Meeting with Southern Sudan delegation
Sport, Arts and Culture
01 November 2006
Meeting Summary
A summary of this committee meeting is not yet available.
Meeting report
SPORTS AND RECREATION PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE
1 November 2006
MEETING WITH SOUTHERN SUDAN DELEGATION
Chairperson: Mr B Komphela (ANC)
Documents handed out:
None
SUMMARY
The Committee hosted a delegation of members from the Sports Committee of
the Southern Sudanese Parliament, who were visiting South Africa to learn from
its experiences about the role of sport in a developing society. Members of the
Portfolio Committee indicated that the major challenges in South Africa
were
access to sports, which thus played both a unifying and a dividing role. They
indicated the role of the Department of Sports and its relationship with the
Portfolio Committee, the purpose of oversight visits and public hearings, the
participation of women in sport, and the preparations for the World Cup. The
purpose, function and procedures followed by the Committee in dealing with
legislation were discussed. Questions were asked by the Sudan delegation on the
contribution to sports funding by the private sector, the challenges facing women, and the media
reports that South Africa would not be ready to host the 2010 World Soccer Cup.
MINUTES
Mr C Frolick (ANC) introduced members of the Committee
Ms B Anchan Ogwaro, Chairperson, Gender, Social Welfare Youth and Sport,
Southern Sudan introduced her delegation. She said that Southern Sudan had parties
working together in the Government of National Unity. The Sudanese Peoples
Liberation Army (SPLM) was the majority party in the Southern Sudan Legislative
Assembly. The Southern Sudan was a semi autonomous region and after six years
the people of Southern Sudan would decide whether they wished to be fully
autonomous in the future. She said the Delegation came to South Africa to learn
from the experiences of South Africa about the role of sport in a developing
society. She cited an example of sporting codes that excluded a sector of the
Southern Sudanese population, such as swimming and cricket.
Mr Frolick said that South Africans did love their sport, but the majority of
the South African population did not have access to sports. He added that South
African sport could play both a unifying and a dividing role. He said that some
federations were rich while others were struggling, but all sport federations
had to sign a performance agreement and account to the Committee. The Director
General had to report on a quarterly basis how far the Department had gone in
the School Sport and Mass Participation in Sport programmes. The Committee was
busy with the National Sports Amendment Bill. The private sector had been
funding the bigger federations, and the lottery also funded some of the sports
federations. This Committee was named the Sports and Recreation Portfolio
Committee, but the focus was on sports rather than recreation.
Mr A Mlangeni (ANC) said that public hearings played a very important role to
the Committee, because they were an effective means of engaging the public in
the legislative process. The main objective of all processes was to address the
past injustices.
Mr L Reid (ANC) added that the Committee went on oversight visits at the local
level and to entities such as sports academies, and the main reason for
oversight was to try to ensure that there was improved access to sports
facilities.
Mr M Ntuli (ANC) said the other role of the Committee was to ensure that more
women participated in sport. The Committee was only twelve years old but it had
to deal with some federations that were sometimes more than 100 years old. Many
of those federations maintained a very traditional attitude whilst others were
quite co-operative.
Mr E Saloojee (ANC) said that the white people had always controlled rugby and
cricket. Some sports administrators manipulated the situation by using
tokenism. The Committee would use the legislation to correct these injustices.
Mr Frolick said that the Committee had visited France and Germany on
fact-finding missions to prepare for the 2010 Soccer World Cup. South Africa
was far ahead with preparations. The Committee was working very closely with
the Departments of Communications, Environment and Transport on preparations.
Mr Mlangeni said that every piece of legislation had to be discussed by the
Committee until the Committee was satisfied with the principles and drafting.
If it was not satisfied, then the legislation would be sent back for
redrafting.
Ms Anchan Ogwaro said that the population of Sudan needed to have access to all
sporting codes, so that they could nurture the talent. Women had not previously
been allowed to play sports in Sudan. The situation had to change. She then
asked how did the private sector contributed to sports funding..
Mr C Gidieon said that there was no discrimination in Southern Sudan. Southern
Sudan was striving for autonomy in sport. He cited an example of a Ghanian
based American who had scouted talented basketball players, built sports complex
and taken the players to America for greater opportunities. He said he was
disturbed about media reports that said that South Africa was not ready for the
World Cup.
Mr Frolick replied that the President of FIFA, Mr Sepp Blatter, had commented
that the media had been speculating. South Africa would host the event.
The Chairperson said that the South African Constitution said that any
legislation should advance the lives citizens. South Africa was ready to host
this event. He said that sports played a significant role in unifying the
country. The South African Women’s national soccer team had beaten Ivory Coast
and were on their way to Beijing. The President was busy pursuing peace in the
continent so that Africa may prosper. South Africa could have exchange
programmes with Sudan. The private sector was willing to fund sporting codes,
and sporting facilities should be in place to nurture the emerging talent. The
South African companies that were operating in Sudan had a moral obligation to
fund sporting codes. Sports women faced many challenges such as lack of
sponsorship. He added that some selectors felt that the Government should not
interfere in sports.
The meeting was adjourned.
Audio
No related
Documents
No related documents
Present
- We don't have attendance info for this committee meeting
Download as PDF
You can download this page as a PDF using your browser's print functionality. Click on the "Print" button below and select the "PDF" option under destinations/printers.
See detailed instructions for your browser here.