GPW 2019/20 Annual Report; with Minister and Deputy Minister

Home Affairs

09 November 2021
Chairperson: Mr M Chabane (ANC)
Share this page:

Meeting Summary

Annual Reports 2020/21

The Government Printing Works (GPW) briefed the Committee on its financial statements and Annual Report for the 2019/20 year.

The GPW had a total of 23 performance targets for the 2019/20 financial year. Out of these targets, 18 were attained, demonstrating a 78 percent achievement. This means five targets were not achieved. These five targets all relate to the financial situation of GPW.

The entity had challenges with regard to audit processes of the financial year under review which resulted in escalations to the Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA). GPW put measures in place to improve areas upon which findings were raised. Headway could not be made with completion of the capital projects, including the GPW’s Master Plan project. This was because of inherent dependencies which proved to have a serious bearing on the initiation of projects.

The GPW’s revenue for 2019 was R1.51billion, cost of sales was R732.34million, gross profit amounted to R779.3million, which resulted in a total comprehensive income of R536.28million for 2019, and R450.1 million for 2020. For 2019, the GPW’s total assets amounted to R3.78billion compared to R3.96billion for 2020. The liabilities of the entity amounted to R644.86million for 2019, as compared to R718.99million in 2020. The total cash of GPW at the end of 2019 amounted to R2.21billion, compared to R2.41billion in 2020.

The Committee expressed concern about the dire financial situation of the GPW in light of the AGSA findings, and asked GPW to submit a detailed report on its responses to the findings, since there were instances where AGSA said GPW relied on unreliable data for its financial statements. Members agreed there was little reason for Parliament to accept the GPW’s financial statements when there is no documentary evidence to back up the GWP’s reported financial performance. Members asked for clarity on the causes of GPW’s massive data loss, and how the entity will ensure such a situation does not repeat itself in the future. The Committee was concerned with GPW’s deteriorating audit outcomes, since the entity received a disclaimer opinion, which is the lowest possible level. The review of GPW’s organisation structure which was submitted for approval by the Minister has not been achieved for the second year in a row, with the same excuses about some late finalisation of the business case. GPW is expected to provide detailed reports on this issue. Members received complaints about the Government Gazette website being down regularly, and this is a service which is crucial to the functioning of the courts.

The Committee asked for clarity on how the downtime is going to affect the court system and other functions which rely on the Government Gazette. The Committee asked the Minister of DHA to give Members a progress update on the appointed Task Team investigating the GPW’s data loss. While GPW has committed to ensure the adverse findings of AGSA are resolved, the Committee was concerned about the lack of adequate financial controls at the entity. The Committee urged DHA to promptly develop a turnaround plan or strategy to address those issues, particularly as it relates to gross negligence. The Executive Authority of GPW must be focused on achieving an effective and an efficient governance structure, with stronger measures of accountability.

Meeting report

The Department of Home Affairs (DHA), Government Printing Works (GPW), and delegates from the Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA) were present at the meeting.  The GPW briefed the Committee on its Annual Report (AR) and financial statements for the 2019/20 financial year.

The delegation from the DHA included, Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, Minister of Home Affairs, Mr Njabulo Nzuza, Deputy Minister, Mr Tommy Makhode, Director-General, DHA, and Mr Muzi Njoko, Director, DHA.

Ms Moroesi Mooketsa, Senior Audit Manager, AGSA, was present.

The delegation from GPW included Chief Executive Officer, Ms Alinah Fosi, Mr Ian van der Merwe, Chief Financial Officer, Mr Anele Apleni, Chief Information Officer, Ms Constance Shabangu, Chief Audit Executive, and Mr Lungelo Nkwanyane, Senior Financial Specialist.

The Committee Chairperson said the Committee received AGSA’s reports on the GPW and the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC). The current meeting would centre on issues raised by AGSA regarding GPW, as highlighted in its Annual Report. Members of the Committee will get a full opportunity to engage with the Annual Report.

Opening remarks by the Minister of the DHA
Minister Motsoaledi said GPW achieved 18 out of its 23 set targets. This means five targets were not achieved. These five targets all relate to the financial situation of GPW. He said he would update the Committee on the loss of data at GPW as soon as information is available. This situation, among others, led to the GPW getting an adverse audit outcome from AGSA. Other issues related to buildings and problems with the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure (DPWI). GPW bought equipment but has no space to store it. DHA was in talks with National Treasury (NT) about these issues.

