National Treasury: Budget Speech
10 May 2010
11 May 2010
Honourable ministers and deputy ministers
This government has set itself a clear vision for the next five years. Its vision is embodied in the medium term strategic framework (MTSF) and the 12 outcomes which government intends achieving over the medium term.
The MTSF and these outcomes are the guiding principles that inform the work of the National Treasury and are in line with its strategic focus areas of promoting economic growth and work opportunities, reducing poverty, promoting the optimal allocation and utilisation of resources ensuring good governance and accountability and maintaining macroeconomic stability.
Improved financial management
The National Treasury's resolve to improve financial management and ensure that funds are spent effectively remains unwavering. The Office of the Accountant-General is to accelerate current efforts targeted at, rooting out wastage, corruption, promoting cost efficiency and phasing out ineffective programmes.
Procurement reforms are now currently underway to address the current supply chain management challenges and at the same time align it to government's broader economic objectives. Some of the interventions being explored include analyses of the market, benchmarking of prices, determining the most appropriate method of procurement and due diligence audits on information provided by bidders prior to the awarding of contracts.
This may also result in the centralisation of bids for strategic commodities. Oversight in respect of procurement planning and the auditing of the processes of adjudication and selection of suppliers before the award of large contracts is also to be strengthened.
Integrated financial management systems
National Treasury will maintain government's current financial management systems at a level of 98 percent availability to users by implementing the third phase of the integrated financial management system, which will focus on rolling out the completed procurement, human resource and asset management modules in 2010/11 and fast tracking the development and implementation of the remaining modules in 2011/12.
Strengthening of the country's intergovernmental fiscal system
The period ahead will also see a further strengthening of the country's intergovernmental fiscal system. In line with some of the proposals made by the relevant parliamentary committees when the Division of Revenue Bill was processed, the National Treasury is reviewing the fiscal framework for provincial and local government.
Specifically, the provincial equitable share formula is reviewed to improve targeting and to ensure alignment between the delivery agreements signed between the president and the ministers responsible for concurrent functions like education and health.
Honourable chair, members will appreciate the vast fiscal differences that exist between the country's municipalities. The review of the local government fiscal framework will attempt to align, without compromising local accountability, the fiscal system to these differences.
In addition, a process is currently underway to review all conditional grants with the aim of rationalising them to ensure that the sphere of government that is closer to the people is funded directly to accelerate the delivery of quality basic services. These reforms are to be phased in from next year.
Improving municipal financial performance
Steps to improve the quality of local government budgets are at an advanced stage. With the implementation of the new municipal budget and reporting regulations, which prescribes norms and standards for the preparation and format of municipal budgets, last year, the quality of municipal budget information has improved considerably.
As from the 2010/11 municipal financial year, all 283 municipalities are required to prepare their budgets, adjustment budgets and in-year financial reports in a uniform, prescribed format. This will greatly facilitate transparency and understanding of municipal budgets by councils, communities and other stakeholders and thus enhance oversight.
The Siyenza Manje programme, currently administered by the Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA), seeks to build capacity in municipalities. In the past financial year, the programme succeeded in unlocking capital spending of R8.2 billion. Government is currently reviewing the programme to improve its targeting and to ensure its impact is sustainable. Part of the review would look at options to strengthen local government governance, infrastructure delivery and financial management.
It is expected that that these interventions, together with the review of the local government fiscal framework, will put government in a better position to attain a responsive, accountable, effective and efficient local government system (ninth outcome), sustainable human settlements (eighth outcome) and vibrant, equitable and sustainable rural communities (seventh outcome).
Development finance institutions (DFIs) as a catalyst for growth
As government, we are continuously confronted with the question of how best to position our DFIs in order to enhance their capacities to effectively and efficiently deliver significant and tangible developmental results to all the qualifying needy individuals and institutions of South Africa.
This means that the contributions of DFIs must be measured not by meaningless statistical numbers, but by their direct impact on the lives of the ordinary people of South Africa observable through sustained improvements in incomes and standards of living as a result of access to DFI funding, projects, facilities, and infrastructure base.
In spite of government's concerted efforts, there are still some very significant challenges our DFIs face. These include the sheer quantum and volume of under development especially in provinces such as the Eastern Cape, Limpopo as well as several places even within the metro areas and the limited capacities of our DFIs in terms of financial resource base to satisfy these needs.
These constraints are further impacted by lack of institutional capacities in most implementing institutions such as municipalities, beneficiary contractors, emerging farmers and small, medium and micro-enterprises (SMMEs).
The total combined balance sheet of all our national DFIs put together is approximately R142 billion (2009). A strategic partnership with banks and capital market funds is going to be key to leveraging development finance to ensure greater impact moving forward.
Approximately 98 percent (R139 billion) of the total assets of South Africa's DFIs is concentrated in four major DFIs (DBSA, IDC, Land Bank, NEF and NHFC). The Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) constitutes 52 percent of the total DFIs asset base, whilst the DBSA constitutes 28 percent.
The National Treasury is Executive Authority to two DFIs, the Development Bank of Southern Africa and the Land and Agricultural Development Bank of South Africa (Land Bank).
Development Bank of Southern Africa
Currently the DBSA's geographical spread of its developmental loans exhibits a bias towards resourceful metros: Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and the Western Cape followed by significant presence in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and multinational investments. Due to this bias, government challenged the DBSA to deepen its development impact and in particular to increase its support to poorer municipalities as follows:
(a) Increase funding of weaker municipalities' operations and maintenance of existing and new infrastructure
(b) Assist weaker municipalities with project identification, preparation and implementation to enhance service delivery, growth and improved revenues
(c) Assist municipalities' capacities through improved access to appropriate funding, including securing the participation of appropriate private sector partners for enhanced project quality and risk mitigation in project delivery
(d) Assist municipalities' administrative systems, management quality and operational processes through the Siyenza Manje programme in order to ensure their diversified revenue streams
(e) Assist with the eradication of classroom backlogs in some provinces.
To achieve this, the current budget includes measures intended to enhance the DBSA’s capital structure by increasing its callable capital by R15.2 billion from R4.8 billion to R20 billion. This will effectively increase the DBSA’s lending capacity from R38 billion currently to R140 billion.
Since the increase of the DBSA’s callable capital requires the amendment of the DBSA Act, which normally takes time for Parliament to approve, the Minister of Finance has in the interim provided a guarantee of R15.2 billion to the DBSA.
In order to allow the Land Bank to effectively implement its turnaround strategy, the Minister of Finance announced support for the Land Bank with a guarantee of R3.5 billion which will be converted into a capital injection over the MTEF period. In December 2009, the Land Bank received R1 billion from the Adjustment Appropriation Act 2009, reducing the guarantee to R2.5 billion. The Land Bank has been allocated a R750 million in 2010/11 financial year, a further R750 million in 2011/12 and R1 billion in and 2012/13.
Official development assistance (ODA)
While ODA makes up just less than one percent of our budget, it is important in assisting our country to achieve its overall developmental agenda. The targeted programmes in some sectors like water, health and science and technology is significant, demonstrating the significant value added by donor agencies.
It is therefore important that all government departments receiving ODA improve their reporting and ensure that such assistance is aligned to their budget priorities and adds value to their key development goals. In the spirit of accountability and in affording Parliament an opportunity to engage on ODA related matters the National Treasury will report on a regular basis to Parliament on government's interaction with our development partners.
The 2010 FIFA World Cup
The 2010 FIFA World Cup is an African event. Africa is the theatre and South Africa is the stage. The awarding of the right to host the 2010 FIFA World Cup to South Africa in 2004 was a great achievement in itself. Through the medium of television, radio, the internet and print media, a further opportunity exists, between 11 June and 11 July, to showcase the country to billions of people all over the globe including the key decision makers in the global investment community.
We will continue to work with the global investment community to attract the much needed funding for further economic growth. There is no doubt that the hosting the 2010 FIFA World Cup has been a catalyst for development. This is evident in social and economic infrastructure that we see all over the country.
In addition, the hosting of the event also contributed to the development of skills, enhanced construction capacity, the creation of employment and economic growth. For example construction of the stadiums sustained 130 200 direct and indirect jobs during the 2007 and 2010 period. Direct jobs accounted for the majority of jobs and was sustained at 66 800. Stadiums construction had a R15 billion direct, indirect and induced economic impact. R7.4 billion of benefits accrued to households. R2 billion accrued to low income households.
On the eve of this event I thank those who have worked diligently to make the hosting of this event a reality. We are indeed ready to host this great event and we now have the skills, competencies and types of structures to deliver mega multi-faceted and integrated infrastructure projects in the future.
Chairperson, I like to thank the Minister of Finance Mr Pravin Gordhan for his steady hand in the Ministry of Finance, officials from the departments and entities reporting to the Minister of Finance for their dedication and commitment to the to the public service, Members of the Standing Committee on Finance and the Committee Appropriation under the leadership of honourable Thaba Mufamadi and honourable Elliot Sogoni for the valuable contribution to the our work in government and my family for their support.
