst others, are to:

· Consider Bills;

• Deal with departmental budget votes;
• Oversee the implementation of the work of the departments it is responsible for, enquire and make recommendations about any aspect of the departments, including structures, functionality and policies;
• Process and pass legislation; and
• Facilitate public participation in Parliament relating to issues of oversight and legislation.

The work of Committee is not restricted to government. The Committee may also investigate any matter of public interest that falls within the ICT area of responsibility.

2.1.1 Vision

The vision of the Committee is:

• To promote the development and implementation of policy relating to telecommunications, postal, broadcasting services; advertising industry and print media sectors;
• To monitor fiscal transfers to the Department of Communications and portfolio organisations such as the South African Post Office (SAPO), the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC), the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa, the Ikamva National e-Skills Institute (iNeSI), Sentech, the Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa (USAASA);
• To monitor fiscal transfers to the Department of Government Communications and Information System (GCIS) and its portfolio organisation, the Media Diversity and Development Agency (MDDA); and
• To monitor fiscal transfers to The Presidency; Programme 4: Brand South Africa.

2.1.2 Mission

The mission of the Committee is to:

• Ensure that ICT, Postal and media services are available to all South Africans and that they have access to both traditional and electronic media;
• Deal with bills and other matters falling within its portfolio, as referred to it by the NA, or assigned to it in terms of legislation;
• Maintain oversight over the Executive, the DoC, GCIS, BSA and State Owned Entities;
• Where necessary, make recommendations concerning any organ of state, constitutional institution or other body or institution;
• Work towards the goal of working together we can do more to better lives for all; and
• Approve fiscal transfers to the DoC, the GCIS. BSA and State Owned Entities (SOEs).

2.2 Purpose of the report

The purpose of this report is to provide an account of the Portfolio Committee on Communications’ work during the 4^th Parliament and to inform members of the incoming 5^th Parliament of key outstanding issues pertaining to the oversight and legislative programme of (i) DoC and its entities; (ii) GCIS and its entity; and (iii) BSA.

It provides activities, achievements and challenges that emerged during the period under review and outlines issues that should be considered for follow up by 5^th Parliament.

2.3 Overview of Sector

2.3.1 A connected country South Africa and Africa

In South Africa, the size of the telecommunication market is increasing, in line with developments in terms of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) access and uptake. Sector growth continues to rise at (at least) double the national growth rate, and is now contributing around 6 per cent to the national Growth Domestic Product (GDP).[2] Work by Abrahams and Goldstuck (2011) estimated that the communications sector contributed 5 per cent to Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Between 2007 and 2010, the ICT market grew by over R131 billion to R179 billion.[3] The Department of Communications (DoC), however, estimated that the sector would grow to R187 billion in 2011, with an estimated figure of R250 billion by 2020. This growth will be driven by the rapid uptake and use of data and applications-driven mobile communications.[4] The value of the ICT industry is therefore subject to speculation and unconfirmed figures. As revenue from the communications sector moves beyond income from voice traffic and becomes increasingly data driven, further investment and sector growth can be expected.[5]

For South Africa, this growth can be attributed to sector policy albeit slow at times. The policy environment has created an environment conducive to investment and institutional arrangements have attempted to provide effective competition; but a number of regulatory bottlenecks have resulted in sector constrains when expanding. An important aspect of growth has to be underpinned by the developmental state agenda of the country.

Future revenue growth will be fuelled by accelerating the rollout of broadband[6], thereby reaching more people and increasing the intensity of use of telecommunication services. As more and more people join the global information society and high-speed communication networks become an indispensable infrastructure, the tracking and measurement of developments in ICTs remain as relevant as ever.[7]

In Africa, fixed (wired)-broadband penetration remains below 1 per cent, compared with 27 per cent in Europe. An important trend highlighted by the previous International Telecommunications Union (ITU) report[8] and which will continue in the near future, is the shift from voice to data traffic. A separate but identical research, a 2013 Cisco research, noted that global mobile data traffic grew by 70 per cent in 2012, to a level which corresponds to almost 12 times the entire Internet traffic in 2000. Ericsson[9] also forecasts that by 2018 there will be 6.5 billion mobile-broadband subscriptions, almost as many as there are mobile-cellular telephone subscriptions in 2013.[10]

Business-to-Consumer (B2C) e-commerce comprises both traditional retail conducted in the online space and intangible products like air ticket sales, fulfilled online. The total spent on online retail goods in South Africa in 2010 passed the R2 billion mark for the first time, growing by 30 per cent to reach R2.028 billion. In 2011, this high growth rate was maintained, with a further 30 per cent increase, to R2.636 billion.

Nothing sums up the potential of both the current and future impact of technology on Africa better than the insatiable appetite for connectivity. Today it is about the connections between human voices; in future it will increasingly revolve around the data stream that is made possible by these connections.

It has long been believed that South Africa has the largest Internet economy in Africa. This is a positive result emanating from government vision towards a connected society. At the end of 2011, South Africa had approximately R8.5 million Internet users.[11] This represented no less than a 25 per cent increase over the 2010 figure of R6.8 million, maintaining a high growth rate fuelled by the explosion of smartphones in the South African market.

The current penetration rate is 34 per cent that translates to 17 million South Africans. This growth brings Internet penetration in South Africa to approximately 17 per cent. Despite rapid growth, however, it still lags behind Egypt’s 21.6 million users gives it 26 per cent penetration and Morocco’s 15.6 million users represents 49 per cent penetration.[12] In each of these countries, the high Internet penetration is a consequence of heavy use of the Internet on cellphones, but it should be borne in mind that physical Internet access infrastructure is less developed in these countries, and quality of access is relatively poor.[13]

On the other hand, broadband, however, represents a new challenge for researchers and governments. First, its deployment has proceeded at an incredibly fast pace. Within 12 years, broadband has been adopted by over 62 per cent of households in the United States, 80 per cent in the Netherlands and 96 per cent in Korea.[14][15] Consequently, the length of time series data of broadband adoption is considerably shorter than for voice telecommunications. Second, only the countries that have understood early on its economic potential have proceeded to collect statistics at the beginning of the diffusion process. Third, since broadband is an access technology for data communications, it only has an economic effect in combination with the adoption of information technology, and the implementation of organisational and process changes in enterprises. In sum, because broadband has been deployed in such a short time span and it is an enabler of remote information technology access, it has represented a substantial research challenge. The primary challenge, though, remains the lack of disaggregated datasets that allow to quantitatively establish the conditions under which broadband has an economic effect.[16] South Africa enjoys vast infrastructure to promote connectivity and the work of the Committee continues to support the adoption of this highly sought technology development that is changing how the world operates and interacts.

3. Departments and entities falling within the Committee’s portfolio

3.1 Department of Communications (DoC)

3.1.1 Overview of DoC

The DoC is mandated to create a vibrant ICT sector that ensures that all South Africans have access to robust, reliable, affordable and secure ICT services in order to advance socio-economic development goals and support the Africa agenda and contribute to building a better world. The mandate is further embedded in legislation as well as other policy frameworks. The legislative framework for the work of the DoC is contained mainly in the:

· Broadcasting Act (Act 4 of 1999);

· Electronic Communications and Transactions Act (Act 25 of 2002);

· Electronic Communications Act (Act 36 of 2006);

· Independent Communications Authority of South Africa Act (Act 13 of 2000);

· Sentech Act (Act 63 of 1996);

· Postal Services Act (Act 124 of 1998);

· South African Post Office SOC Ltd. Act (Act 22 of 2011); and

· South African Postbank Limited Act (Act 9 of 2010).

Consequently the core functions of the DoC are:

· To develop ICT policies and legislation that create conditions for an accelerated and shared growth of the South African economy, which positively impacts on the well-being of all our people and is sustainable;

· To ensure the development of robust, reliable, secure and affordable ICT infrastructure that supports and enables the provision of a multiplicity of applications and services to meet the needs of the country and its people;

· To contribute to the development of an inclusive information society which is aimed at establishing South Africa as an advanced information-based society in which information and ICT tools are key drivers of economic and societal development;

· To contribute to e-Skilling the nation for equitable prosperity and global competitiveness;

· To strengthen the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA), in order to enable it to regulate the sector in the public interest and ensure growth and stability in the sector;

· To enhance the capacity of, and exercise oversight over, State Owned Enterprises (SOE’s) as the delivery arms of Government; and

· To fulfil South Africa’s continental and international responsibilities in the ICT field.

In executing its role, the DoC is also guided, amongst others, by:

· The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Act 108 of 1996);

· The Public Service Act, 1994 (Act 103 of 1994) as amended; and

· The Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act 1 of 1999) as amended.

Throughout the term when delivering the State of the Nation Address (SoNA), the President of the Republic of South Africa, His Excellency Jacob Zuma, has always highlighted the need for intervention to develop the Second Economy as means of addressing a lack of opportunities and under development in South Africa. For the communications sector, this priority has been an indication of an urgent need to increase investment in the country through reducing the cost of doing business to bridge the digital divide and narrow the gap between the rich and the poor through empowering, in particular, underprivileged communities with the necessary ICT skills.[i]

In addition he has made several pronouncements regarding bold ICT interventions that have been made during the States of the Nation Address over the five year period. These include the following:

• The call for government to reduce the cost of communications;
• 2011 a year of job creation through meaningful economic transformation and inclusive growth. In communications, we have committed to convert our television and radio signals from the analogue platform to the more advanced digital signal which will enable quality pictures and sound;
• 100 per cent Broadband roll-out by the year 2020; and

· The 37 000km of fibre-optic cable that has been laid by the private and public sectors in the past five years will be "significantly” expanded in the years ahead.

In accordance with the 12 outcomes-based performance management framework adopted by government, the Department contributes to outcome number six: the development of an efficient, competitive, and responsive economic infrastructure network by developing ICT policies and legislation, as well as overseeing the operation of public entities within the sector.

Job creation is one of the key priority service delivery imperatives for the current term of government. In an effort to address the challenge of structural unemployment, the South African government has embarked on a new economic growth path in a bid to create five million jobs and reduce unemployment from 25 per cent to 15 per cent over the next 10 years. The framework targets 100 000 new jobs by 2020 in the knowledge intensive sectors of ICT, higher education, healthcare, mining related technologies, pharmaceuticals and biotechnologies.

Furthermore, an ICT-Wide Working Group on Job Creation was also established following the interaction of the Department with the top 30 ICT Companies in 2011. This working group was charged with coordinating ICT Industry contribution to job creation with tangible commitments on the total number of jobs in the sector. The areas of focus for job creation identified by the aforesaid working group were as follows:

a) Broadband Infrastructure and services;

b) Digital Terrestrial Television Infrastructure;

c) Creative Industries;

d) SMME and Human Capital Development;

e) Regulatory environment for sector competitive growth and development;

f) Postal Sector including Postal Services;

g) Manufacturing of Electronics; and

h) Content creation for increased digital television channels.

In terms of the DoC’s contribution towards achieving the 5 Priorities of Government, which are creating decent work, health, education, fighting corruption and combating crime and rural development, it has achieved the following:

Job creation: A total of 36 500 jobs were created from the period 2010 to March 2013. A total of 823 jobs were created in 2013, of these, 39.6 per cent (326) were females and 39.8 per cent (328) were males. 66.7 (549) of these individuals were youth. Of the total employed, 22.4 per cent (185) were employed on a permanent basis, while 57 per cent (469) were employed on a temporary employment. Only 1.8 per cent of the total employed consists of people living with disabilities. The consolidated number of jobs created from 2010 to date within the ICT sector is therefore 37 323. This figure includes direct and indirect jobs, as well as permanent and temporary appointments. [17]

Lastly, the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) launched the technical standard (SANS 862) for STBs in June 2012 during the ICT Indaba. The process of manufacturing the STBs and rollout of digital migration will be kick-started because government has resolved the issue of conditional access with broadcasters. Twenty five thousand jobs are expected to be created through the Set Top Box manufacturing strategy.

Education: The Department finalised the Broadband Strategy and Plan in December 2013. One of the focuses of the Broadband Strategy is to connect schools and educational institutions. The Broadband Strategy has specific targets related to the education system.

Health: The Broadband Plan also targets hospitals, clinics and health institution. The Broadband Plan has targets to be achieved in connecting the health facilities.

Fighting Crime: In March 2012, Cabinet approved a National Cybersecurity Framework. The framework is a broad term encompassing many aspects of electronic information, data, and media services that affect a country security, economy and wellbeing.

Rural Development: In its infrastructure deployment to expand access to ICT services throughout the country, the Department facilitates universal access to ICT networks and applications for schools, health and government centres. Therefore in communications, the President noted vital ICT projects that should benefit from this investment, namely: (i) migrating to digital broadcasting; (ii) promoting cooperation on ICT issues with Africa and the rest of the world; (iii) promoting affordable and accessible financial services; (iv) creating opportunities within the economy; (v) using ICT to advance cultural and heritage objectives; (vi) the rollout of National Wireless Broadband (NWB) countrywide as well as in other areas in which the ICT sector can also play an indirect but significant role; and (vii) the development of a broadband legislative framework.

In September 2012, the Department undertook a soft launch of digital migration in the Northern Cape.

3.1.2 DoC programme structure trends

The Department programmes comprises of the following: (1) Administration; (2) ICT International Affairs and Trade; (3) ICT Policy Development; (4) Finance and ICT Enterprise Development; (5) ICT Infrastructure Development; and (6) Presidential National Commission (PNC).

Over the period under review, the Department did not alter its programmes. However, once completed and approved, the restructuring exercise that started in the 2010/11 financial year will result in a revised structure of the Department. The aim of the changes is to ensure that the Department has the capacity to deliver its mandate. The Department’s new structure will consist of the following programmes: Programme 1 - Administration; Programme 2 - International Affairs; Programme 3 - Policy, Research and Capacity Development; Programme 4 - Broadcasting and Communications Regulations; and Programme 5 - ICT Infrastructure Support.

3.1.3 Budget estimates of the DoC

Graph A

The noticeable decline in budget allocation which started in earnest in 2009/10 to 2011/12 can be attributed to many factors such as the successful hosting of the World Cup 2010 by South Africa as well as the hosting of African Cup of Nations (AFCON) 2013, see Graph A above.

Having said that, Graph B (below), paints an encouraging picture in that it reflects a Department that has progressed in expenditure patterns between 2010/11 and 2012/13 financial years.

Graph B

The spending for the previous financial year (2012/13), amounted to R1.6 billion which equates to 99.8 per cent and there is a mere under-spending of R3.8 million mainly as a result of transfer payments to New Partnership for Africa’s Development e-Africa Commission (NEPAD). The huge spending is mainly under programme 4, which constitutes 73 per cent of the budget on transfer payments to entities. This expenditure trend is commendable and should be encouraged granted it is a reflection of expenditure in relation to service delivery objectives of the Department.

3.1.4 Findings of the Auditor General of South Africa (AGSA)

The DoC obtained a qualified report for the 2009/10 financial year, and improved to an unqualified opinion with findings in last three consecutive financial years, in the 2010/11, 2011/12 and in 2012/13 financial years.

While the DoC has consistently acquired unqualified audit opinion, it incurred irregular expenditure amounting to R 27105 million and fruitless and wasteful expenditure of R25 21.5 million over three year period under review.[18] However, it must be noted from these above figures, for instance, that all amounts have accrued from the 2010/11 financial year till this financial year. During the 2012/13 financial year alone, the DoC incurred R 5 210 million in irregular expenditure which is a major improvement from the amount incurred in the 2011/2012 financial year (R 20 054 million).

3.1.5 Entities of the DoC reporting to the Committee

The Department has six (6) State-Owned Companies (SOCs) that report to it under Programme 6 whose aim is to provide strategic leadership to international agreements and monitor the implementation of South Africa’s ICT foreign policy as well prioritising Africa’s development through the:

· Positioning of South Africa’s ICT sector as an economic hub;

· Fulfilment of South Africa’s ICT responsibilities within Multilateral Institutions of governance (Geneva focal points: ITU, UPU, OECD);

· Fulfilment of South Africa’s ICT responsibilities towards the socio-economic development on the African continent; and

· Fulfilment of South Africa’s International ICT responsibilities within Bilateral Institutions of governance.

Name of Entity	Mandate of Entity
Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA)	To license and regulate electronic communications and broadcasting services and the postal sector.
South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC)	To supply broadcasting and information services and services that are ancillary thereto, to the general public in the Republic of South Africa and beyond its borders and to achieve the objectives as set out in the Broadcasting Act 4 of 1999.
Sentech	To provide the Electronic Communications and Electronic Communications Network Services as stipulated in the Electronic Communications Act No 36 of 2005.
Ikamva National e-Skills Institute (iNeSI)-launched in February 2014	A merger between the former National Electronic Media Institute of South Africa (NEMISA), Institute for Satellite and Software Applications (ISSA) and the e-Skills Institute. All were entities of the Department which were merged in order to address existing overlaps and avoid duplication and undue competition within the Department. iNeSI is a national collaborator and facilitator to develop e-skills within the country for equitable prosperity and global competitiveness. A multi-stakeholder collaborative network ensures impact.
Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa (USAASA)	USAASA is established in terms of an Act of Parliament. The existence, functions, duties and mandate of the Agency are governed by sections 80 – 91 of the Electronic Communications Act No 36 of 2005 (“the EC Act”) which came into operation on 19 July 2006. ASAASA promote the goal of universal service access and construct infrastructure in under-serviced areas.
South African Post Office (SAPO)	To provide affordable and accessible postal and financial services to South Africans.

3.1.5.1 Telkom

In addition to the State-Owned Companies mentioned above, Telkom historically evolved as part of the then Department of Posts and Telecommunications that existed prior to the demise of Apartheid and currently although it is registered with the Johannesburg stock exchange, government is a majority shareholder. As at 31 March 2011, the shareholding structure at Telkom was:

· Government 39.8 per cent;

· Public Investment Corporation 10.9 per cent;

· Telkom Treasury 2.0 per cent; and

· Free Float 47.3 per cent.

3.2 Department of Government Communication and Information System (GCIS)

3.2.1 Overview of GCIS

Since the democratic dispensation took over the governance modes have shifted increasingly towards a pro-consultation mode which has led to the internalisation and mandating of new communication practices in many jurisdictions. These include the development and use of instruments which promote citizen empowerment such as Bill of Rights and the Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA), the use of public performance measures, various forms of e-government and the increased use of government surveys and advertising among others. Government communications are typically thought of as the 'sermons' in a 'carrots, sticks, and sermons' formulation of basic policy instrument types.