Briefing by GPW on its Annual Report and financial statements (2019/20 financial year)
The GPW briefed the Committee on its Annual Report and financial statements for the 2019/20 financial year. Ms Alinah Fosi, GPW CEO, made the presentation.

Executive summary of GPW’s annual performance:
The GPW made progress during the financial year 2019/20, notwithstanding challenges faced in the same period. The organisation continued to strive towards expanding its footprint in the Southern African Development Region (SADC region). Ten countries in SADC were engaged during the reporting period, while more efforts were placed on creating a local customer base. GPW also wants to focus on local customers, namely the spheres of government.

Despite the challenging economic times, GPW saw an increase in total revenue from R1.4billion in the 2018/19 financial year to R1.6billion in the 2019/20 financial year. GPW declared its surplus in accordance with its founding legislation, and a total of R200million was retained by National Treasury as a stakeholder contribution to the National Revenue Fund. It GPW has experienced a few challenges with the auditing process but has managed to engage with all the relevant stakeholders and audit committees.

The entity had challenges with audit processes of the financial year under review. This resulted in escalations to the AGSA by management. It continues with measures to improve areas upon which findings are raised. GPW experienced a few challenges with the auditing process but managed to engage with all the relevant stakeholders and audit committees. It could not make headway with the completion of capital projects, including the GPW’s Master Plan project, because of inherent dependencies that proved to have a serious bearing on the initiation of projects. Challenges in the GPW environment led to the start of the process of having generators in place. The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the Chief Information Officer(CIO) were looking at the capacity of the different generators, and the options available to mitigate the power challenges and effects of load shedding so that GPW could continue to sustain operations even during those periods.

The legislative mandate of GPW is to deliver security printing and related services to the South African government. The entity strives to make a significant contribution to the national outcomes of government and contributes to the Medium Term Strategic Framework (MTSF) priorities in support of the DHA, including building a capable, ethical, and developmental state working towards economic transformation and job creation, improving social cohesion, and building safe communities for a better country and continent.

The GPW’s annual performance in the 2019/20 financial year:
For the 2019/20 financial year, the GPW attained 18 out of the 23 performance targets planned for the financial year. The overall performance translates into a total 78 percent achievement. The five targets which were not achieved are:
- 99.5 percent system availability within the Information and Communications Technology (ICT)
- Obtaining a clean audit outcome from the AGSA
- 100 percent of GPW Headquarters building completed 
- Construction of ten percent of the Master Plan completed
- Submission of the reviewed GPW organisational structure to Minister of DHA, for approval

Regarding the GPW’s performance over the years, it was reported it achieved the same percentage achievement of targets as during the 2018/19 financial year. Since the 2016/17 financial year, the GPW has repositioned itself to focus on high impact and value. Efforts were made to implement the GPW’s Modernisation Plan, to modernise some of its typical environments. On its internal audits, it was reported the GPW’s Internal Audit Plan was approved by the Audit Committee and 100 percent of this was implemented in the operations and production space. All targets were achieved in the area of producing the right quality and quantity of documents. The GPW has been printing examinations with specific provinces in line with its specifications, and 825 000 court papers were also delivered in line with the specifications.

The annual performance of the GPW was broken down per branch to the Committee:
The Office of the Chief Executive Officer - Out of four targets, two targets were achieved. The two targets not achieved related to security vulnerabilities detected by security assessments mitigated and system availability. GPW is in the process of upgrading environmental infrastructure. The target has also been adjusted to 95.5 percent, in line with industry standards for the financial year 2020/21.

The Operations and Productions branch - All five targets were achieved. It was reported the measure is a ratio between the quantity of defects reported in the market versus the quantity of products made and handed over by GPW. The intention is to achieve and better the target. Stringent quality management processes led to a higher achievement.

The Strategic Management branch - All six targets were achieved. Strong partnerships between stakeholder engagement and sales led to more leads being identified. More leads were identified during engagements and exhibitions, which led to more governmental departments within the same countries being engaged.