I thank you.
Budget Vote Speech for National Treasury by Pravin Gordhan, Minister of Finance
11 May 2010
It is one year exactly since the appointment of the new government, and nearly three months since this year’s Budget was presented to the House.
Last year’s financial accounts are now closed. Allow me to begin with a word of appreciation for the many thousands of public servants who have quietly and diligently kept orderly books of account over the past year, contributing to sound audit reports and measurable value for money in government expenditure.
The heroes of good governance are these honest, hard-working officials. The revenue at our disposal, and effective stewardship of our public resources, would not be possible without their ordinary and disciplined patience with double-entry record-keeping in the public accounts. Yes, I know there is much to be done to improve public accounting. But the fact that we can meet today, six weeks after the close of the financial year, and comment on the fiscal outcome with confidence that we have the numbers at our disposal is testament to the sound foundations that are in place in the work of the Accountant-General, the Auditor-General and our Accounting Standards Board.
Mister Speaker, the books have been closed on last year – revenue was about R8 billion more than we expected, and expenditure a bit less. The budget deficit was 6.7 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) – rather better than 7.3 percent that was anticipated, though considerably wider than 1.0 percent of GDP recorded in 2008/09.
The Ministers’ Committee on the Budget and the Treasury have begun work on next year’s budget. Preliminary data suggest that we will see moderate economic growth this year, perhaps somewhat higher than we projected in February. But last week’s employment statistics were a sobering reminder that more must be done, more urgently, to restructure our economy and create jobs, particularly for young people.
Nationally and internationally, economic and financial developments continue to present formidable challenges both to our understanding of the growth and development process and to the practical implementation of policy and government programmes.
We have been witness to some extraordinary events unfolding in
Debt crisis and structural balance
After months of uncertainty and inaction, the European Union has taken action to ward off a further crisis in financial markets.
Despite immense public anger and protest action, the Government of Greece has been obliged to enact a 30 billion euro fiscal curtailment programme, while negotiating a 110 billion euro debt restructuring arrangement with member countries of the European Union and multilateral financial institutions.
Several other European economies face the possibility of similar difficulties, and questions are being asked about the sustainability of the European Union itself. Late on Sunday, the EU and the IMF agreed to an historically unprecedented one trillion euro financial support programme.
So on the one hand, the global recession of 2008 and 2009 appears to be over. Many economies including our own have experienced encouraging growth in trade and activity over the past six months. Yet on the other hand there is widespread concern that the fiscal debt problems of OECD countries will spill over into another financial crisis and a second wave of trade and employment cutbacks.
The problems are most severe for countries that entered the recession with high levels of public debt – in several cases in excess of 100 percent of GDP. Between 2004 and 2007 – at the height of the global boom –
Though we are not in this position, we need to take a closer look at the current turbulence in global finances, because the underlying trends may hold lessons for our own development path. How did other countries get into such difficulties? The immediate crisis is typically straightforward – it is a story that has taken many forms, in many countries, over many centuries. Unsustainable borrowing is the mirror-image of imprudent lending – both fuelled by an unrealistic expectation that good times will last forever. When the bubble bursts, borrowers pull back their plans and lenders withdraw credit, trade declines, unemployment rises and businesses come under stress.
But this cycle of market euphoria and disillusion is just the surface manifestation of underlying structural imbalances. In the
In many European economies, the underlying problems are rather different, embedded in difficult-to-change social institutions: pension systems that are unsustainable because life expectancy is now so much higher than it was when these benefit schemes were designed; public sector wage and employment trends that are unaffordable; tax systems that have failed to keep pace with business modernisation; industries that have been left behind by global trends in trade and technology.
Are these simply
Our overall fiscal position is in good health. Consistent with our counter-cyclical stance, we were running a fiscal surplus before the crisis broke, and debt was 27 percent of GDP. We can therefore respond to the crisis with a wider deficit for several years, without threatening the integrity of the public finances.
We will maintain our fiscal strategy, and at the same time address some key development challenges ahead.
We have not yet made enough progress in our social security and retirement reform agenda – we have an excellent opportunity here to design arrangements that will be durable and equitable, and will avoid the mistakes that many other countries have made in promising more than can be afforded.
In public sector employment we have made substantial improvements to remuneration and career progression in recent years. Over the period ahead, we need to ensure that keep the right balance between paying better wages and salaries, investing in productivity improvements and employing more civil servants in front line services. If we are to achieve sustainable improvements in living standards for all, we have to ensure that salary increases are affordable, equitable and aligned with improvements in performance and service delivery.
And in growing the wider economy, broadening participation, deepening trade and strengthening our revenue base, we have recognised that a new growth path is needed, that industrial policy has to be founded on a well-considered action plan and that we need to do more to promote a dynamic economy, capable of responding both to domestic demand and international opportunities. In reflecting on Europe’s experience, we surely also can see lessons for regional cooperation with our neighbours in Southern Africa, the importance of strengthening South-South trade and financial relations and the urgency of governance reform in the world’s multilateral financial institutions.
So there is much to be learnt from the international experience, and we will no doubt feel some of the effects of the uncertainty in financial markets and possible downturn in trade again over the period ahead. But the primary lesson is that we must remain focused on our own long-term structural growth and development challenges – these are different in important respects from the European or Asian situation, and we have to construct a development path that is suited to our own circumstances, taking into account our commitment to and shared interest in Africa and the region around us.
Towards an inclusive growth path
As many commentators have noted, Mister Speaker, while we have become a more integrated community over the past sixteen years, we remain a profoundly unequal society.
What must we do to become more equal? How do we overcome the economic gulf between rich and poor, how do we give practical meaning to our commitment to a
We should not fall into the trap of thinking that there is an easy road. Economic history is littered with examples of interventions that were short-sighted and self-defeating; policy measures that ignored their unintended negative effects. And even successful and necessary interventions require careful balancing: industrialisation and urbanisation bring transport congestion and rapidly growing housing needs; progress in service delivery is unavoidably uneven in its impact.
But there are clear signposts we need to follow.
One is that employment is a key success factor. Income support and welfare services can contribute to poverty reduction, and education is an important enabling condition, but if workseekers cannot find jobs, then the unemployment fault-line remains a formidable dividing line between opportunity and vulnerability, between progress and despair.
This leads to a second signpost, which is really a cluster of direction indicators, pointing in a multitude of directions. An economic growth path has to create jobs along many roads – a range of policy measures is needed, and jobs must be created in many sectors, many industries, many occupations, many kinds of skills and associated learning opportunities.
Similarly, the review of our further education institutions and the sector education and training authorities that Minister Nzimande has undertaken is a necessary and critical reform programme – for long-run growth and development has to be accompanied by more effective and better targeted skills development, training and vocational education.
A range of fiscal interventions is also needed, some new and some reinforcements of existing programmes. These include a counter-cyclical policy stance, focused especially on infrastructure investment, strengthening of the Expanded Public Works Programme, targeted relief and income support programmes, trade promotion, capacity building and infrastructure investment in municipalities and, measures focused on youth employment. Responsibility for these and other initiatives is now explicitly set out in performance agreements of the economic cluster Ministers – whose mandate, President Zuma has rightly determined, is firmly focused on the job creation challenge.
I have already pointed to another signpost with important implications for both fiscal sustainability and the long-term trend in income distribution – I refer to the still outstanding work shared amongst several Ministers and Departments for social security reform and the financing of health services.
But income distribution is not only an outcome of public policy and programmes, it is also shaped by social norms, remuneration practices and the exercise of power and privilege. Extreme earnings disparities cause offence not just when they are associated with profiteering or financial malfeasance, but also when the reward for honest work seems disproportionate or weakly aligned with incentives. There is a national discourse needed here, aimed at moderating high-earning remuneration levels within our large corporations, including state-owned enterprises – for the social dimensions of earnings trends can surely not be ignored in the economic calculus of risk and rewards. We are creating a dangerous culture in
Improving service delivery: accountability and value for money
Alongside the economic policy responsibilities we share with several other Ministries, Mister Speaker, much of the Treasury’s work is focused on integrity, accountability and value for money in the use of public funds.
This is an especially difficult challenge in times of economic stringency.
President Zuma has called for us to do things differently, to ensure that we bring better services to South Africans, efficiently and effectively. This is the central aim of our budget process. In the period ahead there will be further reforms to the budgeting system, taking into account the new performance mandates of Ministers and with a special focus on monitoring and measuring performance and progress against identified targets.
We are also mindful of the need for further progress in financial management, supply chain management, human resource management and governance of public entities. I need to express my appreciation for the work of Parliamentary committees in strengthening oversight of government spending, and in particular for the diligence of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts.
We must also thank our trade unions and other organisations for their support in fighting corruption. We must intensify our efforts to root out this culture of “easy money”. Instead, we must surely aim to be able to say: “I’ve worked hard, done creative things, saved and invested, and this made money!”
Under this spotlight is a very considerable share of national income. In the current financial year, national and provincial government will spend R907 billion, 33.6 percent of the GDP – up from 28 percent just five years ago.
Treasury’s first order of business for 2010 is the implementation of the 2010 Budget and the development of the 2011 Budget. Within the currently strained economic and public finance context, the budget process this year will focus strongly on the realignment of existing resources towards priority areas. Cost saving will therefore continue to be an integral part of departmental budgeting and expenditure analysis, as part of a broader review of expenditure and service delivery priorities.
The Treasury is also strengthening its capacity to address long-term infrastructure and capital investment requirements and alternatives. We will in due course benefit from the work of the newly appointed Planning Commission, and we particularly welcome the range of expertise and diversity of perspectives that its membership will bring.
South African Revenue Service
Providing government with funds to finance public services requires that sufficient resources be raised from the economy to pay for these services. In this respect, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) has provided a sure foundation to our fiscus by raising the financial resources for expanded and accelerated service delivery. In this respect, we must all thank the millions of honest taxpayers who continue to contribute to the growth and development of our country, especially in these most difficult economic conditions. It remains a central focus of SARS’s work that all taxpayers should pay their fair share. This, regrettably, is still not the case! Several further steps will be taken to improve compliance in the year ahead.
Third party data from employers and financial institutions has proved highly effective in identifying cases of tax evasion including employers withholding PAYE deductions and taxpayers failing to disclose interest and other income.
Other sources of data – including the stock exchange data and registration data from other government departments such as Home Affairs and the Companies and intellectual property registration office (CIPRO) - provide further scope for closing the net on the non-compliant.
Using data from the Department of Social Welfare, the National Prosecuting Authority, the Special Investigations Unit, and the South African Revenue Service has identified more than 200 000 individuals who appear to be collecting social service grants unlawfully. Through verification activities country-wide, the authorities will now be in a position to not only collect taxes due from such individuals and apply the relevant punitive measures, but also be in a position to ensure that continued payments to such persons be discontinued with immediate effect.
From September this year SARS will require all those receiving any form of employment income – including those below the tax threshold – to be registered with SARS to help reduce the scope for non-compliance.
The net is also closing in on those who have sought refuge in tax havens. In the aftermath of the global financial crisis there has been a welcome acceptance of the need for greater transparency of financial dealings. In the tax arena a number of jurisdictions that have previously been unwilling to share information with SARS have now signalled their willingness to do so. Agreement in principle on the text of Tax Information Exchange Agreements has been reached with the
The success of collaboration between tax, financial and enforcement agencies in the broader financial and justice systems is also evident from significant progress made in the earlier identification and more efficient dismantling of complex fraudulent schemes aimed at abusing the trust of citizens.
I can today report that further evidence of such collaboration was demonstrated in the early hours of this morning in Durban and Pretoria where SARS investigators assisted by the South African Police, clamped down on a company listed on the Johannesburg Alternative Stock Exchange, suspected to be involved in another multi-million rand suspected fraudulent investment scheme involving the abuse of trust of vulnerable citizens - this time the product is a so-called "immune booster pack for HIV/Aids sufferers".
Those who seek to abuse the value-added tax (VAT) system to defraud the fiscus will also be pursued – as recent arrests have shown. Increased export controls as part of the Customs modernisation programme will assist SARS in identifying fraudulent VAT refunds linked to exports.
SARS and the Department of Home Affairs have developed a real-time risk-based movement control system which significantly enhances our capability to streamline the movement of goods and persons through our ports while at the same time stopping unwanted goods and people. The system is currently being implemented in all key ports of entry ahead of the 2010 FIFA World Cup.
At the same time, continued enforcement actions by Customs and enforcement units in SARS, in conjunction with the South African Police, the Directorate of Priority Crimes and a number of external stakeholders have already made a major impact in the smuggling, manufacturing and distribution of counterfeit goods. More than one million counterfeit DVD’s have been seized over the past three months. In addition during the last two weeks In April there were seizures of counterfeit World Cup clothing worth more than R108 million.
Financial Intelligence Centre
Mister Speaker, the Financial Intelligence Centre continues to play an important role in assisting to identify the proceeds of crime, money laundering and the financing of terrorism. In this past year the Centre identified R66.1 billion that passed through bank accounts in
The Centre continues to lead the South African delegation to the Financial Action Task Force which deals with combating of money laundering and terror financing standards. At the request of the G-20 the FATF has undertaken a process to identify countries that pose a risk to the international financial regulatory system by not having sufficient measures in place to minimise the abuse of financial institutions. This is one of the issues that the G-20 has been dealing with as it seeks to bring reform and stability to the financial system.
Public investment and development priorities
Mister Speaker, the finance family includes, alongside the National Treasury and the South African Revenue Service, several other institutions with notable roles and responsibilities in securing sound and sustainable financial development.
I am pleased to confirm that the working relationship between the Treasury and the Reserve Bank remains strong, and indeed is critical to our successful negotiation of the uncertainties of the current financial environment. Members of the House will be aware that we have tabled proposals to further secure the independence of the Reserve Bank, to deal amongst other matters with anomalies in the law that might otherwise be abused by opportunistic shareholders. We have a duty not just to protect the integrity of our central bank, but also to affirm its role as a source of statistics and economic analysis, as supervisor of our banking system and as the centre of our international payment system. The Reserve Bank also plays a leading role in the development of the banking and payment systems in the wider region.
Members of the House will also be aware that the Financial Services Board has extensive responsibilities, and the fact that our banking sector and our major savings and insurance institutions remain in good health is in no small measure a consequence of the standards of regulatory oversight applied by the Reserve Bank and the Financial Services Board (FSB) – these are immeasurable institutional strengths.
Allow me to say a few words, before concluding, about an important savings fund which does not yet fall under FSB supervision, but which I believe should in due course also be subject to the Pensions Fund Act and associated regulatory standards. I refer to the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF), which pays pensions every month to some 300 000 former civil servants and invests funds on behalf of over a million employees of national and provincial government.
The GEPF is governed by a Board on which members and the state as employer are equally represented. A separation of administration of contributions and benefits from governance of the Fund has recently been completed. In future therefore a new agency, known as the Government Pensions Administration Agency, will report to Parliament on the administration of pensions on behalf of both the GEPF and the National Treasury, which has several post-retirement and other benefit funds provided for on programme 8 of the voted appropriation. The administration agency now has thirteen regional offices, including new centres at Pietermaritzburg,
The funds of the GEPF are invested by the Public Investment Corporation (PIC), which has steadily widened its funds under management to include not just government bonds but a range of equities, property and targeted infrastructure investments. During the year to March 2009, the PIC’s assets under management declined from R786 billion to R739 billion – largely as a result of the general decline in capital markets. During the 2009/10 year a strong recovery was achieved, bringing assets under management to over R900 billion, or some 23.6 percent up year-on-year.
Much of this investment is channelled to government infrastructure and development priorities, both through government bonds and direct investment in state-owned enterprises. Currently, R91.5 billion is in bonds issued by state-owned enterprises, including Eskom and Transnet issues, funding of the Airports Company to complete the new
In the process of creating value for the GEPF, the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF) and other investor clients, the PIC contributes directly and indirectly to a wide range of development projects. So for example, the PIC has invested R550 million in the development of Bridge City, a shopping mall in Kwa-Mashu, 25 km north-west of Durban city centre, which will be linked with central Durban by an underground railway station, which is set to be completed in 2011. Other future constructions include a 400-bed provincial hospital, a regional magistrate court; all linked to an inter-model transport hub for taxis, buses, rail and cars.
Financing in support of the National Industrial Policy Action Plan will be prioritised in the period ahead, together with support for affordable housing, educational loans, road infrastructure, and the taxi recapitalisation programme. About R30 billion is available to fund economic infrastructure, social infrastructure, sustainability, and job creation projects. Funds of the GEPF together with the Development Bank of Southern Africa will contribute to supporting Eskom in building additional generation capacity and improving the maintenance of its power stations. These are investments with clear long-term social and economic benefits, while also yielding satisfactory financial returns on a risk-adjusted basis.
In concluding let me return, Mister Speaker, to the uncertainty of the financial and economic outlook of the world economy. These are circumstances in which we have to be cautious in our growth projections and prudent in managing the public finances. But they are also circumstances in which we are called upon to be bold in setting targets for service delivery, and in reinforcing the momentum of infrastructure investment aimed at expanding productive capacity and broadening participation in our economy. We also have to be courageous – perhaps even adventurous – in seeking a new growth path that delivers employment, sustainable growth and a more equal society.
Issued by: National Treasury
11 May 2010
No related documents