Question NW3041 to the Minister of Transport

Share this page:

08 November 2018 - NW3041

Profile picture: Alberts, Mr ADW

Alberts, Mr ADW to ask the Minister of Transport

(1)Whether he can give an indication of the expected and actually realized income regarding the Gauteng e-toll system for each month from 31 December 2013 to date; (2) what type of road user made payments through corporate and individual road users for each month during the same period respectively; (3) what number of e-tags that are recorded have been activated and deactivated for each month during the same period; 4) what is the total (a) amount of legal costs spent on issuing summonses to road users thus far and (b) outstanding debt to the e-toll system for each month of the specified period; (5) whether any consideration is given to reissue summonses; if not, what is the position in this regard; if so, (a) what amount has been budgeted for this, (b) what number of persons or institutions will be sued in this regard and (c) on what date will this take place?

Reply:

  1. Please see Table 1 below for the expected (forecast) versus realized (actual) income.
  2. Payments are made by an account holder who assumes responsibility to pay the account for the registered vehicles, which can be an individual, a corporate, or a combination. The person/entity that sets up the account does not complete a “field” to indicate if it is a corporate or individual user. As a result, the SANRAL toll system does not record whether a vehicle is registered (or owned) by an individual or a corporate user and the information requested cannot be directly extracted from the toll system. Should more details be required the Member of Parliament is welcome to visit SANRAL Head Office in Pretoria.
  3. Table 2 below provides, for each month, the number of tags that have been activated and deactivated from December 2013 to date. The table does not reflect the tags registered prior to the December 2013 date, such as the tags that were already in use on the Bakwena route. Tags are deactivated for various reasons, which include the following:
  • Movement of tag to a new vehicle
  • Movement of vehicles and tags between accounts, e.g. Public Entity and Key accounts
  • Deregistrations, etc

Table 1: GFIP expected (forecast) versus realized (actual) income

Table 2: e-Tag Activations versus Deactivations

Year

Month

Tags Activated

Tags Deactivated

2013

December

348382

22667

 

 

 

 

2014

January

165030

23480

 

February

112086

18424

 

March

87814

18731

 

April

70082

17578

 

May

62602

18419

 

June

65643

19330

 

July

51642

19357

 

August

40810

18739

 

September

34834

22980

 

October

31604

17940

 

November

25614

17144

 

December

18833

12155

 

 

 

 

2015

January

24856

17406

 

February

22443

15280

 

March

21656

16827

 

April

18924

15425

 

May

22663

17850

 

June

29217

17329

 

July

36139

19312

 

August

30274

21768

 

September

30685

19336

 

October

32080

18070

 

November

24631

15287

 

December

18624

12945

 

 

 

 

2016

January

29676

16615

 

February

30536

16897

 

March

31193

20179

 

April

29310

19458

 

May

34520

21343

 

June

28130

19711

 

July

32300

16475

 

August

27270

16852

 

September

28881

20350

 

October

30733

16361

 

November

26566

59163

 

December

21566

84980

 

 

 

 

2017

January

30497

17699

 

February

29186

16936

 

March

28355

28654

 

April

19699

17387

 

May

24736

18799

 

June

24399

16537

 

July

29388

17478

 

August

29138

17409

 

September

26645

16760

 

October

31358

17295

 

November

29733

15409

 

December

21410

12567

 

 

 

 

2018

January

29016

19675

 

February

28005

16357

 

March

21786

18216

 

April

21571

16997

 

May

22334

20042

 

June

24091

14923

 

July

29719

16678

 

August

26140

16107

 

September

27454

15749

 

October

31005

16733

4. (a)The Contractor (ETC) incurred R4,6m on legal fees up to August 2018.

(b) The Accounting Policy of SANRAL, which is in line with IFRS, determines that the impairment assessment is done on an annual basis. As such the trade receivables balance is calculated, audited and published annually. Table 3 below reflects the audited trade receivables for the requested financial years:

Financial Year

Toll debtors (R’million)

2018

10 840.4

2017

8 798.4

2016

6 620.1

2015

4 935.3

2014

951.3

   
   

Table 3

5. SANRAL’s toll operator is not re-issuing summonses. The summonses that have already been issued will be amended to include new debt (if required) but will not require re-issuing. Therefore, we respond as follows:

a) Not applicable as the re-issuing summonses is not required.

b) Not applicable refer to a).

c) Not applicable refer to a).

Source file