SABS on Role of Standards & Accreditation in Trade Liberalisation

Share this page:

Meeting Summary

A summary of this committee meeting is not yet available.

Meeting report

20 September 2000

Documents handed out
Internationalization of Standards within the WTO-TBT Context - text outline only [for power point version, e-mail]
SABS Position Paper Regarding the Implementation of a Technical Regulation Best Practice Model for South Africa

Chairpersons: Dr R Davies; Mr M Moosa

In respect of compliance with international standards South Africa compares favourably to other developing economies.

Policing the SADC region to ensure that they comply with standards was described as ''a nightmare''. The problem is that there is uncertainty as to where the responsibility to do this lies. Presently different institutions are passing the buck, for example the Customs Union passes it onto the South African Bureau of Standards and so on. The uncertainty is expected to continue until the roles of roleplayers are defined by a regulatory regime. Discussions on this issue must take place.

Dr Carolissen made the presentation on behalf of the SABS. The points he made included the following:
- Developing countries must not lower their standards as this would be a retrogressive step. Instead they must bridge the gap between the skills base and international standards.
- Developed economies want to push their own standards as international standards. In this regard the SABS (as a founding member of ISO) looks after the interests of developing economies.
- There must be internationally acceptable certification to show exporters and importers that SA conforms to international standards.
- If there are shortcomings in SA's conformity assessment system then this will result in re-testing overseas. This adds to the cost of the SA product and the effect will be that SA's competitiveness will decrease.
- It is important that trends of trade partners be monitored. The WTO agreement on TBT (Technical Barriers to Trade) requires that any proposed technical regulations must be reported to the WTO. The WTO then informs the other WTO members. The SABS is setting up a communication system to ensure that government stays informed and that businesses know what is going on.
- SA has 3500 unique national standards. This is higher than any of the countries in the SADC region.

A committee member noted that the South African unique national standards figures were compared mostly to SADC countries. He asked what the position of SA was when compared to other emerging economies such as Brazil.
Dr Carolissen replied that SA compared favourably.

Dr Davies mentioned the potential advantage of strengthening the ISO and commented that a standard is simply a minimum requirement. It does not make one the best. SA's standards should be above the international minimum in order to give SA an advantage. Dr Carolissen added that one must also ensure that international standards accommodate South African needs.

Dr Davies asked for Dr Carolissen to comment on:
- The role of the SABS as a sub-agent for Europe (in terms of the SABS being a certifying agency for European products),
- Whether technical assistance is provided to SADC countries, and
- The ISO-WTO relationship.

Dr Carolissen confirmed that the SABS is currently recognised by the EU as certificators for certain products. He said that the SABS would like to extend this role to other areas of export.

On the issue of providing technical assistance to SADC countries, Dr Carolissen noted that the SABS is active in SADC structures. In this regard they play a role in various committees, example the SADC subcommittee on standards.

On the ISO-WTO relationship, Dr Carolissen said that the WTO established a subcommittee which identifies standards as a barrier to trade. The ISO also noticed that these trade blocks exist. There is some dynamic between the ISO and the WTO on this issue.

The co-chairperson, Mr Moosa asked if they were policing the standards of products and commodities which are coming into SA. If SA is importing from the SADC countries and the levels of their standards are as low as indicated then that could present a real problem for SA. What is the SABS doing to ensure that the SADC region improves their standards? He also asked if the SABS were offering assistance to industries to improve their standards.

Dr Carolissen replied that policing this is a nightmare because there is uncertainty about whose responsibility it is. This uncertainty will continue until roles are defined by a regulatory regime. The problem at the moment is that different institutions are passing the buck, for example the Customs Union passes it onto the SABS.

Mr Moosa suggested that the roleplayers should meet to discuss concerns around policing. He suggested that Parliament facilitate such discussions if the SABS wished.

In response to Mr Moosa's second question Dr Carolissen replied that there is such a thing as voluntary standards. This occurs when the industries get together and there is consensus between them on particular standards. If someone then wants to enter the market, they must meet that minimum standard which has been agreed to by the industries themselves.
The SABS has developed training courses for SMMEs. They try to get them accredited and get the SMMEs to understand the standards and to apply them. The problem is that they think it is a waste of money. They want them to understand that if they meet standards then it enhances their competitive position. Thus, a general education process has to take place.

Mr Durr (ACDP) gave the following comments and questions:
- He noted that in the past, SA has had equivalency agreements with countries such as Italy and Germany. The effect of these agreements is that SA standards are considered equivalent to the standards of the country with which the agreement is undertaken. He asked if these agreements still exist.
- He asked for a comment on WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organisation).
- The SABS should be consulted in respect of agreements which come before the Committee, for example the Abuja Treaty which the Committee had discussed that morning. They can then advise the Committee before they make decisions. Mr Moosa agreed with him saying that they needed more integration and more dialogue.

Dr Carolissen could not comment on the bi-lateral trade agreements or on WIPO. He assured Mr Durr that he would find out about this and get back to him.

The meeting was adjourned.


No related



  • We don't have attendance info for this committee meeting

Download as PDF

You can download this page as a PDF using your browser's print functionality. Click on the "Print" button below and select the "PDF" option under destinations/printers.

See detailed instructions for your browser here.

Share this page: