Corporate Laws Amendment Bill [B6-2006]: briefing
NCOP Economic and Business Development
20 June 2006
Meeting Summary
A summary of this committee meeting is not yet available.
Meeting report
ECONOMIC AFFAIRS SELECT COMMITTEE
20 June 2006
CORPORATE LAWS AMENDMENT BILL [B6-2006]: BRIEFING
Chairperson: Ms N Ntwanambi (ANC)
Documents handed out:
Department of Trade and
Industry presentation
Proposed
amendments document
Corporate Laws Amendment Bill
[B6-2006]
SUMMARY
The Department of Trade and Industry briefed the Committee on key aspects of
the Corporate Laws Amendment Bill that intended to amend sections of the Companies
Act. Proposed legislation focused on financial assistance by companies to
purchase their own shares, the establishment of audit committees within public
interest companies, the entrenchment of accounting standards and the
recognition of electronic signatures in financial transactions and other
related activities. Legislation would facilitate the creation of a Council and
a Panel to guide implementation of the legislation and monitor progress.
Members asked various questions including the positioning of agencies to
implement the legislation, the implications of companies providing financial
assistance to purchase their own shares, the prohibition of auditors to render
non-audit services, the communication of proposed amendments to interested parties
and business entities, the indemnification of Inspectors, reasons for the 75%
shareholder approval threshold, measuring tools to monitor implementation, the
list of interest groups consulted and the role of provincial governments in
implementation plans.
MINUTES
Department of Trade and Industry presentation
Mr M Netshitenzhe (Director-Commercial Law and Policy) outlined the
important issues contained in the Corporate Laws Amendment Bill. Issues
discussed included financial assistance by companies to purchase their own
shares, the introduction of an audit committee to public listed companies, the
rotation of auditors on a five-year basis, to provide a legal framework for
accounting standards and the acceptance of electronic signatures. The Bill
sought to provide confidence to both foreign and domestic investors. Certain
entities would be created to enforce provisions of the Bill. The rationale of
the Bill was explained.
Discussion
Ms M Temba (ANC-Mpumalanga) noted that the Department’s presentation referred
to the Portfolio Committee and commented that the Select Committee should
receive greater recognition from the Department. She asked where the entities
established to enforce provisions and monitor implementation would be based.
Mr N Hendricks (UIF) sought further clarity on the concept of companies
providing financial assistance to prospective investors to purchase their own
shares. The prohibition of auditors to render non-audit functions could have an
adverse impact on small business in terms of additional costs.
The Chairperson asked for a comprehensive list of agencies linked to the
Department to be forwarded to the Committee.
Mr Netshitenzhe stated that previously accountants had operated in accordance
with an ethical framework designed by the relevant professional body. The
present mindset was that more accountability from auditors was needed in the
light of widespread fraud and misrepresentation. The Bill advocated the
establishment of a Council and a Panel to oversee implementation. The entities
would be based at the national level but would have a presence in all
provinces. Section 38 of the Companies Act did not permit companies to provide
financial assistance from their own assets to facilitate purchase of their
shares. The intention of the present Bill was to allow companies to render
financial assistance in accordance with three criteria namely, that the company
remained solvent, assets were of a higher value than liabilities and that 75%
of shareholders agreed to the assistance at the Annual General Meeting. Systems
were in place to monitor implementation. The provisions of the Bill pertaining
to the services to be provided by auditors should be read in conjunction with
the guidelines expressed in the Auditors Professions Act. Auditors should not
provide non-audit services such as tax advice to companies that they audited.
The Chairperson asked if additional amendments other than those provided would
follow.
Ms Temba asked how relevant information on proposed amendments could be communicated
to the local level.
Mr Hendricks asked whether companies would be informed beforehand of intended
visits by Inspectors. Inspectors could cause considerable damage to a company’s
financial status by leaking certain confidential information to competitors or
adverse information to the wider public. He asked how the actions of Inspectors
could be controlled and to what extent indemnification would be allowed.
Mr D Gamede (ANC-KwaZulu-Natal) noted that the 75% threshold to approve
financial assistance transactions appeared unrealistic and asked why two-thirds
or a simple majority would not be acceptable. Clarity was sought on the
measuring tools to be used by entities created to implement the legislation. He
asked whether only registered auditors would be used in the short term.
Mr Netshitenzhe stated that no new issues would be introduced to the Committee
at this stage until the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee had been
consulted.
The Chairperson asked that any new proposed amendments would be forwarded to
the Committee prior to the next meeting. She asked what steps could be taken
against Inspectors that contravened regulations.
Mr Netshitenzhe responded that wrongful acts by Inspectors would be
investigated and prosecutions would follow if necessary. Negligent acts
committed by the Inspectors in good faith would be treated leniently by the
courts. The Minister would appoint Inspectors to investigate alleged
irregularities or non-compliance of regulations. The Inspector would hold an
initial meeting with the company management to acquire a response to the
allegations. A preliminary report would then be formulated. Auditors were
obligated by the Companies Act to report violations to the relevant
authorities. For example, tax avoidance had to be reported to the Revenue
Service. The 75% threshold for shareholder approval was unusual but the
intention was to dissuade irresponsible decision-making and protect the
interests of minority shareholders. The threshold had been approved at recent
public hearings.
Mr M Lepaku (Director-Policy and Legislation) explained that the threshold had
initially been introduced in the United Kingdom in the 1920s to prevent
asset-stripping takeovers where investors borrowed money to purchase a
company’s shares and then sold the shares to repay the loan. The Bill intended
to protect minority shareholders’ rights.
Mr Mutwa (Legal Advisor) added that the 75% threshold encompassed a special
resolution as opposed to an ordinary resolution. Overwhelming support was necessary
to protect the interests of minority shareholders.
Mr Lepaku stated that the prohibition of non-audit services by an external
auditor applied to public interest companies.
Mr Netshitenzhe declared that awareness campaigns on the implications of the
Bill would be conducted at the provincial level.
Ms Temba asked whether the awareness campaigns would occur prior to or after
the promulgation of the legislation.
A member asked whether Nafcoc had been included in the consultation process.
She stated that electronic registration had to operate in tandem with
traditional forms of registration.
The Chairperson requested the list of stakeholders consulted by the Department.
She asked whether consultation had occurred with provincial MECs on aspects of
the Bill.
Mr Netshitenzhe explained that the Department had obtained a mandate from the
Cabinet to publish the Bill in August 2005. Fifty key professional stakeholders
and business bodies had initially commented on the Bill. No consultation
occurred with closed corporations. The electronic and traditional registration
processes would be applied simultaneously.
Mr Mutwa stated that the Department would consider an alternative communication
strategy to ensure that the implications of the Bill were available to all
stakeholders and business groups.
The Chairperson requested copies of all submissions to be forwarded to the
Committee. The legal advisors had to be present at the next meeting. The
Committee discussed the Third Term Committee Programme. An oversight visit
would be undertaken to Richards Bay to focus on various industries. Particular
attention would be placed on local economic development. The Department of
Minerals and Energy’s Director-General would brief the Committee on current
legislation in the third term.
The meeting was adjourned.
Audio
No related
Documents
No related documents
Present
- We don't have attendance info for this committee meeting
Download as PDF
You can download this page as a PDF using your browser's print functionality. Click on the "Print" button below and select the "PDF" option under destinations/printers.
See detailed instructions for your browser here.