Over the past five years the President of the Republic has reiterated that the government departments at all levels must work closely with communities and ensure that all concerns are attended to before they escalate.

The reference by the president during the SoNAs relating to the Governing Party’s five priorities and strategic framework re-affirms the Department’s crucial role in communication. Moreover, the Department responds to the strategic outcome-oriented goal number 12, which is efficient, effective and development-oriented public service and empowered, fair and inclusive citizenship.

The Department aims to provide a comprehensive communication service on behalf of government to facilitate the involvement of the majority of South Africans in governance, reconstruction and development, nation building and reconciliation.

Vision:

The pulse of communication excellence in government.

Mission:

To lead the strategic communication of government, ensure coherence of message, and open and extend channels of communication between government and the people, towards a shared vision.

The functions of the Department as embedded in its founding document are to:

· Provide strategic leadership in government communication;

· Strengthen the government-wide communication system for effectiveness and proper alignment;

· Learn and explore communication methods and practices to enhance communication;

· Lead and guide the domestic and international marketing of South Africa;

· Build partnerships with strategic stakeholders in pursuit of the Department’s’ vision;

· Operate communication platforms that will keep public servants informed; and

· Operate an efficient, effective and compliant government communication organization.

In an effort to communicate, market and publicise government’s infrastructure-led economy as well as the national policy frameworks of government National Growth Path (NGP) and National Development Plan (NDP) in every corner, street and avenue of the country the Department developed a five-year National Communication Strategy (NCS) in line with Cabinet and public needs, which was endorsed by Cabinet in 2011. The NCS is developed to drive the communication priorities to the Medium Term Strategy Framework (MTSF) and is updated annually to ensure that it remains relevant and highlights communication priorities that may have arisen in the course of the year. The Strategy is also cascaded down to all national and provincial departments to ensure uniformity. In addition the Department will assist the strategic communications related to the popularisation of the Department of Basic Education’s Bill of Responsibilities which aims at building social cohesion.

The GCIS was formally established in terms of section 239 of the Constitution and as a strategic unit in The Presidency in terms of section 7 of the Public Service Act, 1994 (Act 103 of 1994).

The organisation is further mandated to coordinate, guide and advise on government communication, including media liaison, development communication and marketing. Its goal is to achieve integrated, coordinated and clear communications between government and South African citizens to enable public involvement in the country’s transformation. The work of GCIS is informed by:

• The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (1996);

• The Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), 1999 (Act 1 of 1999, as amended);

• International bilateral and multilateral agreements;

• National Treasury’s Framework for Strategic Plans and Annual Performance Plans; and

• The Medium Term Strategic Framework 2009-2014.

3.2.2 Programme structure trends

Over the years (2009/10 – 2012/13), the Department has undergone a series of structural realignments in order to respond to the changing communications environment necessitated by the technological and broader government developments. This section below will seek to explain these changes in programmes.

During the past three (3) financial years up to 2009/10, the Department was organised into eight programmes:

(i) Programme 1: Administration;

(ii) Programme 2: Policy and Research;

(iii) Programme 3: Government and Media Liaison;

(iv) Programme 4: Provincial Coordination and Programme Support;

(v) Programme 5: Communication Service Agency;

(vi) Programme 6: International Marketing and Media Development;

(vii) Programme 7: Government Publication; and

(viii) Programme 8: Communication Resource Centre.

During the 2011/12 Strategic Plan, following an internal organisational review, the Department reviewed its structure into three key core programmes namely:

(i) Programme 1: Administration;

(ii) Programme 2: Communication and Content Management; and

(iii) Programme 3: Government and Stakeholder Engagement.

Towards the fourth quarter of the 2012/13 financial year, the Department reviewed its programmes from three programmes to four programmes and this necessitated alterations to the names of two of the programmes as follows:

(i) Programme 1: Administration – remains unchanged;

(ii) Programme 2: Communication and Content Management; is now Content Processing and Dissemination;

(iii) Programme 3: Government and Stakeholder Engagement; is now Intergovernmental Coordination and Stakeholder Management; and

(iv) Programme 4: Communication Service Agency – remains unchanged.

In the 2012/13 financial year, there was yet again a reshuffle in the Department’s programme. The Training and Development Chief Directorate was transferred from Programme 2(the Communication and Content Management Programme) to Programme 1 (Administration), the Corporate Services Sub-programme, which handles department-wide human resource development.

Lastly, following the shifting of International Marketing Council (IMC), now Brand South Africa (BSA), to The Presidency, the Communication Service Agency became a sub-programme of Programme 3, (Government and Stakeholder Engagement). And the Media Development and Diversity Agency (MDDA) became the only public entity that is managed by the Department.

3.2.3 Budget estimates of the GCIS

Over the five year review period, a steady increase in government funding was observed between 2009/10 until 2012/13 totalling a budget of R461 million, but decreases from 2013/14, see Graph C below:

Despite budget constraints, targets were amended accordingly to respond to the cuts. As a result, the Department has managed to function and deliver on its mandate with aplomb considering that at this time, the Department had undergone programme and organisational changes necessitated by the need to deliver the National Communication Strategy.

There is substantial evidence that shows the effectiveness and efficiency of the Department in terms of its allocated budget versus expenditure. But the recent two financial years 2011/12 and 2012/13, the Department’s expenditure was at 86 per cent in 2012/13, lower from 95 per cent in 2011/12, see Graph D below. This increase in under expenditure can be attributed to programme and organisational changes to the Department resulting in a large percentage of unspent budget when compared to the last 4 financial years. Having occupied the new building, it is expected that GCIS spending will improve to normality during the 2013/14 financial year.

Graph D

During the two consecutive financial years, (2007/08 and 2008/09) the Department had received a financially unqualified audit with no findings. In the subsequent financial years up to the 2012/13 financial year, the Department received financially unqualified with findings, though limited.

3.2.4 Findings of the Auditor General of South Africa Report

During the two consecutive financial years, (2007/08 and 2008/09) the Department had received a financially unqualified audit with no findings; but in the subsequent financial years up to the 2012/13, the Department received financially unqualified audits with findings, though limited. It should also be emphasised that these findings refer to the same issues which have been raised repeatedly by the AG.

2008/09	2009/10	2010/11	2011/12	2012/13
Financially unqualified with no findings	Financially unqualified with findings	Financially unqualified with findings	Financially unqualified with findings	Financially unqualified with findings

3.2.5 Entity of the GCIS reporting to the Committee

The Media Development and Diversity Agency (MDDA) was established under the executive authority of the GCIS and listed as a Schedule 3A public entity in terms of the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act 1 of 1999). Its executive authority is the Minister in The Presidency, who it reports to through the GCIS.

To ensure sound governance of the public entity, regular meetings are held between GCIS and the public entity in order to:

· consider the public entity’s strategic plans; and

· monitor and evaluate the operational and financial performance, including evaluation of the quarterly reports prior to transfer of funds being effected.

Name of Entity	Mandate of Entity
Media Development and Diversity Agency (MDDA)	To create an enabling environment for media development and diversity that reflects the needs and aspirations of all South Africans.
	To redress exclusion and marginalisation of disadvantaged communities and persons from access to the media and the media industry.
	To promote media development and diversity by providing support primarily to community and small commercial media projects.

3.3 Brand South Africa (BSA)

3.3.1 Overview of BSA

Brand South Africa (BSA) is South Africa’s official marketing agency and the custodian of brand South Africa. The agency has been in existence since 2002 and it is established to lead the global and domestic marketing of the nation’s brand.[19] Previously called the International Marketing Council (IMC), it develops and implements a proactive and coordinated international marketing and communication strategy for South Africa to contribute to job creation and poverty reduction, and to attract inward investment, trade and tourism. It is also meant to help create a positive and compelling brand image for South Africa. Its main objective is the marketing of South Africa through the Brand South Africa Campaign.

Following a Cabinet review during the 2011/12 financial year, it was renamed from IMC to BSA and is now a sub programme (Programme 4) under Budget Vote 1 of the Presidency and under Minister Collins Chabane. It is the only entity of the Presidency reporting to the Committee. The Agency no longer reports to GCIS as was the case before 2011/12 financial year.

It is a schedule 3A public entity, registered as a Trust. A consistent Brand South Africa message creates strategic advantages in terms of trade and tourism for the country in an increasingly competitive marketplace.

The year under review marked the first year BSA reported directly to The Presidency, following the operational changes that were introduced in the previous financial year .President Jacob Zuma appointed new members of the BSA Board of Trustees to help strengthen the South African brand identity locally and abroad.

Mandate:

BSA was given the mandate of nation brand management, which was influenced by government policy imperatives. The objective was to enhance South Africa’s global competitiveness and international reputation and to build pride and patriotism amongst South Africans and contribute to social cohesion and nation brand ambassadorship.

Vision:

For South Africa to be acknowledged as a Top 20 Nation Brand and a Top 30 Competitive Nation by 2020.

Mission:

To build and manage South Africa’s nation brand reputation in order to strengthen the country’s global competitiveness.

The following are the long term goals and strategic objectives of BSA:

· To ensure that all partners across government, the private sector and civil society are aligned behind nation brand in terms of corporate identity, behaviours, messaging and imaging;

· To contribute to increased pride and patriotism, active citizenship and social cohesion;

· To monitor nation brand performance on global competitiveness and to inform target audiences, and policy development processes, with regard to the country’s policies that impact competitiveness;

· To inform and influence conversations and perceptions about South Africa by global and local audiences and proactively manage the ‘narrative’ by enhancing success stories and achievements and communicating the national vision and plan;

· To collaborate with partners and leverage each other’s resources to extend brand and messaging reach and impact in a cost effective manner; and

· To ensure sound governance, compliance, human capital and risk management systems to ensure the long-term sustainability of the organisation.

BSA’s activities are influenced by the National Development Plan (NDP), South Africa’s national objectives of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth, job creation, poverty alleviation and social cohesion based on (i) the Constitution; (ii) the Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTEF); (iii) the Nation Plan of Action; (iv) the National Communications Framework; and (v) the country’s International Relations Strategy. The policy messages derived from the State of the Nation (SoNA) sets the tone for BSA’s task each year.

3.3.2 Budget estimates of Brand South Africa

Over the five year review period, with the exception of 2011/12 where there was a considerable drop in financial allocation, there is a steady increase in government funding for BSA, with the year 2012/13 totalling an allocated budget of R154.8 million. This is a considerable increase from the R140.1 million of the 2011/2012 funding allocation, see Graph E below. There is yet another increase to R160.4 million for the financial year 2013/14 and R167.7 million for the financial year 2014/15. Increased funding will ensure South Africa a destination of choice while promoting social cohesion.

Graph E

In terms of quarterly expenditure for the previous financial year (2012/13), there is substantial evidence that shows the effectiveness and efficiency of BSA in terms of its allocated budget versus expenditure. It is evident that BSA has been consistent in spending all allocated budget within the quarters with the exception of quarter 3 where it spent slightly less than the expected expenditure. However, the entity is evidently on par with spending of its financial allocation having spent all its allocation by end of financial year. This is a commendable feat when considering the responsibility of the entity in relation to its mandate

. And BSA obtained three unqualified reports for the 2010/11, 2011/12 and 2012/13 financial years.

3.3.3 Findings of the Auditor General of South Africa

BSA achieved an unqualified report during the year under review. The financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BSA as at 31 March 2013, and its financial performance and cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with the SA Standards of GRAP and the requirements of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA).

Name of Entity	Mandate of Entity
Brand South Africa	Nation brand management to enhance South Africa’s global competitiveness and international reputation and to build pride and patriotism amongst South Africans and contribute to social cohesion and nation brand ambassadorship

4. Key Activity statistics of the Committee

The table below provides an overview of the number of meetings held, legislation and international agreements processed and the number of oversight trips and study tours undertaken by the committee, as well as any statutory appointments the committee made, during the 4^th Parliament:

Activity	2009/10	2010/11	2011/12	2012/13	2013/14	Total
Meetings held	42	47	42	45	44	217
Legislation processed	2	0	0	0	4	6
Oversight trips undertaken	1	0	7	3	0	11
Study tours undertaken	0	1	0	0	0	1
International agreements processed	0	1	0	0	0	1
Statutory appointments made	1	3	3	2	3	12
Interventions considered	0	0	0	0	0	0
Petitions considered	0	2	0	0	0	2

5. Other Stakeholders

During the term of office, the Committee interacted with various stakeholders. The stakeholders listed here below give an indication of the sectors’ major players that have engaged the Committee. As part of its strategic plan, the 5^th Parliament Committee will develop an extensive stakeholder matrix as indicated in Section 11 of this report.

Broadcasters: SABC, Etv, Multichoice, and community broadcasters.

Electronic Communications Network and Service licensees: Vodacom, Mobile Technology Network (MTN), Cell C, 8ta, Neotel, TelkomSA, Virgin Mobile, USALs.

Major Stakeholders: Fibre Communications, Broadband Infraco, Smile Communications, South African Communicators Forum (SACF), National Association of Broadcasters in South Africa (NABSA), Research ICT Africa; Wireless Access Provider Association (WAPA) Non-governmental organisations, Internet Solutions, Internet Service Providers Association (ISAP), the South African National Research and Education Network (SANREN), National Association of Manufacturers in Electronic Components (NAMEC), Right to Know (R2K), various Unions of the sector such as the Communication Workers Union (CWU), Black Circle, Pygma Consulting, Support Public Broadcasting South Africa (SOS), Academia, labour, political entities and SMME’s of the sector and other sectors.

6. Public Hearings

Committees scrutinise legislation, oversee government action, and interact with the public. One of the most important aspects of the oversight function is the consideration by Committees of Annual Reports and Budgets of organs of State, and reports of the Auditor-General. Depending on the purpose of the oversight, the Committee will either request a briefing from the organ of State or visit as a form of fact-finding mission; a public hearing constitutes such a visit.

The Committee conducted the following public hearings during the 4^th Parliament:

6.1 Cost to Communicate Public Hearings

The telecommunications industry is the central nervous system of an economy as it connects all parts of a network society and rapidly shares vital information between its connections. It connects users to one another and to information, which is critical to the operation of every society. It is hard to imagine how a country without a robust telecommunications sector with high cost to conduct business can stay competitive in the global economy. Therefore, the most important features of business and society are ensuring that we implement measures geared towards reducing costs to conduct business. Cost-based pricing is a regulatory market remedy that will begin to reduce the costs of calls and other forms of communications. It must be recognised that the quality of the infrastructure and speed of the connection are crucial issues, but in South Africa one of the main concerns remains price.

In a Portfolio Committee meeting 14 September 2009, the Committee resolved to hold public hearings based on these proposals: (i) mobile and telecommunications operators to drop the interconnection rates with effect from 1 November 2009 to 60 cents per minute during peak times; (ii) interconnection rates should be further reduced by 15 cents per annum on the 1 November 2009 for each successive year until 2012; and (iii) the Committee further declared that it was willing to introduce a Bill to amend the Electronic Communications Act (No 36 of 2005) during the next session of Parliament.

The Committee hosted the public hearings over two days (12 – 13 October 2009) and the Committee received over 80 submissions, which responded to two proposals as mentioned in paragraph above. There after the Committee selected 22 for oral submission. An exception was made in allowing Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) to also present to the Committee as its submission was received after the closing date. The Chairperson made a discretionary ruling based on the nature of COSATU’s constituency and the voices it represented.

The Committee received over 80 submissions and the consensus was that people supported the initiative. The Committee had selected 22 for oral submission. ICASA responded on 15 February 2010.

6.1.1 ICASA: Progress report on investigations into interconnection rates

Mr Paris Mashile, Chairperson: ICASA stated that he told the Committee at their last meeting that ICASA was guided by Chapter 10 (Section 67) of the Electronic Communications Act (ECA). The intention of the report back was to inform Parliament about what they have been doing since they had last met. ICASA had contracted a consulting firm to conduct research into the Wholesale Call Termination (WCT) Market. This information would be used in the drafting of the regulations for termination rates.

In October 2009, ICASA issued a comprehensive WCT questionnaire. The objective was to collect information to evaluate the effectiveness of competition as part of a Chapter 10 market review process. It also assisted ICASA in getting an understanding of the status of competition issues in the wholesale market.

ICASA was in the process of drafting a position paper on WCT as well as one on Termination Rate Regulations. Public hearings would be held in May 2010 in order to obtain input from stakeholders and to give them the opportunity to voice their opinions about the important matter of competition. The final regulations would be drawn up before the end of June 2010.

6.1.2 ICASA: Reasons for rejecting mobile operators’ interconnection rates amendment agreement

Ms Nomvuyiso Batyi, Councillor: ICASA stated that ICASA had received Mobile Termination Rate (MTR) filings from Vodacom, MTN and Cell C on 25 January 2010. The agreement sought to bind ICASA to accept the filing without question, and not to review the MTR until after 1 March 2013. This was illegal as it fettered ICASA’s powers. Also, ICASA could not be party to an interconnection agreement. The interconnection agreement sought to impose obligations on ICASA.

If operators amended rates in their existing interconnection agreements, without imposing conditions on ICASA, then the Authority would accept the amendments. ICASA would not be distracted from its intention to complete the Chapter 10 process, and was committed to completing the process as well as regulating Wholesale Termination Rates (WTR).

During the 2012/13 financial year, the Portfolio Committee on Communications embarked on another set of Public Hearings regarding the general cost to communicate in South Africa. The Cost to Communicate Public Hearings formed part of the broader and continuous programme mandate of the Committee to investigate the impact of high costs-to-communicate to the public. The hearings sought to leverage from the partnership between Parliament, government, industry and the public in order to inform the legislative, policy and regulatory interventions to help bring the costs of communications to affordable levels.

These hearings were a phased programme where the initial process was extended only to the Department of Communications(DoC) as the Policy maker, the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA), as the regulator, as well as the dominant mobile and fixed-line and mobile players in the telecommunications sector in the country (Telkom, Cell-C, Vodacom, 8ta and MTN).

For the second phase the Committee embarked on an identical public hearing process that focused on all role players in the telecommunications sector value chain, interested parties and the public at large.

Therefore the Committee conducted four provincial public hearings on Cost to Communicate in (i) Cape Town, 29 – 30 November, 2012 (ii) Gauteng Province, 22 – 25 July, 2013; (iii) Eastern Cape Province, 29 – 30 July, 2013; and (iv) KwaZulu-Natal Province, 31 July – 1 August 2013.

As is the norm with public hearings of Parliament, organisations and the general public were invited to make written submissions to the Committee via the Committee Secretary, and were also requested to indicate intent to make oral presentations to the Committee.

It is widely reported that the cost of communication is still high in South Africa and is mainly due to a lack of competition in the market. And that despite ICASA‘s regulatory intervention to regulate the Call Termination Rates (CTRs) for both Mobile Termination Rates (MTRs) and Fixedline Termination Rates (FTRs) regime, the cost of communication still remains high while competition remains fragmented with anti-competitive conditions for new entrants and challenger networks. For more information around this subject, new Members will have access to the document as part of this Legacy Handbook.

In general the public hearings process also gave the Committee an opportunity to gather public information that will assist the Committee to better perform its oversight role informed by the needs of citizens and businesses both large and small. A total of forty – three (43) oral and written submissions were received by the Committee during hearings.

As indicated in section 12.2.1 of this document, the 5^th Parliament will have to follow-up on the recommendations of the Committee during this important programme.

6.2 Diversity and transformation in the print media Indaba

On 21 September 2011, the Committee hosted a Communications Indaba on transformation in the print media, during which several stakeholders made submissions to the Committee and the Committee committed to addressing the challenges of the media industry. The Committee acknowledged that the Indaba was a first step towards necessary engagement on transformation and diversity in the media.

In the main, Members of Parliament sought to propose that the print media be encouraged to contribute to Media Development and Diversity (through the MDDA although it was under-funded) by legislative prescription. Members also suggested that MDDA with Print Media of South Africa (PMSA) and GCIS must conduct research to update information on ownership in terms of MDDA Act and on B-BBEE certificates.

The Committee said the MDDA had to fulfil its mandate and should not delve into content of publications. Members warned that regulation and control that would impede the media was not the way to go. The Chairperson of the Committee stated that challenges in the media industry had to be addressed and there needed to be a commitment to the transformation agenda. The Indaba was a first step towards necessary engagement on transformation and diversity in the media.

6.3 DTT State of readiness: First Briefing

The Portfolio Committee on Communications held discussions for two days (20 – 21 September 2011) to get an update on the state of readiness on Digital Migration (DM) and Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) from the stakeholders that are involved in the project. The Department of Communications (DoC), Trade & Industry (DTI), the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA), the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS), broadcasters and manufacturers were invited to brief the Committee.

The Committee called on the DoC, ICASA and SABS to facilitate the process by meeting their set targets, because this was the foundation required by broadcasters to prepare for the launch. During the briefing sessions the DoC confirmed that the plan was still on track to launch DTT by April 2012. The DoC informed the Committee that the Digital Migration Policy Amendments were gazetted for public comment on August 19 and the process had to be completed before the end of this year. ICASA told members that it also planned to repeal the Digital Migration regulations and publish DTT regulations for public comment.

Members questioned the affordability of a Set Top Box (STB) to ordinary South Africans who live below the breadline. The committee welcomed the proposed 70 per cent subsidy for a set top box for those in need and steps that were planned to assist people living with disabilities, such as subtitling and supers describing background sound.

The Committee was mindful that one of the major players in this process Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa has not presented their plan, to this end the Committee will endeavour to create time in the fourth quarter.

The Committee encouraged Doc to continue engaging other government departments and entities to ensure minimisation of costs where possible for instance the establishment of a conformance lab. Members warned and requested DTI to take necessary steps to curb the possible dumping of analogue television sets to the country, which might later contribute to e-waste.

6.3.1 Second Briefing

Another briefing by the Department on the DTT State of Readiness was held for two days from 27 – 28 November 2012. All the role players as identified by the Department briefed the Committee about their readiness to DTT rollout.

An important discussion was the current legal case by e.tv which threatened to delay the project even further, thus extending the dual illumination period with the associated running costs. While there were still funding issues, there had been some improvements and the DoC would continue to work with entities and National Treasury to ensure that this project was fully funded, and that the funding and project delivery schedules were aligned.

Another important deliberation of the briefing was Nemisa’s presentation focussed specifically on training installers for the DTT roll-out process. The training would happen in three phases of which the first would be the up-skilling of existing DSTV installers. There were more than 1500 of them and they would be trained to do the DTT installations, which did not differ much from DSTV installations.

6.4 Progress report on the transformation of advertising industry – February 2012

Concern over the slow pace of transformation in the advertising industry prompted the Committee to direct the Department of Communications (DoC) and the Government Communication and Information System (GCIS) to facilitate a consultative process with all stakeholders in 2002. A value statement was adopted in April 2003. Subsequently, extensive research, public dialogue and public hearings were undertaken.

The briefing document included an overview of the findings and conclusions from the research reports commissioned by the MDDA. The report on “Trends of Ownership and Control of Media in South Africa” was issued in 2009. It was found that many small local newspapers were owned by private companies, which did not fall within the definition of community media in the MDDA Act. A clear understanding of what was meant by ‘community media’ was necessary.

The Committee undertook oversight visits to the projects supported by the MDDA and held public hearings during June 2011. A summary of the recommendations and the progress that had been made in implementing the recommendations was included. Consultation with various stakeholders in network organisations, industry organisations, government entities and State-owned enterprises took place.

Government advertising would be centralised within GCIS and an increased proportion of government advertisements would be channelled to community media. Brand South Africa had committed to allocating 25 per cent of advertising expenditure to community media.  The South African Post Office (SAPO) had launched an advertising campaign involving community newspapers. The MDDA was monitoring the efficacy of these campaigns and addressing the challenges that had arisen. There were concerns over the operations of media brokers, which were not subject to regulation.

The implementation of the Marketing Advertising and Communication South Africa (MACSA) Charter and the establishment of partnerships with the public and private sectors were considered to be crucial to achieve the transformation of the sector.

7. Legislation

The key issues that the Committee tackled over this period include (i) broadening and extending access to ICT services to the public at more affordable rates; (ii) increasing job and training opportunities in the ICT sector; (iii) improving the efficiency of the regulatory authority; and (iv) ensuring greater and better co-ordination among public entities and other stakeholders in ICT in preparation for DTT, Broadband technologies.

The following pieces of legislation were referred to the committee and processed during the 4^th Parliament:

7.1 Reviewed legislation of the communications sector

The Committee undertook the legislative process to pass predominantly technical amendments relating to the four Bills that were referred to it for consideration. These include (i) the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) Amendment; (ii) Act Electronic Communications Act (ECA); (iii) South African Postbank Limited Act; and (iv) South African Post Office State-Owned Company Limited Amendment. In line with its (Committee) mandate, public hearings were conducted to enable greater public and stakeholder participation. These hearings are referred to in detail in the following section 7.2 of this report.

In relation to the Banks Act, a slight challenge occurred due the inadequate familiarity of the Committee and stakeholder knowledge of the Banks Act. However a presentation from South African Reserve Bank brought much-needed information. Brief summaries of all the amendments to the legislation are provided below:

South African Postbank Limited Act was amended to review provisions that may negatively affect the operational autonomy and independence of the Office for Banks; to remove any inconsistencies with the Banks Act 2010; as well as to provide for matters connected therewith;

South African Post Office State-Owned Company Limited Act 2011, was amended so as to (i) improve governance provisions between the Boards of the South African Post Office SOC Ltd and the South African Postbank Limited; (ii) to amend the Post and Telecommunication-related Matters Act of 1958 so as to provide for the payment of pension benefits to a former spouse of a member on divorce or the dissolution of a customary marriage; as well as to provide for matters connected;

Independent Communications Authority Act 2000, was reviewed in order to insert new, amend existing and repeal obsolete, definitions, (i) to provide for further clarity on the powers and duties of the Authority; (ii) to introduce mechanisms to ensure the accountability of the Authority, including that of councillors and committees; and (iii) to confirm the use of electronic communications networks and services for the purpose of electronic transactions and to provide matters connected therewith; and

Electronic Communications Act 2005, was reviewed so as to insert, amend, and delete certain definitions; (i) to align the Act with broad-based black economic empowerment legislation; (ii) to refine provisions relating to licensing; (iii) to make further provision towards ensuring effective competition amongst persons licensed under the Act; (iv) to remove bottlenecks that require the Minister of Communications to establish a council to advise the Minister on broadband policy and implementation; (v) to make further provision for the discounted rate at which Internet services must provided to schools, educational institutions and public health establishments; (vi) to authorise the Minister to require that certain information be submitted to the Minister; (vii) to make provisions for the fiduciary duties of members of the Board of the Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa; (viii) to provide afresh for the appointment and conditions of the chief executive officer of the Board; and (ix) to make further provision for the utilisation of money in the Universal Service and Access Fund, as well as to provide matters connected herewith.

In the main, it has been agreed to that more needs to be done to support the liberalised market so that it can appropriately respond to the socio-economic objectives of government. The amended legislation is part of a larger process to transform the sector to support the economic activities and promote socio-economic development.

Technology developments have necessitated the revisit of the Electronic Communications Transaction Act (ECTA). The Department of Communications took a lead in the process. The amended bill has been gazetted in 2013, and is awaiting submission to Parliament.

7.2 Public hearings on ECA and ICASA Amendment Bills

It is procedural for the Committee before passing legislation to engage the public at large and solicit input to the finalisation of the acts and or amendments. For this reason, the Committee hosted public hearings from 01 – 04 October 2013 for the ECA and ICASA amendments. The summaries of submissions are herewith attached as ‘ICASA_Submissions Matrix and ECA Amendment Summaries Matrix.”

7.3 Legislative and regulatory activities

Over the period in review and in line with its Parliamentary duties, and as articulated in detail in section 10 of this document, the Committee has had to:

(i) Dissolve the SABC Board, interview and recommend candidates to the President;

(ii) Interview and recommend candidates for both the SABC and MDDA Board of Directors to the President; and

(iii) Interview and recommending candidates for ICASA Council to the Minister of Communications;

The Committee also

(iv) Took lead in the transformation of media and advertising print media sector; and

(v) Championed the transformation of the advertising industry.

8. Oversight trips undertaken

During the term under review, there was a total of eleven (11) oversight visits to all nine (9) provinces of the Republic. These were follow-up visits to Limpopo and the Eastern Cape. The following gives a summary of the proceedings provincially:

8.1 Background

The oversight visits by the Committee are in line with its role and the mandate as per: (i) the Constitution; (ii) and the National Assembly Rules.

The objective of the oversight visit served as the measurement indicator against the service delivery commitment by the executives. The theme of these oversight visits was “Touch, Feel and See” how technology contributes to better the lives for all and amongst others the areas of focus were as follows:

(a) The strides made in the progressive realization of rights as contained in section 16(1) (a) and (b) of the Bill of Rights: (i) Freedom of the media; and (ii) Freedom to receive or impart information or ideas. To this end the Committee visited Media Development and Diversity Agency (MDDA) community media projects, including those community broadcasters supported by Department of Communications (the Department);

(b) Efficiency of the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) in licensing community broadcasting, and monitoring compliance of licensees with license conditions, and other challenges in this sphere of broadcasting;

(c) The role played by Sentech in signal distribution for broadcasting and challenges they are facing in providing services to this Province;

(d) To measure progress made by the South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) in rolling out the low-powered transmitters in collaboration with Sentech and ICASA; and

(e) Successes and challenges: (i) experience by Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa (USAASA) in deploying Tele Centres for ICT services; and (ii) experience by South African Post Office (SAPO) in rolling out postal outlets, addresses and functionality of Public Internet Terminals (PITs); and (iii) rollout of telecommunications and broadcasting infrastructure.

8.2 Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal

The Committee undertook an oversight visit to Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal Provinces on 28 March – 01 April 2011. Annexure titled “PCC Recommendations Concerns from oversight visits and BRRR” (herewith attached) is the summary of recommendations of the Committee and responses by the Department submitted to Committee 31 July 2013.

8.3 Western Cape SABC Regional Office

The Committee undertook an oversight visit to Northern Cape and Free State Provinces on 23 August 2011. Annexure titled “PCC Recommendations Concerns from oversight visits and BRRR” (herewith attached) is the summary of recommendations of the Committee and responses by the Department submitted to Committee 31 July 2013.

8.4 Northern Cape and Free State

The Committee undertook an oversight visit to Northern Cape and Free State Provinces on 28 March – 08 November 2011. Annexure titled “PCC Recommendations Concerns from oversight visits and BRRR” (herewith attached) is the summary of recommendations of the Committee and responses by the Department submitted to Committee 31 July 2013.

8.5 Northern Cape and Western Cape

The Committee undertook an oversight visit to Northern Cape and Western Cape Provinces on 17 – 20 January 2012. Annexure titled “PCC Recommendations Concerns from oversight visits and BRRR” (herewith attached) is the summary of recommendations of the Committee and responses by the Department handed to the Committee 31 July 2013.

8.6 Limpopo

The Committee undertook an oversight visit to Limpopo Province on 5 – 8 February 2012. Annexure titled “PCC Recommendations Concerns from oversight visits and BRRR” (herewith attached) is the summary of recommendations of the Committee and responses by the Department handed to the Committee 31 July 2013.

8.7 Mpumalanga

The Committee undertook an oversight visit to Mpumalanga Province on 18 – 23 March 2012. Annexure titled “Consolidated Oversight Matrix With Responses” and “PCC OVERSIGHT PROGRESS REPORT - Mpumalanga & North West,” (herewith attached) is the summary of recommendations of the Committee and responses by the Department dated 31 July 2013.

8.8 North West

The Portfolio Committee on Communications (the Committee) undertook an oversight visit to the North West Province from 6 – 8 June 2012. Annexure titled “Consolidated Oversight Matrix With Responses” and “PCC OVERSIGHT PROGRESS REPORT - Mpumalanga & North West,” (herewith attached) is the summary of recommendations of the Committee and responses by the Department and its entities dated 31 July 2013.

8.9 Gauteng

The Portfolio Committee on Communications (the Committee) undertook an oversight visit to the Gauteng Province from 19 – 22 June 2012. The summary of recommendations of the Committee will be made available to the members of 5^th Parliament because the report was only adopted in the month of March by the Committee.

8.10 Eastern Cape follow-up

The Portfolio Committee on Communications (the Committee) undertook a follow-up oversight visit to the Eastern Cape Province from 28 January – 1 February 2013. The summary of recommendations of the Committee will be made available to the members of 5^th Parliament because the report was only adopted in the month of March by the Committee.

9. Study tours undertaken

The following oversight trips to Europe and South America were undertaken:

9.1 United Kingdom (17 – 23 July 2010)

9.1.1 Objective

(i) develop an understanding of the governance and financing models of the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) System of broadcasting;

(ii) understand the governance and operational model of the Office of Communication (OFCOM); and

(iii) understand how the UK manages its respective migration from analogue to digital broadcasting.

9.1.2 Observations

The Committee noted that the BBC is regulated by the BBC Trust, a body which also plays a role as the broadcaster’s Board. While the private sector has to bid for spectrum, the BBC gets allocated spectrum for free and is able to use it to generate revenue for the corporation.

The DVB-T digital standard is an acceptable choice for the country’s terrain. The BBC has already implemented the latest version DVB-T2 to compress its current spectrum. Government is also contributing towards the Digital Switchover Help Scheme for the vulnerable. However, television owners buy their own STBs which range from £20 per box and upwards.

9.2 Brazil (24 July 2010 to 30 July 2010)

9.2.1 Objective

(i) develop an understanding of the governance and financing models of the Brazilian System of Telecommunications;

(ii) understand the governance and operational model of the Brazilian Agency of Telecommunications (ANATEL); and

(iii) understand how Brazil is managing its respective migration from analogue to digital broadcasting.

9.2.2 Observations

In Brazil, Anatel is not converged. Anatel’s remit is limited to technical telecommunications issues. According to Anatel, policy-making for the ICT sector, spectrum allocation and the regulation of the Broadcasting industry is the responsibility of the Communications Ministry. The regulator is autonomous and its decisions cannot be reversed by the Communications Minister. Brazil’s public broadcasters are subject-specific.

Brazil has adopted the ISDB-T digital standard. Its digital migration period is from 2007 to 2016 with the following features are available:

• Robustness;
• Standard and High Definition;
• Mobility and Portability;
• Interactivity (return path for e-government); and

· Royalty-free software or middleware.

Brazilians do not pay TV licenses and approximately 88 per cent of the population watch free-to-air television. Brazil’s interest in South Africa adopting ISDB-T standard is informed by its desire to strengthen its strategic economic partnership with South Africa.

9.3 Status of study tours reports

A combined report was adopted in September 2010.

9.4 Lessons learned

9.4.1 South Africa: adopted broadcasting standard

In 2008, the Cabinet approved a Digital Migration Policy (BDM) and the following Technical Standards are approved:

· DVB-T (EN 300 144) is adopted as the national standard for broadcasting digital terrestrial television in South Africa.

· DVB-S (EN 300421) is adopted as the national standard for broadcasting digital satellite television in South Africa.

· MPEG-4 is adopted as the compression standard for South Africa’s Digital Terrestrial Television (OTT) rollout, while existing direct-to-home (DTH) services continue to use MPEG-2 with the option to migrate to MPEG-4 when commercially viable.

In line with the Southern African Development Community (SADC) resolutions by Minsters representing ICT sector, a regional standard was adopted for implementation as a DVB-T-2.

9.4.2 Access system

The above-mention standard was based on the UK model and furthermore dictated that the STBs shall be enabled to receive services from different platforms and operators. STBs will have standardised operating systems prioritising security features, interoperability and inter-connectability. For this reason the policy provided for the STBs to have a control system to prevent STBs from being used outside the borders of South Africa and to disable the usage of stolen STBs.

9.4.3 Revised BDM Policy

In December 2012, the policy was revised and adopted by Cabinet. In the main, the reason for this revision was to avoid challenges in implementing the digital migration programme caused mainly by differences between broadcasters and manufacturers relating to the use of a control system. The Department opted to remove the mandatory Access Control on (STBs) except for those subsidised by government as means to protect government investment.

Furthermore the revised policy set a switch-on date to 01 April 2014 while the switch-off date will be determined by the Minister after engagement with Cabinet and stakeholders. The fully revised policy is available for 5^th Parliament members upon request.

10. Statutory appointments

The following appointment processes were referred to the committee and the resultant statutory appointments were made:

MDDA Board
November 2010	Louise Vale
	Nadia Bulbulia
	Phelisa Nkomo
November 2011	Rene Alicia Smith
	Phenyo Nongane
November 2012	Robert Nkuna
	Nothando Migogo
November 2013	Roland Williams
March 2014	Jimmy Manyi
SABC Board
June 2009	Board Dissolved and Interim Board appointed. Thereafter a full board was appointed
March 2011	Dr Sethe Patricia Makhesha
	Dr John Sembie Danana
	Cawekazi Mahlati
	Lumko Mtimde
November 2011	Thami ka Plaatjie
September 2012	Noluthando Gosa
March 2013	Board Dissolved and Interim Board appointed
September 2013	Full Board appointed
December 2013	One Board member resigned
March 2014	Leah Thabisile Khumalo
ICASA
October 2009	William Stucke (reappointed in 2010)
June 2010	Dr S Mncube
	Joseph Lebooa
	William Currie
	Ntomizodwa Ndhlovu
November 2010	Marcia Socikwa
September 2012	Nombuyiso Batyi
	Manyana Rubben Mohlaloga
	Katharina Gloria Pillay

11. Petitions

11.1 Unitra Community Radio

A petition regarding the situation at Unitra Community Radio, submitted in terms of Rule 312 by Dr Z Luyenge, was referred to the Portfolio Committee on Communications on Wednesday, 10 March 2010. The Portfolio Committee on Communications, having considered the Petition regarding the situation at Unitra Community Radio, reported as follows:

The community was not happy about the following:

• Disregard and lack of interest in workers’ rights;
• The misuse of the community radio station to sabotage government programmes;
• Breaching the conditions of the licence;
• Corruption and nepotism;
• Giving the station a bad image;
• Managing the station through the courts of law;
• Defying government’s structures;
• Changing the aims of the stations for their own protection;
• Disregarding the voice of the community; and

· Independent Communications Authority of South Africa’s (ICASA) role.

Through interaction with ICASA, the Portfolio Committee on Communications received an update which it communicated to the affected community on 11 May 2010 that (i) a charge sheet was drafted by the Compliance Unit for the Complaints and Compliance Committee (CCC) to consider convening a hearing in respect of the contraventions on matters of statutory obligations; (ii) a letter has been written to the Unitra Community Radio Station Manager requesting a register and minutes of the meeting where a resolution was taken to adopt a revised Constitution; and (iii) the due process was taking its course in line with the procedures. Lastly the Committee informed the community that it be informed of any further developments.

11.2 SAPO

In July 2011, SAPO employees sent the petition to the Office of the Speaker of Parliament, Mr Max Sisulu, seeking the Parliament intervention on the following matter:

· Years services performed as temporary employees with no opportunity to be full time;

· Gross neglect of procedural fairness concerning Permanent positions to staff working as temps for two years;

· Employment of some SAPO temporary staff through the labour brokers; and

· About 8000 staff members employed through labour brokers demanded to directly appointed by SAPO.

The matter was subsequently referred to the Committee. The committee then engaged with SAPO to redress and these engagements resulted in SAPO directly hiring the staff as the first phase of employee integration. To date about 1 500 employees have been integrated into the main stream employment.

12. Summary of outstanding issues

The following key issues are recommended for the 5^th Parliament some of which are outstanding from Committee activities during the 4^th Parliament:

12.1 Committee administration issues for 5^th Parliament

· Members committed to afford reasonable and equal opportunity for interactions between the Committee, the DoC and its entities, GCIS and its entity, and Brand South Africa (BSA);

· Profile and develop an extensive stakeholder database (Stakeholder Matrix Development);

· Systematise Committee business processes, i.e. develop and implement a Management Information Systems (MIS);

· In light of the workload of the Committee, it is apparent that the budget allocation must be reviewed, for more rationale on the matter refer to Section 13 of this Report;

· Based on the experience of the work of the Committee which is unique in nature, it is advisable that the Committee support staff is expanded in order to match the increasing literature-intensive workload of the sector;

· During the years under review, the Committee undertook training in partnership with the WITS Link Centre and specific to the sector. It is advisable that the training is institutionalised for all members and staff who are to serve in this Portfolio;

· Identify courses and organise capacity development lessons for Members of Parliament and support staff;

· Oversight Booklet Formulation;

· Continue to realise the five key priority areas of the strategic planning session; and

· Appointment of a second permanent female Committee secretary.

12.2 Outstanding reports and issues from DoC

Based on Budget Review and Recommendations Reports (BRRR), oversight visits, and Committee meetings, the DoC is expected to submit the following reports which are still outstanding from those submitted:

· Respond to 2012/13 BRRR recommendations;

· Status report following the President’s signed proclamation authorising the SIU to investigate certain matters relating to the affairs of the Department;

· Status report on the SABC Skills Audit;

· Status report of SABC Public Protector Report;

· Status report on SAPO SIU report;

· Status report on Cost to Communicate programme of ICASA;

· Status report on the legal litigation by the dominant operators (MTN and Vodacom) regarding the recently published Call Termination Rates (CTRs);

· Status report on price transparency issues;

· Status report on Minister’s commitments to the Committee;

· A report on the development of a comprehensive plan on ICT and disabilities, in addition to the scope of the National Universal Access and Service strategy;

· Status report on the Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) framework to the Committee;

· Status report on DTT State of Readiness;

· Status report on Broadband Policy implementation and Broadband Council;

· Status report on Spectrum Audit;

· Status report on cyber security initiatives by the Department;

· Status report on ICASA Skills Audit;

· Status Report on ICASA consumer advisory panel;

· Status report on USAASA investigations;

· Status report on issues of people with disabilities in terms of DTT;

· Status report on launch of DTT in rural areas;

· Status report on Auditor-General recommendations;

· Status report on role of Department as identified in the Cabinet 2007 Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) Policy; and

· Parliament should continue to engage National Treasury, the DoC and SAPO on the issue of government subsidy of the entity.

12.2.1 Cost to communicate public hearing recommendations

The Committee noted with concern the issues predominantly related to the digital dividend raised in the submissions made by various organisations and individuals, see Annexure on the Committee report of the hearings.

12.2.1.1 The Department

(i) must present a progress report on the Revised Programme of Action relating to the policy interventions presented during the public hearings;

(ii) must provide strategic leadership and policy direction on how the sector players will be encouraged to provide innovative and affordable data services to business, SMME’s, education institutions, health sector; previously disadvantaged people, particularly women and the general public as presented in paragraphs above; and

(iii) in consultation with the Regulator and USAASA, must investigate, conduct a benchmark study and compile a report to be presented before the Committee, the viability and sustainability of utilising the Universal Service and Access Fund (USAF) for the purpose of subsidising rural connectivity, people with disabilities and the college students classified as receiving grants. Furthermore the presentation should investigate possibilities for creating or partnering industry to create community-based ecosystems for SMMEs.

12.2.1.2 ICASA

(iv) must expedite its Skills audit and present before the Committee its findings prior to making it publicly available;

(v) must report to the Committee on the processes to undertake to respond to the concerns it raised during the public hearings regarding:

a. The level of on- and off-net tariff differential by Vodacom & MTN;

b. On-net promotions by Vodacom & MTN could further increase in on- and off-net differential; and

c. International voice tariff less than national tariff (Cell C R0.85 international tariff, Vodacom R0.89 international tariff) vs. R1.04 industry effective tariff); and

(vi) ICASA must investigate and consult with GSMA regarding its projections of Sub-Saharan Africa and report back to the Committee on the validity of this model as reported by GSMA Mobile Economy Report (2013).

12.2.2 Other DoC issues for consideration by the 5^th Parliament

· Parliament should regularly monitor how the DoC implements the Digital Migration Policy and ensure that the television owners are adequately informed of the impact that the process will have on the citizens of the country;

· Parliament should regularly monitor how the DoC implements the national Broadband Policy, Spectrum Policy, Cost to Communicate Programme;

· Parliament should also request more detail on how the DoC will ensure that the subsidy on the Set Top Boxes distributed equitably and will be allocated to deserving television owners; and

· The committee should follow up on the integration of the remaining temporary employees in the company.

The incoming Committee must further ensure that the following are in place and are continuously monitored to improve the country’s rankings:

· South Africa’s slip down the international ‘e-readiness’ rankings which estimated that South Africa experiences a shortage of over 70,000 Information Technology(IT) professionals in 2008;[20]

· The shortage of e-skills is even more worrying because of the fact that the supply of ICT graduates is now showing a decline, according to a published research by Accenture;[21]

· e-skills are seen as vital in addressing poverty, sustainable livelihoods, the fight against crime, building cohesive communities, international cooperation, and building a developmental state;

· The objectives of the iNeSI should be aligned with the Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) 2014 – 2019 and collaborative work with ISETT SETA;

· Conduct an audit of what ICT skills do government need, what does it have, and how will it bridge the gap between the two;

· What other initiatives or programmes would the iNeSI implement in local government in harnessing ICT to up-skill and boost service delivery;

· President Obama’s administration committed to provide all healthcare provider facilities, from the smallest single doctor practice to the largest medical centres, will have an Electronic Medical Record system installed and operational in their facility by 2014. These are heavily reliant on e-skills. What strategies would the iNeSI use to support the National Health Insurance;

· The iNeSI, must acquire and develop new marketing strategies to ensure that more people are aware of the e-skills initiative and that people’s unique e-skills and innovation capabilities can be harnessed further by the organisation by speeding up the “e-Skills Knowledge Production Hubs” in individual communities; and

· The iNeSI should develop and work with a network of researchers across the higher education sector, the private sector, government, civil society and other role players to provide the research based essential intelligence required for e-skilling in South Africa.

12.3 GCIS

· Respond to 2012/13 BRRR recommendations;

· Status report on community broadcasting services;

· Status report on transformation of the print media;

· Status report on the contribution framework by print media towards the MDDA

· Status Report on the Charter of the advertising industry;

· Expedite the process to fill funded vacancies;

· Implementation of 30 per cent of government advertising expenditure to community media;

· Status report to address issues raised by the Auditor General over the years;

· Implementation of curriculum and or national qualifications for government communicators; and

· Implementation of the online booking system to benefit community media.

12.4 BSA

· Respond to 2012/13 BRRR recommendations;

· Status report on BSA and work with people with disabilities;

· Status report on BSA and social cohesion (domestic marketing);

· Status report to address issues raised by the Auditor General over the years; and

· Prepare a workshop to address the Committee on their mandate and activities.

12.5 Follow-up issues related to the Study tours

Subsequent to the adoption of the UK broadcasting standard, South Africa continues to enjoy a healthy relation with Brazil through the IBSA-Trilateral as well as Bilateral relations. The relations continue to further partnerships in the ICT arena and are spearheaded by the Department of Science and Technology and the Centre for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR).

Recent bilateral interactions with Brazil seek to continue to promote partnership in the broadcasting sector, particularly to promote research and development based on STBs and the Open-Source-based middleware application (Ginga) to be piloted in South Africa and on a DVB-T-II standard STB alongside the native middleware platform for the adopted standard. The Department must provide status report on activities relating to the bilateral partnership with Brazil and the project on piloting of Ginga on STBs as indicated in section 7.4.4 of this report.

12.6 Follow-up on legislation enacted in communications

Parliament should continue to monitor the Department of Communications, the Regulator and its entities’ progress of implementing the four amended bills (ICASA, SAPO, Post Bank and ECA which were amended into laws.

13. Committee strategic plan

13.1 Strategic planning workshop from 2-3 February 2010

The Committee held its strategic planning workshop from 2-3 February 2010. It identified the following as the key areas of strategic focus/importance for the period 2010 – 2014:

(i) Key Policy Thrusts/Initiatives for the Future;

(ii) Enhance Committee Oversight Functions;

(iii) Educate and Empower Committee Members;

(iv) Strengthen Administrative Support within Committee;

(v) Monitoring and Evaluation of Committee Programme; and

(vi) Strengthen Research Capacity within Committee.

13.2 Strategic planning workshop from 17 to 19 of April 2013

The Portfolio Committee again held its strategic plan workshop on the 17 to 19 of April 2013. The aim was to inform the Portfolio Committee on its annual plan for 2013/14 financial year. The workshop further developed and outlined priorities for the Committees 2013/14 financial year’s programme.

There were five Key Priority Areas adopted by the Committee and are summarised below:

Committee Strategic Priority Focus Areas
Priority Focus Area I	1. DoC Oversight
	2. State Owned Entity Oversight
	3. Provincial Oversight visits
Priority Focus Area II	1. Stakeholder Matrix Development
	2. Sectoral Consultations
	3. Oversight Booklet Formulation
Priority Focus Area III	1. Legislative Review Processes
	2. Policy Review Process
Priority Focus Area IV	1. Business Reengineering Recapitalisation
Priority Focus Area V	1. Cost to Communicate

14. Committee Budget Review

Over the period in review, it is evident that the Committee activities far-supersede the budget allocation, see Table below. For that matter the allocated budget is always exhausted by the third quarter of each financial year with the exception of the 2012/13 financial year where the budget was exhausted by the end of first quarter of the financial year.

PCC Budget Allocation for 4^th Parliament
	2009-2010	2010-2011	2011-2012	2012-2013	2013-2014
Allocated	R 500 000.0	R 700 000.0	R 888 000.0	R 777 000.0	R 1 200 000.0
Spent	R 507 262.0	R 786 742.0	R 1 049 703.0	R 1 349 707.0	R 1 391 692.0
Overspend	R -7 262.0	R -86 742.0	R -161 703.0	R -572 707.0	R -191 692.0

In the past, Parliament’s allocation of budget to Committees was a one-size-fit-all approach in its attempt to spread budgetary requirements across all committees. However now that the Parliament Budget office has been established, it is with hope that the ICT sector, as a highly resource-intensive sector, will be considered differently as it does require special allocation and attention because of the catalytic nature of ICT’s and its impact to the entire economy. For this purpose, it is therefore advisable that the Budget Office emulates the Treasurer Regulations and methodology of allocation of budgets to Departments in order to ensure that the work of the Committee on Communications is not compromised in the future.

15. Annexures

Annexures are available from the Committee Secretary, Mr Thembinkosi Ngoma upon request. He can be contacted on: Cell 0837098407 Tel: 0214033733 Email: [email protected]

16. Glossary of Terms
AENE	Adjusted Estimate of National Expenditure
AFCON	African Cup of Nations
AG	Auditor-General
APP	Annual Performance Plan
AU	African Union
BBC	British Broadcasting Corporation
BDM	Digital Migration Policy
BRICS	Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa
BRRR	Budget Review and Recommendations Report
BSA	Brand South Africa
CA	Council of Administration
CAPEX	Capital Expenditure
CTRs	Call Termination Rates
CIO	Chief Information Officer
COGTA	Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs
COSATU	Congress of South African Trade Unions
DAC	Department of Arts and Culture
DBE	Department of Basic Education
DHET	Department of Higher Education and Training
DoC	Department of Communications
DPSA	Department of Public Service and Administration
DST	Department of Science and Technology
DTI	Department of Trade and Industry
DTT	Digital Terrestrial Television
FOSS	Free and Open Source Software
FTRs	Fixedline Termination Rates
GCIS	Government Communication and Information System
GDP	Gross Domestic Product
GRAP	Generally Recognised Accounting Practice
ICASA	Independent Communications Authority of South Africa
ICT	Information Communication Technology
ISSA	Institute for Software and Satellite Applications
IMC	International Marketing Council
MACSA	Marketing Advertising and Communication South Africa
MDDA	Media Development and Diversity Agency
MIS	Management Information Systems
MTRs	Mobile Termination Rates
MTSF	Medium Term Strategy Framework
NABSA	National Association of Broadcasters in South Africa
NDP	National Development Plan
NEMISA	National Electronic Media Institute of South Africa
NEPAD	New Partnership for Africa’s Development e-Africa Commission
NeSPA	National eSkils Plan of Action
NGP	National Growth Path
NCS	National Communication Strategy
NYDA	National Youth Development Agency
NWB	National Wireless Broadband
OECD	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
OFCOM	Office of Communication
PAIA	Promotion of Access to information Act
PCC	Portfolio Committee on Communications
PFMA	Public Finance Management Act
PNC	Presidential National Commission
PITs	Public Internet Terminals
PPPFA	Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
PPR	Preferential Procurement Policy
PMSA	Print Media of South Africa
SABC	South African Broadcasting Corporation
SABS	South African Bureau of Standards
SADC	Southern African Development Community
SAPO	South African Post Office
SCM	Supply Chain Management
SCOA	Standing Committee on Appropriations
SKA	Square Kilometre Array
SOCs	State Owned Companies
SOEs	State Owned Entities
SoNA	State-of-the-Nation Address
STB	Set Top Box
The Institute	NEMISA
TR	Treasury Regulations
UK	United Kingdom
USAASA	Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa
USAF	Universal Service and Access Fund
USO	Universal Service Obligations
UPU	Universal Postal Union
WAN	Wireless Access Networks
WST	Wholesale Call Termination
.zaDNA	.zaDNA

---

[1] Broadly defined, a developmental state brings about rapid and sustainable transformation in a country’s economic and/or social conditions through active, intensive and effective intervention in the structural causes of economic or social underdevelopment. (Source: http://www.npconline.co.za/pebble.asp?relid=54)

[2] Gillwald, A, et al (2012).

[3] Abrahams, T. Goldstuck, G. (2011).

[4] Department of Communications (2012) Strategic Plan 2012/13.

[5] However, sector growth is dependent on growth in other sectors such as financial services, wholesale and retail, hotels and restaurants and will fluctuate with national developments in these sectors.

[6] Broadband[6] has become a key priority of the 21^st Century, and its transformative power as an enabler for economic and social growth makes it an essential tool for empowering people, creating an environment that nurtures the technological and service innovation, and triggering positive change in business processes as well as in society as a whole. Increased adoption and use of broadband in the next decade and beyond will be driven by the extent to which broadband-supported services and applications are not only made available to, but are also relevant and affordable for consumers. And while the benefits of broadband-enabled future are manifest, the broadband revolution has raised up new issues and challenges.

[7] Measuring Information Society (2013).

[8] International Telecommunications Union (2012a).

[9] Ericsson (2012).

[10] See http://www.ericsson.com/news.

[11] World Wide Worx, (2012).

[12] InternetWorldStats (2013).

[13] Ibid.

[14] Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (2010).

[15] In addition, in the last five years, the combination of wireless technology and broadband service is taking service adoption from the household to the individual user.

[16] Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (2012)

[17] It is important to note that these figures are mainly for SOEs and private companies that have responded to the Department’s questionnaire on Job creation.

[18] Department of Communications (2011); Department of Communications (2012); and Department of Communications(2013) Annual Reports.

[19] Brand South Africa (2013) Annual Report.

[20] ITWeb (2008)

[21] Accenture( 2008)

---