The Financial Services branch - Two out of the five set targets were achieved. AGSA made findings on properties, plant and equipment, trade and other receivables, and irregular expenditure. These would continue to be tracked through a Post-Audit Action Plan. The positive working capital ratio is dependent on the current assets versus current liabilities. The GPW’s bank balance was higher than budgeted because the Procurement Plan was not being implemented during the financial year. The GPW also did not spend with regard to the Masterplan Project, which would also reduce the cash balance significantly.The net profit margin of the GPW is dependent on the sales versus the actual expenses. GPW’s sales were average, in line with the budget, but expenses were lower than expected due to the Procurement Plan not being implemented. Lower expenses led to a higher-than-expected net profit. Vacant positions added to savings on the payroll costs.

The unachieved targets related to GPW’s headquarters building being completed. The tender was cancelled because of a query received from a potential bidder and consultations ensued with the independent professional team. The specifications were reviewed, and the project will continue during the 2020/21 financial year. The construction of ten percent of the Master Plan was not completed since the tender could not be advertised. The consultation processes with the DPWI and the GPW will seek exemption.

The Human Resources branch - Two out of the three set targets were achieved, and the target relating to the review of the GPW’s organisational structure was not met. The reason for this was the late finalisation of the business case. The vacancy in the post of the Chief Financial Officer also impacted on the finalisation of this matter, and the project would be expedited in the 2020/21 financial year.

The GSA noted support for GPW in facilitating the construction of two buildings. Internally, GPW is looking at a deviation to assist the entity with both projects, including the construction of the Master Plan. The delays in achieving this target stems from its significant dependencies which result from being a governmental agency. The plans from the DPWI showed a five-to-six-year plan to finalise the building for GPW’s headquarters. GPW will opt to apply for an exemption in this regard. There will be a Project Plan from the GSA including a project management capacity and capability to manage the project on site.

Audit matters of the GPW for the 2019/20 financial year:
Ms Constance Shabangu, Chief Audit Executive, GPW, presented the audit matters of GPW.

The entity obtained a qualified audit opinion for the 2018/19 financial year. A disclaimer opinion was obtained for the 2019/20 period based on these 12 areas: Preparations of the financial statements, property, plant and equipment, trade and other receivables, deferred income, trade, and other payables, inventories, provisions, contingencies, revenue, cost of sales, statement of cash flows, and irregular expenditure.

An audit matrix was developed to monitor progress in implementing mitigating plans or further control measures. These measures are aimed at addressing both the internal audit and AGSA’s findings. It is being continuously monitored on a monthly and quarterly basis.

Regarding the resolution of the audit findings, GPW are taking these steps:
- The GPW’s management is tasked with continuously enforcing both internal controls to address all the gaps identified in the audit metrics.
- Regular reporting to the GPW’s Executive Committee on progress made by management,
- Up until now, of the findings captured in the audit metrics, 50 percent of the audit findings to date were resolved by management.
- The branches of ICT and Financial Services remain the two branches with a significant volume of findings still to be addressed. There have been interventions put in place to support management from outside.
- The management target by the end of the financial year is to have an average of 85 percent of the overall organisational findings raised, resolved.

The GPW said it is committed to resolve the findings of AGSA by clarifying areas of concern and strengthening the relationship between the entities.

Overview of the GPW’s financial statements for the 2019/20 financial year:
Mr Ian van der Merwe, Chief Financial Officer, GPW, presented the financial information for the GPW.

The GPW’s revenue for 2019 was R1.51billion, cost of sales was R732.34million, gross profit amounted to R779.3million, which resulted in a total comprehensive income of R536.28million for 2019, and R450.1 million for 2020. For 2019, the GPW’s total assets amounted to R3.78billion compared to R3.96billion for 2020. The liabilities of the entity amounted to R644.86million for 2019, as compared to R718.99million in 2020. The total cash of GPW at the end of 2019 amounted to R2.21billion, compared to R2.41billion in 2020.

The trade in receivables essentially comes from GPW’s debtors and income receivables, and also affects the GPW’s data age analysis which has now become extremely difficult with data loss. The GPW’s business from its main customer, Digital Home Office (DHO), stayed consistent but there was a significant increase from the South African Police Services (SAPS) for the provision of paper. GPW has not been able to surrender any of its retained funds to DHA, as it has to go through the National Revenue Fund (NRF) and the National Treasury.

Rebuilding financial data:
GPW experienced a power-surge on 4 February 2021 which resulted in the loss of critical financial data dating back from October 2019 to 4 February 2021. All efforts to retrieve the lost data were unsuccessful thus far. GPW developed a Project Plan which is divided into two phases to rebuild the lost data. The First Phase is meant to capture data from 1 February 2021, moving forward towards the end of this financial year, and the Second Phase will recapture all the historical data lost from 16 October 2019 to 31 January 2021.

GPW plans to present the Annual Financial Statement for 2020/21and 2021/22 financial years in May 2022. The 2020/21 data will be unsubstantiated, as the process to recapture the financial data will still be on-going. Once all data is recaptured, GPW will conduct quality assurance on the data to test its validity, completeness, and accuracy. A detailed summary of both phases were presented. To facilitate the auditing process, GPW is in the process of recovering this data. There is a need for GPW to engage with AGSA on a more technical front to resolve findings.

Recommendations
The GPW’s recommendations to improve its annual performance and audit outcomes were outlined. One of the recommendations was the development of a Supply Chain Management (SCM) for the ICT and operations and production, critical areas. GPW is prioritising the development of specifications to address all critical areas, including the data back-up and disaster recovery sites. GPW’s contract management will focus on long term contracts and supplier performance to derive value for money. Accounting Standards were amended into International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), and put GPW’s audit process in jeopardy. GPW must correct this. GPW has engaged with the Office of the Accountant General on this. GPW’s audit readiness is a major concern. The completeness and accuracy of finance and performance data is crucial, and is addressed by GPW’s Project Plan. It is necessary to recruit a facilities manager to address all facilities and maintenance related projects. The technical capacities of branches need to be enhanced.

A general ICT system is not adequately supporting GPW’s business. Engagements are underway with the State Information Technology Agency (SITA) to procure a system which would serve to support all operations, including the e-Gazette system. GPW continues to strengthen its relationship with National Treasury, AGSA, its internal governance structures, and DHA to enlist its support and to build confidence in management practices.

Ms Fosi said GPW collaborated with the oversight entities and will engage with AGSA following a de-briefing session to strengthen the entities’ relationship. The GPW is doing better than in the previous financial years, and will follow up on its undertaking to build a relationship with AGSA. Such deliberations will continue in the future.

Discussion
Ms T Legwase (ANC) commended the GPW for its positive outcomes. She referred to the nature of work done by the GPW, and asked if it considered using any kind of backup system to mitigate the effects during load shedding, without affecting the entity’s performance.

The GPW previously said construction of headquarters would start in the 2020/21 financial year. Ms Legwase asked if this process started; if the asset register was corrected since the last financial year, considering the findings could not be reconciled with the asset record; and asked the GPW to give the Committee a detailed report on its responses to the findings of the AGSA, since there were instances where the AGSA said the GPW relied on unreliable data to calculate the credit loss. She asked why Parliament should accept the financial statements when there is no documentary evidence to back up the GWP’s reported financial performance.

Mr A Roos (DA) said the Chief Executive Officer of the GPW told the Committee the power surge caused financial data system failure, which was now confirmed by the GPW’s Chief Financial Officer. It sounded like the Minister of the DHA said he was sure this was not an accident. He asked if the Minister of the DHA was saying this data loss was not an accident, or if he was saying something else. The GPW hit rock-bottom from 2016 to 2017 and had unqualified audits with findings. In the 2018/19 financial year, it got worse with the GPW getting a qualified audit opinion; and now the GPW received a disclaimer opinion, which is the lowest possible level.

The AGSA said the situation is one of gross negligence and incompetence, referring here to the financial records management and accounting standards. He agreed with Ms Legwase’s question and asked why Parliament should accept the financial statements when there is no documentary evidence to back up the GWP’s reported financial performance. This is exacerbated if one considers AGSA said GWP relies on unreliable data in its financial statements. He asked why GPW does not have a simple off-site backup of absolutely critical data in place; he asked what the cost of this recovery project is; and if the Minister of the DHA took action against the GPW’s Chief Executive Officer concerning the complete lack of financial record management which is required by legislation?

The review of the GPW’s organisation structure submitted for approval by the Minister has not been achieved for the second year in a row, with the same excuses being given about some late finalisation of the business case. He asked how the finalisation of the business case can take over two years, and said it is necessary for the GPW to report on this issue.

