A SUBMISSION ON NUCLEAR ENERGY IN
NiMBLE -
NiMBLE is an
independent community volunteer non-profit platform of volunteers aiming to
promote pro-social aims and economic development of our community within the
framework of environmentalism.
A WIN-WIN economic development and environmental management policy is vital to
the well-being of our community, our socio-economic legacy and to our
VISIBILITY within the INTERNATIONAL climate change effort.
Defining a National Energy Plan gives us ONE shot at getting it right, and
redressing many issues and backlogs. Nuclear Energy is ONE cog in this machine,
but it is a significant cog.
The significance of the role of Nuclear Energy in terms of the Eastern Cape,
and future of the Nelson Mandela Bay Metro necessitates in our opinion the
creation of a 'Commission on Macroeconomics, Energy and Ecosystem Services for
Poverty Reduction'
We are fundamentally GAIA theorists and James Lovelock's philosophy in terms of
Nuclear Energy is the backbone overiding the 'hype and over-hype of
nuclear-phobia. Phobia is an apt term here.
pho.bi.a (f+,bZ f) n., pI.bi.as a persistent,
irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a
compelling desire to avoid it. [1780-90; extracted from nouns ending in
-PHOBIA]- pho,bic adj., n.-phobia a combining form
meaning "dread oŁ:" "phobic aversion toward,"
"unreasonable antipathy toward" a given object: agoraphobia;
xenophobia. [< L < Gk, = -phob (os) -PHOBE + -ia
-IA]
Nuclear Power Plants offer a significant solution to many problems GLOBALLY and
of specific consequence to our Nelson Mandela Bay Metro.
We DO NOT presume to have a NUMERUS CLAUSUS of ALL the answers but hope that
our submission will elucidate the view from
Clear reasoning and mindfulness form a integral part of the road forward, not
only with dealing with communities 'out-of-the-Ioop' so to speak regarding
Nuclear technology, but also with those driving the National Energy Plan for
specific advantage with detriment to segments of South African citizenry like
us in the far too often side-lined Eastern Cape.
For this reason, we propose the 'Commission on Macroeconomics, Energy and
Ecosystem Services for Poverty Reduction'
A strengths
and weakness analysis(SWOT) brainstormed at a meeting
offered these insights:
Strengths (Pro-Nuclear)
1. High-tech knowledge upgrade of skills pool in our community
2. Cleaner than coal
3. Seawater vs Freshwater
4. Abundant local power, positive implications for
pro-poor electrification
5. Development of a local IPP ie a REDS or RTO, Economic benefit
consolidated through the above for provincial & local regions
6. Nuclear Waste 'Storage' off coastal continental shelf out to sea off the bay
is easiest.
7. A 'nuclear knowledge' hub in the
8. Exporting not only energy but knowledge across
9. CDC
boast, positioning Nuclear Plants in the CDC's like Coega will maximize
advantage and minimize ruining pristine coastline
10. Diversification of Energy bouquet
11. Leaves the door open for PREMIUM green energy.
(We envisage this opportunity in the future where Pro-poor and CDM
opportunities can exploit Alternative Energy Production for not only VISIBILITY
in the global climate change effort, but for sustainable livelihood pro-poor
development.
12. The opportunity to revise the NEP, giving the
13. If the
14. We advocate for an Energy bouquet spread: Coal 50 %, Nuclear(at
the Coast)35 % and 15 % Alternative Energy for the account of pro-poor
initiatives
15. Of the Nuclear at the Coast -75% should be for the
16. 50% of National Energy production in the Highveld (CoaI)The
remaining 25% spread between the
17. Uranium enrichment and export via Coega, limiting transport
18. Redressing the
Weaknesses:
1.
2. Phobia's in terms of Nuclear Energy
3. Skills inadequacies
4. Ruining opportunities for CDM developments &
alternative energy production
5. Making LNG and peaking plants redundant
6. Transmission lines
7. Side-lining of other provinces in the Energy 'race
8. Coal; 2nd biggest SA earner is marginalised
9. Uranium, transport, enrichment, and safety
10. Nuclear waste
11. Nuclear at the Coast and eco-tourism
12. Political Will and Finance is NOT centred in the
13. Runririg' pristine coastline
14. Drawing an influx of people into the
15.
Changing the fundamental nature of the
The above are
intended in good faith as a number of consideration around the consideraton of
Nuclear Energy in
NiMBLE as Nelson Mandela Bay Metro's premier Metro Environmentalist platform
for public participation in our local environment affairs for OUR collective
future encourages clear reasoning into the path ahead.
A number of concerns are apparent and FOREMOST must be the side-lining of the
I hope you'll accept this in that spirit.
Grego!)' G. Smith, chairperson 2007, NiMBLE