Department Annual Report 2006: briefing
Social Development
15 November 2006
Meeting Summary
A summary of this committee meeting is not yet available.
Meeting report
SOCIAL
DEVELOPMENT PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE
15 November 2006
DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT 2006: BRIEFING
Acting Chairperson: Mr B Solo (ANC)
Documents handed out:
Annual report of the Department of Social Development 2006 [available at www.welfare.gov.za]
Presentation
by the Department of Social Development 15 November 2006
Briefing
Report: South African Council For Social Service Professions (SACSSP)
SUMMARY
The Department of Social Development briefed the Committee on its performance
in 2006. The national strategic priorities were outlined and the key
performance areas explained. The key achievements included development of regulations
in relation to child and family benefits, as well as disability and retirement
benefits. Social relief funds were disbursed for disasters in the previous
period. Social grants beneficiaries had increased to 11.4 million,
and with the increase in the eligibility age, more child support grants were
paid out. Service to older persons was improved. A Drug Master Plan for
integrated intervention was finalised and the Department facilitated the
appointment of members to the Central Drug Authority (CDA). The Department also
finalized the draft policy on disability. Sector coordination improved in the
Expanded Public Works Programme, and services were expanded in Early Childhood
Development services and Home Community Based Care services. The Children’s Bill
was assented to in June 2006. Services to orphans, and
other vulnerable children were achieved through strategic partnerships. Foster care placement backlogs were being
addressed and monitoring tools established. The achievements were tabled and
explained in relation to children’s services, youth employment opportunities,
the establishment of the Social Security Agency, improvement of service by the
National Development Agency,
and restructuring of the Department. The audit report had been
unqualified, but with matters of emphasis, which were explained. There had been
98.1% spending against budget and rollovers had been approved. Challenges
included the weaknesses. with the grants
administration system, the safekeeping of accounting records, integrity of the
non-financial data provided by provinces, and lack of effective management of
the information systems. A plan of action for the challenges was put forward.
Policy and implementation approaches would have to take into account the
complex social interventions, and the need to shift to system-level planning.
Questions by members addressed the need to reach more people, the issue that
there did not seem to be integration between disability and child support
grants, the need to develop plans for the disaster management centre, training
of social workers, the need for better reporting and accountability from the
Central Drug Agency, particularly in regard to the possible influx of drugs in
2010, and the need for greater visibility in youth programmes. It was noted
that the National Youth Commission failed to submit a report. The awarding and
use of the grants were questioned, as was the length of time to implement the
Children’s legislation. The process of the Child Protection Register was
examined. It was noted that more funding was needed, and there was also a need
for a more coordinated approach on the causes of drug abuse, disaster
management and social interventions.
MINUTES
Annual Report of Department of Social Development (DSD)
Mr Vusi Madonsela, Director General, Department of Social Development indicated
that the National Strategic Priorities were to create an enabling environment
for social and human capital investment, to ensure good governance and
leadership in programmes and development, to build partnerships with civil
society, to promote social integration, to develop initiatives to build
capacity of vulnerable groups, to provide a comprehensive social security
system and to steer national involvement in Africa and international frameworks.
He outlined the key performance areas.
The key achievements were the development of regulations in relation to child
and family benefits as well as disability and retirement benefits. The Social
relief board was pleased to announce that there were no declared disasters for
the current period therefore the outstanding funds were disbursed for disasters
in the previous period, paying out R46 million across eight provinces. Social
grants beneficiaries had increased to 11.4 million, and the eligibility age for
the child support grant was extended to thirteen years, resulting in more than
1.2 million children being covered. Service to older persons was improved with
the development of guidelines for the transformation of old age homes, and the
Older Persons Act was passed. In the area of substance abuse, a Drug Master
Plan for integrated intervention was finalized and the Department facilitated
the appointment of members to the Central Drug Authority (CDA). The Department
also finalized the draft policy on disability, which would streamline and
integrate standards and services, and policy guidelines were developed for the
management of protective workshops. In the Expanded Public Works Programme
sector coordination and capacity building were facilitated. Expansion of
services was achieved in Early Childhood Development services and Home
Community Based Care services. The Children’s Bill was split into a Section 75
and a Section 76 Bill, providing for the separation of provincial and national
competencies, and the Children’s Act was assented to in June 2006. Services to
orphans, and other vulnerable children were achieved through strategic
partnerships with civil society organizations, and services were provided to 5
987 child-headed households, and school uniforms were
distributed. Foster care placement backlogs were being addressed and monitoring
tools established.
The Department set out its key achievements in the areas of services to
children. A policy framework was approved to prevent and combat child abuse,
and norms and standards were being developed. Servers had been established for
Child Protection Registers in eight provinces. The adoptions register was not
functional and up to date and guidelines had been approved for inter-country
adoption. Early childhood development guidelines and plans were approved,
training manuals finalized and training had started in two provinces. The
Department had increased shelters and crisis centers for those in need and
training of professionals in that area. 750 Social Crime Prevention probation
practitioners were trained. In the area of community development, it had
developed strategies for poverty relief, social grant and sustainable
livelihood links, and registration of non-profit organisations. Social service
professionals were recruited and encouraged to remain, subsidies and
scholarships had been set up for these professionals to encourage more to enter
the profession, and social auxiliary workers were trained.
Youth were developed by employment opportunities through the National Youth
Service Programme and youth centers were supported. The South African Social
Security Agency (SASSA) had been established by the Act being put into
operation, a CEO had been appointed, and more than 6 000 grant administration
staff had been seconded across. The National Development Agency (NDA)
reorganized its processes to improve internal tracking and accountability.
Departments had been restructured, there was a high level functional structure
for the Department, and the welfare and community development services had been
expanded. The Security function would focus on comprehensive social security.
Financial management was strengthened and a Chief Operations Office had been
appointment to oversee the public entities. A Social Policy programme would
support better coordination.
The Departmental spending was reviewed. There had been 98.1% spending against
budget and unspent funds from the original Vote were approved as a rollover and
would be utilized for the improvement of systems and transfer of staff to the
SASSA, who would manage the Management Information System for social security.
The rollover from the unspent social assistance administration conditional
grant fund had also been approved and would be used for the payment of social security
litigation costs and improvement of financial management systems.
The audit report had been unqualified, but there were matters of emphasis.
There were challenges with regard to underspending of the social assistance
grant in three provinces, and under spending on the conditional grant for
HIV/AIDS and the integrated social development services grant. A further matter
of emphasis related to the non-compliance by NPOs with their Act, and the lack
of capacity within the Department to monitor, and the problems with the dual
responsibilities of the Department and SASSA during the transition process.
Further challenges included weaknesses with the grants administration system,
the safekeeping of accounting records, integrity of the non-financial data provided
by provinces, and lack of effective management of the information systems.
The Department reported that the objectives not achieved included the quality
assurance framework for social welfare services, audit reports on the
Integrated Rural Development Strategy, the anti-poverty strategy and a proposal
on comprehensive social security. A plan of action for the challenges was put
forward. The macro-value chain was explained and future plans were discussed in
relation to this. The role of social development in relation to other
departments was discussed and policy and implementation approaches would have
to take into account the complex social interventions, and the need to shift to
system-level planning. An integrated alignment between all the Social Development
Institutions was being sought.
Discussion
Adv T Masutha (ANC) commented that more
people should be reached through social development. The poverty beneficiary
budget was R11 million and that the government needed to respond to the need.
Mr Madonsela said that there was a drive to enable the unemployed to become
economically active by linking the basic income grant to economic activities.
The social security issue needed to be talked about and the Committee and the
Department would plan in the new year to deal with
that.
Ms F Batyi (ANC) enquired as to how a family would be able to survive on a
grant of R190 per month if both parents were disabled and the government did
not assist further. She questioned whether there were enough social workers and
what was being done to address the needs. .
Mr Madonsela stated that a policy framework needed to be developed for those
with disabilities.
Poverty measures were not in place and the provinces had their own criteria in
that regard. National training needed to be done in the social assistance
framework. Disability grants information was referred to the regional office,
but the basic income grant did not have a set policy in this regard.
The Chairperson enquired how the disaster management centre was being run and
suggested that it should anticipate disasters before they occurred.
Ms I Direko (ANC) stated that the National Council of Rural Women sent five
students from the rural areas to study social work and enquired as to how there
could be assistance for those who wanted to study social work.
A Department representative responded that the aim would be to train 3 000
social workers but the universities would not have the capacity, so a more
realistic goal of 500 per annum qualified workers was the goal. The costs of
studying were usually high because when the students were placed, they needed
accommodation and related expenses. The focus was to try and keep those that
were studying social work at the present time in the profession.
The Chairperson questioned whether this would be sustainable and whether the
department was guaranteeing the students jobs after they finished studying.
The Department replied that it was trying to minimize the unemployment of the
social workers who were already trained.
Mr M Waters (DA) mentioned that the CDA did not seem to submit required reports
at the appointed time. The National Youth Development also did not seem to
respond and it was suggested that it be run nationally. He mentioned that drug
addiction seemed to be out of hand in the country, particularly among the
youth. The CDA did not submit any master plans to combat drug addiction and
there seemed to be limited State drug rehabilitation centres.
Mr Madonsela mentioned that there was a mini-master plan in progress from the
CDA. There was also a three-pillar system that was been used in research, which
entailed a development discussion document which was then submitted to Cabinet.
The Bill with regard to substance abuse had been approved and now there needed to
be a consultative process.
Mr David Bayever, Vice-Chairman, CDA suggested that the Agency should perhaps
report to the Committee every six months instead of annually, and that there
needed to be accountability and better representation by the government
department on a consistent basis. The three pillars that to prevent drug
addiction were reducing the access to the supply, decreasing the demand and
reducing the harm done. The reduction of demand needed to be addressed in the
communities. There was also a drug master plan that was in progress and there
needed to be uniformity in that.
Ms Nomathemba Kela Chief Director, DSD stated
that there needed to be accountability. All Departments must be on board in
implementing the mini drug-master plan. There were four provincial
rehabilitation centres but the goal was to have one in every province and to
have a community based approach, to avoid having to deal with re-integration.
The Chairperson mentioned that problems had been expressed with the
community-based approach.
Mr Bayever stated that there needed to be a register of those centres that
existed but the budget imposed some constraints. He also mentioned that
planning was needed with regard to the 2010 Soccer World Cup, and the possible
influx of drugs that would occur at that time.
The Chairperson commented that it would be prudent to plan and prepare for
2010.
Ms X Makasi (ANC) questioned the programmes that worked with the youth as they
were not visible. She also commented that the handling of abuse in the Western
Cape was very disorganized. She pointed out that
children were now also vulnerable in schools and systems needed to be in place
for their protection. She also indicated that it was difficult for grandmothers
to legally adopt their own grandchildren, and it was also difficult for a
caregiver to look after children on a grant of R190 per month.
Dr Maria Mabetoa, Chief Director: Children, Youth and Families, DSD replied
that it was not an automatic procedure for children to be awarded to their
grandparents as a social worker needed to submit a report. The foster care strategy needed development.
The Chairperson agreed that the youth needed to be involved against the flood
of drug dealers near the schools and encouraged the members to assist as much
as possible.
Mr B Mkongi (ANC) stated that the messaging to the youth was very important and
questioned how the funding could be processed. The government and the private
sector needed to get involved. Young people must be involved in messaging to the
youth on the issue of drugs, as they knew the best way to communicate with
their peers. He was disappointed that the National Youth Commission failed to
submit a report as it was important for the government to know what was
happening.
Ms X Makasi (ANC) enquired as to whether there was a means test relating to
qualification for the grant, because a family with four children and with
disability would find it difficult to apply if they did not know how to go
about it.
Mr Madonsela stated that there was not a means test. He also stated that the
government had launched a campaign for adoption as opposed to foster care as
foster care lapsed after 18 months and it was not a permanent arrangement for
the children. Adoption was a more permanent solution although there was not an
adoption grant or a policy to support that. The foster care process was slow
because there were not enough social workers to handle the caseload at present.
Mr B Mkongi (ANC) enquired how the social development grant was used, stating that in some cases the caregiver would not use
the grant for the child but use it to pay off debts to micro lenders instead.
The issue was blurred with regard to accountability, but it was clear that it
was not always used in the interests of the child.
Mr Waters stated that there was under funding of the Department with regards to
the Children’s Bill. He enquired why it had taken so long for the tender
process to happen so that the regulations could be finalized. He enquired
whether the Child Protection Register was centralised to government, and asked
for clarity on the ways it would be expanded.
Dr Mabetoa stated that regulations were delayed as the service provider had
only recently been appointed and the regulations should be finalised by the end
of the coming year. The Child Protection Register was being reviewed and a
web-based system was being examined as an easier route.
Mr Segoli, Chief Information Officer, DSD replied that the provinces each had
their own child protection register and that this needed to be incorporated to
a central system. The technology would integrate the systems. There were now
eight servers in the provinces, including a national server, and the Department
was in the process of capturing the data. In the child protection register
great progress had been made.
Ms Makasi stated that sometimes the social workers were also causing a problem
and that this needed to be rectified.
Mr Madonsela summarised that funding was needed in welfare, but there was
recruitment taking place among students studying social work and that
scholarships were being implemented. The budget of R22 million was an issue as
there were no social workers to render the service.
Mr Mkongi raised a question on the AIDS campaign.
The Chairperson suggested that there be collaboration between the related
causes of the drug abuse and that these departments should work together.
A Department representative replied that there needed to be a campaign on a
national level and that the NDA could not achieve everything that was proposed
on a limited budget. Capacity in the provinces was also limited.
Mr Mkongi stated that things needed to happen with regard to the Kemoto
project.
Mr Waters stated that there did not seem to be enough funding for social
workers and that this need was surely enough opportunity to request the
National Treasury for additional funding.
The Department indicated that the total funding was allocated for all projects.
The Chairperson stated that it seemed that there were still some paradigm shifts
needed and that the disaster management should be in place before a disaster
happened.
Ms I Direko (ANC) was pleased that strides had been taken with regard to SASSA
and that the people were better serviced.
The meeting was adjourned.
Audio
No related
Documents
No related documents
Present
- We don't have attendance info for this committee meeting
Download as PDF
You can download this page as a PDF using your browser's print functionality. Click on the "Print" button below and select the "PDF" option under destinations/printers.
See detailed instructions for your browser here.