The Committee heard in its earlier meeting on the present day about the DHA being unable to balance the number of visa papers issued with the number of visas issued. This was a concern. He asked which processes the GPW have in place to balance the security pages issued to subcontractors; if there is an auditing mechanism regarding this; on the financial aspects he asked the GPW’s Chief Financial Officer to provide clarity on how the tariffs were constant on the revenue side, but the input costs were increasing, yet the input costs were consistent in the previous three financial years and suddenly soared. He wanted to know what caused this and how GPW will manage it in the future. He asked why there were credit losses; regarding the deferred income of 473 million, he asked for reasons why the government is paying for services not rendered yet; he asked for clarity on what the industry standard is for systems’ uptime, since the GPW’s downtime increased by almost eight times in the 2019/20 financial year.

Members received complaints about the Government Gazette website being down regularly, and this service is crucial to the functioning of the courts. He asked for clarity on how the downtime is going to affect things like the court system and other functions which rely on the Government Gazette.

Mr K Pillay, (ANC) asked for clarity on what the timeframe is to resolve the issues relating to the GPW’s financial records and the recovery of the lost data; how GPW will prevent similar occurrences in the future; regarding the Task Team appointed by the Minister of the DHA to investigate the loss of data, he proposed the presentation be submitted to the Committee by the end of November 2021, as this will be in keeping with the requests of the AGSA.

Ms M Modise, (ANC) said the Members of the Committee strongly feel there are serious negative findings which were highlighted by the AGSA’s report regarding the financial performance of the GPW. The Committee needs to urge the DHA to promptly develop a turnaround plan or to address those issues, particularly as it relates to gross negligence. She supported Mr Pillay’s proposal for a Task Team, appointed by the Minister of the DHA, to submit its findings to the Committee by the end of November 2021. The Executive Authority of the GPW must be focused on achieving an effective and an efficient governance structure, with stronger measures of accountability. The Committee needs to do regular follow-ups with the GPW. She asked who will be held responsible for the lost data and who will be responsible for recapturing the missing data. She appreciated the sound and healthy degrees of revenue collection from the GPW, but noted concern about the future of the GPW, if proper financial controls are not implemented.

The Committee Chairperson said the questions focus on the issues raised by the AGSA. The repetitive and alarming issues raised by the AGSA, compels the Committee to give more attention to the work done. The Minister of the DHA appointed various teams to investigate, including the Hawks, and it is now at a point where the Committee should interact with the progress report of the investigation.

The Committee will hold the Minister of the DHA accountable for the operations of the GPW. There must be accountability from the GPW and the Minister of the DHA on the issues raised. The continuous lack of progress on the Master plan and the GPW’s building needs more clarity. There is a need to engage with the Minister of the DPWI on this matter.

Regarding the issues on Information and Communication Technology (ICT), there are concerns which compel the Minister of the DHA to act on the loss of a data which contributed to the current financial and non-financial submissions. The Committee is not sure how reliably the GPW and the Minister of the DHA is able to confirm that recovering data will not be compromised, and if a tool to manage this capturing process was tested.

Responses by the GPW
Ms Fosi said the GPW’s management is also worried by the tone and findings of the AGSA’s report and realises there is work to be done to remedy the issues which were highlighted. The findings of the AGSA were incorporated into the GPW’s audit matrix so findings can be resolved. Over 50 percent of the targets for the GPW’s internal auditing processes were achieved, and the remaining targets will be achieved by the end of the financial year. Despite the challenges the entity experienced, there is no evidence of malfeasance. To date, the GPW is awaiting the outcome of the review panel so the relevant steps can be taken. The GPW also tabled investigation reports on the financial matters to check if there was evidence of this within the organisation, based on the previous reports. The GPW has employed the services of an independent law firm to help the entity investigate such forms of irregular or wasteful expenditure and come up with recommendations for consequence management to be exercised.

Speaking on AGSA’s findings of unreliable data, Ms Fosi said the GPW should go on record to say there was evidence which was submitted. There were disagreements at the time, so some of the evidence was not considered within the turnaround time. The GPW is not satisfied with the audit outcome and put mechanisms in place to ensure the good record which was there before, will be recognised. There is a concerted effort to try and rebuild the organisation of the GPW, to ensure the management of the entity are held accountable and responsible for its performance.

