National Research Foundation Annual Report 2006/07: briefing
Science and Technology
23 October 2007
Meeting Summary
A summary of this committee meeting is not yet available.
Meeting report
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE23 October 2007
NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ANNUAL REPORT 2006/07: BRIEFING
Chairperson: Mr G Oliphant (ANC)
Documents handed out:
National Research Foundation presentation
National Research Foundation Annual Report 2006/7 [available at www.nrf.ac.za]
Audio recording of meeting[Part1] [Part2] [Part3]&[Part4]
SUMMARY
Members of the Committee met with the National Research Foundation (NRF) in order to discuss the annual report. The NRF presentation outlined the significant achievements made during the financial year, the financial results and the challenges faced within the organization. The NRF stated that they had received an unqualified audit report for the financial year, and the entire budget had been spent to actual on target. The main challenge faced by the NRF was the production of PhD’s, and more should be done in attracting people into the field of research.
Members asked the NRF to comment on the steps that had been taken in terms of recruiting the youth and the criteria that was used for the allocation of research chairs. Members also asked the NRF to comment on whether they received a return on investments with regard to the number of bursaries awarded. A member stated that it had been established that many researchers left the NRF in order to work in formal institutions such as local government. The NRF should therefore comment on how one could capacitate those officials in participating in research activities. Members felt that the high absentee rate amongst certain board members of the NRF board was cause for concern and clarity should be provided on the steps that have been taken to improve attendance.
MINUTES
National Research Foundation presentation
The NRF presentation was made by Prof Mzamo Mangaliso, President, NRF. He stated that the NRF’s mandate was to promote and support research through funding, human resource development and the provision of the necessary research facilities. Some of the achievements made include the finalisation of contracts for the National Equipment Programmes by Research and Innovative Support and Advancement (RISA). RISA had also been successful in awarding 72 Research Chairs to date. The South African Agency for Science and Technology Advancement (SAASTA) on the other hand, had managed to expand school science programmes, and also design and implement a new national science communication programme. The South African Astronomical Observatory (SAAO), saw the training of students from different African countries; and the upgrade of Infrastructure at Sutherland.
With regard to the finances the NRF had received an unqualified audit report for the financial year, and the entire budget was spent to actual on target. During the financial year, the NRF funded about 8 592 students for higher degrees, and almost R200 million was invested in the provision of critical science infrastructure for use by all higher education institutions. However the was a still a need for the funding for Infrastructure, and funding for the maintenance & upkeep National Research Facilities.
Another major challenge was the production of PhD’s in South Africa. The production of high quality PhDs needed to take place in large numbers. As PhDs was seen as the bedrock for an innovative and entrepreneurial knowledge society.
Discussion
Ms F Mohamed (ANC) focused on page 12 of presentation. She asked for
clarity on how one would look at the jobs per researchers, in terms of the
number of researchers employed. Clarity should also be provided on whether it
was possible to provide an updated version of 2007 PhD list. The NRF should
state on what steps had been taken in terms of recruiting the youth, especially
those infected with HIV/AIDS.
Prof Mangaliso replied that pg 12 referred to the number of researchers per
thousand. He appealed to members to pressure the necessary powers for an
increase in the funding of research. Work could be done more efficient and effectively
if grant was raised. There was a serious need to start graduating more honours
and masters students, and there was also a need to have number of researchers
enhanced in order to increase job creation. With regard to the knowledge PhD
production rates, the numbers for South Africa could be obtained right up to
last year; however problem was the international comparative numbers which were
difficult to obtain.
Ms Beverly Damonse, Executive Director, SAASTA, replied that with regard to
HIV/AIDS and the youth the NRF was looking into a number of policies such as
succession planning. The NRF had a dedicated team which was working closely
with schools, and was taking a number of programmes into rural areas. The NRF
was also looking for additional funding for university students. It should be
noted however that the NRF did not make any investments to the HIV/AIDS
population, as they did not have the necessary impact.
Mr J Blanche (DA) stated that there were many people in local government with
high qualifications, the NRF should comment on how one could capacitate those
officials in participating in research activities. The NRF also needed to start
capacitating and motivating the younger generation in order for them to start
performing research.
Mr Patrick Thompson, Executive Director, Human Resources replied that in terms
of service delivery it was important that knowledge be transferred into service
delivery. The NRF had realised that there was an increasing loss of researchers
to the formal economy. The NRF had therefore launched a project known as the PhD
project, which was aimed at incentivising people sitting in mid career position
in continuing with research.
Prof Mangaliso replied that the NRF was trying to increase the funding for
students at an honours level. The NRF proposed a two step plan of increasing
attracting students into taking up studies at honours level. The first approach
was to double the amount of funding given to honours level students and the
second proposal was to reduce the requirements for getting into honours.
Prof B Reddy, Chairperson of the Board, replied that over the past year the NRF
had brought a whole bunch of top rated scientists into management positions.
However it was discovered that the pool of scientists was very small and the
NRF could afford to turn scientists into managers, and have therefore launched
the PHD programme, which was aimed at increasing the number of scientists.
Prof Krish Bharuth-Ram, Executive Directors: National Facilities, Finance added
that South Africa had a bulk of research which was produced by ageing
researchers, and the number of people entering the research field was lower
than expected. The PhD project was one of the many measures taken to address
the problem.
Mr S Farrow (DA) stated that higher education institutions needed to be made
accountable for the transfers they received. The NRF should comment on what
steps had been taken to gain additional income. With regard to bursaries, there
was an increasing exodus of learners to the international arenas, therefore
clarity should be provided on whether there was any return on investments.
Clarity should also be provided into what was being done to address the issue
of mathematics and science at schools.
Prof Mangaliso agreed with Mr Farrow and stated that higher institutions needed
to be made accountable when it came to public funds. The DST had been working
closely with the NRF in putting out a challenge to the universities to deliver
on the PhD’s. The NRF also needed to diversify its source of income, and
contingency plans had been placed to approach the private sector. With regard
to bursaries plans had been put in place for learners who had taken out bursary
to repay the bursary through some sort of service to the nation. The shortfall
of mathematics and science was very unfortunate outcome, and the NRF would
investigate the matter. The NRF planned on resuscitating a programme in which
enabled individuals who were not given the opportunity to take mathematics and
science in high school, to return and spend a year learning the subject.
Prof J Mohammed (ANC) asked the NRF to comment on how they monitored the
progress of PhD students, and also provide clarity on the meaning of citation
intensity. He stated that he found it strange that India had PhD per capita
that was lower than South Africa’s, as India tended to be leaders in scientific
research. The issue of women in science was a serious problem that needed to be
addressed.
Prof Mangaliso replied that the definition of PhD was the advancing of
knowledge, and the NRF would provide assistance to students where possible.
With regard to women in science, it should me noted that the issue was a
serious problem and black women remain relatively fewer in number. It should be
noted that India was a country that was heavily populated. Since he measure was
calculated by PhD per capita, i.e. number of PhD’s divided by population, then the measure could be discredited.
Mr S Dithebe (ANC) asked whether there had been a turnaround strategy to ensure
that the president’s concerns on issues surrounding the sciences were being
addressed. Clarity should be provided on whether learners were benefiting from
science week and the ICT’S.
Prof Mangaliso replied that there was a turnaround strategy in place and the
NRF continued to engange in discussions with the DST. The NRF needs resources
so that it could increase the number of bursaries it offers to students and
grants given to research.
Ms Damonse replied that national science week was a programme that was headed
by the DST. The programme reached many learners across the country. A good
relationship had been developed with the South African Broadcasting
Co-operation and community radio stations, which enabled the NRF to access
areas the organisation could never have gotten into
before.
Ms B Ngcobo (ANC) asked for an elaboration on the indigenous knowledge systems
and whether the NRF’s recommendations were being taken seriously. The NRF
should also comment on the extent in which they collaborated with researchers
in the field of science, and what was being done to attract graduates to create
job creation for unemployed graduates.
Prof Mangaliso stated that the recommendations by the NRF should be taken
seriously, since the organization made collaborations with other system
players. The issue of job creation for graduates was an excellent idea which
needed to be investigated further.
Dr Albert Van Jaarveld, Vice President, NRF, replied that the indigenous
knowledge systems were generally underfunded. The NRF had been in discussion
with DST in order to find ways of resolving the matter. With regard to the
unemployed graduates, the DST had initiated an internship system which gave the
graduates an opportunity to get into the research stream.
Mr B Myandu (ANC) asked for clarity on the criteria that were used for the
allocation of research chairs.
Mr Morkel asked for clarity on how the private sector incorporated research
into their day to day operations. Comment should also be provided on what steps
have been taken to capacitate South African learners in gaining international
experience. Comment should also be made on the promotion of science through
technology at school level.
Prof Mangaliso replied that the NRF was looking into business enterprise and
development in order to determine the way forward. With regard to gaining
international exposure, discussion should be made with international firms who
used to sponsor such programmes to re-introduce the programmes so that learners
can be afforded the opportunities to gain international experience. With regard
to the promotion of science through technology, the E Schools programme still
needed to be rolled out, and government was the main service provider when it
came to the infrastructure. It should be noted that internet access was key to
a knowledge economy.
Mr A Ainslee (ANC) stated that there seemed to be a
high absentee rate amongst certain board members of the NRF board, clarity
should be provided on the steps that have been taken to improve attendance.
Prof Reddy replied that there were many challenges that faced the board, these
included geographical challenges. However it should be noted that the present
board was fully committed despite the fact that they were very busy individuals.
The meeting was adjourned.