Sport and Recreation South Africa 2006 Annual Report: briefing
NCOP Education and Technology, Sports, Arts and Culture
28 February 2007
Meeting Summary
A summary of this committee meeting is not yet available.
Meeting report
EDUCATION
AND RECREATION SELECT COMMITTEE
28 February 2007
SPORT AND RECREATION SOUTH AFRICA 2006 ANNUAL REPORT: BRIEFING
Chairperson: Mr B Tolo (ANC, Mpumalanga)
Document handed out:
Sport and
Recreation SA Presentation on 2005/6 Annual Report
Sport and Recreation SA 2005/6 Annual Report (available at www.srsa.gov.za)
SUMMARY
Sport and Recreation South Africa presented its 2006 Annual Report stating
that it had already taken steps to correct the shortcomings identified by the
Auditor-General in its financial management. Employing and training staff
tackled some of these shortcomings. There was a general lack of capacity and
human resources weaknesses. The Department had made a concerted effort to
increase the number of Black women and disabled persons in its employ. The
Department had signed numerous Memoranda of Understanding with other countries
to promote sports. The country benefited from exchange programmes
which resulted in the grant of scholarships to some athletes.
The Committee observed that it takes too long to fill departmental vacancies;
that the Department had to publicise its activities
to make the people aware of sports facilities and that it had doubts about the
need for Memoranda of Understanding and their benefits. The Department was
asked to co-ordinate the activities of the different stakeholders and entities
in the overall sports sector.
MINUTES
Sport and Recreation SA (SRSA) 2006 Annual Report Presentation
Mr Greg Fredericks (Chief Director: Programmes) explained that the Department had already
started tackling some of the problems that had been identified in the
Auditor-General’s audit report. It was the first year of restructuring of
sports delivery structures, following adoption of the SA Sports Confederation
and Olympic Committee’s (SASCOC) Articles of Association and elections in
December 2004. The restructuring process had attempted to delineate clear areas
of responsibility between government and SASCOC.
Ms Elsie Cloete (Chief Financial Officer) said the Department had made use of
over 95% of the budget allocated to it.
The audit report indicated that there are vacancies in certain posts
which made it difficult to monitor activities at all levels and compliance with
laws and regulations. The Department within the year under review had
insufficient control over gifts. There was also a lack of comprehensive and
approved policies on monitoring of risk and fraud prevention and provision for
irrecoverable debt.
Ms Lulu Sizani (Chief Director: Corporate Services)
said there were vacant positions at the management level. There were lots of
challenges encountered in the recruitment process. The Department also suffered
from a lack of capacity to achieve its targets. The Department is in need of a
sign language expert. There is a sustained drive to recruit Black women
(particularly Africans and coloureds). The Department
would ensure the disabled made up at least 2% of its staff strength. The
position of Director General of the Department had been advertised and the
position of Chief Director had recently been filled.
Mr Fredericks said that the Department had signed
Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) with some
countries to improve sports delivery in South Africa. Exchange programmes were in place to expose athletes to competitions
in different countries.
Discussion
The Chairperson thanked the Department for their well-presented report
and noted that they had successfully pre-empted many of the questions that
would have been asked by shedding light on the strategies employed to tackle
challenges. He noted that a general problem that cut across all government
departments was that it took too long to recruit staff (on average about eight
months). He argued that the Department should find a way to shorten this
period.
Ms Sizani explained that the delay was a result of
certain procedures that had to be followed in the recruitment process. This
included skills assessment and extensive security checks. These delays were
much more extensive for top management positions.
Mr J Thlagale (UCDP, North
West) asked whether the Department was not compromising standards to employ
Black women.
Ms Sizani explained that all candidates, irrespective
of gender, go through the same processes. The candidates, who are elevated to
higher positions from within the Department, are trained to handle the
challenges in their new roles. The Department had to comply with Government’s
policies on gender employment equity.
Mr Thlagale asked what the
Department was doing to promote sports at the grassroots level.
The question was not answered.
Ms N Madlala-Magubane (ANC, Gauteng)
asked if the Department would retrench incompetent managers.
The question was not answered.
Ms F Mazibuko (ANC, Gauteng)
commented that the overall projection for athletic performance was low. The
Department should publicise recreational facilities
so that the public was more aware of them. She felt there was too little
co-ordination between the various sports bodies and organisations.
Mr Fredericks said there were no legal instruments to
enforce co-ordination and co-operation between sports organisations.
He explained they were mostly private entities and therefore the Department
could not enforce co-ordination and co-operation.
Mr M Thetjeng (DA, Limpopo) asked the Department to explain the use and
importance of MOUs entered into with other countries.
Mr Fredericks explained that MOUs
are agreements to exchange expertise and culture and are often beneficial to
both parties. The Department had MOUs with countries
like Cuba in basketball and boxing. Students were also granted scholarships
under MOUs with countries like France and the
Netherlands. There were varying levels of success with MOUs
however. The MOU entered into with Nigeria was completely unsuccessful.
Mr Thetjeng asked the
Department to give an update on the MOU entered into with the Education
Department. He suggested that the Committee should facilitate a joint meeting
between SRSA and the Department of Education so that they could provide a
report on the status of the MOU.
Mr Fredericks responded that it was very difficult to
work across departments and this could often be exacerbated as a result of
personality clashes.
Mr Thetjeng suggested that
bowling should be introduced in black areas.
Mr Fredericks explained that the Department would
develop a wide range of sports and not just bowling. The Department was
building swimming pools in municipalities and was also promoting the sport in
these areas. Bowling required an intensive maintenance regime. SRSA could
however adapt the sport so that it could be played in residential areas.
Mr Thetjeng asked what
areas of Human Resources development the Department was engaged in.
Ms Noma Kotelo (Department Director) explained that
the Department liaised with local government to recruit staff. The Department
was engaged in the business of reviving sports clubs which would be achieved by
training people to manage the sports centers.
The Chairperson asked how far sports had been integrated.
The question was not answered.
The Chairperson said that he was satisfied with the presentation and the
Department’s strategy to tackle problems. The Committee would look more closely
at the Department’s strategic plans at the next meeting.
The meeting was adjourned.
Audio
No related
Documents
No related documents
Present
- We don't have attendance info for this committee meeting
Download as PDF
You can download this page as a PDF using your browser's print functionality. Click on the "Print" button below and select the "PDF" option under destinations/printers.
See detailed instructions for your browser here.