Mr van der Merwe addressed the cost of sales and said this is a direct result of the input costs which were good in the financial year. He addressed the raw material of R18 million, additional salaries of R25 million, and maintenance of R9 million, and said it is the nature of the business and it reflects the increases the GPW’s deal with on an annual basis. The debt was consistent since 2017 and is influenced by departmental budget cuts. The tariff increase, the issue of trades and receivables, and the issue of credit losses, effectively comes down to a bad debt provision. The GPW needs to engage more robustly with the AGSA to increase its capacity for technically understanding its reconciliation processes. On deferred income, he said the issue has some historical background to it as there was some funds received from National Treasury, and this has become a non-cash item on the GPW’s depreciation allocation or depreciation calculations. The GPW employed some resources to assist with fast-tracking recovery of the lost data.

Mr Apleni, the Chief Information Officer, replied to the issue of data backups, and said the GPW rebuilt its systems in the back environment to ensure data is available. Secondly, the GPW also procured additional hardware, space hardware, to ensure the data storage backup environment is enhanced to cater for data growth and sustainability. The GPW is now running daily, weekly, and monthly backups to ensure the restoration of its data. The entity has set a long-term strategy for backing up its data. On the questions about industry standards, he said there are a couple of standards which one would employ for recovery time and system availability. When talking about the delivery of high-quality services, there are international standards which emphasise the critical role of people and sources relative to technology. Another standard is to have scheduled downtime for security updates, but the GPW’s service-level agreements actually refer to standard. This shows business is not intercepted and is less interrupted as far as downtime is concerned. The long-term goal of the GPW is to move to a cloud-based system.

The GPW said there was a delay in its organisational structure because of the need for an intense consultation process with the leaders of the entity. Leaders must look into manpower needs and the change which was encountered in leadership. Another reason for the delay was the GPW’s intention to develop the structure and have the Department of Public Services and Administration (DPSA) on board. The DPSA gave its input, and the GPW also engaged with other governmental departments of input before ultimately submitting the proposed organisational structure to the Minister of the DHA. It has since been approved by the relevant Ministers, and the DPSA engaged with the GPW regarding corrections which had to be made, and is awaiting final approval.

On the issue of visas, it was reported the GPW issues numbers whenever there is a batch of visas which needs to be printed and issued, and the visas will also have issuing numbers. Quality-checking processes then include the scanning mechanism which is built into the process. It checks for any duplication of numbers, and checks are also done in the repackaging process. This prevents duplication from occurring in the internal printing process. The production has been on target as per the requests which have come through to the GPW.

Regarding the poor audit outcomes, GPW said there is a need to fix its internal controls and monitoring systems, and to fill up the vacancies for an improved turnaround time.

Ms Fosi said the GPW took note of all of the comments from the Committee. A request was made for GPW to submit a detailed report based on the findings of the AGSA’s unreliable data. The GPW undertakes to submit the requested Turnaround Plan to the Committee before the end of November 2021.

Minister Motsoaledi said the Task Team which was appointed to investigate the causes of the data loss at the GPW is made out of lawyers, experts in governance, and investigators. The report from the Task Team will determine who is accountable and if there has been any malfeasance in the process which led to the data loss. Once the report is finalised, he committed to submit it to the Committee as soon as possible. The position of General Manager of Production at the GPW has been advertised.

The Committee Chairperson said the Committee made recommendations to GPW on how it should carry its work forward, and noted the issues the GPW committed to correct. The GPW will provide Members with the Turnaround Plan, and a report on how it will implement the AGSA’s findings by the end of November 2021.

The Committee agreed to deal with areas of concern and determine the course of action which the Minister of the DHA should take at the level of GPW. This will be done after the Committee engaged with the Select Committee on Public Accounts, as the main oversight body dealing with governance in the financial systems of our institutions. While the GPW committed to ensure the adverse findings of the AGSA are resolved, the Committee was concerned about the lack of adequate financial controls at the entity. The Committee urged the DHA to promptly develop a turnaround plan or strategy to address those issues, particularly as it relates to gross negligence. The Executive Authority of the GPW must be focused on achieving an effective and an efficient governance structure, with stronger measures of accountability.

The meeting was adjourned.
 

Download as PDF

You can download this page as a PDF using your browser's print functionality. Click on the "Print" button below and select the "PDF" option under destinations/printers.

See detailed instructions for your browser here.

Share this page: