DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Report to the Portfolio Committee for Social Development
The Social Security Improvement Programme
(Norms and Standards for Social Security)
29 August 2001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. Proposed Norms and Standards for Social security
2.1 Institutional Arrangements
2.2 Organisation and Management of Social Security
2.3 The Grant Administration Process
2.4 Human Resources
2.5 Customer Care
2.6 Payment Contractors
2.7 Paypoints
2.7 Physical Infrastructure and Technology
2.8 Financial Management
3. Implementation Strategy
Programme Timelines & Quick Wins
Programme Outputs
Programme Structure
4. Business Case
Status Quo of leakages in Social Security
Tangible benefits
Intangible benefits
5. Critical Success factors
The objective of this executive brief is to outline the Department of Social Development’s improvement programme for social security service delivery. The improvement of the existing system of social security was identified as a priority in the Action Plan of the Cabinet Committee for the Social Sector in March 2001. The proposed intervention involves three major projects, namely, the development of comprehensive norms and standards; the replacement of SOCPEN (grants payment computer system) and the improvement of physical infrastructure at pension pay points.
This report discusses the social security challenges and the mitigation of these challenges through the recommended implementation programme of norms and standards to enable excellent service delivery. Section two provides a list of the more salient proposed norms and standards. The last section provides a brief of the proposed implementation strategy.
1.2 Constitutional, Legislative, Policy and Service Delivery imperatives
Citizens’ rights are entrenched in the 1996 Constitution Section 27, which states that "everyone has the right to have access to social security, including, if they are unable to support themselves and their dependants, appropriate social assistance."
In terms of Section 146 (subsection 2 (b)) of the Constitution, the role of national legislation will prevail if legislation is aimed at uniformity for effective service delivery. Provincial Departments of Social Development are responsible for the direct delivery of social grants to people who are eligible in terms of the Social Assistance Act of 1992. The objective of the norms and standards is to provide for the "promotion of equal opportunity and equal access to government services" (Section 146, subsection 2(c) (v) of the Constitution.
The imperative of service delivery is addressed in the New Public Service Regulations - Service Delivery Improvement which states that an executive authority shall establish and sustain a service delivery improvement programme of his/her department. Government service delivery principles to the Citizens have been clearly captured in the Batho Pele White Paper and the norms and standards have been identified as a key enabler to fulfilling the service delivery mandate within social security.
The government’s strategy is to work towards the creation of an integrated social security system to improve the quality of social spending and to enhance its positive impact on those in society who are in need (The President in the State of the Nation Address, February 2001). The delivery of social security has been recognised, as government’s most effective poverty alleviation program to address poverty. It is therefore imperative that the deployment and utilization of social security norms and standards are optimised in a manner that significantly addresses the service delivery expectations from both the Citizens and Government stakeholders.
1.3 Social Security Challenges
Despite the imperatives stated above, the Department is currently faced with a number of challenges in its operations, including:
Finally, the Department has been receiving very negative press coverage resulting in its public image being perceived as bad and uncaring.
1.4 Findings by different commissions
A number of studies have been carried out in the past, including the Committee for Restructuring of Social Security Report (The Chikane Report, 1996) and the Public Service Commission Investigation into Delivery of Social Security Services Report ((PSC Report, 1998) amongst others. There is close congruency in the issues raised by these various studies including:
1.5 Programme to address Social Security challenges
To meet up with these challenges, the Department embarked on a programme to develop norms and standards for effective and efficient delivery of its social assistance programmes. The scope of the programme is:
The three main objectives of the norms and standards are:
The implementation of norms and standards for social security service delivery will address the current disparities which resulted from the apartheid legacy. In the proposed norms and standards, uniformity of service delivery is proposed on five levels:
Following are the proposed norms for the critical areas of service delivery. It must be borne in mind that these norms are proposed within the current business model of social security being a concurrent function (Schedule 4).
The following recommendations should compliment existing norms for paypoints:
The programme is comprised of three projects, which, at the tactical level, should realise the strategic direction set by Social Security legislation and enable the efficient implementation of the new norms and standards.
The three sub-programmes are briefly described below:
Programme Timelines & Quick Wins
It is envisaged that a solution of this nature would take three years to implement and a further two years to stabilise before realising full benefits. Some of the activities that will be performed in the current fiscal year phase include:
The diagram below summarises the norms and standards programme outputs/outcomes. Annexure A provides more detail on the projects of the implementation plan.
The implementation of norms and standards requires the establishment of a programme office that will be guided by a well-defined program structure. The following assumptions were made in developing the programme structure:
The norms and standards must be driven by the benefits case.
Although the objective of implementing norms and standards is not solely for monetary benefits, the department is likely to save a substantial amount of resources (that is the average of savings over five years).
Savings are directly derived from the leakage. Every rand that is saved from leakages counts to the bottom line (cash flows). This automatically increases the budget of Social Security to increase coverage and bring more and more of the poor into government’s social safety net.
The implementation of norms and standards will not only benefit the Department of Social Development in terms of monetary savings, there are more intangible benefits than tangible benefits:
The following are some of the critical success factors that will ensure implementation of norms and standards. Most of the key risks have already been addressed in the challenges section.
Stream |
Current Fiscal year |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3 |
Year 4 & 5 |
Grant Administration Processes reengineering |
|
|
|
|
Consolidate Process improvement |
Customer Care and Communications |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Management |
|
|
|
|
|
Organisation and Human Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay Points |
|
|
|
|
|
Applications and Infrastructure |
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities and Layout |
|
|
|
|
|